Displaced Physeal and Metaphyseal Fractures of Distal Radius in Children. Can Wire Fixation Achieve Better Outcome at Skeletal Maturity than Cast Alone?

Return to Play in Youth Athletes: Role of the Radiologist with Focus on the Upper Extremity

Increase in youth sports participation, longer duration of play, and earlier starting points have increased the prevalence of acute and repetitive overuse musculoskeletal injuries. This rise in injury rates has led to increased efforts to better understand the susceptible sites of injury that are unique to the growing immature skeleton. Upper extremity injuries are currently the best studied, particularly those that occur among pediatric baseball players and gymnasts. The weak link in skeletally immature athletes is the growth plate complex that includes those injuries located at the epiphyseal and apophyseal primary physes and the peripherally located secondary physes. This article reviews the anatomy and function of these growth plate complexes, followed by a discussion of the pathophysiologic mechanisms, spectrum of imaging findings, and existing evidence-based guidelines for injury prevention and return to play.

Modified Kapandji technique in pediatric displaced distal radius fractures: results in 195 patients

PURPOSE

The modified Kapandji technique has been proposed for fracture reduction in pediatric displaced distal radius fractures (DDRFs), but evidence is sparse. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our outcomes and complications, critically and systematically, when performing the modified Kapandji technique in pediatric DDRFs. Using this technique since 2011, we asked: (1) What is the quality of fracture reduction using this technique? (2) How stable is fracture alignment with this technique? (3) What are the postoperative complications and complication rates?

METHODS

Retrospective observational study of 195 pediatric patients treated with the modified Kapandji technique. Quality of fracture reduction, fixation type (intrafocal, combined, or extrafocal), and coronal/sagittal angulation were recorded at surgery and healing. Perioperative complications were graded. Patients were stratified by fracture (metaphyseal or Salter-Harris) and fixation type, as well as age (≤ 6 years; 6 to 10 years; > 10 years).

RESULTS

Fracture reduction was 'good' to 'anatomical' in 85% of patients. 'Anatomical' fracture reduction was less frequent in metaphyseal fractures (21% vs. 51%; p < .001). Mean angulation change was higher in metaphyseal fractures in both the sagittal (p = .011) and coronal (p = .021) planes. Metaphyseal fractures showed a higher mean change in sagittal angulation during fracture healing for the 'intrafocal' group. We observed a 15% overall complication rate with 1% being modified Sink Grade 3.

CONCLUSION

The modified Kapandji technique for pediatric DDRFs is a safe and effective treatment option. Metaphyseal fractures that do not involve the physis should be treated with extrafocal or combined wire fixation. Complications that require additional surgical treatment are rare.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level of evidence IV.

Distal radius fractures in children aged 5-12 years: a Swedish nationwide register-based study of 25 777 patients

BACKGROUND

Distal radius fracture (DRF) is the most common type of fracture in children. There is no clear consensus on primary treatment for complete DRFs. Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation has been recommended, to avoid the risk of redislocation. However, recent studies have indicated that casting can be sufficient, at least for children with two or more years left to grow. There is no recent study regarding pediatric DRFs and the extent of K-wire fixations in the Swedish population. The purpose of this study was to investigate epidemiology and treatment of pediatric DRFs registered in the Swedish Fracture Register (SFR).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, based on data from SFR for children aged 5-12 years with DRF between January 2015 and October 2022, we investigated epidemiology and choice of treatment. Sex, age, type of DRF, treatment, cause and mechanism of injury, were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 25,777 patients were included, 7,173 (27%) with complete fractures. Number and peak age of girls vs. boys with fractures were 11,742 (46%), 10 years, and 14,035 (54%), 12 years, respectively. Odds ratio (OR) for a K-wire fixation in girls vs. boys was 0.81 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.74-0.89, p < .001). With age 5 -7 years as reference, OR for age group 8-10 years was 0.88 (95% CI 0.80-0.98 p = .019) and OR for age group 11-12 years was 0.81 (95% CI 0.73-0.91 p =  < .001.

CONCLUSION

Casting only was the preferred treatment for all fractures (76%). Boys acquired DRFs more often than girls, with a peak age of 12 years. Younger children and boys with a complete fracture were more likely than older children and girls to receive a K-wire. Further research regarding indications for K-wiring of DRFs in the pediatric population is needed.

Testing a new method of osteosynthesis of forearm fractures in children; a prospective randomized controlled longitudinal study

PURPOSE

Displaced children's forearms fractures are commonly treated surgically with Kirschner Wires or Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nails. The osteosynthesis system "Minimally Invasive Reduction and Osteosynthesis System" might be beneficial in the treatment of these fractures due to being minimally invasive while achieving fracture stability. In this exploratory prospective randomized controlled longitudinal study, we compared Minimally Invasive Reduction and Osteosynthesis System to Kirschner Wires and Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nails osteosynthesis.

METHODS

Twenty children were included consecutively to treatment with either conventional surgery (5 Kirschner Wires/5 Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nails) or Minimally Invasive Reduction and Osteosynthesis System (10). Evaluation of radiographic alignment and clinically of range of motion, pain status, grip strength, level of physical activity and scar size were compared after 3 months and after 5 years.

RESULTS

Surgical parameters of the duration of insertion- and removal-surgery, the need for postoperative casting and scar size were significantly better for Minimally Invasive Reduction and Osteosynthesis System. All osteosynthesis systems maintained radiographically fracture alignment at three months and 5 years follow-up. Clinical status regarding pain, grip strength difference, and return to recreational activities were not significantly different. The complication rates were nonsignificant, but MIROS had moderate severe complications of refractures, while mild complications occurred when operated on with Kirschner Wires/Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nails. Our study was sufficiently powered at 3 months, but the comparisons are suggestive at 5 years.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, Minimally Invasive Reduction and Osteosynthesis System is not significantly different to other surgical methods in radiological outcomes for forearm fractures in children. Minimally Invasive Reduction and Osteosynthesis System has the clinical benefit of omitting casting after surgery, obtaining reduced scar size, and shorter insertion and removal time without general anesthesia. However, moderately severe complications occurred.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II-a prospective comparative study.