Phrenic Nerve Stimulation for the Treatment of Central Sleep Apnea: A Pooled Cohort Analysis

Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation for the treatment of central sleep apnea reduces episodic hypoxemic burden

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation (TPNS) on the composition of the nocturnal hypoxemic burden in patients with CSA.

METHODS

We analysed oximetry data from baseline and follow-up overnight polysomnograms (PSG) in 134 CSA patients with implanted TPNS randomised (1:1) to neurostimulation (treatment group; TPNS on) or no stimulation (control group; TPNS off) from the remedē System Pivotal Trial. The hypoxemic burden was quantified using a battery of metrics, including the oxygen desaturation index (ODI), the relative sleep time spent below 90% SpO2 (T90) due to acute episodic desaturations (T90_desat) and due to non-specific and non-cyclic drifts of SpO2 (T90_non-specific). Mean change from baseline is provided.

RESULTS

TPNS titrated to reduce respiratory events significantly reduced the ODI in the treatment group by -15.85 h^-1 ± 1.99 compared to the control group, which increased 1.32 h^-1 ± 1.85 (p 〈0001) and shortened the relative T90 duration by -3.81 percentage points ± 1.23 vs. 0.49 percentage points ± 1.14 increase (p = 0.012). This shortening of T90 was primarily accomplished by reducing the brief cyclic desaturations (T90_desaturation: -4.32 percentage points ± 0.98 vs. 0.52 percentage points ± 0.91, p = 0.0004) while notable non-specific drifts in SpO₂ remained unchanged (T90_non-specific: 0.18 percentage points ± 0.62 vs. -0.13 percentage points ± 0.57, p = 0.72).

CONCLUSIONS

TPNS appears to significantly reduce the nocturnal hypoxemic burden due to sleep-disordered breathing, but a considerable nocturnal hypoxemic burden from other sources remains. Further investigations are warranted to identify the best strategy to reduce the nocturnal hypoxemic burden beyond preventing respiratory events.

Trends in volumetric-energy efficiency of implantable neurostimulators: a review from a circuits and systems perspective

This paper presents a comprehensive review of state-of-the-art, commercially available neurostimulators. We analyse key design parameters and performance metrics of 45 implantable medical devices across six neural target categories: deep brain, vagus nerve, spinal cord, phrenic nerve, sacral nerve and hypoglossal nerve. We then benchmark these alongside modern cardiac pacemaker devices that represent a more established market. This work studies trends in device size, electrode number, battery technology (i.e., primary and secondary use and chemistry), power consumption and longevity. This information is analysed to show the course of design decisions adopted by industry and identifying opportunity for further innovation. We identify fundamental limits in power consumption, longevity and size as well as the interdependencies and trade-offs. We propose a figure of merit to quantify volumetric efficiency within specific therapeutic targets, battery technologies/capacities, charging capabilities and electrode count. Finally, we compare commercially available implantable medical devices with recently developed systems in the research community. We envisage this analysis to aid circuit and system designers in system optimisation and identifying innovation opportunities, particularly those related to low power circuit design techniques.

Phrenic nerve stimulation for the treatment of central sleep apnea in patients with heart failure

Objective

Central sleep apnea (CSA) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure (HF). We aimed to explore the effectiveness of phrenic nerve stimulation (PNS) on CSA in patients with HF.

Methods

This was a prospective and non-randomized study. The stimulation lead was inserted into the right brachiocephalic vein and attached to a proprietary neurostimulator. Monitoring was conducted during the implantation process, and all individuals underwent two-night polysomnography.

Results

A total of nine subjects with HF and CSA were enrolled in our center. There was a significant decrease in the apnea–hypopnea index (41 ± 18 vs 29 ± 25, p = 0.02) and an increase in mean arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) (93% ± 1% vs 95% ± 2%, p = 0.03) after PNS treatment. We did not observe any significant differences of oxygen desaturation index (ODI) and SaO2 < 90% (T90) following PNS. Unilateral phrenic nerve stimulation might also categorically improve the severity of sleep apnea.

Conclusion

In our non-randomized study, PNS may serve as a therapeutic approach for CSA in patients with HF.

Transvenous Phrenic Nerve Stimulation for Central Sleep Apnea: Clinical and Billing Review

Central sleep apnea (CSA) frequently coexists with heart failure and atrial fibrillation and contributes to cardiovascular disease progression and mortality. A transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation (TPNS) system has been approved for the first time by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of CSA. This system, remedē® ZOLL Medical, Inc. is implanted during a minimally invasive outpatient procedure, and has shown a favorable safety and efficacy profile. Currently, patients' access to this therapy remains limited by the small number of specialized centers in the US and the absence of a standard coverage process by insurers. While a period of evaluation by insurers is expected for new therapies in their early stages, the impact on patients is particularly severe given the already limited treatment options for CSA. Implantation and management of this novel therapy requires the establishment of a specialized multidisciplinary program as part of a Sleep Medicine practice and support from health care systems and hospitals. Several centers in the US have been successful in building sustainable TPNS program offering this novel therapy to their patients by navigating the current reimbursement environment. In this article, we will review the background and efficacy data of TPNS and briefly address relevant aspects of the clinical activities involved in a TPNS program. The article will present the status of coverage and reimbursement for this novel therapy. We will also discuss the current approach to obtaining reimbursement from third party payors during this transitional period of evaluation by Medicare and other insurers.

Extra-cardiac targets in the management of cardiometabolic disease: Device-based therapies

Heart failure (HF) does not occur in a vacuum and is commonly defined and exacerbated by its co‐morbid conditions. Neurohormonal imbalance and systemic inflammation are some of the key pathomechanisms of HF but also commonly encountered co‐morbidities such as arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, cachexia, obesity and sleep‐disordered breathing. A cornerstone of HF management is neurohormonal blockade, which in HF with reduced ejection fraction has been tied to a reduction in morbidity and mortality. Pharmacological treatment effective in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction did not show substantial effects in HF with preserved ejection fraction. Here, we review novel device‐based therapies using neuromodulation of extra‐cardiac targets to treat cardiometabolic disease.

All You Need Is Sleep: the Effects of Sleep Apnea and Treatment Benefits in the Heart Failure Patient

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recognition and treatment of sleep apnea is an important but easily overlooked aspect of care in the heart failure patient. This review summarizes the data behind the recommendations in current practice guidelines and highlights recent developments in treatment options.

RECENT FINDINGS

Neuromodulation using hypoglossal nerve stimulation has been increasingly used for treatment of OSA; however, it has not been studied in the heart failure population. Alternatively, phrenic nerve stimulation for treatment of CSA is effective for heart failure patients, and cardiac resynchronization therapy can be effective in improving CSA in pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. In patients suspected to have sleep apnea, polysomnography is recommended to better understand the prognosis and treatment options. Positive airway pressure is the standard treatment for sleep apnea; however, neurostimulation can be especially effective in those with predominantly central events. Understanding the pathophysiology of sleep apnea can guide further management decisions.

Advances in Treatment of Sleep-Disordered Breathing

BACKGROUND

Sleep-disordered breathing, composed of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and central sleep apnea (CSA), affects millions of people worldwide carrying with it significant morbidity and mortality. Diagnosis is made by polysomnography, and severity of sleep apnea is determined by the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy has been the gold standard in treating both OSA and CSA. PAP therapy can greatly reduce AHI burden as well as morbidity and mortality and improve quality of life.

AREAS OF UNCERTAINTY

However, patients report difficulties adhering to PAP therapy because of discomfort with mask interface, sensation of excessive pressure, and claustrophobia. Although other options exist to treat sleep apnea, such as mandibular advancement oral appliance devices, positional therapy, and surgery, these additional therapeutic modalities as current options have limitations. Emerging technology is now available to overcome hindrances to standard therapy.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was performed from the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and FDA device database (clinicaltrial.gov).

THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES

Other modalities of treating sleep-disordered breathing now include the hypoglossal nerve stimulator, which stimulates the hypoglossal nerve during sleep to alleviate airflow obstruction by contracting the genioglossus muscle thus treating OSA. Similarly, the phrenic nerve stimulator restores a more stable breathing pattern during sleep by stimulating the phrenic nerve to activate the diaphragm during CSA. Both nerve stimulators have been shown to reduce AHI severity and improve quality of life for patients suffering from sleep-disordered breathing.

CONCLUSIONS

PAP therapy, although the gold standard, has limitations in the treatment of sleep apnea. New modalities such as hypoglossal nerve stimulator and phrenic nerve stimulator may help to overcome difficulties with adherence and offer new options for treatment of both obstructive and central sleep apnea.

Baclofen destabilises breathing during sleep in healthy humans: A randomised, controlled, double-blind crossover trial

AIMS

Periodic breathing is frequent in patients with severe heart failure. Apart from being an indicator of severity, periodic breathing has its own deleterious consequences (sleep-related oxygen desaturations, sleep fragmentation), which justifies attempts to correct it irrespective of the underlying disease. Animal models and human data suggest that baclofen can reconfigure respiratory central pattern generators. We hypothesised that baclofen, a GABA_B agonist, may thus be able to correct periodic breathing in humans.

METHODS

Healthy volunteers were exposed to hypoxia during sleep. Participants who developed periodic breathing (n = 14 [53 screened]) were randomly assigned to double-blind oral baclofen (progressively increased to 60 mg/d) or placebo. The primary outcome was the coefficient of variation (CoVar) of respiratory cycle total time considered as an indicator of breathing irregularity. Secondary outcomes included the CoVar of tidal volume, apnoea-hypopnoea index, sleep fragmentation index and ventilatory complexity (noise limit).

RESULTS

The analysis was conducted in 9 subjects after exclusion of incomplete datasets. CoVar of respiratory cycle total time significantly increased with baclofen during non-rapid eye movement sleep (median with placebo 56.00% [37.63-78.95]; baclofen 85.42% [68.37-86.40], P = .020; significant difference during the N1-N2 phases of sleep but not during the N3 phase). CoVar of tidal volume significantly increased during N1-N2 sleep. The apnoea-hypopnoea index, sleep fragmentation index and ventilatory complexity were not significantly different between placebo and baclofen.

CONCLUSION

Baclofen did not stabilise breathing in our model. On the contrary, it increased respiratory variability. Baclofen should probably not be used in patients with or at risk of periodic breathing.

[Sleep disordered breathing in patients with chronic heart failure: prognosis and management]

Sleep disordered breathing is a frequent comorbidity (50-75%) in patients with chronic heart failure, but it is usually underestimated. This review analyzes sleep disordered breathing in patients with chronic heart failure, demonstrates pathogenetic relationships and the prognostic role of sleep apnea. The authors present modern treatment options for sleep apnea in this cohort (from non-invasive ventilation to implantable devices), highlight the role of drug therapy and outline perspectives of different treatment approaches. This clinical problem is designated as multidisciplinary, which requires a dialogue between researchers and doctors of various specialties to organize comprehensive effective care for this cohort of patients.

Central Sleep Apnea in Patients with Heart Failure-How to Screen, How to Treat

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Central sleep apnea occurs in up to 50% of heart failure patients and worsens outcomes. Established therapies are limited by minimal supporting evidence, poor patient adherence, and potentially adverse cardiovascular effects. However, transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation, by contracting the diaphragm, restores normal breathing throughout sleep and has been shown to be safe and effective. This review discusses the mechanisms, screening, diagnosis, and therapeutic approaches to CSA in patients with HF.

RECENT FINDINGS

In a prospective, multicenter randomized Pivotal Trial (NCT01816776) of transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation with the remedē System, significantly more treated patients had a ≥ 50% reduction in apnea-hypopnea index compared with controls, with a 41 percentage point difference between group difference at 6 months (p < 0.0001). All hierarchically tested sleep, quality of life, and daytime sleepiness endpoints were significantly improved in treated patients. Freedom from serious related adverse events at 12 months was 91%. Benefits are sustained to 36 months. Transvenous phrenic nerve stimulation improves quality of life in patients with heart failure and central sleep apnea. Controlled trials evaluating the impact of this therapy on mortality/heart failure hospitalizations and "real world" experience are needed to confirm safety and effectiveness.

Sleep Apnea and Heart

Scientific investigations in the past few decades have supported the important role of sleep in various domains of health. Sleep apnea is a highly prevalent yet underdiagnosed sleep disorder representing a valid cardiovascular risk factor, particularly for hypertension. While several studies have demonstrated the benefits of sleep apnea treatment on subclinical cardiovascular measures, there is a paucity of studies proving reduction of cardiovascular events and mortality. Sufficient and high-quality sleep is also important in the maintenance of cardiovascular health. Future investigations should focus on improving identification of patients at greatest risk of adverse cardiovascular s sequalae of sleep apnea and testing the therapeutic benefit of sleep apnea treatment in this vulnerable group.