Zhao L, Qi YM, Yang L, Wang GR, Zheng SN, Wang Q, Liang B, Jiang CZ. Comparison of the Effects of Proximal Humeral Internal Locking System (PHILOS) Alone and PHILOS Combined with Fibular Allograft in the Treatment of Neer Three- or Four-part Proximal Humerus Fractures in the Elderly.
Orthop Surg 2019;
11:1003-1012. [PMID:
31762222 PMCID:
PMC6904636 DOI:
10.1111/os.12564]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2019] [Revised: 09/16/2019] [Accepted: 10/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective
To compare and analyze the clinical outcomes of the proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) alone and the PHILOS combined with fibular allograft in the treatment of Neer threeâ and fourâpart proximal humerus fractures (PHF) in the elderly.
Methods
From January 2014 to January 2018, a total of 42 elderly patients with Neer threeâ or fourâpart PHF admitted to our hospital were randomly divided into observation group and control group, with 21 patients in each group. The observation group was treated with the PHILOS combined with fibular allograft. The control group was treated with the PHILOS alone. Perioperative parameters and fracture classification were recorded in the two groups. Function results were assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ConstantâMurley score (CMS), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and the Disability of ArmâShoulderâHand (DASH) score. Radiological results were evaluated using the neckâshaft angle (NSA) and humeral head height (HHH), and complications were also recorded in each group.
Results
There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of preoperative status, age, gender, cause of trauma, fracture site, and fracture classification. The average followâup time was 12âmonths. At the last followâup, the VAS and DASH observation groups were lower than the control group, and there was significant difference between the two groups (Pâ<â0.05). The CMS and ASES were higher in the observation group than the control group, and there was significant difference between the two groups (Pâ<â0.05). The mean difference in the NSA and HHH were lower in the observation group than the control group, and there was a significant difference between the two groups (Pâ<â0.05). There was one postoperative complication in the observation group, which was humeral head avascular necrosis (AVN). There were seven postoperative complications in the control group, including three cases of humeral head collapse and three cases of screw cutout and one case of humeral head AVN. The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was significantly lower than the control group (Pâ<â0.05), there was a significant difference between the two groups.
Conclusions
For Neer threeâ or fourâpart PHF in the elderly patients, PHILOS fixation with fibular allograft shows satisfactory shortâterm results with respect to humeral head support and maintenance of reduction, and may reduce the incidence of complications associated with fixation using a PHILOS alone.
Collapse