1
|
Four-year follow-up of the Choice of Health Options In prevention of Cardiovascular Events randomized controlled trial. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2011; 18:278-86. [PMID: 20606594 DOI: 10.1097/hjr.0b013e32833cca66] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine if the improved risk factor profile at 1 year attributed to the Choice of Health Options In prevention of Cardiovascular Events (CHOICE) program was maintained at 4 years. DESIGN Single-blind randomized controlled trial with post-hoc 476 months follow-up (76% complete). SETTING Australian tertiary referral hospital. PATIENTS Two hundred and eight acute coronary syndrome survivors. INTERVENTIONS Acute coronary syndrome survivors not accessing cardiac rehabilitation (CR) were randomized to control (n=72) or CHOICE (n=72) comprising the tailored risk factor reduction packaged as a clinic visit and 3 months phone support. A contemporary CR reference group were also recruited (n=64). Blinded risk assessment occurred at baseline, 1 and 4 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Total cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, smoking status, physical activity. RESULTS One year improvements in all the modifiable risk factors achieved in CHOICE were maintained at 4 years. CHOICE and control were well-matched at baseline. At 4 years, there was a trend towards lower total cholesterol in CHOICE compared with controls (mean 4.0±0.1 vs. 4.2±0.1 mmol/l, P=0.05), significantly better systolic blood pressure (mean 132.2±2.1 vs. 136.8±2.0 mmHg, P=0.01), physical activity scores (1200±209 vs. 968±196 metabolic equivalent min/week, P=0.02) and proportion with three or more risk factors above national targets (20 vs. 42%,P=0.02). Participants in CHOICE were at higher baseline risk than CR but at 4 years they had similar risk factor profiles. CONCLUSION Participants in CHOICE maintained favorable changes in coronary risk profile at 4 years compared with control, indicating that CHOICE is an effective long-term intervention among those not accessing facility-based CR.
Collapse
|
2
|
Dondorp AM, Fanello CI, Hendriksen ICE, Gomes E, Seni A, Chhaganlal KD, Bojang K, Olaosebikan R, Anunobi N, Maitland K, Kivaya E, Agbenyega T, Nguah SB, Evans J, Gesase S, Kahabuka C, Mtove G, Nadjm B, Deen J, Mwanga-Amumpaire J, Nansumba M, Karema C, Umulisa N, Uwimana A, Mokuolu OA, Adedoyin OT, Johnson WBR, Tshefu AK, Onyamboko MA, Sakulthaew T, Ngum WP, Silamut K, Stepniewska K, Woodrow CJ, Bethell D, Wills B, Oneko M, Peto TE, von Seidlein L, Day NPJ, White NJ. Artesunate versus quinine in the treatment of severe falciparum malaria in African children (AQUAMAT): an open-label, randomised trial. Lancet 2010; 376:1647-57. [PMID: 21062666 PMCID: PMC3033534 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61924-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 660] [Impact Index Per Article: 47.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Severe malaria is a major cause of childhood death and often the main reason for paediatric hospital admission in sub-Saharan Africa. Quinine is still the established treatment of choice, although evidence from Asia suggests that artesunate is associated with a lower mortality. We compared parenteral treatment with either artesunate or quinine in African children with severe malaria. METHODS This open-label, randomised trial was undertaken in 11 centres in nine African countries. Children (<15 years) with severe falciparum malaria were randomly assigned to parenteral artesunate or parenteral quinine. Randomisation was in blocks of 20, with study numbers corresponding to treatment allocations kept inside opaque sealed paper envelopes. The trial was open label at each site, and none of the investigators or trialists, apart from for the trial statistician, had access to the summaries of treatment allocations. The primary outcome measure was in-hospital mortality, analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered, number ISRCTN50258054. FINDINGS 5425 children were enrolled; 2712 were assigned to artesunate and 2713 to quinine. All patients were analysed for the primary outcome. 230 (8·5%) patients assigned to artesunate treatment died compared with 297 (10·9%) assigned to quinine treatment (odds ratio [OR] stratified for study site 0·75, 95% CI 0·63-0·90; relative reduction 22·5%, 95% CI 8·1-36·9; p=0·0022). Incidence of neurological sequelae did not differ significantly between groups, but the development of coma (65/1832 [3·5%] with artesunate vs 91/1768 [5·1%] with quinine; OR 0·69 95% CI 0·49-0·95; p=0·0231), convulsions (224/2712 [8·3%] vs 273/2713 [10·1%]; OR 0·80, 0·66-0·97; p=0·0199), and deterioration of the coma score (166/2712 [6·1%] vs 208/2713 [7·7%]; OR 0·78, 0·64-0·97; p=0·0245) were all significantly less frequent in artesunate recipients than in quinine recipients. Post-treatment hypoglycaemia was also less frequent in patients assigned to artesunate than in those assigned to quinine (48/2712 [1·8%] vs 75/2713 [2·8%]; OR 0·63, 0·43-0·91; p=0·0134). Artesunate was well tolerated, with no serious drug-related adverse effects. INTERPRETATION Artesunate substantially reduces mortality in African children with severe malaria. These data, together with a meta-analysis of all trials comparing artesunate and quinine, strongly suggest that parenteral artesunate should replace quinine as the treatment of choice for severe falciparum malaria worldwide. FUNDING The Wellcome Trust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arjen M Dondorp
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical MedicineResearch Unit (MORU), Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Caterina I Fanello
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical MedicineResearch Unit (MORU), Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Ilse CE Hendriksen
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical MedicineResearch Unit (MORU), Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Amir Seni
- Hospital Central da Beira, Beira, Mozambique
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Samwel Gesase
- Magunga District Hospital, NIMR-Korogwe Research Laboratory, Tanga, Tanzania
| | - Catherine Kahabuka
- Magunga District Hospital, NIMR-Korogwe Research Laboratory, Tanga, Tanzania
| | | | - Behzad Nadjm
- Teule Designated District Hospital, Muheza, Tanzania
| | | | | | - Margaret Nansumba
- Mbarara University of Science and Technology and Epicentre Research Base, Mbarara, Uganda
| | - Corine Karema
- Malaria Control Program, Ministry of Health, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Noella Umulisa
- Malaria Control Program, Ministry of Health, Kigali, Rwanda
| | - Aline Uwimana
- Malaria Control Program, Ministry of Health, Kigali, Rwanda
| | | | | | | | - Antoinette K Tshefu
- Kinshasa School of Public Health—Kingasani Research Centre, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Marie A Onyamboko
- Kinshasa School of Public Health—Kingasani Research Centre, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo
| | - Tharisara Sakulthaew
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical MedicineResearch Unit (MORU), Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Wirichada Pan Ngum
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical MedicineResearch Unit (MORU), Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kamolrat Silamut
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical MedicineResearch Unit (MORU), Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Kasia Stepniewska
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical MedicineResearch Unit (MORU), Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Charles J Woodrow
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical MedicineResearch Unit (MORU), Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Delia Bethell
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Bridget Wills
- Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | | | - Tim E Peto
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Nicholas PJ Day
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical MedicineResearch Unit (MORU), Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Nicholas J White
- Mahidol Oxford Tropical MedicineResearch Unit (MORU), Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
- Correspondence to: Prof N J White, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, 420/6 Rajvithi Road, Bangkok 10400, Thailand
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
The artemisinins are the most effective antimalarial drugs known. They possess a remarkably wide therapeutic index. These agents have been used in traditional Chinese herbal medicine for more than 2,000 years but were not subjected to scientific scrutiny until the 1970s. The first formal clinical trials of the artemisinins, and the development of methods for their industrial scale production, followed rapidly. A decade later, Chinese scientists shared their findings with the rest of the world; since then, a significant body of international trial evidence has confirmed these drugs to be far superior to any available alternatives. In particular, they have the ability to rapidly kill a broad range of asexual parasite stages at safe concentrations that are consistently achievable via standard dosing regimens. As their half-life is very short, there was also thought to be a low risk of resistance. These discoveries coincided with the appearance and spread of resistance to all the other major classes of antimalarials. As a result, the artemisinins now form an essential element of recommended first-line antimalarial treatment regimens worldwide. To minimize the risk of artemisinin resistance, they are recommended to be used to treat uncomplicated malaria in combination with other antimalarials as artemisinin combination therapies (ACTs). Their rollout has resulted in documented reductions in malaria prevalence in a number of African and Asian countries. Unfortunately, there are already worrisome early signs of artemisinin resistance appearing in western Cambodia. If this resistance were to spread, it would be disastrous for malaria control efforts worldwide. The enormous challenge for the international community is how to avert this catastrophe and preserve the effectiveness of this antimalarial “magic bullet”. Drug Dev Res 71: 12–19, 2010. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard J Maude
- Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University Bangkok 10400, Thailand
| | | | | |
Collapse
|