Sublingual apomorphine solution in Parkinson's disease

Intermittent Apomorphine Use for off Period Rescue in Parkinson's Disease: A Pragmatic Review of over Three Decades of Clinical Experience

Background

Although proven very efficacious as treatment for Parkinson's disease by Schwab as far back as the 1950s, and later confirmed by Cotzias and colleagues in the early 1970s, use of intermittent subcutaneous injections of the dopamine agonist apomorphine remains limited worldwide.

Objectives

To review evidence regarding use of intermittent, on-demand apomorphine as a treatment for off-period disability in Parkinson's disease.

Methods

A PRISMA-compliant structured literature search was carried out with a focus on clinical effect (motor improvement, daily off time decrease; latency, duration), antiemetic prophylaxis, and adverse events.

Results

Fifty-eight studies were evaluated. Apomorphine administration route was subcutaneous in 29 (50%), sublingual in 14 (24.1%), intranasal in 6 (10.3%), inhaled in 5 (8.6%), rectal in 3 (5.2%) and transdermal in 1 (1.7%). Irrespective of the route, motor disability improved 19% to 74% and daily off time decreased 3% to 68%, with subcutaneous having the fastest onset of action ranging from 6 to 24 minutes and lasting 28 to 96 minutes. Antiemetic prophylaxis was used in almost all studies. Systemic side effects like nausea and yawning were mild and well tolerated, but sedation led to discontinuation of subcutaneous apomorphine in 5.5%. Local side effects to subcutaneous administration did not result in discontinuation. Stomatitis with the early sublingual formulations led to discontinuation in nearly half of patients and was reduced to 16.7% with novel film strips.

Conclusions

Intermittent subcutaneous injections remain the most reliable and safest route of apomorphine administration, with an efficacy for off period treatment supported by nearly four decades of clinical experience.

A novel sublingual apomorphine treatment for patients with fluctuating Parkinson's disease

We tested a novel preparation of a sublingual apomorphine hydrochloride tablet (APO) in 10 patients with advanced Parkinson's disease complicated by motor fluctuations. After a dose titration, patients took either 40 mg APO three times per day alternating with levodopa doses (eight patients) or six doses of 20 mg APO taken concurrently with levodopa doses (two patients) for 3 months. Assessments included timed tapping and ambulation tests, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), and patient diaries. Tapping speed while taking only APO (12 hours after stopping levodopa) was faster than while taking only levodopa (p <0.05). The daily levodopa dose decreased by 32.1% (p <0.01), yet the total "on" time increased from 73.5% +/- 10.2% to 81.5% +/- 7.5% of the day (p <0.01) after starting APO. "On" UPDRS part II scores (p <0.05) and "on" UPDRS part III (motor examination) scores (p <0.05) also improved. Adverse events such as nausea, orthostatic hypotension, and disagreeable taste did not limit the dose of APO in any case. The short-term benefit and tolerability demonstrated in this study warrant further study of this new APO preparation.

Domperidone: a peripherally acting dopamine2-receptor antagonist

OBJECTIVE

To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of domperidone in the treatment of gastrointestinal motility disorders and emesis.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE and Excerpta Medica online databases were searched to identify published reports.

STUDY SELECTION

Domperidone has been marketed worldwide outside the US since 1978, and extensive clinical data for this drug are available. This review focuses on the clinical experience from controlled studies of domperidone in the treatment of motility disorders, particularly diabetic gastroparesis. Also, case reports are used in summarizing safety. The control comparator groups included placebo or other prokinetic drugs (metoclopramide and cisapride). Controlled clinical trials of domperidone's efficacy and safety as an antiemetic are also briefly examined. Although a variety of domperidone dosage forms have been marketed, data generated from trials using the 10-mg tablet are highlighted because this is the only dosage form available in Canada and is under investigation in the US.

DATA EXTRACTION

Because symptoms do not correlate with objective measures of gastrointestinal motility and they are the primary reason that patients with motility disorders seek treatment, the primary outcome extracted from the clinical studies was symptomatic response to treatment. Safety and efficacy between domperidone and placebo, metoclopramide, or cisapride were compared.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Domperidone, a peripheral dopamine2-receptor antagonist, regulates the motility of gastric and small intestinal smooth muscle and has been shown to have some effects on the motor function of the esophagus. It also has antiemetic activity as a result of blockade of dopamine receptors in the chemoreceptor trigger zone. In controlled clinical trials, domperidone provided better relief of symptoms (anorexia, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, early satiety, bloating, distension) than placebo in patients with symptoms of diabetic gastropathy; symptomatic improvement was similar with domperidone and metoclopramide or cisapride. Domperidone also provided short-term relief of symptoms in patients with dyspepsia or gastroesophageal reflux, prevented nausea and vomiting associated with emetogenic chemotherapy, and prevented the gastrointestinal and emetic adverse effects of antiparkinsonian drugs. Because very little domperidone crosses the blood-brain barrier, reports of central nervous system adverse effects, such as dystonic reactions, are rare.

CONCLUSIONS

Domperidone is a unique gastrokinetic and antiemetic drug. Because of its favorable safety profile, domperidone appears to be an attractive alternative to metoclopramide. In the management of diabetic gastropathy, domperidone's antiemetic activity distinguishes it from cisapride.

A new sublingual formulation of apomorphine in the treatment of patients with Parkinson's disease

A new formulation of a sublingual tablet with 10 mg apomorphine was examined in 13 patients with Parkinson's disease. Vitamin C (250 mg) was added sublingually to lower the salivary pH. Four patients received sublingual apomorphine and nine received sublingual apomorphine as well as vitamin C. Subcutaneous apomorphine was given to all patients. The study was designed as a randomized three-way cross-over study. Tmax, Cmax, and bioavailability (F) were determined. Clinical efficacy was assessed by hand-tapping during 30 s, walking time over 25 m, and a 4-point tremor score. The mean Tmax after subcutaneous apomorphine was 14.5 +/- 1.9 min with a mean Cmax of 19.2 +/- 3.8 ng/ml. The mean clearance of all patients was 3.8 +/- 0.6 L/min. The mean Tmax after sublingual apomorphine was 61.1 +/- 6.9 min vs. 61.7 +/- 8.2 min with vitamin C. The mean Cmax was 7.4 +/- 1.0 ng/ml (- vitamin C) vs. 4.3 +/- 1.3 ng/ml (+ vitamin C). These data resulted consequently in a not significantly different mean bioavailability, varying from 17.6% (- vitamin C) to 6.1% (+ vitamin C). The latency of onset of clinical efficacy varied between 25.0 +/- 8.5 min (- vitamin C) and 26.0 +/- 5.3 min (+ vitamin C). The duration of effect was lower (not significantly) when vitamin C was added: 88.0 +/- 12.5 min (- vitamin C) vs. 61.0 +/- 11.9 min (+ vitamin C). These data show that 10 mg apomorphine sublingually was effective in 56% of the patients. The combination with vitamin C did not significantly change the latency of onset or duration of clinical efficacy. Sublingual apomorphine should be considered as an alternative in the treatment of "off"-periods in Parkinson's disease, in particular when patients have the capacity to anticipate their off-periods.