1
|
Nielsen SS, Alvarez J, Bicout DJ, Calistri P, Canali E, Drewe JA, Garin‐Bastuji B, Gonzales Rojas JL, Gortázar Schmidt C, Herskin M, Michel V, Miranda Chueca MÁ, Padalino B, Roberts HC, Spoolder H, Stahl K, Viltrop A, Winckler C, Mitchell M, Vinco LJ, Voslarova E, Candiani D, Mosbach‐Schulz O, Van der Stede Y, Velarde A. Welfare of domestic birds and rabbits transported in containers. EFSA J 2022; 20:e07441. [PMID: 36092767 PMCID: PMC9449994 DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
This opinion, produced upon a request from the European Commission, focuses on transport of domestic birds and rabbits in containers (e.g. any crate, box, receptacle or other rigid structure used for the transport of animals, but not the means of transport itself). It describes and assesses current transport practices in the EU, based on data from literature, Member States and expert opinion. The species and categories of domestic birds assessed were mainly chickens for meat (broilers), end-of-lay hens and day-old chicks. They included to a lesser extent pullets, turkeys, ducks, geese, quails and game birds, due to limited scientific evidence. The opinion focuses on road transport to slaughterhouses or to production sites. For day-old chicks, air transport is also addressed. The relevant stages of transport considered are preparation, loading, journey, arrival and uncrating. Welfare consequences associated with current transport practices were identified for each stage. For loading and uncrating, the highly relevant welfare consequences identified are handling stress, injuries, restriction of movement and sensory overstimulation. For the journey and arrival, injuries, restriction of movement, sensory overstimulation, motion stress, heat stress, cold stress, prolonged hunger and prolonged thirst are identified as highly relevant. For each welfare consequence, animal-based measures (ABMs) and hazards were identified and assessed, and both preventive and corrective or mitigative measures proposed. Recommendations on quantitative criteria to prevent or mitigate welfare consequences are provided for microclimatic conditions, space allowances and journey times for all categories of animals, where scientific evidence and expert opinion support such outcomes.
Collapse
|
2
|
Cranley JJ. Post‐mortem indications of poor welfare—an hypothesis upon supine broilers: stress and efforts to ameliorate suffering in a low throughput abattoir. VETERINARY RECORD CASE REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1136/vetreccr-2019-000927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
3
|
Influence of Long-Distance Transportation Under Various Crating Densities on Broiler Meat Quality During Hot and Humid Weather. J Poult Sci 2020; 57:246-252. [PMID: 32733160 PMCID: PMC7387949 DOI: 10.2141/jpsa.0190087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of the study was to investigate the effect of transportation distance and crating density on broiler meat quality during hot and humid weather. Breast meat samples were collected from broilers (Ross-308) after transportation for 80, 160, and 240 km at crating densities of 10, 12, and 15 birds per crate. The broilers were transported in plastic crates of 0.91 × 0.55 × 0.31 m (length × width × height) in summer at an ambient temperature of 27.2–33.6°C and relative humidity of 52.7–62.9%. The birds were then slaughtered, and the meats' physicochemical characteristics, marination and cooking attributes were measured. Meat pH at 2 hours (h) postmortem (PM) was significantly higher in birds transported for 80 and 160 km compared to those transported for up to 240 km, while meat pH at 24 h PM was higher in birds transported for up to 160 km compared to the other treatments; however, no effect of different crating densities on meat pH and drip loss was observed. Meat losses such as drip loss, thaw loss, cooking loss in raw and marinated breast, and meat shear force were significantly higher in birds transported for up to 240 km compared to the other treatments. An increase in crating density above 12 birds per crate also increased thaw loss, whereas crating density of 12 birds per crate and higher increased cooking loss and meat shear force. Meat lightness also increased significantly with the increase in transportation distance above 160 km and crating density above 12 birds per crate. In conclusion, transportation of broilers for more than 80 km with crating density higher than 12 birds per crate during summer was associated with severe losses in yield and deterioration in physical appearance and functional characteristics of meat.
Collapse
|
4
|
Water-spraying forced ventilation during holding improves the water holding capacity, impedance, and microstructure of breast meat from summer-transported broiler chickens. Poult Sci 2019; 99:1744-1749. [PMID: 32115041 PMCID: PMC7587643 DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2019.10.077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2019] [Revised: 10/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Heat stress is a broiler welfare issue and economic deficit to the broiler industry. Water atomizing with three-dimensional forced ventilation, a holding treatment after summer transport for broiler, has been proved to significantly improve water holding capacity of fresh meat. However, effectiveness of this treatment on water retention after freeze-thaw needs to be conducted. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess whether water atomizing with forced ventilation could increase freeze-thaw meat quality after birds slaughtering. Arbor Acres broiler (n = 105), undergoing 32°C ambient temperature transport, was randomly categorized into 3 treatments: 1) T group, which underwent 45-min transport without rest; 2) TR group, which underwent 45-min transport with 1-h rest; and the 3) TWFR group, which underwent 45-min transport followed by 15-min water atomizing with three-dimensional forced ventilation and 45-min rest. All birds were hot-deboned within 30-min postmortem. A total of 105 breast fillets were collected and split into halves, which left part fillets were kept in 4°C and for meat analysis, the other part fillets, marked with T-F, TR-F, and TWFR-F, were frozen (−18°C) for 1 mo and then thawed overnight for meat quality analysis. Regardless of fresh or frozen treatment among 3 groups, TWFR has the highest pH which was more than 6.01 (P < 0.05). The L* value, drip loss, and cooking loss of TWFR were significantly lower compared to T and TR groups in both fresh and frozen breast fillets (P < 0.05). Compared with the T group, the TWFR meat shows closely microscopic structure which means less water loss channel. The impedance amplitude of the fresh meat was significantly higher than that of the frozen-thawing meat (P < 0.05). TWFR-treated meat has significantly higher impedance module than T and TR meat at 50 Hz frequency region, for both fresh or thawed meat. Among 6 treatments, TWFR fresh meat has significantly highest Q (modulus change ratio) value (P < 0.05). These results indicate that TWFR treatment for 15 min after transport can improve meat quality, which may be due to the improved welfare of broilers transported in hot summer months.
Collapse
|
5
|
Nielsen SS, Alvarez J, Bicout DJ, Calistri P, Depner K, Drewe JA, Garin-Bastuji B, Gonzales Rojas JL, Gortázar Schmidt C, Miranda Chueca MÁ, Roberts HC, Sihvonen LH, Spoolder H, Stahl K, Velarde Calvo A, Viltrop A, Winckler C, Candiani D, Fabris C, Van der Stede Y, Michel V. Slaughter of animals: poultry. EFSA J 2019; 17:e05849. [PMID: 32626156 PMCID: PMC7008870 DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The killing of poultry for human consumption (slaughtering) can take place in a slaughterhouse or during on-farm slaughter. The processes of slaughtering that were assessed, from the arrival of birds in containers until their death, were grouped into three main phases: pre-stunning (including arrival, unloading of containers from the truck, lairage, handling/removing of birds from containers); stunning (including restraint); and bleeding (including bleeding following stunning and bleeding during slaughter without stunning). Stunning methods were grouped into three categories: electrical, controlled modified atmosphere and mechanical. In total, 35 hazards were identified and characterised, most of them related to stunning and bleeding. Staff were identified as the origin of 29 hazards, and 28 hazards were attributed to the lack of appropriate skill sets needed to perform tasks or to fatigue. Corrective and preventive measures were assessed: measures to correct hazards were identified for 11 hazards, with management shown to have a crucial role in prevention. Ten welfare consequences, the birds can be exposed to during slaughter, were identified: consciousness, heat stress, cold stress, prolonged thirst, prolonged hunger, restriction of movements, pain, fear, distress and respiratory distress. Welfare consequences and relevant animal-based measures were described. Outcome tables linking hazards, welfare consequences, animal-based measures, origins, and preventive and corrective measures were developed for each process. Mitigation measures to minimise welfare consequences were also proposed.
Collapse
|
6
|
|
7
|
Xing T, Wang C, Zhao X, Dai C, Zhou G, Xu X. Proteome Analysis Using Isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Analysis Quantitation (iTRAQ) Reveals Alterations in Stress-Induced Dysfunctional Chicken Muscle. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY 2017; 65:2913-2922. [PMID: 28304171 DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b05835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
The current study was designed to investigate changes in the protein profiles of pale, soft, and exudative (PSE)-like muscles of broilers subjected to transportation under high-temperature conditions, using isobaric tags for relative and absolute analysis quantitation (iTRAQ). Arbor Acres chickens (n = 112) were randomly divided into two treatments: unstressed control (CON) and 0.5 h of transport (T). Birds were transported according to a designed protocol. Pectoralis major (PM) muscle samples in the T group were collected and classified as normal (T-NOR) or PSE-like (T-PSE). Plasma activities of stress indicators, muscle microstructure, and proteome were measured. Results indicated that broilers in the T-PSE group exhibited higher activities of plasma stress indicators. The microstructure of T-PSE group showed a looser network and larger intercellular spaces in comparison to the other groups. Proteomic analysis, based on iTRAQ, revealed 29 differentially expressed proteins in the T-NOR and T-PSE groups that were involved in protein turnover, signal transduction, stress and defense, calcium handling, cell structure, and metabolism. In particular, proteins relating to the glycolysis pathway, calcium signaling, and molecular chaperones exhibited significant differences that may contribute to the inferior post-mortem meat quality. Overall, the proteomic results provide a further understanding of the mechanism of meat quality changes in response to stress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tong Xing
- Key Laboratory of Meat Processing and Quality Control, Ministry of Education, Synergetic Innovation Center of Food Safety and Nutrition, College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University , Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Chong Wang
- Key Laboratory of Meat Processing and Quality Control, Ministry of Education, Synergetic Innovation Center of Food Safety and Nutrition, College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University , Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Xue Zhao
- Key Laboratory of Meat Processing and Quality Control, Ministry of Education, Synergetic Innovation Center of Food Safety and Nutrition, College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University , Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Chen Dai
- Experimental Teaching Center of Life Science, Nanjing Agricultural University , Nanjing 210095, People's Republic of China
| | - Guanghong Zhou
- Key Laboratory of Meat Processing and Quality Control, Ministry of Education, Synergetic Innovation Center of Food Safety and Nutrition, College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University , Nanjing 210095, China
| | - Xinglian Xu
- Key Laboratory of Meat Processing and Quality Control, Ministry of Education, Synergetic Innovation Center of Food Safety and Nutrition, College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University , Nanjing 210095, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jiang N, Wang P, Xing T, Han M, Xu X. An evaluation of the effect of water-misting sprays with forced ventilation on the occurrence of pale, soft, and exudative meat in transported broilers during summer: Impact of the thermal microclimate1. J Anim Sci 2016; 94:2218-27. [DOI: 10.2527/jas.2015-9823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- N. Jiang
- Key Laboratory of Meat Processing and Quality Control, Ministry of Education, Synergetic Innovation Center of Food Safety and Nutrition, Key Laboratory of Animal Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - P. Wang
- Key Laboratory of Meat Processing and Quality Control, Ministry of Education, Synergetic Innovation Center of Food Safety and Nutrition, Key Laboratory of Animal Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - T. Xing
- Key Laboratory of Meat Processing and Quality Control, Ministry of Education, Synergetic Innovation Center of Food Safety and Nutrition, Key Laboratory of Animal Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - M. Han
- Key Laboratory of Meat Processing and Quality Control, Ministry of Education, Synergetic Innovation Center of Food Safety and Nutrition, Key Laboratory of Animal Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| | - X. Xu
- Key Laboratory of Meat Processing and Quality Control, Ministry of Education, Synergetic Innovation Center of Food Safety and Nutrition, Key Laboratory of Animal Products Processing, Ministry of Agriculture, College of Food Science and Technology, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China
| |
Collapse
|