Titration studies overestimate continuous positive airway pressure requirements in uncomplicated obstructive sleep apnea

Differences in Positive Airway Pressure Requirements in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Between Black and White Patients

OBJECTIVE

There are disparities between Black and White patients in the utilization of positive airway pressure (PAP) alternatives for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Given low utilization rates among Black patients, there is limited knowledge of PAP alternative outcomes in this group. Therapeutic PAP levels are clinically accessible measures that have been shown to predict PAP alternative outcomes. Herein, we examined differences in PAP requirements between Black and White patients in a large clinical sample.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING

Academic sleep center.

METHODS

We included OSA patients prescribed autoadjusting PAP between January 2018 and 2020 with baseline apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 10. Mean and 90th percentile PAP levels were compared between White and Black patients who used PAP for ≥1 hour daily using linear regression controlling for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), AHI, oxygen saturation nadir, and mask type.

RESULTS

There were 157 Black and 234 White patients who were generally obese (BMI, 37.3 ± 8.7) with severe OSA (AHI, 36.9 ± 25.6). Black patients had a 0.68 cm higher (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36, 1.35) mean PAP level and 0.85 cm H2O higher (95% CI: 0.36, 1.35) 90th percentile PAP level than white patients. Although statistically significant, differences were small and not clinically meaningful.

CONCLUSION

Black and White OSA patients had clinically insignificant differences in PAP requirements, suggesting comparable upper airway collapsibility. Considering the predictive value of therapeutic PAP levels, our findings suggest Black and White patients may have comparable PAP alternative responses from a collapsibility standpoint. Future studies should explore reasons for low utilization of PAP alternatives among Black patients.

Factors associated with treatment outcomes after use of auto-titrating CPAP therapy in adults with obstructive sleep apnea

OBJECTIVES

To determine factors that are associated with OSA therapy outcomes with auto-titrating positive airway pressure (APAP).

METHODS

We sequentially grouped patients from a retrospective cohort based on APAP efficacy (sufficiently vs. insufficiently treated; insufficiently treatment defined as residual AHI of ≥ 5), therapy adherence (adherent vs. non-adherent, non-adherence defined as < 70% usage for ≥ 4 h/night), and therapy outcomes (optimal vs. non-optimal and non-optimal outcomes defined as non-adherent and/or insufficiently treated). We subsequently compared each group.

RESULTS

The insufficiently treated were older (68.4 ± 12.5 vs. 60.4 ± 13.1 years, p < 0.01) and had lower BMI (31.9 ± 6.3 vs. 37.9 ± 9.1 kg/m², p < 0.01). They had higher baseline central apnea indices (CAI), longer leaks, higher peak pressures, and were less compliant. The non-adherent were younger (61.1 ± 12.6 vs. 65.5 ± 13.2 years, p = 0.03) and comprised more females (56.1 vs. 43.9%, p = 0.04). The leak duration per usage hour was higher in the non-compliant (median: 1.5; IQR 7.9 vs. median: 0.3; IQR 1.9 min/h; p < 0.01). The non-optimally treated had lower BMI, longer leaks, and less nightly usage. Multivariate analyses showed that leak duration was the common factor associated with treatment effectiveness and optimal therapy outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Various demographic and clinical factors were associated with treatment efficacy and adherence. However, leak duration was the common factor related to treatment efficacy and overall optimal therapy outcomes.

Clinical and polysomnographic predictors of suboptimal auto-adjusting CPAP titration in adult OSA patients: a single-center study

PURPOSE

To examine potential clinical, demographic, anthropometric, and polysomnographic predictors of successful auto-adjusting continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA).

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted in adults diagnosed with moderate-to-severe OSA (baseline apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] ≥ 15.0/h), who underwent auto-adjusting CPAP titration (S9 or S10 AutoSet ResMed^®) in a sleep laboratory setting while wearing a nasal or pillow mask. Participants were then grouped into two groups: optimal CPAP titration (residual AHI < 5.0/h) or suboptimal CPAP titration (residual AHI ≥ 5.0/h). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess possible independent predictive factors for suboptimal CPAP titration.

RESULTS

A total of 1222 adults consisting of 874 subjects with optimal CPAP titration (71.5%) and 348 subjects with suboptimal CPAP titration (28.5%) were evaluated. Multivariate analysis resulted in a model with an adequate calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow chi-square-test: 7.088; p = 0.527), with male sex, higher values of baseline AHI, therapeutic pressure (95th percentile), and mask leak (95th percentile) emerging as significant and independent predictors for suboptimal CPAP titration: adjusted odds ratio (OR): 1.456 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.076-1.971; p = 0.015), OR: 1.009 (95% CI 1.002-1.016; p = 0.013), OR: 1.281 (95% CI 1.206-1.361; p < 0.001), and 1.035 (1.026-1.043; p < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large cohort of adults undergoing auto-adjusting CPAP titration due to moderate-to-severe OSA, male sex, increased values of baseline AHI, pressure requirements, and mask leak were significant predictors for less than optimal CPAP titration.

Current and Novel Treatment Options for OSA

Obstructive sleep apnoea is a challenging medical problem due to its prevalence, its impact on quality of life and performance in school and professionally, the implications for risk of accidents, and comorbidities and mortality. Current research has carved out a broad spectrum of clinical phenotypes and defined major pathophysiological components. These findings point to the concept of personalised therapy, oriented on both the distinct clinical presentation and the most relevant pathophysiology in the individual patient. This leads to questions of whether sufficient therapeutic options other than positive airway pressure (PAP) alone are available, for which patients they may be useful, if there are specific indications for single or combined treatment, and whether there is solid scientific evidence for recommendations. This review describes our knowledge on PAP and non-PAP therapies to address upper airway collapsibility, muscle responsiveness, arousability and respiratory drive. The spectrum is broad and heterogeneous, including technical and pharmaceutical options already in clinical use or at an advanced experimental stage. Although there is an obvious need for more research on single or combined therapies, the available data demonstrate the variety of effective options, which should replace the unidirectional focus on PAP therapy.

The analysis of individual pathophysiological composition opens new directions towards personalised treatment of OSA, focusing not only on pharyngeal dilation, but also on technical or pharmaceutical interventions on muscle function or breathing regulationhttps://bit.ly/3sayhkd