Care of very low birthweight infants with limited neonatal intensive care resources

Ethical aspects of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in premature neonates: where do we stand?

Advances in diagnosis, techniques, therapeutic interventions, organisation of perinatal care, and socio-economic factors have all contributed to the survival after resuscitation and intensive care of neonates with extremely low birth weight and gestational age. While morbidity during the first years of life in those infants does not increase, at school age multiple dysfunctions may become apparent. What are the limits of intensive care for the newborn? Is it right to use extreme technical and economic measures for neonates with a borderline chance of survival? What is justifiable for the neonate, the family, the society and how does legislation interfere in a decision process which involves starting, stopping or continuing intensive care? A short historical overview for the care of the newborn is given, followed by the outcome after resuscitation and treatment of the very low birth weight infant. Published management strategies and recommendations are discussed.

Continuing morbidity in extremely low birthweight infants

The pattern of lesser but continuing morbidity in the first 2 years was reported in 36 survivors who weighed 500-799 g at birth and in 83 survivors who weighed 800-999 g at birth. Over this period, there was one post-discharge death. Sixty-one percent of children were rehospitalized, most commonly for respiratory tract disorders and surgical procedures such as aural ventilation tube insertion and inguinal herniorrhaphy. Their three most common medical disorders were otitis media (55%), wheezing episode (48%) and lower respiratory tract infection (29%). At 2 years of age, 44% remained below the tenth percentile for weight, 45% for height and 12% for head circumference. Other lesser morbidity included iatrogenic scarring, abnormal head shape and behavioural problems. Except for otitis media, survivors of 500-799 g birthweight did not have a significantly higher rate of neurodevelopmental impairment, health problems, rehospitalization, suboptimal growth or behavioural disorders, compared to those of 800-999 g birthweight. This study confirms the need for providing extremely low birthweight children and their families with a continuity of comprehensive medical care and social support after hospital discharge.

The survival of extremely-low-birthweight infants in Victoria: 1982-1985

A population-based survey of mortality in extremely-low-birthweight (500- to 999-g) infants was carried out in Victoria for the years 1982 to 1985. No increase in the number of extremely-preterm births occurred during that time. The still-birth rate fell from 498 still births per 1000 births in 1982-1983 to 403 still births per 1000 births in 1984-1985. The neonatal mortality in 1982-1985 was 638 deaths per 1000 live births, with no significant decline from that of the 1978-1981 cohort. The small increase in neonatal survivors was not associated with any change in the postneonatal death rate. Delivery in a level-3 unit was associated with a significantly better outcome. Multiple births made a major contribution to the extremely-low-birthweight group of infants.

Development and validation of a multivariate predictor of mortality in very low birth weight

Accurate prognosis is critical to the design of all prospective research aimed at improving survival. Predictions based on birth weight, gestational age, or any other single variable, fail to take into account the potentially important contribution of other factors. In order to develop a practical and accurate multivariate model, we studied all singleton pregnancies resulting in viable liveborn infants who weighed less than or equal to 1500 g at birth during 1984 and 1985 at the New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center. When gestational age, birth weight, and/or crown-heel length were considered, no maternal characteristics were significant predictors of mortality. The model with the maximal predictive accuracy (84.5%) used birth weight and 5-minute Apgar score to calculate a probability of mortality. This prognostic model was then validated in a separate cohort of singletons born in 1986. We conclude that clinical trials should require stratification before randomization, using the calculated probability of mortality, rather than birth weight or gestational age alone. Given the ability of models, such as the one presented here, to generate reasonable estimates of mortality, this information might also be used in the clinical setting to assist parents and physicians in individualized decision-making processes for a given infant.

Attitudes of Australian neonatal paediatricians to the treatment of extremely preterm infants

A questionnaire survey was carried out to identify areas of consensus or disagreement in the attitudes and practices of Australian neonatal paediatricians with regard to the treatment of extremely preterm infants. Considerable variation was found in the estimated chances of survival and disability among respondents. The majority of neonatal paediatricians advocated prompt resuscitation and initiation of neonatal intensive care at birth, although all believed life-support treatment should be withdrawn in those instances where medical complications develop resulting in near certainty of death or life with total incapacity. The predominant view was for parents to be involved in the decision-making process for withdrawal of life-support and for the neonatal intensive care policy to be made known to the parents. Information from this survey which raised concerns included the variability in the estimate of the potential for survival, the lack of relevance of the law to everyday practices in the neonatal intensive care units, the small minority of respondents who felt that life-and-death decisions should be made by medical staff alone, and the reluctance of some neonatal paediatricians to inform parents about the policies of their unit.