1
|
Fakes K, Williams T, Collins N, Boyle A, Sverdlov AL, Boyes A, Sanson-Fisher R. Preparation for cardiac procedures: a cross-sectional study identifying gaps between outpatients' views and experiences of patient-centred care. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. QUALITY OF CARE & CLINICAL OUTCOMES 2024; 10:235-245. [PMID: 37451699 PMCID: PMC11112521 DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2023] [Revised: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To examine and identify gaps in care perceived as essential by patients; this study examined outpatients': (1) views on what characterizes essential care and (2) experiences of care received, in relation to cardiac catheterization and subsequent cardiovascular procedures. METHODS Cross-sectional descriptive study. Surveys were posted to outpatients who had undergone elective cardiac catheterization in the prior 6 months at an Australian hospital. Participants completed a 65-item survey to determine: (a) aspects of care they perceive as essential to patients receiving care for a cardiac condition (Important Care Survey); or (b) their actual care received (Actual Care Survey). Numbers and percentages were used to calculate the most frequently identified essential care items; and the experiences of care received. Items rated as either 'Essential'/'Very important' by at least 80% of participants were determined. A gap in patient-centred care was identified as being any item that was endorsed as essential/very important by 80% or more of participants but reported as received by <80% of participants. RESULTS Of 582 eligible patients, 264 (45%) returned a completed survey. A total of 43/65 items were endorsed by >80% of participants as essential. Of those, for 22 items, <80% reported the care as received. Gaps were identified in relation to general practitionerconsultation (1 item), preparation (1 item) subsequent decision making for treatment (1 item), prognosis (6 items), and post-treatment follow-up (1 item). CONCLUSIONS Areas were identified where actual care fell short of patients' perceptions of essential care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristy Fakes
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia
| | - Trent Williams
- Cardiovascular Department, John Hunter Hospital. Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305 Australia
- School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
| | - Nicholas Collins
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia
- Cardiovascular Department, John Hunter Hospital. Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305 Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
| | - Andrew Boyle
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia
- Cardiovascular Department, John Hunter Hospital. Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305 Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
| | - Aaron L Sverdlov
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia
- Cardiovascular Department, John Hunter Hospital. Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305 Australia
- School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia
| | - Allison Boyes
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia
| | - Rob Sanson-Fisher
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, 2308, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
van der Velden NCA, Smets EMA, van Vliet LM, Brom L, van Laarhoven HWM, Henselmans I. Effects of prognostic communication strategies on emotions, coping, and appreciation of consultations: An experimental study in advanced cancer. Palliat Support Care 2024:1-13. [PMID: 38533613 DOI: 10.1017/s1478951524000403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed to investigate effects of prognostic communication strategies on emotions, coping, and appreciation of consultations in advanced cancer. METHODS For this experimental study, we created 8 videos of a scripted oncological consultation, only varying in prognostic communication strategies. Disease-naive individuals (n = 1036) completed surveys before and after watching 1 video, while imagining being the depicted cancer patient. We investigated effects of the type of disclosure (prognostic disclosure vs. communication of unpredictability vs. non-disclosure) and content of disclosure (standard vs. standard and best-case vs. standard, best- and worst-case survival scenarios; numerical vs. word-based estimates) on emotions, coping, and appreciation of consultations. Moderating effects of individual characteristics were tested. RESULTS Participants generally reported more satisfaction (p < .001) after prognostic disclosure versus communication of unpredictability and less uncertainty (p = .042), more satisfaction (p = .005), and more desirability (p = .016) regarding prognostic information after numerical versus word-based estimates. Effects of different survival scenarios were absent. Prognostic communication strategies lacked effects on emotions and coping. Significant moderators included prognostic information preference and uncertainty tolerance. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS In an experimental setting, prognostic disclosure does not cause more negative emotions than non-disclosure and numerical estimates are more strongly appreciated than words. Oncologists' worries about harming patients should not preclude disclosing (precise) prognostic information, yet sensitivity to individual preferences and characteristics remains pivotal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi C A van der Velden
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Quality of Care, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen M A Smets
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Quality of Care, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Liesbeth M van Vliet
- Department of Health, Medical and Neuropsychology, University of Leiden, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Linda Brom
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Association for Palliative Care (PZNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Inge Henselmans
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Quality of Care, Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Travado L, Bastos L. Distress and Psycho-Oncological Support for Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer. Semin Oncol Nurs 2024; 40:151555. [PMID: 38081761 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2023.151555] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) face an incurable disease that brings along many challenges. Health care professionals, and nurses in particular, have a main role in supporting these patients to adapt and adjust to their condition. In this study, we discuss how good communication skills can be the first level of emotional support to patients and families; and how the high prevalence of distress in this population makes it of great importance to screen for distress regularly and treat it when needed. DATA SOURCES We present our research study on the impact of negative effects on biobehavioral processes that contribute to disease progression, and comment on the psychological interventions that may reduce it, with a particular focus on the CALM therapy model we validated for the Portuguese ABC patients. We also report on the added human value of a retreat for couples and professionals that our team has tested with ABC patients and their partners. CONCLUSION It is critical to screen for distress in ABC patients who have a higher prevalence of distress. There are available evidence-based interventions to assist clinicians in reducing their suffering. CALM therapy and a retreat format may be options to consider with ABC patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE As front-line clinicians, nurses have an important role in providing provide emotional support to patients using good communication skills, but also in identifying patients at risk for distress, screening for it regularly, and referring patients for specialized psychosocial care when needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luzia Travado
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical & Research Center, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Leonor Bastos
- Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical & Research Center, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Smets EMA, Menichetti J, Lie HC, Gerwing J. What do we mean by "tailoring" of medical information during clinical interactions? PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 119:108092. [PMID: 38056218 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.108092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/25/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
Although medical information is essential for all patients, information needs and information processing capacities vary between individual patients and over time and context, within patients. Therefore, it is often recommended to "tailor" medical information to individual patients during clinic visits. However, there is a lack of consensus on what "tailoring" in clinical interactions represents since the definitions provided in the literature thus far generally regard tailoring of written text, rather than in dialogue during face-to-face interactions. To provide clinicians with guidance on how to tailor information to individual patients and to allow researchers to assess the effectiveness thereof, clarity is urgently needed regarding what "tailoring" actually means and what it entails in practice. In this paper we outline the current challenges of applying the concept of "tailoring" to the clinical setting and present existing definitions. Importantly, we introduce a new working definition of the concept that encompasses essential informational and dialogic components. We believe this provisional definition promotes much-needed conceptual precision in how communication researchers and educators define and assess tailored information provision in clinical consultations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen M A Smets
- Medical Psychology, Amsterdam University Medical Center/ University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Julia Menichetti
- Health Services Research Unit (HØKH) Centre, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Hanne C Lie
- Department of Behavioral Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Jennifer Gerwing
- Health Services Research Unit (HØKH) Centre, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Islam Z, Pollock K, Patterson A, Hanjari M, Wallace L, Mururajani I, Conroy S, Faull C. Thinking ahead about medical treatments in advanced illness: a qualitative study of barriers and enablers in end-of-life care planning with patients and families from ethnically diverse backgrounds. HEALTH AND SOCIAL CARE DELIVERY RESEARCH 2023; 11:1-135. [PMID: 37464868 DOI: 10.3310/jvfw4781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
Background This study explored whether or not, and how, terminally ill patients from ethnically diverse backgrounds and their family caregivers think ahead about deterioration and dying, and explored their engagement with health-care professionals in end-of-life care planning. Objective The aim was to address the question, what are the barriers to and enablers of ethnically diverse patients, family caregivers and health-care professionals engaging in end-of-life care planning? Design This was a qualitative study comprising 18 longitudinal patient-centred case studies, interviews with 19 bereaved family caregivers and 50 public and professional stakeholder responses to the findings. Setting The study was set in Nottinghamshire and Leicestershire in the UK. Results Key barriers - the predominant stance of patients was to live with hope, considering the future only in terms of practical matters (wills and funerals), rather than the business of dying. For some, planning ahead was counter to their faith. Health-care professionals seemed to feature little in people's lives. Some participants indicated a lack of trust and experienced a disjointed system, devoid of due regard for them. However, religious and cultural mores were of great importance to many, and there were anxieties about how the system valued and enabled these. Family duty and community expectations were foregrounded in some accounts and concern about being in the (un)care of strangers was common. Key enablers - effective communication with trusted individuals, which enables patients to feel known and that their faith, family and community life are valued. Health-care professionals getting to 'know' the person is key. Stakeholder responses highlighted the need for development of Health-care professionals' confidence, skills and training, Using stories based on the study findings was seen as an effective way to support this. A number of behavioural change techniques were also identified. Limitations It was attempted to include a broad ethnic diversity in the sample, but the authors acknowledge that not all groups could be included. Conclusions What constitutes good end-of-life care is influenced by the intersectionality of diverse factors, including beliefs and culture. All people desire personalised, compassionate and holistic end-of-life care, and the current frameworks for good palliative care support this. However, health-care professionals need additional skills to navigate complex, sensitive communication and enquire about aspects of people's lives that may be unfamiliar. The challenge for health-care professionals and services is the delivery of holistic care and the range of skills that are required to do this. Future work Priorities for future research: How can health professionals identify if/when a patient is 'ready' for discussions about deterioration and dying? How can discussions about uncertain recovery and the need for decisions about treatment, especially resuscitation, be most effectively conducted in a crisis? How can professionals recognise and respond to the diversity of faith and cultural practices, and the heterogeneity between individuals of beliefs and preferences relating to the end of life? How can conversations be most effectively conducted when translation is required to enhance patient understanding? Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 11, No. X. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoebia Islam
- Leicestershire and Rutland Organisation for the Relief of Suffering (LOROS) Hospice, Leicester, UK
| | - Kristian Pollock
- School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Anne Patterson
- Leicestershire and Rutland Organisation for the Relief of Suffering (LOROS) Hospice, Leicester, UK
| | - Matilda Hanjari
- Leicestershire and Rutland Organisation for the Relief of Suffering (LOROS) Hospice, Leicester, UK
| | - Louise Wallace
- Faculty of Wellbeing, Education and Language Studies, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
| | - Irfhan Mururajani
- Leicestershire and Rutland Organisation for the Relief of Suffering (LOROS) Hospice, Leicester, UK
| | - Simon Conroy
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Christina Faull
- Leicestershire and Rutland Organisation for the Relief of Suffering (LOROS) Hospice, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Waller A, Hullick C, Sanson-Fisher R, Herrmann-Johns A. Optimal care of people with brain cancer in the emergency department: A cross-sectional survey of outpatient perceptions. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2023; 10:100194. [PMID: 36915388 PMCID: PMC10006536 DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective People diagnosed with brain cancer commonly present to the emergency department (ED). There is uncertainty about essential components and processes of optimal care from the perspective of consumers, and few guidelines exist to inform practice. This study examined the perceptions of outpatients and their support persons regarding what constitutes optimal care for people with brain cancer presenting to the ED. Methods A cross sectional descriptive survey study was undertaken. Participants included adults attending hospital outpatient clinics (n = 181, 60% of eligible participants). Participants completed a survey assessing perceptions of optimal care for brain cancer patients presenting to emergency department and socio-demographic characteristics. Results The survey items endorsed as 'essential' by participants included that the emergency department team help patients: 'understand signs and symptoms to watch out for' (51%); 'understand the next steps in care and why' (48%); 'understand if their medical condition suggests it is likely they will die in hospital' (47%); 'ask patients if they have a substitute decision maker and want that person told they are in the emergency department' (44%); 'understand the purpose of tests and procedures' (41%). Conclusions Symptom management, effective communication and supported decision-making should be prioritised by ED teams. Further research to establish the views of those affected by brain cancer about essential care delivered in the ED setting, and to compare these views with the quality of care that is actually delivered, is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy Waller
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Carolyn Hullick
- Emergency Department, Belmont Hospital, Hunter New England Local Health District, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Rob Sanson-Fisher
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Anne Herrmann-Johns
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Department for Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Professorship for Medical Sociology, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lai-Kwon J, Heynemann S, Hart NH, Chan RJ, Smith TJ, Nekhlyudov L, Jefford M. Evolving Landscape of Metastatic Cancer Survivorship-Reconsidering Clinical Care, Policy, and Research Priorities for the Modern Era. J Clin Oncol 2023:JCO2202212. [PMID: 36848622 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.02212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/01/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Lai-Kwon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Sarah Heynemann
- Department of Medical Oncology, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Sydney Health Ethics, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Nicolas H Hart
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia.,Centre for IMPACCT, School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney (UTS), Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Exercise Medicine Research Institute, School of Medical and Health Science, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia.,Institute for Health Research, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Raymond J Chan
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Thomas J Smith
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Section of Palliative Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, New York, NY.,Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD
| | | | - Michael Jefford
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Department of Health Services Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To synthesise empirical findings on the role of family in end-of-life (EOL) communication and to identify the communicative practices that are essential for EOL decision-making in family-oriented cultures. SETTING The EOL communication settings. PARTICIPANTS This integrative review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses reporting guideline. Relevant studies published between 1 January 1991 and 31 December 2021 were retrieved from four databases, including the PsycINFO, Embase, MEDLINE and Ovid nursing databases, using keywords with meanings of 'end-of-life', 'communication' and 'family'. Data were then extracted and coded into themes for analysis. The search strategy yielded 53 eligible studies; all 53 included studies underwent quality assessment. Quantitative studies were evaluated using the Quality Assessment Tool, and Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist was used for qualitative research. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES Research evidence on EOL communication with a focus on family. RESULTS Four themes emerged from these studies: (1) conflicts in family decision-making in EOL communication, (2) the significance of timing of EOL communication, (3) difficulty in identification of a 'key person' who is responsible for decisions regarding EOL care and (4) different cultural perspectives on EOL communication. CONCLUSIONS The current review pointed towards the importance of family in EOL communication and illustrated that family participation likely leads to improved quality of life and death in patients. Future research should develop a family-oriented communication framework which is designed for the Chinese and Eastern contexts that targets on managing family expectations during prognosis disclosure and facilitating patients' fulfilment of familial roles while making EOL decision-making. Clinicians should also be aware of the significance of the role of family in EOL care and manage family members' expectations according to cultural contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jack Pun
- Department of English, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
| | - James C H Chow
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
| | - Leslie Fok
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
| | - Ka Man Cheung
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lewis ET, Hammill K, Culbert R, van der Merwe M, Sahay A, Turner R, Cardona M. Delivering Prognostic News to Older People with Chronic Disease: What Format Preference and Level of Involvement in Decision Making? A Hospital Survey. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:healthcare11030444. [PMID: 36767019 PMCID: PMC9913994 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11030444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Shared decision making near end of life is a balancing act of communicating prognosis to patients and their surrogates/families and engaging them in considering value-concordant management choices. This cross-sectional survey aimed to determine the format in which older patients with chronic illnesses would prefer to receive prognostic information on their treatment options and disease progression, and their desired level of engagement in decision making. With a 60% participation rate, 139 inpatients in two hospitals and five surrogates were presented with six hypothetical scenarios with a randomly assigned sequence: verbal and written summary, graph, table, photo, video, and pamphlet. The majority (76%) of respondents chose the traditional verbal communication of prognosis by their doctor with a written summary as a reference and to share with family; the second choice was a condition-specific pamphlet (63%). Many found the graph and photo to be distressing (36% and 42%, respectively). Most (71%) wanted to know everything about their condition trajectory, and 63% chose shared decision making rather than completely autonomous or full delegation to clinicians or family. There were no gender differentials between wanting to know it all, supporting shared decision making or the preferred format for breaking news (p > 0.05). Older hospitalized patients with chronic conditions are willing to discuss end-of-life issues, learn about their prognosis, and be involved in shared decision making. Innovative formats such as graphs, videos, or photos were not welcome as part of the prognostic discussion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ebony T. Lewis
- School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia
- School of Psychology, The University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia
- Correspondence:
| | - Kathrine Hammill
- School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown 2560, Australia
| | - Rebekah Culbert
- Occupational Therapy Services, Camden and Campbelltown Hospitals, Campbelltown 2560, Australia
| | | | - Ashlyn Sahay
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Sciences, Central Queensland University, Mackay 4740, Australia
| | - Robin Turner
- Biostatistics Unit, Otago Medical School, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
| | - Magnolia Cardona
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University, Robina 4226, Australia
- EBP Professorial Unit, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport 4215, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chen W, Chung JOK, Lam KKW, Molassiotis A. End-of-life communication strategies for healthcare professionals: A scoping review. Palliat Med 2023; 37:61-74. [PMID: 36349371 DOI: 10.1177/02692163221133670] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Timely and effective communication about end-of-life issues, including conversations about prognosis and goals of care, are extremely beneficial to terminally ill patients and their families. However, given the context, healthcare professionals may find it challenging to initiate and facilitate such conversations. Hence, it is critical to improving the available communication strategies to enhance end-of-life communication practices. AIM To summarise the end-of-life communication strategies recommended for healthcare professionals, identify research gaps and inform future research. DESIGN A scoping review performed in accordance with the Arksey and O'Malley framework. DATA SOURCES A literature search was conducted between January 1990 and January 2022 using PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases and Google, Google Scholar and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. Studies that described recommended end-of-life communication strategies for healthcare professionals were included. RESULTS Fifty-nine documents were included. Seven themes of communication strategies were found: (a) preparation; (b) exploration and assessment; (c) family involvement; (d) provision and tailoring of information; (e) empathic emotional responses; (f) reframing and revisiting the goals of care; and (g) conversation closure. CONCLUSIONS The themes of communication strategies found in this review provide a framework to integrally promote end-of-life communication. Our results will help inform healthcare professionals, thereby promoting the development of specialised training and education on end-of-life communication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weilin Chen
- School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Joyce Oi Kwan Chung
- School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Katherine Ka Wai Lam
- School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Alex Molassiotis
- School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.,Health and Social Care Research Centre, University of Derby, Derby, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Harnischfeger N, Rath H, Alt-Epping B, Brand H, Haller K, Letsch A, Rieder N, Thuss-Patience P, Bokemeyer C, Bergelt C, Oechsle K. Effects of a communication training for oncologists on early addressing palliative and end-of-life care in advanced cancer care (PALLI-COM): a randomized, controlled trial. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100623. [PMID: 36356411 PMCID: PMC9808464 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In advanced cancer care, early communication about palliative care (PC) and end-of-life (EoL)-related issues is recommended, but is often impeded by physicians' communication insecurities. We investigated the effect of a newly developed compact communication skills training 'PALLI-COM' on oncologists' competencies to early address PC/EoL-related issues. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a randomized, controlled trial (RCT) with an intervention group (IG; 2 × 90 min training) and a wait list control group (CG) at five sites. At two assessment points, participating oncologists led videotaped medical consultations with simulated patients (SPs) via a privacy compliant video conference platform. SPs were represented by trained actors. The taped conversations were rated for primary outcome (communication skills assessed by adapted COM-ON-checklist and COM-ON-coaching rating scales) by raters blinded for study group. Secondary outcomes included oncologists' self-reported communication skills (Self-Efficacy in Palliative Care Scale, Thanatophobia-Scale, Communication about End of Life Survey, study-specific items) as well as external rating of the SPs. Univariate analyses of covariance with baseline adjustment were used to analyze intervention effects. RESULTS A total of 141 oncologists [age: mean (standard deviation) = 32.7 (6.3) years, 60% female (nIG = 73, nCG = 68)] participated. Following intervention, the IG showed significantly more improvement in four out of five assessed communication skills: 'reacting to emotions and showing empathy', 'pointing out opportunities and giving hope', 'addressing the EoL' and 'explaining the concept of PC'. IG participants also improved more than CG participants in almost all secondary outcomes assessed by participants and SPs: oncologists' self-efficacy, attitudes towards caring for terminally ill patients, communication strategies and confidence in dealing with PC/EoL-related issues as well as communication quality from the SPs' perspective. CONCLUSION Findings indicate that the compact communication skills training PALLI-COM increases oncologists' competencies in early addressing PC/EoL-related issues from different perspectives. Implementation in routine oncology residency might improve advanced cancer care by strengthening these communication skills.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N. Harnischfeger
- Palliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany,Correspondence to: Nele Harnischfeger, Palliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany
| | - H.M. Rath
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - B. Alt-Epping
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany,Department of Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - H. Brand
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Campus Kiel, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - K. Haller
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité – University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - A. Letsch
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Campus Kiel, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany,Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité – University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - N. Rieder
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany,Department of Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - P. Thuss-Patience
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Cancer Immunology, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité – University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - C. Bokemeyer
- Palliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - C. Bergelt
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany,Department of Medical Psychology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| | - K. Oechsle
- Palliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bryant J, Hobden B, Waller A, Sanson-Fisher R, Shepherd J. Oncology nurse perceptions about life expectancy discussions: a cross-sectional study exploring what patients want to know, and why doctors don't disclose. Contemp Nurse 2022; 58:424-434. [PMID: 36373372 DOI: 10.1080/10376178.2022.2147848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background: Sensitive and patient-centred discussion about life expectancy has clear benefits for patients with advanced cancer and their families. The perceptions of oncology nurses about disclosure of life expectancy, and the barriers to disclosure, have rarely been explored. Objectives/Aims/Hypotheses: To examine oncology nurses' perceptions of the: (1) proportion of patients with advanced cancer who want, receive and understand estimates of life expectancy; (2) reasons why doctors may not provide estimates of life expectancy. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Methods: Australian oncology nurses who were members of a professional society or worked at a participating metropolitan cancer centre were emailed a link to an anonymous online survey. Participants provided socio-demographic characteristics and their perceptions about the proportion of patients with advanced cancer who (a) want, (b) are provided with, (c) receive and (d) understand estimates of life expectancy, as well as the reasons estimates of life expectancy may not be provided. Results: A total of 104 nurses participated. While 51% of nurses perceived that most patients (>75%) want to be provided with an estimate of their life expectancy, 63% of nurses reported that <50% of patients were provided with an estimate. Further, 85% of nurses indicated that <50% of patients understand the estimate. The most frequent reason nurses perceived doctors did not provide an estimate of life expectancy was because the doctor didn't have an accurate idea of life expectancy (80.8%). Almost one-fifth of nurses (18.3%) thought that doctors did not provide estimates because they felt it was not their responsibility to do so. Conclusions: Strategies to ensure a patient-centred approach to life expectancy discussions with patients with advanced cancer are urgently needed. Impact statement: Oncology nurses perceive that many patients with advanced cancer are not provided with an accurate estimate of their life expectancy and few understand the information provided to them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamie Bryant
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Equity in Health and Wellbeing Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Breanne Hobden
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Equity in Health and Wellbeing Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Amy Waller
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Equity in Health and Wellbeing Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Rob Sanson-Fisher
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.,Equity in Health and Wellbeing Program, Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, Australia
| | - Jan Shepherd
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
van der Velden NCA, van Laarhoven HWM, Burgers SA, Hendriks LEL, de Vos FYFL, Dingemans AMC, Jansen J, van Haarst JMW, Dits J, Smets EM, Henselmans I. Characteristics of patients with advanced cancer preferring not to know prognosis: a multicenter survey study. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:941. [PMID: 36050628 PMCID: PMC9434918 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09911-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background For some patients with advanced cancer not knowing prognosis is essential. Yet, in an era of informed decision-making, the potential protective function of unawareness is easily overlooked. We aimed to investigate 1) the proportion of advanced cancer patients preferring not to know prognosis; 2) the reasons underlying patients’ prognostic information preference; 3) the characteristics associated with patients’ prognostic information preference; and 4) the concordance between physicians’ perceived and patients’ actual prognostic information preference. Methods This is a cross-sectional study with structured surveys (PROSPECT). Medical and thoracic oncologists included patients (n = 524), from seven Dutch hospitals, with metastatic/inoperable cancer and an expected median overall survival of ≤ 12 months. For analysis, descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were used. Results Twenty-five to 31% of patients preferred not to know a general life expectancy estimate or the 5/2/1-year mortality risk. Compared to patients preferring to know prognosis, patients preferring unawareness more often reported optimism, avoidance and inability to comprehend information as reasons for wanting limited information; and less often reported expectations of others, anxiety, autonomy and a sense of control as reasons for wanting complete information. Females (p < .05), patients receiving a further line of systemic treatment (p < .01) and patients with strong fighting spirit (p < .001) were more likely to prefer not to know prognosis. Concordance between physicians’ perceived and patients’ actual prognostic information preference was poor (kappa = 0.07). Conclusions We encourage physicians to explore patients’ prognostic information preferences and the underlying reasons explicitly, enabling individually tailored communication. Future studies may investigate changes in patients’ prognostic information preferences over time and examine the impact of prognostic disclosure on patients who prefer unawareness. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09911-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naomi C A van der Velden
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sjaak A Burgers
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Ziekenhuis, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lizza E L Hendriks
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Filip Y F L de Vos
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anne-Marie C Dingemans
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost Jansen
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Maarten W van Haarst
- Department of Respiratory Medicine and Department of Surgery, Tergooi Ziekenhuis, Hilversum, The Netherlands
| | - Joyce Dits
- Department of Pulmonology, Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen Ma Smets
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Inge Henselmans
- Department of Medical Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Martin P. Clinical communication: A core clinical skill that underpins quality cancer care. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2022; 9:100067. [PMID: 35634134 PMCID: PMC9136267 DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2022.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2022] [Accepted: 04/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Martin
- Clinical Communication and End-of-Life Care, School of Medicine, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
- Centre for Organisational Change in Person-Centred Healthcare, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Walker L, Sivell S. Breaking bad news in a cross-language context: A qualitative study to develop a set of culturally and linguistically appropriate phrases and techniques with Zulu speaking cancer patients. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2022; 105:2081-2088. [PMID: 35193783 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2020] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Breaking bad news (BBN) in healthcare is common. Guidelines abound but little is documented in an African context. We wanted to describe Zulu speaking patients' BBN experience and assess their opinions of internationally recommended techniques. METHODS BBN techniques were highlighted from the literature using systematic review methods. Semi-structured focus group interviews with Zulu speaking cancer patients were conducted. Data were analysed using Framework Analysis. RESULTS Language concordance was central - regardless of whether this necessitated a nurse acting as translator. While non-abandonment, empathy and maintenance of hope was valued by participants, an oft-expressed belief in positive outcomes accounted for mixed responses to phrases implying ambiguity. In contrast, "I wish" phrases were appreciated. Silence received mixed responses with a strong dislike for silence as a front for non-disclosure. CONCLUSION Language-related concerns dictated the bulk of participants BBN perspectives. While cultural and linguistic differences exist, good communication skills, empathy and the maintenance of hope remain central. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS BBN in a language in which the patient is fluent, whether mediated or not, should be the standard of care. Cultural and linguistic variance must be born in mind and clinicians should become familiar with the preferences of the communities they serve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Walker
- Cardiff University, Wales, UK; Greys Hospital, Private Bag 9001, Pietermaritzburg 3200, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa.
| | - Stephanie Sivell
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Wales, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Harnischfeger N, Rath HM, Oechsle K, Bergelt C. Addressing palliative care and end-of-life issues in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review of communication interventions for physicians not specialised in palliative care. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e059652. [PMID: 35715185 PMCID: PMC9207918 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify and summarise evaluated interventions aiming to improve the communication of palliative care (PC) and end-of-life (EoL) issues in physicians caring for cancer patients. Such interventions are needed with regard to the aim of an earlier communication of those issues in oncology daily practice, which is associated with a range of benefits for patients and caregivers but is often impeded by physicians' communication insecurities. DESIGN Systematic review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. DATA SOURCES Relevant publications were systematically searched in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science databases in September 2020 with an update in July 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We included publications reporting a quantitative evaluation of a communication intervention on one or more PC/EoL issues with a communication-related main outcome. Target group had to be physicians caring for cancer patients non-specialist in PC. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two independent raters extracted intervention characteristics, publication characteristics and publication quality. Results were narratively synthesised. RESULTS 24 publications reporting 22 interventions were included. 13 publications reported randomised controlled trials. A majority of the interventions addressed one specific PC/EoL issue, most often breaking bad news. Teaching strategies mostly involved role-plays. Target group were mainly oncologists. In addition to self-reported outcome measurements for evaluation, most publications also reported the use of external rating data. All but one publication reported significant intervention effects on at least one outcome parameter. Publication quality was overall moderate. CONCLUSIONS The empirically tested communication interventions on PC/EoL issues seem to effectively improve physicians' communication. Future interventions should focus on other issues than breaking bad news, such as preparing for the future. Target group should also be organ-specific oncologists, as all primary caring physicians are responsible for timely communication. Our risk-of-bias assessment revealed some weaknesses, indicating that more high-quality studies for evaluation are needed. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020191054.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nele Harnischfeger
- Palliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hilke M Rath
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Karin Oechsle
- Palliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Corinna Bergelt
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bloom JR, Marshall DC, Rodriguez-Russo C, Martin E, Jones JA, Dharmarajan KV. Prognostic disclosure in oncology - current communication models: a scoping review. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2022; 12:167-177. [PMID: 35144938 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 01/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prognostic disclosure is essential to informed decision making in oncology, yet many oncologists are unsure how to successfully facilitate this discussion. This scoping review determines what prognostic communication models exist, compares and contrasts these models, and explores the supporting evidence. METHOD A protocol was created for this study using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Protocols extension for Scoping Reviews. Comprehensive literature searches of electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and Cochrane CENTRAL were executed to identify relevant publications between 1971 and 2020. RESULTS In total, 1532 articles were identified, of which 78 met inclusion criteria and contained 5 communication models. Three of these have been validated in randomised controlled trials (the Serious Illness Conversation Guide, the Four Habits Model and the ADAPT acronym) and have demonstrated improved objective communication measures and patient reported outcomes. All three models emphasise the importance of exploring patients' illness understanding and treatment preferences, communicating prognosis and responding to emotion. CONCLUSION Communicating prognostic estimates is a core competency skill in advanced cancer care. This scoping review highlights available communication models and identifies areas in need of further assessment. Such areas include how to maintain learnt communication skills for lifelong practice, how to assess patient and caregiver understanding during and after these conversations, and how to best scale these protocols at the institutional and national levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Rachel Bloom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | | | - Carlos Rodriguez-Russo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Emily Martin
- Palliative Care Program, Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Joshua Adam Jones
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Kavita Vyas Dharmarajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Verhoef MJ, de Nijs E, Sweep B, Warmerdam-Vergroesen D, Horeweg N, Pieterse A, van der Steen J, van der Linden Y. Non-specialist palliative care - question prompt list preparation: patient, family and clinician experiences. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2022:bmjspcare-2021-003035. [PMID: 35144937 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Question prompt lists (QPLs) support patients and family to ask questions they consider important during conversations with clinicians. We aimed to evaluate how a QPL developed for specialist palliative care is used during consultations and is perceived by patients and family, and how non-specialist clinicians would use the QPL. We further developed the QPL using these perspectives. METHODS The QPL is part of a conversation guide on palliative care. Patients and family were asked to select topics and questions before consultation with a palliative care consultant. This qualitative study (2016-2018) included 18 interviews with patients and family who had used the QPL, 17 interviews with non-specialist clinicians and 32 audiotaped consultations with palliative care consultants. The data were analysed thematically and iteratively to adjust the QPL accordingly. RESULTS All participants considered the QPL elaborate, but recommended keeping all content. Patients and family found that it helps to structure thoughts, ask questions and regain a sense of control. They also felt the QPL could support them in gathering information. Although it could evoke strong emotions, their real challenge was being in the palliative phase. Clinicians considered the QPL especially helpful as an overview of possible discussion topics. During audiotaped consultations, topics other than those selected were also addressed. CONCLUSION By using the QPL, patients and family felt empowered to express their information needs. Its use may not be as unsettling as clinicians assume. Nevertheless, clinicians who hand out the QPL should introduce the QPL properly to optimise its use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary-Joanne Verhoef
- Center of Expertise in Palliative Care, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen de Nijs
- Center of Expertise in Palliative Care, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Boudewijn Sweep
- Center of Expertise in Palliative Care, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Desirée Warmerdam-Vergroesen
- Center of Expertise in Palliative Care, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Nanda Horeweg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Arwen Pieterse
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| | - Jenny van der Steen
- Public Health and Primary Care, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
- Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Gelderland, The Netherlands
| | - Yvette van der Linden
- Center of Expertise in Palliative Care, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Brédart A, Rault A, Terrasson J, Seigneur E, De Koning L, Hess E, Savignoni A, Cottu P, Pierga JY, Piperno-Neumann S, Rodrigues M, Bouleuc C, Dolbeault S. Helping Patients Communicate With Oncologists When Cancer Treatment Resistance Occurs to Develop, Test, and Implement a Patient Communication Aid: Sequential Collaborative Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Res Protoc 2022; 11:e26414. [PMID: 35019850 PMCID: PMC8792782 DOI: 10.2196/26414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most cancer-related deaths result from disseminated diseases that develop resistance to anticancer treatments. Inappropriate communication in this challenging situation may result in unmet patient information and support needs. Patient communication aids such as question prompt lists (QPLs) may help. OBJECTIVE This study aims to develop and pilot-test a specific QPL in the following two contrasting clinical contexts in France after cancer resistance has developed: triple-negative and luminal B metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and metastatic uveal melanoma (MUM). METHODS A sequential study design with a mixed methods collaborative approach will be applied. The first step aims to build a specific QPL. Step 1a will explore oncologist-patient communication issues from oncology professionals' interviews (n=20 approximately). Step 1b will appraise information and support needs experienced by patients with MBC or MUM both quantitatively (n=80) and qualitatively (n=40 approximately). These data will be used to develop and pilot-test a QPL specific to patients with cancer experiencing initial or acquired resistance to treatment. We expect to obtain a core QPL that comprises questions and concerns commonly expressed by patients with resistant cancer and is complemented by specific issues for either MBC or MUM cancer sites. In step 1c, 2 focus groups of patients with any type of metastatic cancer (n=4) and health care professionals (n=4) will be conducted to revise the content of a preliminary QPL and elaborate an acceptable and feasible clinical implementation. In step 1d, the content of the QPL version 1 and implementation guidance will be validated using a Delphi process. Step 2 will pilot-test the QPL version 1 in real practice with patients with MBC or MUM (n=80). Clinical utility will be assessed by comparing responses to questionnaires administered in step 1b (QPL-naive historical control group) and step 2 (QPL intervention group). RESULTS This study received grants in March and December 2019 and was approved by the French national ethics committee in July 2019. As of October 2021, interviews with oncology professionals have been conducted and analyzed (N=26 to reach saturation), and 39 and 27 patients with MBC and MUM, respectively, have been recruited. CONCLUSIONS A clinically and culturally tailored QPL is expected to facilitate patients' participation in consultations, improve oncologists' responses to patients' information and support needs, and thus foster patients' psychological adjustment to the diagnosis and follow-up of cancer resistance to treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04118062; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04118062. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/26414.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Brédart
- Psycho-Oncology Unit, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres Research University, Paris, France.,Psychopathology and Health Process, Paris University, Boulogne Billancourt, France
| | - Aude Rault
- Psycho-Oncology Unit, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres Research University, Paris, France
| | - Johanna Terrasson
- Psycho-Oncology Unit, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres Research University, Paris, France
| | - Etienne Seigneur
- Psycho-Oncology Unit, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres Research University, Paris, France
| | - Leanne De Koning
- Research Centre, Paris Sciences et Lettres Research University, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Elisabeth Hess
- Research Centre, Paris Sciences et Lettres Research University, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Alexia Savignoni
- Direction Recherche Ensemble Hospitalier, Data Management Unit, Biometry Department, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - Paul Cottu
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Yves Pierga
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Curie, Paris, France.,Faculty of medicine, Paris University, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Carole Bouleuc
- Département Interdisciplinaire de Soins de Support pour le Patient en Oncologie, Department of Supportive Care, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Sylvie Dolbeault
- Psycho-Oncology Unit, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences et Lettres Research University, Paris, France.,Research Centre in Epidemiology and Population Health (CESP), INSERM, U1018, University Paris-Sud, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Edwards WF, Malik S, Peters J, Chippendale I, Ravits J. Delivering Bad News in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Proposal of Specific Technique ALS ALLOW. Neurol Clin Pract 2022; 11:521-526. [PMID: 34992959 DOI: 10.1212/cpj.0000000000000957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2019] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Purpose of Review Physician communication skills are a critical part of care for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients and caregivers. They shape the development of autonomy and quality of life, and they mitigate emotional trauma. Communication skills are especially critical at 2 different time points in the course of the disease: early when delivering and establishing the diagnosis, and later when clarifying goals of care. Recent Findings Several techniques for physician communication of difficult information are available, including SPIKES (Setting up the interview, assessing the patient's Perception, obtaining the patient's Invitation, giving Knowledge and information to the patient, addressing the patient's Emotions with Empathetic responses, and Strategy and Summary), ABCDE (Advance preparation, Build a therapeutic environment/relationship, Communicate well, Deal with patient and family reactions, Encourage and validate emotions), and BREAKS (Background, Rapport, Exploring, Announce, Kindling, Summarize). These emphasize the physician's accountability and responsibility for communicating effectively. Formal training in these techniques is limited, and their applicability specifically to ALS is inexact. Summary We propose an ALS-specific technique which we call ALS ALLOW to guide physicians in conducting difficult communications with ALS patients and caregivers to develop their understanding, establish autonomy, set goals, and mitigate emotional trauma. The techniques are useful in discussions both early and late stages in the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wesleigh F Edwards
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine (WFE, SM, JP, IC, JR); Department of Internal Medicine (WFE), Scripps Green Hospital and Clinic, La Jolla, CA; Cooper Medical School of Rowan University (SM), Camden, NJ; Department of Neurosciences (JP, JR), University of California, San Diego; and University of New England College of Osteopathic Medicine (IC), Biddeford, ME
| | - Sahana Malik
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine (WFE, SM, JP, IC, JR); Department of Internal Medicine (WFE), Scripps Green Hospital and Clinic, La Jolla, CA; Cooper Medical School of Rowan University (SM), Camden, NJ; Department of Neurosciences (JP, JR), University of California, San Diego; and University of New England College of Osteopathic Medicine (IC), Biddeford, ME
| | - Jonathan Peters
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine (WFE, SM, JP, IC, JR); Department of Internal Medicine (WFE), Scripps Green Hospital and Clinic, La Jolla, CA; Cooper Medical School of Rowan University (SM), Camden, NJ; Department of Neurosciences (JP, JR), University of California, San Diego; and University of New England College of Osteopathic Medicine (IC), Biddeford, ME
| | - Ivy Chippendale
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine (WFE, SM, JP, IC, JR); Department of Internal Medicine (WFE), Scripps Green Hospital and Clinic, La Jolla, CA; Cooper Medical School of Rowan University (SM), Camden, NJ; Department of Neurosciences (JP, JR), University of California, San Diego; and University of New England College of Osteopathic Medicine (IC), Biddeford, ME
| | - John Ravits
- University of California San Diego School of Medicine (WFE, SM, JP, IC, JR); Department of Internal Medicine (WFE), Scripps Green Hospital and Clinic, La Jolla, CA; Cooper Medical School of Rowan University (SM), Camden, NJ; Department of Neurosciences (JP, JR), University of California, San Diego; and University of New England College of Osteopathic Medicine (IC), Biddeford, ME
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Dementia is a progressive, irreversible illness and leading global cause of death defined by cognitive and subsequent functional decline. Current treatments have limited impact on mortality. In this chapter, we discuss the trajectory of dementia and its variability, markers associated with poorer prognosis (such as poor nutrition, pneumonia, comorbid conditions), the impact of hospitalization on prognosis, and current models of end-of-life palliative care/hospice eligibility (with the use of the Functional Assessment Staging tool and other markers). We then discuss strategies to discuss prognosis with patients and their healthcare proxies using a mental model (Ask, Discover, Anticipate, Provide, Track: ADAPT) and specific skills. Because of progression of dementia variability, prognosis is better discussed in terms of function. For patients with dementia, initiating advance care planning earlier in their disease course allows for more patient involvement (such as to identify a surrogate decision maker).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sinthana U Ramsey
- Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States.
| | - Robert M Arnold
- Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, United States; Palliative and Supportive Institute, UPMC Health System, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Motamedi M, Brandenburg C, Bakhit M, Michaleff ZA, Albarqouni L, Clark J, Ooi M, Bahudin D, Chróinín DN, Cardona M. Concerns and potential improvements in end-of-life care from the perspectives of older patients and informal caregivers: a scoping review. BMC Geriatr 2021; 21:729. [PMID: 34930177 PMCID: PMC8690959 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-021-02680-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Overtreatment in advanced age i.e. aggressive interventions that do not improve survival and are potentially harmful, can impair quality of care near the end of life (EOL). As healthcare provider perspectives on care quality may differ from that of service users, the aim of this study was to explore the views of older patients near EOL or their caregivers about the quality of health care at the EOL based on their lived experience, and to identify healthcare service improvements. Methods Medline and backward citation searches were conducted for qualitative or quantitative studies reported on the views of patients and/or informal caregivers about EOL care quality. Thematic analysis was used to summarise qualitative data (primary analysis); narrative and tabulations were used to summarise quantitative data (secondary analysis). Results Thirty articles met the inclusion criteria. Five main qualitative themes regarding quality care emerged: (1) Effective communication between clinicians and patients/caregivers; (2) Healthcare that values patient preferences and shared decision making; (3) Models of care that support quality of life and death with dignity; (4) Healthcare services that meet patient expectations; and (5) Support for informal caregivers in dealing with EOL challenges. The quantitative articles supported various aspects of the thematic framework. Conclusion The findings of this study show that many of the issues highlighted by patients or bereaved relatives have persisted over the past two decades. There is an urgent need for comprehensive evaluation of care across the healthcare system and targeted redesign of existing EOL care pathways to ensure that care aligns with what patients and informal caregivers consider high-quality patient-centred care at the EOL. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02680-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Motamedi
- Australian Centre for Health Engagement Evidence and Values (ACHEEV), University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - Caitlin Brandenburg
- Allied Health Services, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, QLD, Australia.,Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, QLD, Australia
| | - Mina Bakhit
- Institute for Evidence Based Healthcare (IEBH), Bond University, Robina, QLD, Australia
| | - Zoe A Michaleff
- Institute for Evidence Based Healthcare (IEBH), Bond University, Robina, QLD, Australia
| | - Loai Albarqouni
- Institute for Evidence Based Healthcare (IEBH), Bond University, Robina, QLD, Australia
| | - Justin Clark
- Institute for Evidence Based Healthcare (IEBH), Bond University, Robina, QLD, Australia
| | - Meidelynn Ooi
- Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Danial Bahudin
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, QLD, Australia
| | - Danielle Ní Chróinín
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, NSW, Australia.,South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Magnolia Cardona
- Institute for Evidence Based Healthcare (IEBH), Bond University, Robina, QLD, Australia. .,Bond EBP Professorial Unit, Gold Coast University Hospital, QLD, Southport, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
van Eenennaam RM, Koppenol LS, Kruithof WJ, Kruitwagen-van Reenen ET, Pieters S, van Es MA, van den Berg LH, Visser-Meily JMA, Beelen A. Discussing Personalized Prognosis Empowers Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis to Regain Control over Their Future: A Qualitative Study. Brain Sci 2021; 11:brainsci11121597. [PMID: 34942899 PMCID: PMC8699408 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11121597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
The ENCALS survival prediction model offers patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) the opportunity to receive a personalized prognosis of survival at the time of diagnosis. We explored experiences of patients with ALS, caregivers, and physicians with discussing personalized prognosis through interviews with patients and their caregivers, and in a focus group of physicians. Thematic analysis revealed four themes with seven subthemes; these were recognized by the focus group. First, tailored communication: physician’s communication style and information provision mediated emotional impact and increased satisfaction with communication. Second, personal factors: coping style, illness experiences, and information needs affected patient and caregiver coping with the prognosis. Third, emotional impact ranged from happy and reassuring to regret. Fourth, regaining control over the future: participants found it helpful in looking towards the future, and emphasized the importance of quality over quantity of life. Personalized prognosis can be discussed with minimal adverse emotional impact. How it is communicated—i.e., tailored to individual needs—is as important as what is communicated—i.e., a good or poor prognosis. Discussing personalized prognosis may help patients with ALS and their caregivers regain control over the future and facilitate planning of the future (care). For many patients, quality of life matters more than quantity of time remaining.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Remko M. van Eenennaam
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; (R.M.v.E.); (L.S.K.); (W.J.K.); (E.T.K.-v.R.); (J.M.A.V.-M.)
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Loulou S. Koppenol
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; (R.M.v.E.); (L.S.K.); (W.J.K.); (E.T.K.-v.R.); (J.M.A.V.-M.)
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Willeke J. Kruithof
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; (R.M.v.E.); (L.S.K.); (W.J.K.); (E.T.K.-v.R.); (J.M.A.V.-M.)
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Esther T. Kruitwagen-van Reenen
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; (R.M.v.E.); (L.S.K.); (W.J.K.); (E.T.K.-v.R.); (J.M.A.V.-M.)
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Sotice Pieters
- Basalt Rehabilitation, 2543 SW The Hague, The Netherlands;
| | - Michael A. van Es
- Department of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; (M.A.v.E.); (L.H.v.d.B.)
| | - Leonard H. van den Berg
- Department of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; (M.A.v.E.); (L.H.v.d.B.)
| | - Johanna M. A. Visser-Meily
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; (R.M.v.E.); (L.S.K.); (W.J.K.); (E.T.K.-v.R.); (J.M.A.V.-M.)
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Anita Beelen
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands; (R.M.v.E.); (L.S.K.); (W.J.K.); (E.T.K.-v.R.); (J.M.A.V.-M.)
- Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +31-638-555-078
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Wallace RA. Palliative care for adults with intellectual disability. Intern Med J 2021; 51:1963-1968. [PMID: 34796628 DOI: 10.1111/imj.15577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Revised: 05/28/2021] [Accepted: 06/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Contemporary disability principles and values suggest that adults with intellectual disability should be able to access and participate in any mainstream service rather than having a separate service for them. In the case of healthcare services, achievement of optimal access to and participation in healthcare by adults with intellectual disability requires the presence of both adequate disability supports for the person and reasonable adjustments to generic health systems to enable a person-centred approach to care. Development of an interface between people with lived experience of intellectual disability, disability and health sectors help clarify the required nature of disability supports and types of adjustments to mainstream health services. The article describes a case study of an adult with intellectual disability with a serious illness warranting palliative care, and focusses on the reasonable adjustments to mainstream core palliative care principles for adults with intellectual disability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robyn A Wallace
- Department of Internal Medicine, Calvary Lenah Valley Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Cardona M, Dobler CC, Koreshe E, Heyland DK, Nguyen RH, Sim JPY, Clark J, Psirides A. A catalogue of tools and variables from crisis and routine care to support decision-making about allocation of intensive care beds and ventilator treatment during pandemics: Scoping review. J Crit Care 2021; 66:33-43. [PMID: 34438132 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Revised: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This scoping review sought to identify objective factors to assist clinicians and policy-makers in making consistent, objective and ethically sound decisions about resource allocation when healthcare rationing is inevitable. MATERIALS AND METHODS Review of guidelines and tools used in ICUs, hospital wards and emergency departments on how to best allocate intensive care beds and ventilators either during routine care or developed during previous epidemics, and association with patient outcomes during and after hospitalisation. RESULTS Eighty publications from 20 countries reporting accuracy or validity of prognostic tools/algorithms, or significant correlation between prognostic variables and clinical outcomes met our eligibility criteria: twelve pandemic guidelines/triage protocols/consensus statements, twenty-two pandemic algorithms, and 46 prognostic tools/variables from non-crisis situations. Prognostic indicators presented here can be combined to create locally-relevant triage algorithms for clinicians and policy makers deciding about allocation of ICU beds and ventilators during a pandemic. No consensus was found on the ethical issues to incorporate in the decision to admit or triage out of intensive care. CONCLUSIONS This review provides a unique reference intended as a discussion starter for clinicians and policy makers to consider formalising an objective a locally-relevant triage consensus document that enhances confidence in decision-making during healthcare rationing of critical care and ventilator resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magnolia Cardona
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia; Gold Coast University Hospital Evidence-Based Practice Professorial Unit, Southport, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Claudia C Dobler
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia; Evidence-Based Practice Center, Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, MN, USA; The University of New South Wales, South Western Sydney Clinical School, NSW, Australia
| | - Eyza Koreshe
- InsideOut Institute, Central Clinical School, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Daren K Heyland
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rebecca H Nguyen
- The University of New South Wales, South Western Sydney Clinical School, NSW, Australia
| | - Joan P Y Sim
- The University of New South Wales, South Western Sydney Clinical School, NSW, Australia
| | - Justin Clark
- Institute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Bond University Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Alex Psirides
- Intensive Care Unit, Wellington Regional Hospital, Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Chen JO, Chang SC, Lin CC. The development and pilot testing of an ACP simulation-based communication-training program: Feasibility and acceptability. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0254982. [PMID: 34428209 PMCID: PMC8384223 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The lack of knowledge of advance care planning and training of communication skills among nurses in Taiwan is one of the main reasons for the low rate of advance directive signing. However, there is no specific and effective solution to this problem. The purposes of this study were (1) to develop and pilot testing of an advance care planning simulation-based communication training program and (2) to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of the program. This study was conducted in three phases. Phase 1: Developing an advance care planning simulation-based communication training program; Phase 2: Conducting a pilot test; Phase 3: Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of the program. Twelve convenient participants from a medical center in central Taiwan were selected. The participants believed that team-based learning was beneficial for several reasons. First, it helped to clarify the participants’ understanding of advance care planning and improve their communication skills. Second, role-playing, as one of the components, was helpful for discovering their own shortcomings in communication skills while debriefing enabled them to identify their blind spots in the communication process. Finally, the reflection log documented their weekly performance so they were able to reflect upon their weekly performance, improve their performance, and become more confident. All twelve participants signed the consent form and completed the whole training program. The participants were satisfied with the program, affirming that the timing and content of the program were appropriate and that the expected learning outcomes could be achieved. According to participant feedback, the program was beneficial in improving their knowledge of advance care planning and confidence in communication. Thus, it is feasible and acceptable to introduce communication of advance care planning programs into the staff training protocols of healthcare organizations. Clinical trial registration:NCT04312295.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jui-O Chen
- Department of Nursing, Tajen University, Pingtung County, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- College of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Chen Chang
- Department of Nursing, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Dayeh University, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Chiu-Chu Lin
- School of Nursing, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Renal Care, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Research, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Welsch K, Gottschling S. Wishes and Needs at the End of Life. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2021; 118:303-312. [PMID: 34180804 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2020] [Revised: 09/19/2020] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Managing the last phase of life properly, i.e., taking care that a patient's wishes are respected at the end of life and beyond, is very important and can relieve the patient and his or her family of unnecessary burdens. METHODS This review is based on guidelines, reviews, meta-analyses, selected publications, and the authors' own experiences from everyday clinical practice. RESULTS Most patients want frank information from their physicians about their condition at all times over the course of their treatment, from the moment of diagnosis to the end of their life. This has no lasting adverse effects, but rather enables patients to take decisions that are appropriate to their stage of disease. Early integration in palliative care can improve patients' quality of life, symptom control, and mood. In helping to manage the last phase of life, the physician often serves as a provider of impulses, or else determines which other types of professional should counsel or support the patient. Patients should be enabled to issue directives that reflect their wishes, as well as to choose representatives who are allowed to speak for them. Consideration should also be given to the patient's emotional legacy, e.g., letters or video messages with personal content. CONCLUSION In the care of patients with life-limiting diseases, more attention should be paid to the management of the last phase of life. Palliative-care physicians can take over this task from other medical disciplines, and early integration in palliative care is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katja Welsch
- Centre of Palliative Care and Pediatric Pain, Saarland University Medical Center and Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, Homburg/Saar
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Genuis SK, Luth W, Campbell S, Bubela T, Johnston WS. Communication About End of Life for Patients Living With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: A Scoping Review of the Empirical Evidence. Front Neurol 2021; 12:683197. [PMID: 34421792 PMCID: PMC8371472 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.683197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Accepted: 07/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Communication about end of life, including advance care planning, life-sustaining therapies, palliative care, and end-of-life options, is critical for the clinical management of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients. The empirical evidence base for this communication has not been systematically examined. Objective: To support evidence-based communication guidance by (1) analyzing the scope and nature of research on health communication about end of life for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; and (2) summarizing resultant recommendations. Methods: A scoping review of empirical literature was conducted following recommended practices. Fifteen health-related and three legal databases were searched; 296 articles were screened for inclusion/exclusion criteria; and quantitative data extraction and analysis was conducted on 211 articles with qualitative analysis on a subset of 110 articles that focused primarily on health communication. Analyses summarized article characteristics, themes, and recommendations. Results: Analysis indicated a multidisciplinary but limited evidence base. Most reviewed articles addressed end-of-life communication as a peripheral focus of investigation. Generic communication skills are important; however, substantive and sufficient disease-related information, including symptom management and assistive devices, is critical to discussions about end of life. Few articles discussed communication about specific end-of-life options. Communication recommendations in analyzed articles draw attention to communication processes, style and content but lack the systematized guidance needed for clinical practice. Conclusions: This review of primary research articles highlights the limited evidence-base and consequent need for systematic, empirical investigation to inform effective communication about end of life for those with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. This will provide a foundation for actionable, evidence-based communication guidelines about end of life. Implications for research, policy, and practice are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shelagh K. Genuis
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Westerly Luth
- School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Sandra Campbell
- John W. Scott Health Sciences Library, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Tania Bubela
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada
| | - Wendy S. Johnston
- Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Olsson MM, Windsor C, Chambers S, Green TL. A Scoping Review of End-of-Life Communication in International Palliative Care Guidelines for Acute Care Settings. J Pain Symptom Manage 2021; 62:425-437.e2. [PMID: 33276045 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.11.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2020] [Revised: 11/22/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT End-of-life communication in acute care settings can be challenging and many patients and families have reported low satisfaction with those conversations. OBJECTIVE To explore existing guidelines around palliative care to increase current understanding of end-of-life communication processes applicable to the acute care setting. METHODS A scoping review following the method of Arksey and O'Malley was undertaken to identify eligible documents and thematically summarize findings. Web sites of government authorities, departments, and ministries of health as well as palliative care organizations were searched as were MEDLINE, CINAHL (EBSCOhost), EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Joanna Briggs Institute, and PsycINFO databases. Searches were limited to documents published between January 2009 and August 2019 that were nondisease specific and applicable to the acute care setting. RESULTS Thirteen guidelines from nine different countries were identified. Thematic analysis produced eight themes: 1) The purpose and process of end-of-life communications, 2) cognitive understanding and language in end-of-life communication, 3) legal aspects of end-of-life communication, 4) conflicts and barriers related to end-of-life care, 5) end-of-life communication related to medical record documentation, 6) healthcare professionals' responsibilities and collaboration, 7) education and training, and 8) policies, guidelines, and tools for end-of-life communications. CONCLUSIONS Palliative and end-of-life guidelines applicable to acute care settings outline the purpose of end-of-life communication and address how, when, and by whom such conversations are best initiated and facilitated. How guidelines are developed and what aspects of communications are included and emphasized may differ across countries related to role differences of physicians and nurses and national laws and regulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maja Magdalena Olsson
- Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
| | - Carol Windsor
- Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Shirley Chambers
- Centre for Healthcare Transformation, School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Cancer & Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Theresa L Green
- Faculty of Health & Behavioural Sciences, School of Nursing, Midwifery & Social Work, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Metro North Hospital & Health Service, Surgical Treatment & Rehabilitation Service, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zhang X, Jeong SYS, Chan S. Advance care planning for older people in mainland China: An integrative literature review. Int J Older People Nurs 2021; 16:e12409. [PMID: 34291574 DOI: 10.1111/opn.12409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2020] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, the attempts to promote advance care planning (ACP) and advance directives (ADs) have appeared in mainland China. However, anecdotal evidence suggests that the concept of ACP and ADs is not widely known to the public and healthcare professionals. AIM To examine and synthesise currently available research about ACP and ADs for older people in mainland China, and to discuss implications for future nursing practice and research. DESIGN An integrative literature review. METHODS A systematic search was conducted in seven English electronic databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, ProQuest, Cochrane, JBI, Scopus and Wiley) and four Chinese electronic databases (CNKI, Wanfang, VIP and CBM). Eligible articles were critically appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). FINDINGS From various groups including older people, families and healthcare professionals, low levels of knowledge and awareness about ACP and ADs are reported. Demographic characteristics such as age, gender, education and clinical conditions were related to positive or negative attitude towards ACP. The main reason people cited for being 'reluctant/fairly reluctant' to make an AD was that they were 'Not familiar with it'. CONCLUSIONS Given that older people showed positive attitudes towards ACP, policy support and practice guidelines about ADs and ACP are necessary to respect their wishes and to guide healthcare professionals in mainland China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuan Zhang
- School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fujian, China
| | - Sarah Yeun-Sim Jeong
- The School of Nursing & Midwifery, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| | - Sally Chan
- The School of Nursing & Midwifery, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Perceptions of healthcare professionals towards palliative care in internal medicine wards: a cross-sectional survey. BMC Palliat Care 2021; 20:101. [PMID: 34193142 PMCID: PMC8247075 DOI: 10.1186/s12904-021-00787-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The extension of palliative care services to meet the needs of patients with chronic non-malignant life-limiting conditions faces misconceptions amongst healthcare professionals. A study of prevailing perceptions of healthcare professionals on this wider palliative care service was thus conducted to identify current obstacles, guide the education of local healthcare professionals and improve service accessibility. Methods A cross-sectional study was carried out at the Singapore General Hospital. An anonymised and close-ended online questionnaire was disseminated to 120 physicians and 500 nurses in the Department of Internal Medicine. The online survey tool focused on participant demographics; perceptions of palliative care and its perceived benefits; roles and indications; and attitudes and behaviours towards palliative care referrals. Results Forty four physicians and 156 nurses suggested that care of terminally ill patients with chronic non-malignant life-limiting conditions are compromised by concerns over the role of palliative care in non-cancer care and lapses in their prognostication and communication skills. Respondents also raised concerns about their ability to confront sociocultural issues and introduce palliative care services to patients and their families. Conclusions Gaps in understanding and the ability of nurses and physicians to communicate end of life issues, introduce palliative care services to patients and their families and confront sociocultural issues suggest the need for a longitudinal training program. With similar concerns likely prevalent in other clinical settings within this island nation, a concerted national education program targeting obstacles surrounding effective palliative care should be considered.
Collapse
|
32
|
Lewis ET, Hammill KA, Ticehurst M, Turner RM, Greenaway S, Hillman K, Carlini J, Cardona M. How Do Patients with Life-Limiting Illness and Caregivers Want End-Of-Life Prognostic Information Delivered? A Pilot Study. Healthcare (Basel) 2021; 9:healthcare9070784. [PMID: 34206435 PMCID: PMC8303293 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9070784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Revised: 06/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
We aimed to identify the level of prognostic disclosure, type of prognostic information and delivery format of prognostic communication that older adults diagnosed with a life-limiting illness or caregivers prefer to receive. We developed and pilot tested an open-ended survey to 15 older patients and caregivers who had experience in health services for life-limiting illness either for a relative, friend or themselves. Five hypothetical clinical scenarios of prognostic options were presented to ascertain preferences. The preferred format to receive prognostic information was verbal delivery by the clinician with a written summary. Photos and videos were less favoured, and a table with numbers/percentages was least preferred. Distress levels to the prognostic scenarios were low, with the exception of a photo. We conclude that older patients/caregivers want end-of-life prognostic information delivered the traditional way, verbally by clinicians. Options to deliver prognostic information may vary across patient groups but empower clinicians in introducing end-of-life discussions with patients/caregivers. Our study illustrates the feasibility of involving terminal patients and caregivers in research that contributes to eliciting prognostic preferences. Further research is needed to understand whether the prognostic preferences of hospitalized patients with life-limiting illness differ.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ebony T. Lewis
- School of Population Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia
- School of Psychology, The University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia
- Correspondence:
| | - Kathrine A. Hammill
- School of Science and Health, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown 2560, Australia;
| | - Maree Ticehurst
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool 2170, Australia; (M.T.); (K.H.)
| | - Robin M. Turner
- Biostatistics Unit, Otago Medical School, University of Otago, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand;
| | - Sally Greenaway
- Supportive and Palliative Medicine, Westmead Hospital, Westmead 2145, Australia;
| | - Ken Hillman
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Liverpool 2170, Australia; (M.T.); (K.H.)
- Intensive Care Unit, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool 2170, Australia
| | - Joan Carlini
- Department of Marketing, Griffith University, Southport 4222, Australia;
| | - Magnolia Cardona
- Institute for Evidence Based Healthcare, Bond University, Robina 4226, Australia;
- EBP Professorial Unit, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport 4215, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Pilch M, Lunt V, May P, Mockler D, Thomas S, Doyle F. Facilitators and barriers to stakeholder engagement in advance care planning for older adults in community settings: a hybrid systematic review protocol. HRB Open Res 2021; 3:38. [PMID: 34212126 PMCID: PMC8212429 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13082.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Poor stakeholder engagement in advance care planning (ACP) poses national and international challenges, preventing maximisation of its potential benefits. Conceptualisation of advance care planning as a health behaviour highlights the need to design innovative, evidence-based strategies that will facilitate meaningful end-of-life care decision-making. Aim: To review systematically and synthesise quantitative and qualitative evidence on barriers and facilitators to stakeholders` engagement in ACP for older adults (≥ 50 years old) in a community setting. Methods: A hybrid systematic review will be conducted, identifying studies for consideration in two phases. First, databases will be searched from inception to identify relevant prior systematic reviews, and assess all studies included in those reviews against eligibility criteria (Phase 1). Second, databases will be searched systematically for individual studies falling outside the timeframe of those reviews (Phase 2). A modified SPIDER framework informed eligibility criteria. A study will be considered if it (a) included relevant adult stakeholders; (b) explored engagement in ACP among older adults (≥50 years old); (c) employed any type of design; (d) identified enablers and/or barriers to events specified in the Organising Framework of ACP Outcomes; (e) used either quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods methodology; and (f) evaluated phenomena of interest in a community setting (e.g., primary care or community healthcare centres). Screening, selection, bias assessment, and data extraction will be completed independently by two reviewers. Integrated methodologies will be employed and quantitative and qualitative data will be combined into a single mixed method synthesis. The Behaviour Change Wheel will be used as an overarching analytical framework and to facilitate interpretation of findings. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Reviewers` Manual and PRISMA-P guidelines have been used to inform this protocol development. Registration: This protocol has been submitted for registration on PROSPERO, registration number CRD42020189568 and is awaiting review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Pilch
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, D2, Ireland
| | - Victoria Lunt
- Beaumont Hospital and St Luke's Radiation Oncology Centre at Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Dublin, D9, Ireland
| | - Peter May
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, D2, Ireland
- The Irish Longitudinal study on Ageing (TILDA), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, D2, Ireland
| | - David Mockler
- The Library of Trinity College Dublin, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, D2, Ireland
| | - Stephen Thomas
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, D2, Ireland
| | - Frank Doyle
- Division of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, D2, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Prabhu RA, Salins N, Bharathi, Abraham G. End of Life Care in End-Stage Kidney Disease. Indian J Palliat Care 2021; 27:S37-S42. [PMID: 34188377 PMCID: PMC8191743 DOI: 10.4103/ijpc.ijpc_64_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
There is a rise in burden of end-stage renal disease globally and in India. The symptom burden, prognosis, and mortality in chronic kidney disease closely mimics that of cancer. However, the palliative and end of life care needs of these patients are seldom addressed. A consensus opinion statement was developed outlining the provision of end of life care in end-stage kidney disease. Recognition of medical futility, consensus on medical futility, and cessation of potentially inappropriate therapies and medications are the initial steps in providing end of life care. Conducting a family meeting, communicating prognosis, discussing various treatment modalities, negotiating goals of care, shared decision-making, and discussion and documentation of life sustaining treatment are essential aspects of end of life care provision. The provision of end of life care entails assessment and the management of end-stage kidney disease symptoms and the care extends beyond the death of the patient to their families in the bereavement period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravindra Attur Prabhu
- Department of Nephrology, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Naveen Salins
- Department of Palliative Medicine and Supportive Care, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Bharathi
- Department of Renal Replacement Therapy and Dialysis Technology, Manipal College of Health Professions, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
van der Velden NCA, van der Kleij MBA, Lehmann V, Smets EMA, Stouthard JML, Henselmans I, Hillen MA. Communication about Prognosis during Patient-Initiated Second Opinion Consultations in Advanced Cancer Care: An Observational Qualitative Analysis. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph18115694. [PMID: 34073341 PMCID: PMC8199300 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18115694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2021] [Revised: 05/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Prognostic communication is essential for patients with advanced cancer to enable informed medical decision-making and end-of-life planning. Discussing prognosis is challenging, and might be especially complex for oncologists conducting a second opinion (SO). Survival data are often lacking, and consulting oncologists need to consider previously conveyed information and patients’ relationship with the referring oncologist. We qualitatively investigated how advanced cancer patients and consulting oncologists discuss prognosis during audio-recorded SO consultations (N = 60), including prognostic information received from the referring oncologist. Our results show that patients regularly expressed implicit cues to discuss prognosis or posed explicit questions tentatively. Consulting oncologists were mostly unresponsive to patients’ cues and cautious to prognosticate. They also seemed cautious when patients brought up the referring oncologist. Consulting oncologists checked which prognostic information patients had received from the referring oncologist, before estimating prognosis. They agreed with the first opinion or rectified discrepancies carefully. Altogether, this study exposes missed opportunities for open prognostic discussions in SOs. Consulting oncologists could explicitly explore patients’ information preferences and perceptions of prognosis. If desired, they can provide tailored, independent information to optimise patients’ prognostic awareness and informed medical decision-making. They may additionally support patients in dealing with prognosis and the uncertainties associated with it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N. C. A. van der Velden
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Department of Medical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.B.A.v.d.K.); (V.L.); (E.M.A.S.); (I.H.); (M.A.H.)
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, VU University Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Correspondence:
| | - M. B. A. van der Kleij
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Department of Medical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.B.A.v.d.K.); (V.L.); (E.M.A.S.); (I.H.); (M.A.H.)
| | - V. Lehmann
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Department of Medical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.B.A.v.d.K.); (V.L.); (E.M.A.S.); (I.H.); (M.A.H.)
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, VU University Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E. M. A. Smets
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Department of Medical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.B.A.v.d.K.); (V.L.); (E.M.A.S.); (I.H.); (M.A.H.)
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, VU University Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J. M. L. Stouthard
- Department of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 121, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - I. Henselmans
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Department of Medical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.B.A.v.d.K.); (V.L.); (E.M.A.S.); (I.H.); (M.A.H.)
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, VU University Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. A. Hillen
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Department of Medical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (M.B.A.v.d.K.); (V.L.); (E.M.A.S.); (I.H.); (M.A.H.)
- Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, VU University Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1118, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Brain cancer patient and support persons' experiences of psychosocial care: a mapping of research outputs. Support Care Cancer 2021; 29:5559-5569. [PMID: 33710411 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06071-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with brain cancer and their support persons (SPs) are critical sources of information on the components of care that contribute to psychosocial outcomes. AIMS To determine the proportion of studies that examined (1) at least one of 14 nominated components of psychosocial cancer care and (2) more than one component of care. METHODS Medline, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO and Embase were electronically searched for publications from January 1999 to December 2019. Publications that met the inclusion criteria were coded according to the number and type of psychosocial care components assessed from 14 listed components, and whether patient and/or SPs' views about care were elicited. RESULTS Of the 113 included publications, 61 publications included patient-reported data only (54%), 27 included both patient and SP-reported data (24%) and 25 included SP-reported data only (22%). Most assessed a single component of care (77% of patient-reported and 71% of SP-reported). No publications assessed all 14 components. The "Psychosocial" component was the most frequently assessed component of care for patient-reported (n = 80/88, 91%) and SP-reported publications (n = 46/52, 88%). CONCLUSIONS Publications reporting on psychosocial care in brain cancer present a relatively narrow view of patient and support person experiences. The inclusion of both patient and support person perspectives and the assessment of multiple components of care are required in future research to optimize psychosocial outcomes in brain cancer.
Collapse
|
37
|
Vrdoljak E, Gligorov J, Wierinck L, Conte P, De Grève J, Meunier F, Palmieri C, Travado L, Walker A, Wiseman T, Wuerstlein R, Alba E, Biurrún C, D'Antona R, Sola-Morales O, Ubaysi C, Ventura R, Cardoso F. Addressing disparities and challenges in underserved patient populations with metastatic breast cancer in Europe. Breast 2021; 55:79-90. [PMID: 33360479 PMCID: PMC7772562 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
People with metastatic breast cancer face many challenges and disparities in obtaining optimal cancer care. These challenges are accentuated in underserved patient populations across Europe, who are less likely to receive quality healthcare for reasons including socioeconomic inequalities, educational or cultural status, or geographic location. While there are many local and national initiatives targeted to address these challenges, there remains a need to reduce disparities and improve access to healthcare to improve outcomes, with a focus on multidisciplinary stakeholder engagement. In October 2019, a range of experts in metastatic breast cancer, including healthcare professionals, patient representatives, policymakers and politicians, met to discuss and prioritize the critical needs of underserved patient populations with metastatic breast cancer in Europe. Six key challenges faced by these communities were identified: the need for amplification of the metastatic breast cancer patient voice, better and wider implementation of high-quality guidelines for metastatic breast cancer, more collaboration between stakeholders, tailored support for patients from different cultural and ethnic backgrounds, improved data sharing, and work-related issues. The Expert Panel then conceived and discussed potential actionable goals to address each key challenge. Their conclusions present a set of interrelated approaches to address the different challenges and could serve as the basis for concerted improvement of the lives of patients with metastatic breast cancer in Europe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduard Vrdoljak
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Center Split, School of Medicine, University of Split, Spinčićeva 1, Split, HR-21.000, Croatia.
| | - Joseph Gligorov
- Medical Oncology Department, APHP Tenon, 4 Rue de La Chine, Paris, 75020, France.
| | | | - PierFranco Conte
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padova and Medical Oncology 2, IOV - Istituto Oncologico Veneto I.R.C.C.S., Via Giustiniani 2, Padova, 35124, Italy.
| | - Jacques De Grève
- Departments of Genetics and Oncology, Universitair Ziekenhuis (UZ) Brussel, Campus Jette Laarbeeklaan 101, Brussels, 1090, Belgium.
| | - Françoise Meunier
- Federation of European Academies of Medicine, Rue d' Egmont 11, Brussels, 1000, Belgium.
| | - Carlo Palmieri
- The Clatterbridge Cancer Center NHS Foundation Trust, 66 Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L7 8YA, UK; Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, UK.
| | - Luzia Travado
- Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Av. Brasília, Lisbon, 1400-038, Portugal.
| | - Andrew Walker
- Salus Alba Limited, 20-23 Woodside Place, Glasgow, G3 7QL, United Kingdom.
| | - Theresa Wiseman
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Applied Health Research Department, Fulham Road, London, SW3 6JJ, UK.
| | - Rachel Wuerstlein
- Breast Center, University Hospital Munich (LMU), CCC Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, Munich, D-81377, Germany.
| | - Emilio Alba
- University Hospital Virgen de La Victoria, Campus de Teatinos, S/N, Málaga, 29010, Spain.
| | - Concepción Biurrún
- Federación Española de Cáncer de Mama (FECMA), Carrer de Tusset 32, Barcelona, 08006, Spain.
| | - Rosanna D'Antona
- Europa Donna Italia, Via Conservatorio 15, Milano, 20122, Italy.
| | - Oriol Sola-Morales
- Health Innovation Technology Transfer 'Foundation (FHITT), Aragó 60 Ppal 1a, Barcelona, E-08015, Spain.
| | | | - Roberta Ventura
- ABC Global Alliance, C/o Champalimaud Foundation, Av. Brasília, Lisbon, 1400-038, Portugal.
| | - Fatima Cardoso
- ABC Global Alliance, C/o Champalimaud Foundation, Av. Brasília, Lisbon, 1400-038, Portugal; Breast Unit, Champalimaud Clinical Center/Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Molinari V, Edelstein B, Gibson R, Lind L, Norris M, O'Shea Carney K, Bush SS, Heck AL, Moye J, Gordon BH, Hiroto K. Psychologists in Long-Term Care (PLTC) Guidelines for Psychological and Behavioral Health Services in Long-Term Care Settings. PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2021; 52:34-45. [PMID: 33867651 PMCID: PMC8052097 DOI: 10.1037/pro0000298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
To address concerns about limited training of psychologists working in long-term care (LTC) facilities, the Psychologists in Long-Term Care (PLTC) organization published Standards for Psychological Services in Long-Term Care Facilities (Lichtenberg et al., 1998). The expanding evidence base for knowledge and skills, the increasing diversity of LTC residents, and the complexity of presenting problems have compounded the guidance psychologists need when providing services in this setting. In this article, the PLTC Guidelines Revision Task Force presents PLTC guidelines based on the original prescriptive PLTC Standards. The content of the PLTC Standards was updated and the format changed from prescriptive standards to aspirational guidelines. We begin with general guidelines regarding knowledge and skills in LTC (education and training. understanding of LTC systems. end-of-life care), followed by specific guidelines covering the basic psychological service activities in LTC (referral, assessment, treatment, ethical issues, and advocacy). The PLTC Guidelines are designed to provide direction for psychologists who work, or plan to work, in LTC and to guide continuing education pursuits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Robert Gibson
- Edgemoor Distinct Part Skilled Nursing facility, Santee, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jennifer Moye
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Bedford Massachusetts, and Harvard Medical School
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bouleuc C, Savignoni A, Chevrier M, Renault-Tessier E, Burnod A, Chvetzoff G, Poulain P, Copel L, Cottu P, Pierga JY, Brédart A, Dolbeault S. A Question Prompt List for Advanced Cancer Patients Promoting Advance Care Planning: A French Randomized Trial. J Pain Symptom Manage 2021; 61:331-341.e8. [PMID: 32739563 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.07.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 07/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Advance care planning is essential to enable informed medical decisions to be made and to reduce aggressiveness in end-of-life (EOL) care. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to explore whether a question prompt list (QPL) adapted to French language and culture could promote discussions, particularly on prognosis and EOL issues, among advanced cancer patients attending outpatient palliative care (PC) consultations. METHODS In this multicenter randomized study, patients assigned to the intervention arm received a QPL to help them prepare for the next consultation one month later. The main inclusion criteria were advanced cancer patients referred to the PC team with an estimated life expectancy of less than one year. The primary endpoint was the number of questions raised, globally and by topic. The secondary objectives were the impact of the QPL on psychological symptoms, quality of life, satisfaction with care, and coping styles at two months. RESULTS Patients (n = 71) in the QPL arm asked more questions (mean 21.8 vs. 18.2, P = 0.03) than patients in the control arm (n = 71), particularly on PC (5.6 vs. 3.7, P = 0.012) and EOL issues (2.2 vs. 1, P = 0.018) but not on prognosis (4.3 vs. 3.6, not specified). At two months, there was no change in anxiety, depression, or quality of life in either arm; patient satisfaction with doctors' technical skills was scored higher (P = 0.024), and avoidance coping responses were less frequent (self-distraction, P = 0.015; behavioral disengagement, P = 0.025) in the QPL arm. CONCLUSION Questions on PC and EOL issues in outpatient PC consultations were more frequent, and patient satisfaction was better when a QPL was made available before the consultation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carole Bouleuc
- Supportive Care Department, Institut Curie, Palliative Care Unit, Paris, France; PSL, Paris Sciences Lettre, University Paris, Paris, France.
| | - Alexia Savignoni
- Clinical Research Department, Institut Curie, Biometric Unit, Paris, France; PSL, Paris Sciences Lettre, University Paris, Paris, France
| | - Marion Chevrier
- Clinical Research Department, Institut Curie, Biometric Unit, Paris, France; PSL, Paris Sciences Lettre, University Paris, Paris, France
| | - Evelyne Renault-Tessier
- Supportive Care Department, Institut Curie, Palliative Care Unit, Paris, France; PSL, Paris Sciences Lettre, University Paris, Paris, France
| | - Alexis Burnod
- Supportive Care Department, Institut Curie, Palliative Care Unit, Paris, France; PSL, Paris Sciences Lettre, University Paris, Paris, France
| | | | - Phillipe Poulain
- Palliative Care Department, Polyclinique de l'Ormeau, Tarbes, France
| | - Laure Copel
- Palliative Care Department, Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Paul Cottu
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL, Paris Sciences Lettre, University Paris, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Yves Pierga
- Medical Oncology Department, Institut Curie, Paris, France; PSL, Paris Sciences Lettre, University Paris, Paris, France
| | - Anne Brédart
- Institut Curie, Psycho-Oncology Unit, Paris, France; Institute of Psychology, Paris Descartes University, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Sylvie Dolbeault
- Institut Curie, Psycho-Oncology Unit, Paris, France; CESP, University Paris-Sud, UVSQ, INSERM, University Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hui D, Mo L, Paiva CE. The Importance of Prognostication: Impact of Prognostic Predictions, Disclosures, Awareness, and Acceptance on Patient Outcomes. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2021; 22:12. [PMID: 33432524 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-020-00810-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT In the advanced cancer setting, patients, families, and clinicians are often confronted with an uncertain future regarding treatment outcomes and survival. Greater certainty on what to expect can enhance decision-making for many personal and healthcare issues. Although 70-90% of patients with advanced cancer desire open and honest prognostic disclosure, a small proportion do not want to know. Approximately half of patients with advanced cancer have an inaccurate understanding of their illness, which could negatively impact their decision-making. In this review, we use a conceptual framework to highlight 5 key steps along the prognostic continuum, including (1) prognostic formulation, (2) prognostic disclosure, (3) prognostic awareness, (4) prognostic acceptance, and (5) prognosis-based decision-making. We shall summarize the impact of prognostic predictions, disclosure, awareness, and acceptance on various patient and caregiver outcomes, such as hope, trust, anxiety, depression, chemotherapy use, and care planning. Based on where the patient is at along the prognostic continuum, we propose 5 different subgroups (avoidance: "I don't want to know"; discordant, "I never wanted to know"; anxious, "I don't know what's happening"; concerned, "I don't like this"; acceptance, "I know how to plan ahead"). Although prognostication is not necessarily a linear process, recognizing where the patient is at cognitively and emotionally along the prognostic continuum may allow clinicians to provide personalized interventions, such as specialist palliative care and psychology referral, towards personalizing prognostic disclosure, enhancing prognostic awareness, increasing prognostic acceptance, and supporting decision-making and, ultimately, improving patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Hui
- Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1414 - 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Li Mo
- Department of Palliative Care, Rehabilitation and Integrative Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Unit 1414 - 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.,The Center of Gerontology and Geriatrics, National Clinical Research Center of Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
van Eenennaam RM, Kruithof WJ, van Es MA, Kruitwagen-van Reenen ET, Westeneng HJ, Visser-Meily JMA, van den Berg LH, Beelen A. Discussing personalized prognosis in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: development of a communication guide. BMC Neurol 2020; 20:446. [PMID: 33308184 PMCID: PMC7734773 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-020-02004-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Personalized ENCALS survival prediction model reliably estimates the personalized prognosis of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Concerns were raised on discussing personalized prognosis without causing anxiety and destroying hope. Tailoring communication to patient readiness and patient needs mediates the impact of prognostic disclosure. We developed a communication guide to support physicians in discussing personalized prognosis tailored to individual needs and preferences of people with ALS and their families. METHODS A multidisciplinary working group of neurologists, rehabilitation physicians, and healthcare researchers A) identified relevant topics for guidance, B) conducted a systematic review on needs of patients regarding prognostic discussion in life-limiting disease, C) drafted recommendations based on evidence and expert opinion, and refined and finalized these recommendations in consensus rounds, based on feedback of an expert advisory panel (patients, family member, ethicist, and spiritual counsellor). RESULTS A) Topics identified for guidance were 1) filling in the ENCALS survival model, and interpreting outcomes and uncertainty, and 2) tailoring discussion to individual needs and preferences of patients (information needs, role and needs of family, severe cognitive impairment or frontotemporal dementia, and non-western patients). B) 17 studies were included in the systematic review. C) Consensus procedures on drafted recommendations focused on selection of outcomes, uncertainty about estimated survival, culturally sensitive communication, and lack of decisional capacity. Recommendations for discussing the prognosis include the following: discuss prognosis based on the prognostic groups and their median survival, or, if more precise information is desired, on the interquartile range of the survival probability. Investigate needs and preferences of the patients and their families for prognostic disclosure, regardless of cultural background. If the patient does not want to know their prognosis, with patient permission discuss the prognosis with their family. If the patient is judged to lack decisional capacity, ask the family if they want to discuss the prognosis. Tailor prognostic disclosure step by step, discuss it in terms of time range, and emphasize uncertainty of individual survival time. CONCLUSION This communication guide supports physicians in tailoring discussion of personalized prognosis to the individual needs and preferences of people with ALS and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Remko M van Eenennaam
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Department of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Willeke J Kruithof
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Michael A van Es
- Department of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Esther T Kruitwagen-van Reenen
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Henk-Jan Westeneng
- Department of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna M A Visser-Meily
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Leonard H van den Berg
- Department of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Anita Beelen
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science & Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands. .,Center of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Douglas SL, Daly BJ, Lipson AR, Blackstone E. Association between strong patient-oncologist agreement regarding goals of care and aggressive care at end-of-life for patients with advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer 2020; 28:5139-5146. [PMID: 32060703 PMCID: PMC7426252 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05352-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2019] [Accepted: 02/06/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The ability of oncologists to understand patients' goals of care is recognized as a key component of quality care. The purpose of this study is to examine the influence of patient-oncologist agreement regarding goals of care upon aggressive care at end of life (EOL) for patients with advanced cancer. METHODS Patients with advanced cancer and their oncologists were interviewed at study enrollment and every 3 months thereafter until patient death or end of the study period (15 months). A 100-point visual analogue scale was used to represent goals of care, with quality of life (scored as 0) and survival (scored as 100) as anchors. Strong goal of care agreement for survival was defined as oncologist and patient dyadic goal of care scores that fell between 70 and 100 (100 = highest goal for survival) and for comfort, dyadic goal of care values that fell between 0 and 30 (0 = high goal for comfort). RESULTS Two hundred and six patients and eleven oncologists provided data. At the last interview prior to death, 23.3% of dyads had strong goal of care agreement for either survival (8.3%) or comfort (15%) and 76.7% had no strong agreement. There was a significant association between aggressive care use and categories of dyadic agreement regarding goals of care (p = 0.024, Cramer's V = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS A large percentage of oncologists did not understand their patients' EOL goals of care. While aggressive care aligned with categories of dyadic agreement for goals of care, high rates of aggressive care were reported.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara L Douglas
- RN Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44104, USA.
| | - Barbara J Daly
- RN Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44104, USA
| | - Amy R Lipson
- Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44014, USA
| | - Eric Blackstone
- Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44014, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Deckx L, Thomas HR, Sieben NA, Foster MM, Mitchell GK. General practitioners' practical approach to initiating end-of-life conversations: a qualitative study. Fam Pract 2020; 37:401-405. [PMID: 31786593 PMCID: PMC7448298 DOI: 10.1093/fampra/cmz074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As doctors who provide care across the life-course, general practitioners (GPs) play a key role in initiating timely end-of-life discussions. Nonetheless, these discussions are often not initiated until close to death. Given the ageing of the population, GPs will be confronted with end-of-life care more often, and this needs to become a core skill for all GPs. OBJECTIVE To describe GPs' approach to initiating end-of-life discussions. METHODS Fifteen GPs or GP trainees from South-East Queensland, Australia, were purposively recruited to participate in a semi-structured interview. We analysed transcripts using a thematic analysis. RESULTS GPs' approach to initiating end-of-life discussions was summarized by four themes: (1) Preparing the ground; (2) finding an entry point; (3) tailoring communication and (4) involving the family. CONCLUSIONS Emphasis on the doctor-patient relationship; assessing patient readiness for end-of-life discussions; and sensitive information delivery is consistent with factors previously reported to be important to both GPs and patients in this context. Our findings provide a framework for GPs initiating end-of-life discussions, which must be tailored to patient and GP personality factors. Further research is required to evaluate its outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Deckx
- Primary Care Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia
| | - Hayley R Thomas
- Primary Care Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia
| | - Nicolas A Sieben
- Primary Care Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia
| | - Michele M Foster
- The Hopkins Centre, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Woolloongabba, Australia
| | - Geoffrey K Mitchell
- Primary Care Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Anderson RJ, Stone PC, Low JTS, Bloch S. Managing uncertainty and references to time in prognostic conversations with family members at the end of life: A conversation analytic study. Palliat Med 2020; 34:896-905. [PMID: 32233831 PMCID: PMC7336362 DOI: 10.1177/0269216320910934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND When patients are likely to die in the coming hours or days, families often want prognostic information. Prognostic uncertainty and a lack of end-of-life communication training make these conversations challenging. AIM The objective of this study is to understand how clinicians and the relatives/friends of patients at the very end of life manage uncertainty and reference time in prognostic conversations. DESIGN Conversation analysis of audio-recorded conversations between clinicians and the relatives/friends of hospice inpatients. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS Experienced palliative care clinicians and relatives/friends of imminently dying hospice inpatients. Twenty-three recorded conversations involved prognostic talk and were included in the analysis. RESULTS Requests for prognostic information were initiated by families in the majority of conversations. Clinicians responded using categorical time references such as 'days', allowing the provision of prognostic estimates without giving a precise time. Explicit terms such as 'dying' were rare during prognostic discussions. Instead, references to time were understood as relating to prognosis. Relatives displayed their awareness of prognostic uncertainty when requesting prognostic information, providing clinicians with 'permission' to be uncertain. In response, clinicians often stated their uncertainty explicitly, but presented evidence for their prognostic estimates, based on changes to the patient's function previously discussed with the family. CONCLUSION Prognostic uncertainty was managed collaboratively by clinicians and families. Clinicians were able to provide prognostic estimates while being honest about the related uncertainty, in part because relatives displayed their awareness of uncertainty within their requests. The conversation analytic method identified contributions of both clinicians and families, and identified strategies based on real interactions, which could inform communication training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca J Anderson
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Patrick C Stone
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Joseph T S Low
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
| | - Steven Bloch
- Department of Language and Cognition, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Pilch M, Lunt V, May P, Mockler D, Thomas S, Doyle F. Facilitators and barriers to stakeholder engagement in advance care planning for older adults in community settings: a hybrid systematic review protocol. HRB Open Res 2020; 3:38. [PMID: 34212126 PMCID: PMC8212429 DOI: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13082.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/16/2020] [Indexed: 04/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Poor stakeholder engagement in advance care planning (ACP) poses national and international challenges, preventing maximisation of its potential benefits. Conceptualisation of advance care planning as a health behaviour highlights the need to design innovative, evidence-based strategies that will facilitate meaningful end-of-life care decision-making. Aim: To review systematically and synthesise quantitative and qualitative evidence on barriers and facilitators to stakeholders` engagement in ACP for older adults (≥ 50 years old) in a community setting. Methods: A hybrid systematic review will be conducted, identifying studies for consideration in two phases. First, databases will be searched from inception to identify relevant prior systematic reviews, and assess all studies included in those reviews against eligibility criteria (Phase 1). Second, databases will be searched systematically for individual studies falling outside the timeframe of those reviews (Phase 2). A modified SPIDER framework informed eligibility criteria. A study will be considered if it (a) included relevant adult stakeholders; (b) explored engagement in ACP among older adults (≥50 years old); (c) employed any type of design; (d) identified enablers and/or barriers to events specified in the Organising Framework of ACP Outcomes; (e) used either quantitative, qualitative, or mixed methods methodology; and (f) evaluated phenomena of interest in a community setting (e.g., primary care or community healthcare centres). Screening, selection, bias assessment, and data extraction will be completed independently by two reviewers. Integrated methodologies will be employed and quantitative and qualitative data will be combined into a single mixed method synthesis. The Behaviour Change Wheel will be used as an overarching analytical framework and to facilitate interpretation of findings. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Reviewers` Manual and PRISMA-P guidelines have been used to inform this protocol development. Registration: This protocol has been submitted for registration on PROSPERO and is awaiting review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Pilch
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, D2, Ireland
| | - Victoria Lunt
- Beaumont Hospital and St Luke's Radiation Oncology Centre at Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont Hospital, Beaumont, Dublin, D9, Ireland
| | - Peter May
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, D2, Ireland
- The Irish Longitudinal study on Ageing (TILDA), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, D2, Ireland
| | - David Mockler
- The Library of Trinity College Dublin, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, D2, Ireland
| | - Stephen Thomas
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, University of Dublin, Dublin, D2, Ireland
| | - Frank Doyle
- Division of Population Health Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, D2, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Preferences for life expectancy discussions following diagnosis with a life-threatening illness: a discrete choice experiment. Support Care Cancer 2020; 29:417-425. [PMID: 32383072 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05498-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2019] [Accepted: 04/24/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore in a sample of adult cancer patients: (1) the relative influence of initiation source, information format and consultation format on preferred approach to life expectancy disclosure using a discrete choice experiment (DCE); and (2) whether patient age, cancer type and perceived prognosis were associated with preferences within the three attributes. METHODS A DCE survey of adult solid tumour and haematological cancer patients. Participants chose between three hypothetical scenarios about life expectancy disclosure consisting of three attributes: initiation source (i.e. doctor versus patient-initiated discussion), information content (i.e. estimate presented as best-worst-typical length of life case scenario versus median survival time) and consultation format (i.e. two 20-min versus one 40-min consultation). Respondents selected their most preferred scenario within each question. RESULTS Three hundred and two patients completed the DCE (78% consent rate). Initiation source was the most influential predictor of patient choice. More preferred a doctor deliver life expectancy information as soon as it is available rather than waiting for the patient to ask (59% vs 41% z = - 7.396, p < 0.01). More patients preferred the two 20-min rather than the one 40-min consultation format (55% vs 45%, z = 4.284, p < 0.01). Information content did not influence choice. Age, cancer type, and patient-perceived prognosis were not associated with preferences. CONCLUSION Healthcare professionals should assess cancer patients' preferences for engaging in life expectancy discussions as soon as they have this information, and ensure patients have adequate time to consider the information they receive, seek additional information and involve others if they wish.
Collapse
|
47
|
The Effect of Prognostic Communication on Patient Outcomes in Palliative Cancer Care: a Systematic Review. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2020; 21:40. [PMID: 32328821 PMCID: PMC7181418 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-020-00742-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While prognostic information is considered important for treatment decision-making, physicians struggle to communicate prognosis to advanced cancer patients. This systematic review aimed to offer up-to-date, evidence-based guidance on prognostic communication in palliative oncology. METHODS PubMed and PsycInfo were searched until September 2019 for literature on the association between prognostic disclosure (strategies) and patient outcomes in palliative cancer care, and its moderators. Methodological quality was reported. RESULTS Eighteen studies were included. Concerning prognostic disclosure, results revealed a positive association with patients' prognostic awareness. Findings showed no or positive associations between prognostic disclosure and the physician-patient relationship or the discussion of care preferences. Evidence for an association with the documentation of care preferences or physical outcomes was lacking. Findings on the emotional consequences of prognostic disclosure were multifaceted. Concerning disclosure strategies, affective communication seemingly reduced patients' physiological arousal and improved perceived physician's support. Affective and explicit communication showed no or beneficial effects on patients' psychological well-being and satisfaction. Communicating multiple survival scenarios improved prognostic understanding. Physicians displaying expertise, positivity and collaboration fostered hope. Evidence on demographic, clinical and personality factors moderating the effect of prognostic communication was weak. CONCLUSION If preferred by patients, physicians could disclose prognosis using sensible strategies. The combination of explicit and affective communication, multiple survival scenarios and expert, positive, collaborative behaviour likely benefits most patients. Still, more evidence is needed, and tailoring communication to individual patients is warranted. IMPLICATIONS Future research should examine the effect of prognostic communication on psychological well-being over time and treatment decision-making, and focus on individualising care.
Collapse
|
48
|
Butow PN, Clayton JM, Epstein RM. Prognostic Awareness in Adult Oncology and Palliative Care. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:877-884. [PMID: 32023158 DOI: 10.1200/jco.18.02112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Communicating prognosis clearly and empathically can foster accurate prognostic awareness in patients with advanced cancer and their family members. Whereas patients and doctors desire clear prognostic communication, it presents many challenges in oncologic and palliative care settings. Patients with advanced cancer often have poor prognostic awareness as a result of deficiencies in doctor communication and understandable-and potentially adaptive-attempts by patients and families to reduce the threat of death and maintain hope. Interventions to promote prognostic discussion have largely succeeded in increasing the frequency, but not necessarily the quality, of such discussions, yet have failed to improve prognostic awareness. Because clear communication of prognosis is an ethical mandate, more research is needed to provide an evidence base for teaching and practice in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Josephine M Clayton
- The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Greenwich Hospital, Greenwich, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Ronald M Epstein
- University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Chu C, Anderson R, White N, Stone P. Prognosticating for Adult Patients With Advanced Incurable Cancer: a Needed Oncologist Skill. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2020; 21:5. [PMID: 31950387 PMCID: PMC6965075 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-019-0698-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Patients with advanced cancer and their families commonly seek information about prognosis to aid decision-making in medical (e.g. surrounding treatment), psychological (e.g. saying goodbye), and social (e.g. getting affairs in order) domains. Oncologists therefore have a responsibility to identify and address these requests by formulating and sensitively communicating information about prognosis. Current evidence suggests that clinician predictions are correlated with actual survival but tend to be overestimations. In an attempt to cultivate prognostic skills, it is recommended that clinicians practice formulating and recording subjective estimates of prognosis in advanced cancer patient’s medical notes. When possible, a multi-professional prognostic estimate should be sought as these may be more accurate than individual predictions alone. Clinicians may consider auditing the accuracy of their predictions periodically and using feedback from this process to improve their prognostic skills. Clinicians may also consider using validated prognostic tools to complement their clinical judgements. However, there is currently only limited evidence about the comparative accuracy of different prognostic tools or the extent to which these measures are superior to clinical judgement. Oncologists and palliative care physicians should ensure that they receive adequate training in advanced communication skills, which builds upon their pre-existing skills, to sensitively deliver information on prognosis. In particular, clinicians should acknowledge their own prognostic uncertainty and should emphasise the supportive care that can continue to be provided after stopping cancer-directed therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Chu
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London (UCL), 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Rebecca Anderson
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London (UCL), 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Nicola White
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London (UCL), 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK
| | - Patrick Stone
- Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department, Division of Psychiatry, University College London (UCL), 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Chan CWH, Chow MCM, Chan S, Sanson-Fisher R, Waller A, Lai TTK, Kwan CWM. Nurses' perceptions of and barriers to the optimal end-of-life care in hospitals: A cross-sectional study. J Clin Nurs 2020; 29:1209-1219. [PMID: 31889355 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.15160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2019] [Revised: 11/04/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES To assess nurses' perceptions of what constitutes optimal end-of-life (EOL) care in hospital and evaluate nurses' perceived barriers to EOL care delivery. BACKGROUND Care of dying patients is common in hospitals. However, little is known about the important elements of and barriers to optimal EOL care from key service providers' perspective, which is crucial for quality EOL care in hospital settings. METHOD This is a cross-sectional survey. Nurses practising in hospitals recruited by convenience sampling completed self-report survey questionnaires. STROBE checklist was used in study reporting. RESULTS One hundred and-seventy-five nurses participated in the survey. The majority (70%) had experience in caring for dying patients. The five most highly perceived factors constituting optimal EOL care included the following: "families know and follow patient's EOL wishes"; "patients emotional concerns identified and managed well"; "patients participating in decision-making"; "EOL care documents stored well and easily accessed"; and "provide private rooms and unlimited visiting hours for families of dying patients". Top five barriers were "doctors are too busy"; "nurses are too busy"; "insufficient private room/space"; "nurses have limited training in EOL care"; and "families have unrealistic expectations of patient's prognosis." Multivariate regression analysis identified that nurses without experience in caring for dying patients reported a significantly higher number of perceived barriers towards EOL care (p = .012). Those with postgraduate degree training reported significantly fewer perceived barriers (p = .007). CONCLUSION Findings identified essential elements for optimal hospital EOL care not only involving patients and families in EOL decision and care, but also documentation and environmental issues in the healthcare system level and the needs for strengthening manpower and expertise at palliative care policy level. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE This study revealed quantitative data to inform health service managers and policy makers in terms of training and service development/ re-design for EOL care in hospital settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen W H Chan
- The Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | | | - Sally Chan
- The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Robert Sanson-Fisher
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle and Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, NSW, Australia
| | - Amy Waller
- Health Behaviour Research Collaborative, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle and Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton, NSW, Australia
| | - Theresa T K Lai
- Society for the Promotion of Hospice Care, Jockey Club Home for Hospice, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Cecilia W M Kwan
- Bradbury Hospice, New Territories East Cluster, Hospital Authority, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|