Predictors of Side Effects With Long-Term Oral Appliance Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Dentoskeletal changes of long-term oral appliance treatment in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the dental and skeletal effects of the long-term oral appliance (OA) treatment in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and provide insights for clinicians in treatment planning and decision-making for OSA patients undergoing OA treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in major databases up to April 2024. Studies were included if they assessed long-term OA treatment (≥6 months) in adults with OSA using any type of mandibular advancement device (MADs) or tongue retaining device (TRD). Dental and skeletal changes, measured by dental cast and cephalometric analysis, were the primary outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 42 studies were included in the systematic review, with 23 included in the meta-analysis. Long-term OA treatment was associated with a significant decrease in overbite (0.87 mm, 95% CI: 0.69-1.05) and overjet (0.86 mm, 95% CI: 0.69-1.03). Subgroup analyses showed the decrease of overbite and overjet progressively changed over the years intervals. There was a significant retroclination of the upper incisors (U1-SN, 2.58°, 95% CI: 1.07-4.08) and proclination of the lower incisors (L1-MP, -2.67° (95% CI: -3.78-1.56). Skeletal changes were not significant.

CONCLUSION

Overbite and overjet gradually decreased in the long-term OA treatment, which might predominantly result from the retroclination of the upper incisors and the proclination of the lower incisors. The skeletal patterns in the anteroposterior and vertical direction might remain relatively stable over time. There was a tendency for the clockwise rotation of the mandible.

DENTAL AND SKELETAL CHANGES OF LONG-TERM USE OF MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT DEVICES FOR THE TREATMENT OF ADULT OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS

BACKGROUND

Mandibular advancement devices (MADs) are indicated for use in patients with mild to moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Long-term use of MADs has been found to be associated with dental and skeletal changes. This study aims to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to improve knowledge about the dental and skeletal changes of long-term (>1 year) use of MADs for the treatment of OSA.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Electronic databases were systematically searched. Two reviewers conducted screening, quality assessment, and data extraction independently. Thirty-four studies were included in the systematic review and 23 in the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The mean change of overjet and overbite was -0.77mm (95%CI -1.01 to -0.53, P < .00001) and -0.64mm (95%CI -0.85 to -0.43, P < .00001), with progressive change over the treatment duration. The inclination of the upper incisor (U1/SN) and the lower incisor (L1/MP) showed a mean change of retroclined -2.10° (95%CI -3.93 to -0.28, P = .02) and proclined 1.78° (95%CI 0.63 to 2.92, P = .002), respectively. The mean change of the anteroposterior position of the mandible (SNB) was -0.33° posteriorly (95%CI -0.65 to -0.02, P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

The meta-analysis showed a gradual decrease in overjet and overbite with treatment duration with long-term use of MADs for the treatment of OSA. Upper and lower incisors retroclined and proclined, respectively. The skeletal changes might include the mandibular position. Patients treated with MADs need to be continuously monitored over time.

Effect of mandibular advancement appliance use on oral and periodontal health in patients with OSA: a systematic review

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Use of a mandibular advancement appliance (MAA) is an effective treatment option for mild-to-moderate obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). MAA is well-tolerated but undesirable effects may be observed over time. The present systematic review aimed to assess the effect of MAA use on oral and periodontal health in patients with OSA.

METHODS

MEDLINE (PubMed), Cochrane, and Scopus were searched for randomized and non-randomized controlled trials (RCTs, NRCTs), cohorts, and case-control studies reporting on side effects of MAA treatment in OSA patients during a follow-up of at least 6 months.

RESULTS

From a total of 169 articles screened, 28 were selected. The most frequently reported MAA-related effects on oral health were: hypersalivation (weighted mean prevalence, 33.3%), occlusal changes (30.2%), muscle pain (22.9%), tooth discomfort or pain (20.2%), and xerostomia (18.3%). No MAA-related periodontal effect was reported. The periodontal status prior to MAA treatment was rarely assessed and described, but 5 studies (17.8%) stated that periodontitis was an exclusion criterion for MAA. Only one retrospective study specifically evaluated periodontal parameters and reported no significant changes in periodontally healthy patients with OSA using MAA for over 7 years.

CONCLUSION

MAA use is associated with a number of clinical consequences on oral health, but there is no evidence to conclude whether or not MAA affects periodontal health in patients with OSA. This aspect appears to be under-evaluated and should be further investigated in relation to the type of MAA, the duration of treatment, and prior history of periodontitis.

Objectively measured adherence may affect side effects of mandibular advancement therapy in subjects with obstructive sleep apnea

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine if objectively measured adherence to oral appliance (OA) treatment may affect dental changes and temporomandibular disorders (TMD) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

METHODS

The original study group consisted of adults with OSA who were referred for OA therapy. Eight indicators of subjective side effects of using OA (temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and muscle pain, pain in teeth, jaw stiffness in the morning, clicking, dry mouth, hypersalivation, gingival irritation) were evaluated by a questionnaire. Three occlusal indicators (overjet, overbite, molar occlusion) and clinical TMD signs (TMJ pain, muscle pain, clicking, jaw deviation on opening) were evaluated at baseline and at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up. In addition, objective adherence monitoring for OA was registered. Statistical analyses included the chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, paired sample t-test, and linear regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 58 adults with OSA were referred for OA therapy. Mean (SD) age was 50.7 (11.7) and mean apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) was 19.5 (10.0). At 1-year follow-up, the study group consisted of 28 men and 12 women. Overjet but not overbite reduced significantly after 1-year OA therapy. The average nightly wear of OA was related to overjet and overbite reduction, and to TMD signs. Hypersalivation, dry mouth, and tooth discomfort were the most common subjective side effects of OA therapy.

CONCLUSION

There was a time-dependent relationship with the nightly wear of OA and reduction in overjet and overbite, and clinical TMD signs. With 60% of mandibular advancement, dental changes and TM-disorders were considered mild/minor in the 1-year study period.

Focus of dental sleep medicine on obstructive sleep apnea in older adults: A narrative review

PURPOSE

To review dental sleep medicine in older adults based on the literature.

STUDY SELECTION

This narrative review focuses on sleep physiology, common sleep disorders, and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in older adults and their management.

RESULTS

Sleep physiology differs between older and younger adults, with sleep disturbances occurring more frequently in older adults. The prevalence of insomnia increases in older adults due to age-related changes in sleep physiology. Insomnia, sleep-disordered breathing, periodic limb movement disorder, restless legs syndrome, and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder are common sleep disorders in older adults. OSA is more prevalent in older adults, and its effects on them are considered more substantial than those on younger adults. The treatment of older patients with mandibular advancement devices may be less effective and more complex owing to potential impairments in oral and dental health. Furthermore, the prevalence of edentulism in older adults is decreasing while life expectancy is increasing.

CONCLUSIONS

As older adults have comorbidities that affect sleep quality, dentists should consider the effects of sleep physiology and sleep disorders in these patients. OSA may decrease the quality of life and increase the risk of developing other diseases. Therefore, dentists proposing treatment with mandibular advancement devices need to inform patients of their potential lack of efficacy and the requirement for careful follow-up owing to known and unknown side effects.

A Systematic Review of Oral Modifications Caused by the Prolonged Application of Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) and Intraoral Appliances in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA)

Objective

Prolonged use of oral devices as a substitute for traditional treatments has been studied in relation to the dental and skeletal changes associated with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSA), which is a sleep-breathing disorder.

Materials and Methods

A review of articles indexed in PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Sciences, and CINHAL databases in September 2022 based on MeSH-based keywords with "dental and skeletal" and "oral appliance" and "obstructive sleep apnea" was examined to ensure that the keywords alone or cross-linked, depending on which base of the searched data, were used. 16 articles out of 289 articles were included in the research, and 273 articles were excluded due to lack of study.

Conclusions

CPAP treatment has limited dental or skeletal effects in short-term or long-term use. OAs and MADs show significant dental changes with prolonged use. MAS and TSD are more effective in short-term goals than CPAP. OAs' increase may cause dental and skeletal changes. MPD shows notable cephalometric alterations.

Mandibular advancement devices used with morning occlusal guides for treating obstructive sleep apnea-changed incisor inclination and its associated factors

PURPOSE

Mandibular advancement devices (MADs) effectively treat patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Although the use of morning occlusal guides (MOGs) along with MADs is recommended to prevent dental side effects, there is no evidence to support this. The aim of this study was to evaluate the change in incisor inclination in patients with OSA treated with MADs and MOGs, and to identify its predictive factors.

METHODS

Patients with OSA who received MAD and MOG therapy and had a reduction in their apnea-hypopnea index greater than 50% were analyzed. Cephalometric measurements were performed at baseline and at a 1-year follow-up or longer to assess the dentoskeletal side effects of MAD/MOG treatment. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to assess the association between the change in incisor inclination and the independent variables that may cause the observed side effects.

RESULTS

Among 23 patients enrolled in the study, there was significant upper incisor retroclination (U1-SN: 2.83° ± 2.68°, U1-PP: 2.86° ± 2.46°; P < 0.05) and significant lower incisor proclination (L1-SN: 3.04° ± 3.29°, L1-MP: 1.74° ± 3.13°; P < 0.05). However, no significant skeletal changes were observed. Multivariable linear regression revealed that advancement ≥ 95% of the patients' maximal mandibular protrusion was associated with greater upper incisor retroclination. Increased treatment duration was also associated with increased upper incisor retroclination. No \measured variables were associated with the change in lower incisor inclination.

CONCLUSIONS

Dental side effects occurred in patients who used MADs with MOGs. The amount of mandibular protrusion by MADs and treatment duration were predictive factors associated with upper incisor retroclination.

The role of oral appliance therapy in obstructive sleep apnoea

There is now widespread recognition within the world of sleep medicine of the increasing importance of dental sleep medicine and, in particular, the role of oral appliance therapy (OAT) in the management of adults with obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). For the purpose of this review, the term OAT refers to a custom-made intra-oral appliance, which acts to posture the mandible in a forward and downward direction, away from its natural resting position. Whilst nasally applied continuous positive airway pressure remains the "gold standard" in nonsurgical OSA management, OAT remains the recognised alternative treatment.This review of OAT aims to provide an evidence-based update on our current understanding of their mode of action, exploring the potential anatomical and physiological impact of their use in preventing collapse of the upper airway; the current clinical practice guidelines, including the recently published National Institute of Clinical Excellence 2021 guidance, in conjunction with the American Academy of Sleep Medicine and American Academy of Dental Sleep Medicine; optimal design features, comparing the role of custom-made versus noncustom OAT devices and the importance of titration in achieving a dose-dependent effect; patient predictors, preference and adherence to OAT; its impact on a range of both patient- and clinician-centred health outcomes, with a comparison with CPAP; the limitations and side-effects of providing OAT; and, finally, a look at future considerations to help optimise the delivery and outcomes of OAT.

Dental and Skeletal Side Effects of Oral Appliances Used for the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Snoring in Adult Patients—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Mandibular advancement devices for obstructive sleep apnea treatment are becoming increasingly popular among patients who do not prefer CPAP devices or surgery. Our study aims to evaluate the literature regarding potential dental and skeletal side effects caused by mandibular advancement appliances used for adult OSA treatment. Methods: Electronic databases were searched for published and unpublished literature along with the reference lists of the eligible studies. Randomized clinical trials and non-randomized trials assessing dental and skeletal changes by comparing cephalometric radiographs were selected. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were performed individually and in duplicate. Fourteen articles were finally selected (two randomized clinical trials and 12 non-randomized trials). Results: The results suggest that mandibular advancement devices used for OSA treatment increase the lower incisor proclination by 1.54 ± 0.16°, decrease overjet by 0.89 ± 0.04 mm and overbite by 0.68 ± 0.04 mm, rotate the mandible downward and forward, and increase the SNA angle by to 0.06 ± 0.03°. The meta-analysis revealed high statistical heterogeneity. Conclusions: The MADs affect the lower incisor proclination, overjet, overbite, the rotation of the mandible and the SNA angle. More randomized clinical trials providing high-quality evidence are needed to support those findings.

Long-term dentoskeletal side effects of mandibular advancement therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea: data from the Pays de la Loire sleep cohort

OBJECTIVES

Mandibular advancement devices (MADs) are the main therapeutic alternative to continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnea. Our aim was to evaluate the long-term dentoskeletal side effects of MADs and to identify the predictive factors for these side effects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients from the Pays de la Loire cohort treated with a custom-made MAD for at least 1 year were included in this retrospective study. Digital cephalometric analyses were performed at baseline and at follow-up.

RESULTS

We included a total of 117 patients, treated with a MAD for a median [interquartile range] of 4.6 [2.6-6.6] years. The main significant side effects were a decrease in overbite (- 0.5 ± 1 mm), overjet (- 0.7 ± 1 mm) and maxillary incisor inclination (- 2.5 ± 2.8°) and an increase in mandibular incisor inclination (+ 2.2 ± 2.7°). Subjective side effects were not linked to the observed dentoskeletal changes. Current smokers were at higher risk of overjet modifications. A pre-existing anterior open-bite was associated with a greater decrease in overbite. Treatment duration was associated with a more pronounced mandibular incisor proclination. Propulsion was negatively associated with maxillary incisor retroclination.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term dentoskeletal side effects were mainly moderate dental side effects. Some predictive factors were shown to be associated with more pronounced changes. Subjective side effects did not appear to be reliable tools to detect dentoskeletal side effects.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Regular follow-up with clinical examination and regular radiographs is mandatory. The predictive factors could be of interest for a better selection of patients and to individualize follow-up.

Elevated Hyoid Bone Position in Response to Mandibular Advancing Appliance Predicts Effectiveness of the Appliance for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

The objective was to determine whether hyoid bone elevation induced by an anterior mandibular positioning appliance (AMP) predicts the effectiveness of the AMP in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Fifteen patients (12 males and 3 females) underwent polysomnographic recordings and lateral cephalograms before and after AMP use of at least 6 months. Measurements of sleep variables and upper airway morphology were compared between pre-AMP and with-AMP states. The AMP appliance reduced apnea-hypopnea indices (AHI) ~53% (33.77 ± 3.29 vs. 15.85 ± 3.78, P = 0.0013). Cephalograms of the oropharyngeal airway showed that the hyoid bone moved superiorly toward the inferior mandibular border (Δ H-MP) ~5 mm (23.4 ± 1.44 vs. 18.27 ± 1.86, P = 0.0377), with the AMP inserted in the oral cavity; no airway measurement other than hyoid bone position changed. No significant correlations emerged between AHI improvement (Δ AHI) and amounts of hyoid elevation (Δ H-MP) when all patients were pooled. However, when the samples were subcategorized, the correlation coefficients increased significantly (P &lt; 0.01) in both subgroups. This outcome suggests the presence of two distinct types among the “Good-Responders” to AMP appliance use. Overall use of the AMP appliance is effective; however, the effectiveness of the appliance appears to depend on the mode of hyoid elevations, likely resulting from muscle responsiveness in patients with AMP use. The results suggest that Δ H-MP measurements may be a useful marker to segregate patients with tongue and hyoid muscles responsive to AMP from those not-so-responsive.

The effect of gradually increased mandibular advancement on the efficacy of an oral appliance in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To analyze the effect of gradual increments of mandibular advancement on the treatment efficacy of mandibular advancement devices and identify determinants of effective and target protrusion for OSA.

METHODS

Patients were prospectively recruited. The mandible was titrated from 0 mm with a stepwise increment of 0.5 mm until the AHI was reduced to the lowest level. Rhinospirometry, rhinomanometry, and magnetic resonance imaging were used to observe the change of respiratory function and upper airway morphology.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients aged 41.5 ± 9.0 years participated. There was a dose-dependent relationship between mandibular protrusion and the AHI improvement rate, the success rate, and the normalization rate; the changing curves plateaued after approximately 70% of maximal mandibular protrusion was achieved. The correlation between AHI and mandibular protrusion became stronger as the severity of OSA increased. The target protrusion for patients with mild, moderate, and severe OSA was 3.5 ± 1.8 mm (38.6 ± 19.4% maximal mandibular protrusion), 5.8 ± 1.9 mm (62.9 ± 18.8% maximal mandibular protrusion), and 5.9 ± 2.2 mm (68.8 ± 15.6% maximal mandibular protrusion), respectively. Regression analysis revealed that the factors influencing effective and target protrusion included change of maximal lateral dimension of the total upper airway with mandibular advancement devices, mean lateral dimension of the oropharynx, and soft palate length. Further protrusion brought more lateral expansion of the velopharynx, whereas the change in nasal ventilation was not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The dose-dependent effect of mandibular protrusion on reduction of AHI by mandibular advancement devices was nonlinear and became more pronounced with increased severity of OSA. The mandibular protrusion should be more personalized to each patient.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registry: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; Name: Study of the Onset Point of Oral Appliance Treatment in Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Hypopnea Syndrome; URL: http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=22291; Identifier: ChiCTR-IND-17013232.

Evaluation of Respiratory Resistance as a Predictor for Oral Appliance Treatment Response in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Pilot Study

The aim of this study was to determine the utility of respiratory resistance as a predictor of oral appliance (OA) response in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Twenty-seven patients with OSA (mean respiratory event index (REI): 17.5 ± 6.5 events/h) were recruited. At baseline, the respiratory resistance (R20) was measured by impulse oscillometry (IOS) with a fitted nasal mask in the supine position, and cephalometric radiographs were obtained to analyze the pharyngeal airway space (SPAS: superior posterior airway space, MAS: middle airway space, IAS: inferior airway space). The R20 and radiographs after the OA treatment were evaluated, and the changes from the baseline were analyzed. A sleep test with OA was carried out using a portable device. The subjects were divided into Responders and Non-responders based on an REI improvement ≥ 50% from the baseline, or REI < 5 after treatment, and the R20 reduction rate between the two groups were compared. The subjects comprised 20 responders and 7 non-responders. The R20 reduction rate with OA in responders was significantly greater than it was in non-responders (14.4 ± 7.9 % versus 2.4 ± 9.8 %, p < 0.05). In responders, SPAS, MAS, and IAS were significantly widened and R20 was significantly decreased with OA (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in non-responders (p > 0.05). A logistic multiple regression analysis showed that the R20 reduction rate was predictive for OA treatment responses (2% incremental odds ratio (OR), 24.5; 95% CI, 21.5–28.0; p = 0.018). This pilot study confirmed that respiratory resistance may have significant clinical utility in predicting OA treatment responses.

Oral Appliance Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnoea: State of the Art

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) represents a significant global health burden, with impact on cardiometabolic health, chronic disease, productivity loss and accident risk. Oral appliances (OA) are an effective therapy for OSA and work by enlarging and stabilising the pharyngeal airway to prevent breathing obstructions during sleep. Although recommended in clinical guidelines for OSA therapy, they are often considered only as second-line therapy following positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy failure. There has been a long-standing barrier to selecting OA over PAP therapy due to the inability to be certain about the level of efficacy in individual OSA patients. A range of methods to select OSA patients for OA therapy, based on the outcome of a single sleep study night, have been proposed, although none has been widely validated for clinical use. Emergent health outcome data suggest that equivalent apnoea–hypopnea index reduction may not be necessary to produce the same health benefits of PAP. This may be related to the more favourable adherence to OA therapy, which can now be objectively verified. Data on longer term health outcomes are needed, and there are additional opportunities for device improvement and combination therapy approaches. OAs have an important role in precision care of OSA as a chronic disorder through a multi-disciplinary care team. Future studies on real-world health outcomes following OA therapy are needed.

Retrospective comparison of the George Gauge™ registration and the sibilant phoneme registration for constructing OSA oral appliances

Objective: To compare outcomes for appliances manufactured utilizing the George Gauge™ Registration (GGR) and the Sibilant Phoneme Registration (SPR). It was hypothesized that there would be no difference in outcomes.Methods: This study is a retrospective analysis of two groups. Each group consisted of 20 oral appliances manufactured utilizing the GGR and 20 utilizing the SPR.Results: For the two-site data, no difference in outcomes was demonstrated (p = .24). The SPR method required fewer calibrations (p = 5.6 × 10^-3) and less jaw movement (p = 3.33 × 10^-4). Both bite methods resulted in similarly variable post-AHI scores (p = .52). For the eight-site data, no difference in outcomes was demonstrated (p = .76). The SPR required less movement of the jaw (p = 4.52 × 10^-5); however, outcome variance was larger for the SPR (p = .036).Conclusion: The study null hypothesis of no difference in outcomes was supported.Abbreviations: AHI: Apnea-Hypopnea Index; GGR: George Gauge Registration; SPR: Sibilant Phoneme Registration; OSA: Obstructive Sleep Apnea; OA: Oral Appliance; OAT: Oral Appliance Therapy; MA: Mandibular Advancement; VDO: Vertical Dimensional Opening; AADSM: American Academy of Dental Sleep Medicine; ABDSM: American Board of Dental Sleep Medicine; BMI: Body Mass Index.

Oral Appliances in Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Oral appliance therapy is increasingly prescribed as a non-invasive treatment option for patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea. The custom-made titratable mandibular advancement devices (MAD) are the recommended type of oral appliances. Mandibular advancement devices are efficacious in reducing the severity of obstructive sleep apnea, however, only to a lesser extent than standard therapy using continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Although oral appliance therapy is known to reduce the severity of obstructive sleep apnea in most of the patients, one out of three patients still show negligible improvement under MAD therapy. Therefore, the selection of the appropriate candidates for this therapy is imperative and several upfront prediction tools are described. Overall, the health outcome of mandibular advancement device therapy is similar to that of CPAP, probably due to the inferior compliance of CPAP compared to MAD therapy, resulting in similar clinical effectiveness.

Mandibular advancement splints for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea

Introduction: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a chronic condition which requires a comprehensive chronic disease management model, rather than a device-focused approach, so as to achieve the best possible health outcomes. Oral appliances are the main alternative to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) for the treatment of OSA. There has been an expansion of the research evidence to support the use of oral appliances in clinical practice and the clinical use of oral appliances for the treatment of OSA has become a mainstream practice.Areas covered: This review summarizes the evidence base for the use of oral appliances for the treatment of OSA. The types of oral appliances; their mechanism of action and clinical efficacy for the treatment of OSA; adverse effects, and the impact on patient acceptability and treatment adherence; and clinical effectiveness and health outcomes are discussed.Expert opinion: Personalization of treatment is vitally important in OSA and is a pre-requisite for optimizing adherence with treatment which, in turn, is a key determinant of clinical effectiveness. Treatment of OSA with mandibular advancement splints could provide an equivalent health benefit to CPAP despite not achieving a complete normalization of polysomnographic indices, mediated by differences in adherence profiles.

Annual review of selected scientific literature: A report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry

This comprehensive review of the 2018 dental literature is provided to inform busy dentists about progress in the profession. Developed by the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry, each author brings discipline-specific expertise to one of the 8 sections of the report including (1) prosthodontics; (2) periodontics, alveolar bone, and peri-implant tissues; (3) implant dentistry; (4) dental materials and therapeutics; (5) occlusion and temporomandibular disorders; (6) sleep-related breathing disorders; (7) oral medicine and oral and maxillofacial surgery; and (8) dental caries and cariology. The report targets important information that will likely influence day-to-day treatment decisions. Each review is not intended to stand alone but to update interested readers so that they may visit source materials if greater detail is desired. As the profession continues its march toward evidence-based clinical decision-making, an already voluminous library of potentially valuable dental literature continues to grow. It is the intention of this review and its authors to provide assistance in navigating the extensive dental literature published in 2018. It is our hope that readers find this work useful in the clinical management of patients moving forward.

Dental and skeletal long-term side effects of mandibular advancement devices in obstructive sleep apnea patients: a systematic review with meta-regression analysis

Background

Mandibular advancement devices (MAD) are effective in reducing apnea episodes and they are frequently used as first-line therapy in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) patients.

Objectives

The MAD must be used every night for a lifetime and since it performs its function discharging the forces on dental elements the aim of this systematic review was to identify the dental and skeletal long-term side effects of MAD therapy and to evaluate the influence of time on them in OSA or snoring patients.

Search Methods

An electronic search was performed in MEDLINE, Cochrane Database, Google Scholar Beta, Scopus, and LILACS. Studies until 4 April 2018 were analysed, without language restrictions.

Selection Criteria

Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies investigating dental and/or skeletal side effects on adult patients wearing MAD for OSA or snoring treatment with at least 2 years follow-up were included and independently evaluated by two investigators.

Data Collection and Analysis

The quality of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) and the risk of bias by means of Cochrane's tools. For each study included and for each dental and/or skeletal parameter, the difference in means and 95% CI was calculated between baseline and follow-up.

Results

Twenty-one studies with follow-up between 2 and 11 years were included. The side effects reported were a reduction in overjet, overbite, and in the upper incisor inclination, and an increase in lower incisor inclination, A point-Nasion-B point, and anterior facial height. The meta-regression analysis showed that the side effects were influenced by the therapy duration for all parameters (P < 0.05). The quality of evidence was low/moderate.

Conclusions

MAD therapy produces time-related dental and skeletal side effects. After a long period of treatment, the dental side effects are clinically relevant and therefore the clinician should inform the patients about this issue. Since the side effects are progressive, patients need to be continuously monitored over time.

Registration

The study protocol was not registered.

The efficacy of nasal airway stent (Nastent) on obstructive sleep apnoea and prediction of treatment outcomes

BACKGROUND

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is characterised by recurrent episodes of partial or complete upper airway collapse during sleep and is highly prevalent in the general population. The nasopharyngeal airway stent (Nastent) is a specifically designed, preformed silicone tube that intends to maintain the upper airway patency during sleep and reduce snoring and sleep apnoea.

OBJECTIVE(S)

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of Nastent treatment and examine predictors for Nastent treatment outcomes in patients with OSA.

METHODS

Consecutive thirty patients were enrolled in this study. Cephalometric radiographs were obtained to analyse the pharyngeal and craniofacial morphology. Before and after Nastent treatment, we evaluated OSA using a portable sleep study.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine subjects completed this study. There were significant decreases in the respiratory event index (REI) (22.4 ± 14.1 to 15.7 ± 10.4, P < 0.01) and a significant increase in the lowest SpO₂ (81.9 ± 7.5 to 86.6 ± 4.8, P < 0.01) by Nastent treatment. Subjects were divided into responders and non-responders based on reduction in REI of >50% compared with baseline REI. We evaluated the ratio of inferior airway width and middle airway width (IAW/MAW) on cephalograms as the index of the narrowest airway site. The IAW/MAW was significantly higher in responders than in non-responders (1.4 ± 0.9 vs 0.9 ± 0.4, P < 0.01) and predicted treatment responders with high accuracy (sensitivity: 90.9%, specificity: 88.9%, when IAW/MAW was set at 1.10).

CONCLUSIONS

The Nastent device improved OSA, and a narrower velopharynx than hypopharynx predicted treatment response with a good sensitivity and specificity.