Teaching Intellectual Humility Is Essential in Preparing Collaborative Future Pharmacists

Factors influencing behavioral intentions of graduating pharmacy students regarding interprofessional collaboration - a theory-driven qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Interprofessional collaboration enhances the use of competencies of different medical team members. Additionally, pharmacists' involvement in patient care has been shown to improve their outcomes and seems particularly valuable in chronic diseases. Therefore, due to the aging of society and the increasing prevalence of chronic diseases, efforts are needed to involve pharmacists more broadly in patient care. However, there is a limited understanding of what factors could influence their willingness to participate in an interprofessional care team, especially among pharmacy students only entering the profession. This study aimed to fill these knowledge gaps by exploring graduating pharmacy students' intentions in this regard guided by the theory of planned behavior.

METHODS

We conducted seventeen semi-structured interviews with graduating pharmacy students of Poznan University of Medical Sciences, which were then thematically analyzed by two researchers.

RESULTS

Positive attitudes of respondents, who mentioned the possibility of acquiring new knowledge, skills, and competencies, increased prestige and appreciation of the pharmacist's profession, a better quality of patient care, and the support and relief offered to other team members as a result of collaboration, seem to strengthen their intentions. However, they also expressed their worries about potential errors and knowledge gaps, which constituted an example of some existing negative feelings. The identified sources of generally mixed social pressure toward the behavior included other pharmacists and pharmacy students, physicians, patients, their relatives and friends, and the decision and policymakers. Finally, their intentions may also be weakened by the mentioned perceived behavioral control aspects, like their level of pharmaceutical and clinical knowledge, skills, and experience, their knowledge of representatives of other professions and collaboration, the atmosphere at their future place of work, co-workers' potential reluctance to collaborate with them, finding time for collaboration, the existence of incentives and gratification system, and existing legal regulations.

CONCLUSIONS

The attitudes of graduating pharmacy students toward interprofessional collaboration seem mostly positive, but their intentions might be weakened by the mixed sense of social pressure and factors decreasing their perceived behavioral control.

Training Student Pharmacists How to Mitigate Racial or Ethnic Microaggressions in Patient Encounters

The experience of interfacing with the health care system is a taxing one for racially or ethnically marginalized patients (REMPs). The seemingly inevitable occurrence of encountering microaggressions is reason enough to avoid the interaction for many resulting in worse health outcomes. Microaggressions result in conflict, loss to follow-up, and reinforcing the unwelcome atmosphere of the health care system to REMPs. Teaching antimicroaggressive content in doctor of pharmacy curricula is critical for reducing strain on the fragile relationship between REMPs and the health care system. Whether it is gathering a patient history, devising a patient-centered care plan, or counseling patients, there is an opportunity for an interaction that could sever the patient's trust in the health care system. Teaching each of these skills-based learning activities should be combined with didactic lessons in nonjudgmental and nonmicroaggressive communication approaches. In addition, lessons regarding the impact of microaggressions on REMPs should also be present so that learners may appreciate the impact of a clinician's actions on REMPs in this regard. To establish evidence-based best practices, more research on teaching antimicroaggressive didactic and skills-based content to student pharmacists is needed.

How a Power Differential Between Clinicians and Researchers Contributes to the Research-to-Practice Gap

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to contend that there is a power differential between researchers and clinicians where researchers are the primary creators of knowledge and clinicians are the primary consumers of knowledge. Rooted in a sociological model illustrating interacting levels of power at macro-, meso-, and microlevels, we argue that authentic research-practice partnerships and clinician-researcher collaborations can mitigate this power differential.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians and researchers in our field have vastly different responsibilities and priorities that impact our ability to work collaboratively to solve the most pressing problems for the clients we serve. Although some current research practices may reinforce a power differential causing clinicians to feel less than and to only consume knowledge, there are examples of successful collaborations where this power differential is mitigated. These examples can contribute meaningfully to the dialogue on research-practice partnerships, with the goal of improving outcomes for the clients we serve.