Colonoscopic polypectomy

Perioperative blood transfusions for the recurrence of colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

The improvement of renal allograft survival by pre-transplantation transfusions alerted the medical community to the potential detrimental effect of transfusions in patients being treated for cancer.

OBJECTIVES

The present meta-analysis aims to evaluate the role of perioperative blood transfusions (PBT) on colorectal cancer recurrence. This is accomplished by validating the results of a previously published meta-analysis (Amato 1998); and by updating it to December 2004.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Published papers were retrieved using Medline, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, controlled trials web-based registries, or the CCG Trial Database. The search strategy used was: {colon OR rectal OR colorectal} WITH {cancer OR tumor OR neoplasm} AND transfusion. The tendency not to publish negative trials was balanced by inspecting the proceedings of international congresses.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Patients undergoing curative resection of colorectal cancer (classified either as Dukes stages A-C, Astler-Coller stages A-C2, or TNM stages T1-3a/N0-1/M0) were included if they had received any amount of blood products within one month of surgery. Excluded were patients with distant metastases at surgery, and studies with short follow-up or with no data.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

A specific form was developed for data collection. Data extraction was cross-checked, using the most recent publication in case of repetitive ones. Papers' quality was ranked using the method by Evans and Pollock. Odds ratios (OR, with 95% confidence intervals) were computed for each study, and pooled estimates were generated by RevMan (version 4.2). When available, data were stratified for risk factors of cancer recurrence.

MAIN RESULTS

The findings of the 1998 meta-analysis were confirmed, with small variations in some estimates. Updating it through December 2004 led to the identification of 237 references. Two-hundred and one of them were excluded because they analyzed survival (n=22), were repetitive (n=26), letters/reviews (n=66) or had no data (n=87). Thirty-six studies on 12,127 patients were included: 23 showed a detrimental effect of PBT; 22 used also multivariable analyses, and 14 found PBT to be an independent prognostic factor. Pooled estimates of PBT effect on colorectal cancer recurrence yielded overall OR of 1.42 (95% CI, 1.20 to 1.67) against transfused patients in randomized controlled studies. Stratified meta-analyses confirmed these findings, also when stratifying patients by site and stage of disease. The PBT effect was observed regardless of timing, type, and in a dose-related fashion, although heterogeneity was detected. Data on surgical techniques was not available for further analysis.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This updated meta-analysis confirms the previous findings. All analyses support the hypothesis that PBT have a detrimental effect on the recurrence of curable colorectal cancers. However, since heterogeneity was detected and conclusions on the effect of surgical technique could not be drawn, a causal relationship cannot still be claimed. Carefully restricted indications for PBT seems necessary.

Gastrointestinal endoscopy: an accurate and safe primary diagnostic and therapeutic modality

OBJECTIVE

To review the place of gastrointestinal endoscopy in the management of upper and lower gastrointestinal disorders.

DATA SOURCES

We reviewed articles on endoscopy reported over two decades. A Medline search complementing our experience and knowledge of the literature was used to identify the articles.

STUDY SELECTION

Papers were selected which focused on indications, comparison with radiology, including clinical outcome measures, and complications. One hundred papers, including those from radiology journals, were reviewed.

DATA EXTRACTION

Results of studies are referenced as appropriate.

DATA SYNTHESIS AND CONCLUSIONS

Endoscopy allows direct visualisation of the mucosa of the upper gastrointestinal tract, colon and terminal ileum. Subtleties of colour change, vascular pattern abnormalities and scarring are easily detected at endoscopy and are often of diagnostic importance. Endoscopy also provides access for tissue biopsy and allows a wide variety of therapeutic interventions. Traditionally barium studies have been the first step in the evaluation of many gastrointestinal symptoms and still retain cost advantages over endoscopy. However, endoscopy is frequently more sensitive and specific than barium studies. Costs associated with incorrect diagnoses may undermine the apparent cost benefits of barium studies. Advances in endoscopic design have allowed wider therapeutic options and increased safety. Gastrointestinal endoscopy should now be the first line of investigation where diagnostic precision is required or where therapeutic intervention is likely.