Lisik D, Pires GN, Zou D. Perspective: Systematic review and meta-analysis in obstructive sleep apnea - What is lacking?
Sleep Med 2023;
111:54-61. [PMID:
37717377 DOI:
10.1016/j.sleep.2023.09.006]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023]
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) affects nearly one billion of the global adult population. It is associated with substantial burden in terms of quality of life, cognitive function, and cardiovascular health. Positive airway pressure (PAP) therapy, commonly considered the first-line treatment, is limited by low compliance and lacking efficacy on long-term cardiovascular outcomes. A substantial body of research has been produced investigating (novel) non-PAP treatments. With increased understanding of OSA pathogenesis, promising therapeutic approaches are emerging. There is an imperative need of high-quality synthesis of evidence; however, current systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SR/MA) on the topic demonstrate important methodological limitations and are seldom based on research questions that fully reflect the complex intricacies of OSA management. Here, we discuss the current challenges in management of OSA, the need of treatable traits based OSA treatment, the methodological limitations of existing SR/MA in the field, potential remedies, as well as future perspectives.
Collapse