Inspecting Resecting: Examining 20-Year Trends in Epilepsy Surgery

Current Status and Future Objectives of Surgical Therapies for Epilepsy in Japan

This study investigated the number of epilepsy surgeries performed over time in Japan, and conducted a questionnaire survey of the Japan Neurosurgical Society (JNS) training program core hospitals to determine the current status and future objectives of surgical therapies and epilepsy training programs for physicians in Japan. This article presents part of a presentation delivered as a presidential address at the 44th Annual Meeting of the Epilepsy Surgery Society of Japan held in January 2021. The number of epilepsy surgeries performed per year has increased in Japan since 2011 to around 1,200 annually between 2015 and 2018. The questionnaire survey showed that 50% of the responding hospitals performed epilepsy surgery and 29% had an epilepsy center, and that these hospitals provided senior residents with education regarding epilepsy surgery. The presence of an epilepsy center in a hospital was positively correlated with the availability of long-term video electroencephalography monitoring beds as well as the number of epilepsy surgeries performed at the hospital. In regions with no medical facilities offering specialized surgical therapies for epilepsy, the JNS training program core hospitals may help improve epilepsy diagnosis and treatment. They may also increase the number of safe and effective surgeries by establishing epilepsy centers that can perform long-term video electroencephalography monitoring, providing junior neurosurgeons with training regarding epilepsy, and playing a core role in surgical therapies for epilepsy in tertiary medical areas in close cooperation with neighboring medical facilities.

No prevention or cure of epilepsy as yet

Approximately 20% of all epilepsy is caused by acute acquired injury such as traumatic brain injury, stroke and CNS infection. The known onset of the injury which triggers the epileptogenic process, early presentation to medical care, and a latency between the injury and the development of clinical epilepsy present an opportunity to intervene with treatment to prevent epilepsy. No such treatment exists and yet there has been remarkably little clinical research during the last 20 years to try to develop such treatment. We review possible reasons for this, possible ways to rectify the situations and note some of the ways currently under way to do so. Resective surgical treatment can achieve "cure" in some patients but is sparsely utilized. In certain "self-limiting" syndromes of childhood and adolescence epilepsy remits spontaneously. In a proportion of patients who become seizure free on medications or with dietary treatment, seizure freedom persists when treatment is discontinued. We discuss these situations which can be considered "cures"; and note that at present we have little understanding of mechanism of such cures, and cannot therefore translate them into a treatment paradigm targeting a "cure" of epilepsy. This article is part of the special issue entitled 'New Epilepsy Therapies for the 21st Century - From Antiseizure Drugs to Prevention, Modification and Cure of Epilepsy'.

Presurgical diagnosis of epilepsies – concepts and diagnostic tools

Introduction.Numerous reviews of the currently established concepts, strategies and diagnostic tools used in epilepsy surgery have been published. The focus concept which was initially developed by Forster, Penfield and Jasper and popularised and enriched by Lüders, is still fundamental for epilepsy surgery.

Aim.To present different conceptual views of the focus concept and to discuss more recent network hypothesis, emphasizing so-called “critical modes of an epileptogenic circuit”.

Method.A literature search was conducted using keywords: presurgical evaluation, epileptic focus concepts, cortical zones, diagnostic tools.

Review and remarks.The theoretical concepts of the epileptic focus are opposed to the network hypothesis. The definitions of the various cortical zones have been conceptualized in the presurgical evaluation of candidates for epilepsy surgery: the seizure onset zone versus the epileptogenic zone, the symptomatogenic zone, the irritative and functional deficit zones are characterized. The epileptogenic lesion, the “eloquent cortex” and secondary epileptogenesis (mirror focus) are dealt with. The current diagnostic techniques used in the definition of these cortical zones, such as video-EEG monitoring, non-invasive and invasive EEG recording techniques, magnetic resonance imaging, ictal single photon emission computed tomography, and positron emission tomography, are discussed and illustrated. Potential modern surrogate markers of epileptogenicity, such asHigh frequency oscillations, Ictal slow waves/DC shifts, Magnetic resonance spectroscopy, Functional MRI,the use ofMagnetized nanoparticlesin MRI,Transcranial magnetic stimulation,Optical intrinsic signalimaging, andSeizure predictionare discussed. Particular emphasis is put on the EEG: Scalp EEG, semi-invasive and invasive EEG (Stereoelectroencephalography) and intraoperative electrocorticography are illustrated. Ictal SPECT and18F-FDG PET are very helpful and several other procedures, such as dipole source localization and spike-triggered functional MRI are already widely used. The most important lateralizing and localizing ictal signs and symptoms are summarized. It is anticipated that the other clinically valid surrogate markers of epileptogenesis and epileptogenicity will be further developed in the near future. Until then the concordance of the results of seizure semiology, localization of epileptogenicity by EEG and MRI remains the most important prerequisite for successful epilepsy surgery.

Conclusions and future perspectives.Resective epilepsy surgery is a widely accepted and successful therapeutic approach, rendering up to 80% of selected patients seizure free. Although other therapies, such as radiosurgery, and responsive neurostimulation will increasingly play a role in patients with an unresectable lesion, it is unlikely that they will replace selective resective surgery. The hope is that new diagnostic techniques will be developed that permit more direct definition and measurement of the epileptogenic zone.