An Elective Course for Student Pharmacists on Pharmaceutical Industry Practice

An Integrative Review of Approaches Used to Assess Course Interventions

Objective. The objectives of this review are to describe the utility of approaches used for the assessment of course interventions in pharmacy education and to provide recommendations that may guide faculty members in their scholarship of teaching and learning (SoTL) efforts that encompass assessment of course interventions.Findings. Thirty-four articles that included educational interventions published between 2016 and 2020 in the American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning were selected for analysis. Those articles used various approaches for the assessment of course interventions. In the order of decreasing frequency of use, those methods were surveys, student academic performance, student evaluations, mixed quantitative and qualitative methods, pre- and posttest, and learning analytics.Summary. The use of more than one assessment approach, ie, triangulation, and multiple student cohorts are advantageous. When multiple cohorts are used, it is beneficial to present the students' demographic information. Student academic performance should be part of an assessment of course interventions whenever relevant. Surveys about student perceptions and confidence may contribute to the assessment of course interventions. However, since the information collected is subjective and is usually unrelated to student learning, such an approach should be coupled with other assessment approaches that reflect student learning, such as academic performance and/or a pre- and a posttest. Depending on the research question, qualitative methods and learning analytics may also be a part of the assessment of course interventions.

Developing an international industrial advanced pharmacy practice experience in Brazil

INTRODUCTION

In this commentary, we advocate for implementing international industry-focused advanced pharmacy practice experiences (APPEs) that engage pharmacy students and schools with the pharmaceutical industry to develop products for the global market to broaden pharmacy student experiences in non-patient care electives.

COMMENTARY

Our five-year experience suggests the following structural components are essential to the success of the APPE: (1) identification of suitable international industry partners through non-traditional methods, such as the local, United States (US) chamber of commerce; (2) commitment by the company and educational institutions to develop key personnel to work with international students in the host country; (3) development of a global regulatory affairs course and workshops that target the product development stage; (4) development of student experiences based on projects directly linked to a new product(s); (5) use of technology platforms to support weekly video conferencing and translation; (6) engagement of students in community service; (7) cooperative evaluation of students and the program. The aggregate of student projects led to the development of a line of dietary supplement products introduced to the US market.

IMPLICATIONS

The implementation of this APPE benefits pharmacy students but also the academic and industry hosts. Pharmacy students obtained global manufacturing experience, an appreciation for a different culture, and supported commercial product development. The educational institutions developed joint courses and workshops. Students were embedded into various departments, carried out Food & Drug Administration regulations research, prepared comparative regulatory process maps, and provided company employees with an understanding of American consumers.