Bispectral Index in Evaluating Effects of Sedation Depth on Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy: DISE or No Dice

Bispectral Index versus the University of Michigan Sedation Scale in assessing sedation depth during pediatric drug-induced sleep endoscopy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Bispectral Index (BIS) and University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS) were two commonly used methods of monitoring the sedation depth, but their correlation was not clear. The purpose of this study is to ascertain if BIS correlates with UMSS in determining the sedation level during pediatric drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE).

METHODS

One-hundred children, aged 36-143 months, with ASA I~II grade, were enrolled. They were subject to general anesthesia for an elective adenotonsillectomy. Two drug regimens were used. After UMSS ≥ 3, the sites of airway obstructions were located by checking the supraglottic airway structures with a fibrous laryngoscope. UMSS scores, BIS values, electromyography (EMG), and signal quality indices (SQIs) were recorded at the pre-medication and pre-DISE baseline (T0), 5 min subsequent to medication administration but prior to DISE initiation (T1), 1 min after DISE was initiated (T2), 1 min after DISE was completed (T3), 1 min subsequent to tracheal intubation (T4), 1 min following extubation (T5), and 30 min past extubation (T6).

RESULTS

There were strong correlations between BIS monitor readings and UMSS scores for total and two regimens. Kappa values revealed moderate agreement between BIS and UMSS for total and two regimens. The agreement rates were 67.47% for the total, 61.43% for Regimen 1, and 73.42% for Regimen 2, respectively.

CONCLUSION

BIS correlates with UMSS in determining the sedation level during pediatric DISE for two regimens. BIS might serve as an appropriate indicator of sedation intensity when UMSS could not be used.

The influence of different application patterns of propofol on the sedation courses during drug-induced sleep endoscopy

Objective

The course of sedation during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) depends on the application pattern of the sedative drug. The depth of sedation should imitate light and deep sleep as well. Moreover, there should be as many breathing cycles as possible available for observation during light and deep sedation. The aim of the study was to evaluate different rates of propofol application with respect to the achieved depth and length of the course of sedation.

Methods

Sixty-three consecutive patients with obstructive sleep apnea and/or snoring undergoing DISE were randomly sedated by propofol perfusion at seven different application patterns: 14, 16, 18, 19, 20, 22 mg/kg/h (0.233, 0.267, 0.3, 0.317, 0.333, 0.367 mg/kg/min) per perfusor and individual bolus application 10 mg each. Sedation depth was monitored by BiSpectral Index™ (BIS). The influence of baseline parameters and the courses of sedation were analyzed.

Results

The application rate was the only factor that influenced the depth of sedation. Basic parameters (gender, age, body mass index, apnea-hypopnea index) had no influence on the depth of sedation. The sedation depth was dependent on the rate of propofol application. Regimes at 14 and 16 mg/kg/h as well as bolus application did not reach BIS levels below 50 representing deep sleep. Propofol doses of more than 20 mg/kg/h led to rapid decreases of sedation levels below deep sleep niveau. Propofol rates between 18 and 20 mg/kg/h enable BIS levels below 50 representing deep sleep and providing enough breathing cycles for observation.

Conclusion

Lower application rates of propofol provide slower courses of sedation and shallower depths of sedation. A rate of 14 mg/kg/h might be appropriate to reach a sedation plateau at light sleep. A rate of 18 mg/kg/h leads to a sedation, corresponding to deep sleep. The combination of both rates might be a suitable pattern for performing sedation-controlled DISE.

Level of evidence

2: Randomized trial.

A Protocol for Propofol-Infusion Drug-Induced Sleep Endoscopy

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to outline a protocol utilizing propofol infusion without an initial bolus during drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE). We define normative values for final propofol infusion rate (P^final ) during DISE and sedation depth values at P^final .

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary academic hospital.

METHODS

A review of patients with obstructive sleep apnea who underwent DISE between 2016 and 2020 was performed. The following patient data were recorded: demographics; DISE procedure details, including P^final , time to P^final , frequency and cadence of infusion rate changes, depth of sedation as measured by Bispectral Index and SedLine values, and hemodynamics; and polysomnography details including apnea-hypopnea index severity and minimum oxygen saturation. A mixed linear model adjusted for age and body mass index was performed for the analysis of effects on P^final . Pearson correlation coefficients determined the strength of association between depth of sedation measured and pattern of collapse on DISE and P^final .

RESULTS

There were 246 patients who met inclusion criteria. P^final resembled a normal distribution (mean ± SD, 156.44 ± 26.69 mcg/kg/min; median, 150 mcg/kg/min). Analysis demonstrated that P^final was influenced by male sex, current smoker status, time to P^final , and number of propofol dose changes (P < .05). Depth of sedation categories measured differently between Bispectral Index and SedLine (55-65 vs 45-55, P < .001). The pattern including severity of collapse on DISE was not associated with P^final (P > .05). No patients required intra- or postoperative respiratory support beyond oxygen via nasal canula.

CONCLUSION

We describe a propofol slow-infusion DISE protocol that demonstrates safe and reproducible outcomes.

The safety and efficacy of esketamine in comparison to dexmedetomidine during drug-induced sleep endoscopy in children with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome: A randomized, controlled and prospective clinical trial

Background and Purpose: Data and high-quality studies of anesthetic methods for children with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) who undergo drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) are limited. Research on pediatric DISE using esketamine has never been reported before. To test the safety and efficacy of esketamine during DISE in children with OSAHS, we compare esketamine (Group K) with dexmedetomidine (Group D) in this study. Methods: 100 children with ASA Ⅰ∼Ⅱ grade, prepared for an elective adenotonsillectomy under general anesthesia, were enrolled in this study and randomized into two groups. Midazolam 0.1 mg/kg was administered intravenously for both groups. In Group D a 1 μg/kg bolus of dexmedetomidine was given over 10 min followed by the infusion rate 1 μg/kg/hr to the end of DISE. Group K received a 1.0 mg/kg IV bolus of esketamine over 10 s followed by the infusion rate 1 mg/kg/hr to the end of DISE. Results: Group K had a higher percentage of success than Group D (p = 0.008). The onset time of Group K was shorter than that of Group D (p = 0.000). The University of Michigan Sedation Scale (UMSS) score of Group K was higher than that of Group D (p = 0.005). The risk of adverse effects (AEs) was lower in Group K (p = 0.000). In Group D, systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) and heart rate (HR) all decreased, while in Group K, SBP, DBP, and HR hardly changed. Conclusion: Esketamine in comparison to dexmedetomidine provides more effective and safer depth of anesthesia for OSAHS pediatric DISE by ensuring short onset time, deep sedation, and few AEs. Clinical Trial Registration: ClincalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04877639.

Dexmedetomidine versus propofol at different sedation depths during drug-induced sleep endoscopy: A randomized trial

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of dexmedetomidine and propofol on airway dynamics, cardiorespiratory system, and emergence following drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE).

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, single-blinded study.

METHODS

Sixty patients age 18 to 65 years in American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status groups 1 and 2 scheduled to undergo DISE were randomly allocated to either Group P (N = 30; receiving propofol infusion at 50-150 μg/kg/min) or Group D (N = 30; receiving dexmedetomidine bolus of 1 μg/kg followed by infusion at 0.5-1.0 μg/kg/hr). DISE was done at light sleep and deep sleep. Airway obstruction at tongue base was recorded as primary outcome. Airway obstruction at velum, oropharyngeal lateral wall, and epiglottis level during light and deep sedation, hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, time to attain sufficient sedation, time for emergence from sedation, and any adverse events during DISE with the two study drugs were recorded as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

There was a greater degree of obstruction at the tongue base level (P = 0.001) and Oropharynx level (P = 0.017) in Group P compared with Group D during deep sedation. Increase in airway obstruction from light to deep sleep was seen with propofol at the oropharynx (P = 0.0185) and tongue base (P = 0.0108) levels. Two patients (6.6%) in Group D and 10 patients (33.3%) in Group P showed oxygen saturation below the minimum oxygen saturation recorded during polysomnography. Time to open eyes to call after stopping sedation was significantly less in Group P (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Dexmedetomidine shows a lesser degree of airway collapse and higher oxygen saturation levels at greater sedation depth during DISE. Propofol has a faster onset and emergence from sedation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1b Laryngoscope, 130:257-262, 2020.

Subglottic Stenosis

Subglottic stenosis refers to narrowing of the airway diameter below the vocal folds and may be congenital or acquired. Typical signs and symptoms range from recurrent croup and exertional stridor to complete airflow obstruction requiring tracheotomy. Management of moderate and severe subglottic stenosis often requires intricate surgical techniques. To optimize the success of these surgeries, a thorough assessment of the child's airway, lungs, reflux, and swallow needs to be evaluated. In order to provide concerted and coordinated care between typically otolaryngology (ENT), pulmonary, gastroenterology (GI), speech, swallow and language pathologists (SLP), "aerodigestive" teams have been developed and increasing in prevalence at children's medical hospitals. This article sets out to provide a brief overview of an aerodigestive program and evaluation, review a few of the more common laryngotracheal conditions, and the surgical techniques involved to augment the airway.