A case of hepatitis attributable to repeated exposure to methoxyflurane during its use for procedural analgesia

Inhaled methoxyflurane (Penthrox) administration in dentistry as an alternative to nitrous oxide sedation: a review and feasibility study

Methoxyflurane (MOF) as an agent for dental sedation has been used safely in Australasia for decades. The drug is now licensed for relief of pain associated with trauma and is being used during several medical outpatient procedures in the stead of traditional intravenous agents for sedation in the UK. Our aim was to analyse the safety and feasibility of the introduction of MOF as a drug for dental sedation in the UK community setting and assess its environmental impact. A literature review was conducted for available studies and a research audit of medical histories of patients that received nitrous oxide sedation in the previous year was carried out to assess suitability for MOF administration. The published literature shows MOF to be a safe drug for administration in the dental environment and local patients receiving nitrous oxide sedation are medically suitable for MOF administration. The advantages of considering MOF sedation are its environmental benefit and patient acceptability.

Real world safety of methoxyflurane analgesia in the emergency setting: a comparative hybrid prospective-retrospective post-authorisation safety study

BACKGROUND

Low-dose analgesic methoxyflurane (Penthrox®) was approved in Europe for emergency relief of moderate to severe pain in conscious adults with trauma in 2015. A comparative post-authorisation safety study (PASS) was conducted to assess the risk of hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity with methoxyflurane during routine clinical practice.

METHODS

This was a comparative hybrid prospective-retrospective cohort study. The comparative cohorts consisted of adults who were given methoxyflurane (methoxyflurane cohort) or another analgesic (concurrent cohort) routinely used for moderate to severe trauma and associated pain in the emergency setting (ambulance and Emergency Department) in the UK between December 2016 and November 2018. Hepatic and renal events were captured in the ensuing 12 weeks. A blinded clinical adjudication committee assessed events. A historical comparator cohort (non-concurrent cohort) was identified from patients with fractures in the English Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) accident and emergency database from November 2013 and November 2015 (before commercial launch of methoxyflurane). Hepatic and renal events were captured in the ensuing 12 weeks via linkage with the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) and HES hospital admissions databases.

RESULTS

Overall, 1,236, 1,101 and 45,112 patients were analysed in the methoxyflurane, concurrent and non-concurrent comparator cohorts respectively. There was no significant difference in hepatic events between the methoxyflurane and concurrent cohorts (1.9% vs. 3.0%, P = 0.079) or between the methoxyflurane and non-concurrent cohorts (1.9% vs. 2.5%, P = 0.192). Renal events were significantly less common in the methoxyflurane cohort than in the concurrent cohort (2.3% vs. 5.6%, P < 0.001). For methoxyflurane versus non-concurrent cohort the lower occurrence of renal events (2.3% vs. 3.2%, P = 0.070) was not statistically significant. Multivariable adjustment did not change these associations.

CONCLUSIONS

Methoxyflurane administration was not associated with an increased risk of hepatotoxicity or nephrotoxicity compared with other routinely administered analgesics and was associated with a reduced risk of nephrotoxicity compared with other routinely administered analgesics.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Study registered in the EU PAS Register (ENCEPP/SDPP/13040).

Frequency and duration of ambulance officer exposure to nitrous oxide and methoxyflurane in New Zealand

OBJECTIVE

Nitrous oxide (Entonox®) and methoxyflurane (Penthrox®) are inhaled analgesics administered in paramedicine. Occupational exposure to nitrous oxide has been associated with negative health effects, and may inhibit professional capability. The effect of occupational exposure to methoxyflurane has not yet been clearly determined. This study identifies the frequency and duration of ambulance officer (AO) occupational exposure to nitrous oxide and methoxyflurane to provide a foundation for future assessments of occupational toxicity risk.

METHODS

A retrospective database review of Patient Report Forms (PRFs) in 11 months between February 2016 and February 2018 was conducted. Nitrous oxide was available for the first 5 months studied, followed by 6 months methoxyflurane availability. AO-specific measures of attendance, rate of inhaled analgesic use, and duration of analgesic use were determined. Subgroup analysis by AO qualification and rostered work hours was undertaken.

RESULTS

A total of 46,759 PRFs were examined, identifying 1,033 cases of nitrous oxide administration and 1456 cases of methoxyflurane was administration. There was a significant increase in the proportion of cases where inhaled analgesia was administered following the replacement of nitrous oxide with methoxyflurane. Relative risk of exposure to methoxyflurane compared with nitrous oxide was 1.22, while median duration of each exposure remained unchanged (32 vs. 33 min).

CONCLUSIONS

Methoxyflurane via the Penthrox® inhaler was more likely to be administered than nitrous oxide. Most AOs are infrequently exposed to inhaled analgesics and are exposed for durations slightly greater than previously reported. Relative risk of exposure was greatest for lower-qualified AOs. Peak number of exposures and duration values suggest a subset of AOs with higher occupational health risk.

The role of inhaled methoxyflurane in acute pain management

Methoxyflurane is an inhaled analgesic administered via a disposable inhaler which has been used in Australia for over 40 years for the management of pain associated with trauma and for medical procedures in children and adults. Now available in 16 countries worldwide, it is licensed in Europe for moderate to severe pain associated with trauma in conscious adults, although additional applications are being made to widen the range of approved indications. Considering these ongoing developments, we reviewed the available evidence on clinical usage and safety of inhaled analgesic methoxyflurane in trauma pain and in medical procedures in both adults and children. Published data on methoxyflurane in trauma and procedural pain show it to be effective, well tolerated, and highly rated by patients, providing rapid onset of analgesia. Methoxyflurane has a well-established safety profile; adverse events are usually brief and self-limiting, and no clinically significant effects on vital signs or consciousness levels have been reported. Nephrotoxicity previously associated with methoxyflurane at high anesthetic doses is not reported with low analgesic doses. Although two large retrospective comparative studies in the prehospital setting showed inhaled analgesic methoxyflurane to be less effective than intravenous morphine and intranasal fentanyl, this should be balanced against the administration, supervision times, and safety profile of these agents. Given the limitations of currently available analgesic agents in the prehospital and emergency department settings, the ease of use and portability of methoxyflurane combined with its rapid onset of effective pain relief and favorable safety profile make it a useful nonopioid option for pain management. Except for the STOP! study, which formed the basis for approval in trauma pain in Europe, and a few smaller randomized controlled trials (RCTs), much of the available data are observational or retrospective, and further RCTs are currently underway to provide more robust data.

Self-administered methoxyflurane for procedural analgesia: experience in a tertiary Australasian centre

Methoxyflurane, an agent formerly used as a volatile anaesthetic but that has strong analgesic properties, will soon become available again in the UK and Europe in the form of a small hand-held inhaler. We describe our experience in the use of inhaled methoxyflurane for procedural analgesia within a large tertiary hospital. In a small pilot crossover study of patients undergoing burns-dressing procedures, self-administered methoxyflurane inhalation was preferred to ketamine-midazolam patient-controlled analgesia by five of eight patients. Patient and proceduralist outcomes and satisfaction were recorded from a subsequent case series of 173 minor surgical and radiological procedures in 123 patients performed using inhaled methoxyflurane. The procedures included change of dressing, minor debridement, colonoscopy and incision-and-drainage of abscess. There was a 97% success rate of methoxyflurane analgesia to facilitate these procedures. Limitations of methoxyflurane include maximal daily and weekly doses, and uncertainty regarding its safety in patients with pre-existing renal disease.

The 'green whistle': a novel method of analgesia for transrectal prostate biopsy

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• Patients undergoing TRUS-guided biopsies were each given a Penthrox inhaler to self-administer during the procedure and instructed in its use. • Immediately after the procedure, patients were asked to rate their pain using a verbal rating scale from 0 to 10.

RESULTS

• In all, 42 consecutive men underwent a TRUS-guided biopsy. • The median pain score was 3. • All 42 patients stated they would be happy to undergo the same procedure again. The only adverse effects reported by patients were brief light-headedness and a sickly sweet taste.

CONCLUSION

• This study of our initial experience using Penthrox suggests that it may have a role in analgesia for TRUS-guided biopsy. • It may provide safe, adequate analgesia that is easy for urologists to use and avoids excessive use of resources. • Planning for a randomised control trial comparing Penthrox to the current 'gold standard' of prostatic infiltration of local anaesthetic is presently underway.