1
|
Di Mattei VE, Perego G, Taranto P, Mazzetti M, Ferrari F, Derna N, Peccatori FA, Mangili G, Candiani M. Psychological issues in breast cancer survivors confronted with motherhood: Literature review and a call to action. Front Psychol 2023; 14:1133204. [PMID: 36960007 PMCID: PMC10029924 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1133204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is currently the most common cancer among women worldwide; in 15-25% of cases, patients are premenopausal at the time of diagnosis, and 50% of women desire pregnancy after cancer diagnosis. Motherhood after breast cancer involves complex psychological challenges with long-term consequences, though it is safely pursuable with adequate support. The purpose of this mini-review is to analyze the psychological implications surrounding pregnancy and motherhood after breast cancer and promote action in addressing the challenges that might affect women facing these life events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Elisabetta Di Mattei
- School of Psychology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Clinical and Health Psychology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Gaia Perego
- School of Psychology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- Clinical and Health Psychology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Taranto
- Clinical and Health Psychology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Martina Mazzetti
- Clinical and Health Psychology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Noemi Derna
- Clinical and Health Psychology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Fedro Alessandro Peccatori
- Fertility and Procreation Unit, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgia Mangili
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Candiani
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
- School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Di Mattei VE, Perego G, Taranto P, Rancoita PMV, Maglione M, Notarianni L, Mangili G, Bergamini A, Cioffi R, Papaleo E, Candiani M. Factors Associated With a High Motivation to Undergo Fertility Preservation in Female Cancer Patients. Front Psychol 2022; 12:782073. [PMID: 34975672 PMCID: PMC8716366 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.782073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Fertility loss due to cancer treatment can be a devastating experience for women and the couple. Undergoing fertility preservation can be a complex decision from both a medical and emotional point of view. The aim of the present study was to evaluate which socio-demographic and psychological factors predict a high motivation to undergo fertility preservation. Methods: Fifty-eight female cancer patients who accessed an Oncofertility Unit completed: a questionnaire to collect socio-demographic characteristics and the level of motivation, the Beck-Depression Inventory-II, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Y, and the Fertility Problem Inventory. Results: Almost half of the sample (44.8%) declared a high motivation. At multiple logistic regression analysis only the “Need for parenthood” subscale of the FPI predicted a high motivation. We alternatively evaluated as possible predictor the construct “Representations about the importance of parenthood” (i.e., the sum of the “Need for Parenthood” and “Rejection of childfree lifestyle” subscales) in place of the two separate subscales. At multiple logistic regression analysis, only this variable predicted a high motivation to undergo fertility preservation. Conclusion: The most important predictor of a high motivation to undergo fertility preservation is the individual desire for parenthood. This implies that, regardless of socio-demographic characteristics, any woman of childbearing age should receive an appropriate counseling about fertility preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Elisabetta Di Mattei
- School of Psychology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Clinical and Health Psychology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Gaia Perego
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Taranto
- Clinical and Health Psychology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola M V Rancoita
- University Centre for Statistics in the Biomedical Sciences (CUSSB), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Mariangela Maglione
- Clinical and Health Psychology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Lisa Notarianni
- Clinical and Health Psychology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgia Mangili
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alice Bergamini
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaella Cioffi
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Enrico Papaleo
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Candiani
- School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Toro-Wills MF, Imitola-Madero A, Alvarez-Londoño A, Hernández-Blanquisett A, Martínez-Ávila MC. Thyroid cancer in women of reproductive age: Key issues for the clinical team. WOMEN'S HEALTH 2022; 18:17455057221136392. [PMID: 36373610 PMCID: PMC9666833 DOI: 10.1177/17455057221136392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Women who are fertile experience a significant burden from thyroid cancer. In
reality, delaying childbirth is the current trend in maternity. Women who have
thyroid cancer may later want to get pregnant after it has been treated, which
presents a multidisciplinary issue for their doctors. A variety of specialists
are frequently involved in the treatment of thyroid cancer. This review aims to
address the key elements of the strategy and places special emphasis on the
significance of fertility in women with thyroid cancer diagnosis and remission.
We will cover topics including the role of thyroid hormones in pregnancy and
fertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Angélica Imitola-Madero
- Endocrinology Division, Internal Medicine Department, Centro Hospitalario Serena del Mar, Cartagena, Colombia
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wan Q, Han L, Liu J, Li H, Li Y, Long QM, Tan L, Li JJ. Fertility preservation among young breast cancer patients: A single-center experience in China. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2021; 60:827-830. [PMID: 34507656 DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2021.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aims to investigate the status of fertility preservation (FP) in young breast cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS A clinical database of six women with breast cancer who wished to undergo FP before starting chemotherapy were analyzed between January 2018 and December 2019 in our hospital. Among the six women, three were unmarried and three were married. RESULTS Three patients chose oocyte preservation and obtained 23, 7, and 17 MII oocytes, respectively. One patient chose embryo freezing, and three embryos were frozen. Fertility preservation failed for two patients, one of whom had premature ovulation, while the other patient abandoned egg retrieval on the human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) day. CONCLUSION The present results indicate that oocyte and embryo cryopreservation are effective optional methods for young breast cancer patients. However, a lack of knowledge, the urgency of cancer treatment, and financial constraints are causes for a low access rate regarding this process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qi Wan
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Chengdu Jinjiang Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China; Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Ling Han
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University; Key Laboratory of Birth Defects and Related Diseases of Women and Children, Ministry of Education, Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Jing Liu
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Chengdu Jinjiang Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Hui Li
- Department of Breast Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Ya Li
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Chengdu Jinjiang Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Qi-Ming Long
- Department of Breast Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Li Tan
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Chengdu Jinjiang Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China
| | - Jun-Jie Li
- Department of Breast Surgery, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Di Mattei VE, Perego G, Rancoita PMV, Taranto P, Carnelli L, Mangili G, Sarais V, Bergamini A, Candiani M. Psychological Aspects Associated With Fertility Preservation in Oncology: An Exploratory Study. Front Psychol 2021; 11:608651. [PMID: 33414749 PMCID: PMC7783324 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.608651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Gonadotoxicity is considered one of the most distressing side effects of cancer treatment. Although fertility preservation can be a valid solution, it also involves a challenging process. A clear understanding of the features of women who decide to pursue fertility preservation after cancer diagnosis is missing. The purpose of the present study was therefore to analyze the personality profile of female patients referred to oncofertility prior to gonadotoxic treatment. Methods Fifty-two female cancer patients took part in the study. The Temperament and Character Inventory-Revised (TCI-R), the Response Evaluation Measure-71 (REM-71), the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II), and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-Y Form (STAI-Y) were administered to examine personality characteristics, defense mechanisms, depression and anxiety symptoms. Results Compared with reference data of the Italian population, our sample reported significantly lower scores in Harm Avoidance and trait anxiety, and significantly higher levels of mature defense mechanisms. Most of the patients reported low scores in immature defense mechanisms, depression, and trait anxiety, and medium scores in state anxiety. Conclusions Our findings suggest that these women display functional personality traits and defensive style, in association with low levels of depression and trait anxiety. These features may enable a proactive attitude to cancer and the ability to make long-term plans. This may favor psychological adjustment to cancer and a projection toward the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentina Elisabetta Di Mattei
- Division of Neuroscience, Clinical and Health Psychology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,School of Psychology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Gaia Perego
- Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Maria Vittoria Rancoita
- University Centre for Statistics in the Biomedical Sciences (CUSSB), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Paola Taranto
- Division of Neuroscience, Clinical and Health Psychology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Letizia Carnelli
- Division of Neuroscience, Clinical and Health Psychology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgia Mangili
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Veronica Sarais
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Alice Bergamini
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Candiani
- School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Obstetrics and Gynecology Unit, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Robson D, Phua C, Howard R, Marren A. Fertility preservation in oncology patients: A literature review examining current fertility preservation techniques and access to oncofertility services in Australia. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2019; 60:18-26. [PMID: 31617210 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Revised: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 09/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Australia, between the years 2010 and 2014, over 4500 adolescents and young adults (15-25 years old) were diagnosed with cancer. Treatment regimens are often gonadotoxic and are well known to induce ovarian and testicular failure. Oncofertility is an emerging discipline in obstetrics and gynaecology which seeks to preserve and restore the reproductive future of cancer patients. AIM To perform a systematic literature review to assess the current fertility preservation techniques available to patients and examine access and uptake of fertility preservation in Australia. MATERIALS AND METHODS Electronic databases, including Medline, Cochrane Review, SCOPUS and CINHAL, were searched for peer-reviewed publications and national guidelines examining oncofertility practices from 2008 to July 2018. Three hundred and seventy-five articles were initially screened, with 158 articles for full text review and an additional five clinical guidelines were identified. RESULTS There is a paucity of Australian data on oncofertility with <50% of data included for analysis reflecting the Australian experience. The majority of primary research included retrospective papers with small cohort numbers. Key areas addressed included live birth outcomes, uptake of services and patient and physician perspectives on fertility preservation. Few articles sought to examine the positive and negative side effects of fertility preservation in oncology, social challenges of oncofertility and access to services worldwide. CONCLUSION Oncofertility is an emerging discipline which seeks to provide safe, efficient and effective fertility preservation options for young adults and adolescents diagnosed with cancer. A multi-disciplinary approach with collaborative communication with oncologists is key to providing this service within Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle Robson
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital for Women and Babies, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Cheryl Phua
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital for Women and Babies, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Genea LTD, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Robyn Howard
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital for Women and Babies, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anthony Marren
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital for Women and Babies, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Genea LTD, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,The Institute of Academic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital & the University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ciccarone M, Hohaus S, Pulsoni A, Cavaceppi P, Franzò S, Fabbri R, Cudillo L, Battistini R, Di Rocco A, Annibali O, Cox MC, Provenzano I, Abruzzese E, Renzi D, Tesei C, Anticoli Borza P, Cuccaro A, Andriani A, D'Elia GM, Facchiano A, Marchetti P, Cantonetti M. Preliminary results of a counselling programme for fertility preservation in female cancer patients: The experience of the GEMME DORMIENTI network. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2019; 29:e13174. [PMID: 31571303 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2019] [Revised: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe a population of patients referred for fertility preservation (FP), how to efficiently provide FP care, and how FP care changed over time. METHODS This longitudinal observational study enrolled 281 female cancer patients referred between 2013 and 2016 to the non-profit organisation Gemme Dormienti ONLUS (GD) for FP care. All patients underwent the same battery of instrumental and laboratory diagnostic tests. GnRHa therapy was started at least seven days before CTh treatment. RESULTS From 2013 to 2016, we observed a progressive increase in the number of patients referred for FP care. Out of 251 eligible patients, 135 patients were treated with GnRHa only, and 72 patients underwent GnRHa therapy and cryopreservation. The median time from GD referral to oocyte and ovarian tissue cryopreservation was 11 and 5 days respectively. Tissue cryopreservation requests increased during our study period (from four cases in 2013 to 17 cases in 2016). During follow-up, 17β-estradiol and FSH levels were significantly increased (p < .0001), and AMH levels were significantly decreased (p < .0001). CONCLUSION The rapid increase in the number of patients who requested FP care and in the complexity of FP procedures overtime reflects the need to improve quality of life for cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariavita Ciccarone
- Department of Gynaecology, San Carlo di Nancy Hospital, Rome, Italy.,Gemme Dormienti Association ONLUS, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefan Hohaus
- Policlinico Gemelli Foundation, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Pulsoni
- Department of Cellular Biotechnology and Haematology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Raffaella Fabbri
- Gynaecology and Physiopathology of Human Reproduction Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Laura Cudillo
- Haematology and Stem Cell Transplant Unit, Tor Vergata University, Roma, Italy
| | - Roberta Battistini
- A.O. San Camillo Forlanini U.O.C. Ematologia e Trapianti CSE, Rome, Italy
| | - Alice Di Rocco
- Department of Cellular Biotechnology and Haematology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Ombretta Annibali
- UOC Haematology Stem Cell Transplantation, University Campus Bio Medico, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Christina Cox
- Haematology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitaria Sant'Andrea, Rome, Italy
| | - Ida Provenzano
- UOC Oncoematologia Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Daniela Renzi
- Haematology and Stem Cell Transplant Unit, IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Annarosa Cuccaro
- Policlinico Gemelli Foundation, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Andriani
- UOSD di Ematologia, Rome, Italy.,UOC di Ematologia, Osp. F. Spaziani, ASL Frosinone, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianna Maria D'Elia
- Department of Cellular Biotechnology and Haematology, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Marchetti
- Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Maria Cantonetti
- UOC Oncoematologia Fondazione Policlinico Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Challenging iatrogenic menopause. Oncofertility programme in Poland - a single-centre experience. MENOPAUSE REVIEW 2019; 18:63-67. [PMID: 31485201 PMCID: PMC6719631 DOI: 10.5114/pm.2019.85787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2018] [Accepted: 04/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Menopause is defined as a 12-month period of time when menstruation permanently ceases. In some cases, menopause may be caused by external factors – for example gonadotoxic treatment that irreversibly damages ovarian tissue leading to loss of its hormonal and reproductive function. Oncofertility is a discipline that merges oncology and reproductive medicine, giving patients a chance to experience parenthood after gonadotoxic treatment is finished. Aim of the study The purpose of the study is to present the implementation and first outcomes of the Oncofertility Programme in the University Clinic of Endocrinological Gynaecology and Gynaecology, University Hospital in Krakow, Poland. Material and methods Patients interested in fertility preservation have been consulted in the University Clinic of Endocrinological Gynaecology and Gynaecology in Krakow since April 2016. Preliminary qualification to one of the available methods (embryo cryopreservation, oocyte cryopreservation, ovarian tissue cryopreservation) was conducted. Patients declaring a wish to join the programme were then referred to one of the three infertility treatment centres cooperating with the University Clinic, in order to undergo the chosen procedure. Results During a period of 24 months, 18 patients were consulted. The youngest consulted patient was 20 years old, the oldest 39. Two years after the first consultation, a telephone survey among consulted patients was carried out to verify whether the patients finally underwent oncofertility procedures, and to ask about their reproductive status. Conclusions The problem of fertility issues being inadequately addressed results in low referral rates to oncofertility programmes. Attempts to raise awareness of oncofertility possibilities among oncologists should be undertaken because critically few patients are being referred to oncofertility centres.
Collapse
|
9
|
Anazodo A, Laws P, Logan S, Saunders C, Travaglia J, Gerstl B, Bradford N, Cohn R, Birdsall M, Barr R, Suzuki N, Takae S, Marinho R, Xiao S, Qiong-Hua C, Mahajan N, Patil M, Gunasheela D, Smith K, Sender L, Melo C, Almeida-Santos T, Salama M, Appiah L, Su I, Lane S, Woodruff TK, Pacey A, Anderson RA, Shenfield F, Ledger W, Sullivan E. How can we improve oncofertility care for patients? A systematic scoping review of current international practice and models of care. Hum Reprod Update 2019; 25:159-179. [PMID: 30462263 PMCID: PMC6390168 DOI: 10.1093/humupd/dmy038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2018] [Revised: 10/15/2018] [Accepted: 10/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fertility preservation (FP) is an important quality of life issue for cancer survivors of reproductive age. Despite the existence of broad international guidelines, the delivery of oncofertility care, particularly amongst paediatric, adolescent and young adult patients, remains a challenge for healthcare professionals (HCPs). The quality of oncofertility care is variable and the uptake and utilization of FP remains low. Available guidelines fall short in providing adequate detail on how oncofertility models of care (MOC) allow for the real-world application of guidelines by HCPs. OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature on the components of oncofertility care as defined by patient and clinician representatives, and identify the barriers, facilitators and challenges, so as to improve the implementation of oncofertility services. SEARCH METHODS A systematic scoping review was conducted on oncofertility MOC literature published in English between 2007 and 2016, relating to 10 domains of care identified through consumer research: communication, oncofertility decision aids, age-appropriate care, referral pathways, documentation, training, supportive care during treatment, reproductive care after cancer treatment, psychosocial support and ethical practice of oncofertility care. A wide range of electronic databases (CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, PubMed, AEIPT, Education Research Complete, ProQuest and VOCED) were searched in order to synthesize the evidence around delivery of oncofertility care. Related citations and reference lists were searched. The review was undertaken following registration (International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) registration number CRD42017055837) and guidelines of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). OUTCOMES A total of 846 potentially relevant studies were identified after the removal of duplicates. All titles and abstracts were screened by a single reviewer and the final 147 papers were screened by two reviewers. Ten papers on established MOC were identified amongst the included papers. Data were extracted from each paper and quality scores were then summarized in the oncofertility MOC summary matrix. The results identified a number of themes for improving MOC in each domain, which included: the importance of patients receiving communication that is of a higher quality and in different formats on their fertility risk and FP options; improving provision of oncofertility care in a timely manner; improving access to age-appropriate care; defining the role and scope of practice of all HCPs; and improving communication between different HCPs. Different forms of decision aids were found useful for assisting patients to understand FP options and weigh up choices. WIDER IMPLICATIONS This analysis identifies core components for delivery of oncofertility MOC. The provision of oncofertility services requires planning to ensure services have safe and reliable referral pathways and that they are age-appropriate and include medical and psychological oncofertility care into the survivorship period. In order for this to happen, collaboration needs to occur between clinicians, allied HCPs and executives within paediatric and adult hospitals, as well as fertility clinics across both public and private services. Training of both cancer and non-cancer HCPs is needed to improve the knowledge of HCPs, the quality of care provided and the confidence of HCPs with these consultations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoinette Anazodo
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, High Street Randwick, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Nelune Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Barker Street, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Botany Street, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Paula Laws
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, High Street Randwick, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Shanna Logan
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Botany Street, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Fertility and Research Centre, Royal Hospital for Women, Barker Street, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Carla Saunders
- Centre for Health Services Management, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, 15 Broadway, Ultimo, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Jo Travaglia
- Centre for Health Services Management, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, 15 Broadway, Ultimo, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Brigitte Gerstl
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, High Street Randwick, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Nelune Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Barker Street, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Natalie Bradford
- Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Richard Cohn
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children’s Hospital, High Street Randwick, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Botany Street, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Mary Birdsall
- Fertility Associates, 7 Ellerslie Racecourse Drive, Auckland City, New Zealand
| | - Ronald Barr
- Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nao Suzuki
- St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Kawasaki Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan
| | - Seido Takae
- St. Marianna University School of Medicine, 2-16-1 Sugao, Kawasaki Kanagawa Prefecture, Japan
| | - Ricardo Marinho
- Pro Criar Medicina Reprodutiva, Rua Bernardo Guimarães 2063, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Shuo Xiao
- Reproductive Health and Toxicology Lab, Dept. Environmental Health Sciences, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Discovery I, 915 Greene St, Rm 327, Columbia, SC, USA
| | - Chen Qiong-Hua
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, 55 Zhenhai Road, Siming Qu, Xiamen Shi 35, China
| | - Nalini Mahajan
- Mother and Child Hospital, D-59 Defence Colony, New Delhi, India
| | - Madhuri Patil
- Dr. Patil’s Fertility and Endoscopy Center, Center for Assisted Reproductive Technology, Endoscopic Surgery and Andrology, Bangalore, India
| | - Devika Gunasheela
- Gunasheela Surgical & Maternity Hospital, No. 1, Dewan Madhava Road, Opp. M. N. Krishna Rao Park, Basavanagudi, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
| | - Kristen Smith
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University, 420 E Superior Street, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Leonard Sender
- Children’s Hospital Orange County, 1201 W La Veta Avenue, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Cláudia Melo
- Centro de Preservação da Fertilidade, Serviço de Medicina da Reprodução, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Edifício de São Jerónimo, Piso 2, Praceta Professor Mota Pinto, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Teresa Almeida-Santos
- Centro de Preservação da Fertilidade, Serviço de Medicina da Reprodução, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Edifício de São Jerónimo, Piso 2, Praceta Professor Mota Pinto, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Mahmoud Salama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University, 420 E Superior Street, Chicago, IL, USA
- Reproductive Medicine Department, National Research Center, Buhouth Street 33, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Leslie Appiah
- The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbus, OH, USA
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center–James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA
- Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Department of Paediatric Surgery, 700 Children’s Drive, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Irene Su
- University of California San Diego, 355 Dickinson St # 315, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Sheila Lane
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford, UK
- University of Oxford, Wellington Square, Oxford, UK
| | - Teresa K Woodruff
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine Northwestern University, 420 E Superior Street, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Allan Pacey
- Academic Unit of Reproductive and Developmental Medicine, Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Level 4, The Jessop Wing, Tree Root Walk, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK
| | - Richard A Anderson
- MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, The Queen’s Medical Research Institute, Edinburgh University, 47 Little France Crescent, Scotland, UK
| | - Francoise Shenfield
- Reproductive Medicine Unit, Elizabeth Garrett Anderson Wing, University College London Hospital, 25 Grafton Way, London, UK
| | - William Ledger
- School of Women’s and Children’s Health, University of New South Wales, Botany Street, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Fertility and Research Centre, Royal Hospital for Women, Barker Street, Randwick, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Sullivan
- Australian Centre for Public and Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, University of Technology, 15 Broadway, Ultimo, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dittrich R, Kliesch S, Schüring A, Balcerek M, Baston-Büst DM, Beck R, Beckmann MW, Behringer K, Borgmann-Staudt A, Cremer W, Denzer C, Diemer T, Dorn A, Fehm T, Gaase R, Germeyer A, Geue K, Ghadjar P, Goeckenjan M, Götte M, Guth D, Hauffa BP, Hehr U, Hetzer F, Hirchenhain J, Hoffmann W, Hornemann B, Jantke A, Kentenich H, Kiesel L, Köhn FM, Korell M, Lax S, Liebenthron J, Lux M, Meißner J, Micke O, Nassar N, Nawroth F, Nordhoff V, Ochsendorf F, Oppelt PG, Pelz J, Rau B, Reisch N, Riesenbeck D, Schlatt S, Sender A, Schwab R, Siedentopf F, Thorn P, Wagner S, Wildt L, Wimberger P, Wischmann T, von Wolff M, Lotz L. Fertility Preservation for Patients with Malignant Disease. Guideline of the DGGG, DGU and DGRM (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/082, November 2017) - Recommendations and Statements for Girls and Women. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2018; 78:567-584. [PMID: 29962516 PMCID: PMC6018069 DOI: 10.1055/a-0611-5549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2018] [Revised: 04/15/2018] [Accepted: 04/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim
The aim of this official guideline published by the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) and coordinated with the German Society of Urology (DGU) and the German Society of Reproductive Medicine (DGRM) is to provide consensus-based recommendations, obtained by evaluating the relevant literature, on counseling and fertility preservation for prepubertal girls and boys as well as patients of reproductive age. Statements and recommendations for girls and women are presented below. Statements or recommendations for boys and men are not the focus of this guideline.
Methods
This S2k guideline was developed at the suggestion of the guideline commission of the DGGG, DGU and DGRM and represents the structured consensus of representative members from various professional associations (n = 40).
Recommendations
The guideline provides recommendations on counseling and fertility preservation for women and girls which take account of the patientʼs personal circumstances, the planned oncologic therapy and the individual risk profile as well as the preferred approach for selected tumor entities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ralf Dittrich
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Sabine Kliesch
- Centrum für Reproduktionsmedizin und Andrologie, Universitätsklinik Münster, Münster, Germany
| | | | - Magdalena Balcerek
- Pädiatrie mit Schwerpunkt Onkologie und Hämatologie, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Anja Borgmann-Staudt
- Pädiatrie mit Schwerpunkt Onkologie und Hämatologie, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Christian Denzer
- Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Thorsten Diemer
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Kinderurologie und Andrologie, Universitätsklinikum Gießen, Gießen, Germany
| | - Almut Dorn
- Praxis für Gynäkologische Psychosomatik, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Tanja Fehm
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Rüdiger Gaase
- Gemeinschaftspraxis für Frauenheilkunde, Worms, Germany
| | - Ariane Germeyer
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kristina Geue
- Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Pirus Ghadjar
- Radioonkologie und Strahlentherapie, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Martin Götte
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Dagmar Guth
- Praxis für Frauenheilkunde Plauen, Plauen, Germany
| | | | - Ute Hehr
- Zentrum für Humangenetik, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Franc Hetzer
- Chirurgisches Departement, Spital Linth, Uznach, Switzerland
| | - Jens Hirchenhain
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | - Ludwig Kiesel
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Matthias Korell
- Frauenklinik, Johanna Etienne Klinikum Neuss, Neuss, Germany
| | - Sigurd Lax
- Institut für Pathologie, LKH Graz Süd-West, Graz, Austria
| | - Jana Liebenthron
- Gynäkologische Endokrinologie und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Michael Lux
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Julia Meißner
- Hämatologie, Onkologie und Rheumatologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Micke
- Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Franziskus Hospital Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
| | | | - Frank Nawroth
- Facharzt-Zentrum für Kinderwunsch, Pränatale Medizin, Endokrinologie und Osteologie, amedes MVZ Hamburg GmbH, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Verena Nordhoff
- Centrum für Reproduktionsmedizin und Andrologie, Universitätsklinik Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Falk Ochsendorf
- Andrologie, Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Patricia G Oppelt
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Jörg Pelz
- Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Beate Rau
- Onkologische Chirurgie, Charité Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Nicole Reisch
- Endokrinologie, Universitätsklinikum München, München, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Schlatt
- Centrum für Reproduktionsmedizin und Andrologie, Universitätsklinik Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Annekathrin Sender
- Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Roxana Schwab
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Friederike Siedentopf
- Brustzentrum, Martin-Luther-Krankenhaus, Paul Gerhardt Diakonie, Berlin-Wilmersdorf, Germany
| | - Petra Thorn
- Praxis für psychosoziale Kinderwunschberatung, Paar- und Familientherapie, Mörfelden-Walldorf, Germany
| | | | - Ludwig Wildt
- Gynäkologische Endokrinologie und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | | | - Tewes Wischmann
- Medizinische Psychologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael von Wolff
- Gynäkologische Endokrinologie und Reproduktionsmedizin, Universitäts-Spital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Laura Lotz
- Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kyono K, Hashimoto T, Toya M, Koizumi M, Sasaki C, Shibasaki S, Aono N, Nakamura Y, Obata R, Okuyama N, Ogura Y, Igarashi H. A transportation network for human ovarian tissue is indispensable to success for fertility preservation. J Assist Reprod Genet 2017; 34:1469-1474. [PMID: 28866830 PMCID: PMC5699996 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-017-1022-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2017] [Accepted: 08/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of an ovarian tissue transportation network for fertility preservation (FP) for cancer patients in Japan. METHODS PubMed was searched for papers on transportation of human ovarian tissue for FP. We analyzed population, area, number of cancer patients for ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC), quality control/assessment and safety, cost of a cryopreservation center for the building for 30 years, and medical fees of cancer patients (operation, cryopreservation, and storage of ovarian tissue). RESULTS More than twenty babies have been born in Denmark and Germany through a transportation system. Up to 400 new patients a year need OTC. The fees for removal, cryopreservation, and storage for 5 years, and transplantation of ovarian tissue are around €5,000, €4,000, and €5,000, respectively. It costs more than €5 million to establish and maintain one cryopreservation center for 30 years. If we have a few cryopreservation centers in Japan, we can cryopreserve 400 patients' ovarian tissue per year by safer slow freezing and maintain quality control/assessment. We need to lighten the patients' burden for easy to use FP by a government subsidy and medical insurance coverage. CONCLUSIONS This model has been termed the Danish model ("the woman stays - the tissue moves"). This is truly patient-centered medicine. We can have maximum effects with the minimum burden. A transportation network like those of Denmark and Germany is the best strategy for FP in Japan. It may be the best system for cancer patients, medical staff, and the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Kyono
- Kyono ART Clinic Takanawa, Takanawa Court 5F, 3-13-1 Takanawa, Minatoku, Tokyo, 108-0074, Japan.
- Kyono ART Clinic, 1-1-1-3F, Honcho, Aobaku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-0014, Japan.
| | - T Hashimoto
- Kyono ART Clinic Takanawa, Takanawa Court 5F, 3-13-1 Takanawa, Minatoku, Tokyo, 108-0074, Japan
- Kyono ART Clinic, 1-1-1-3F, Honcho, Aobaku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-0014, Japan
| | - M Toya
- Kyono ART Clinic Takanawa, Takanawa Court 5F, 3-13-1 Takanawa, Minatoku, Tokyo, 108-0074, Japan
- Kyono ART Clinic, 1-1-1-3F, Honcho, Aobaku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-0014, Japan
| | - M Koizumi
- Kyono ART Clinic Takanawa, Takanawa Court 5F, 3-13-1 Takanawa, Minatoku, Tokyo, 108-0074, Japan
- Kyono ART Clinic, 1-1-1-3F, Honcho, Aobaku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-0014, Japan
| | - C Sasaki
- Kyono ART Clinic Takanawa, Takanawa Court 5F, 3-13-1 Takanawa, Minatoku, Tokyo, 108-0074, Japan
- Kyono ART Clinic, 1-1-1-3F, Honcho, Aobaku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-0014, Japan
| | - S Shibasaki
- Kyono ART Clinic Takanawa, Takanawa Court 5F, 3-13-1 Takanawa, Minatoku, Tokyo, 108-0074, Japan
- Kyono ART Clinic, 1-1-1-3F, Honcho, Aobaku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-0014, Japan
| | - N Aono
- Kyono ART Clinic Takanawa, Takanawa Court 5F, 3-13-1 Takanawa, Minatoku, Tokyo, 108-0074, Japan
- Kyono ART Clinic, 1-1-1-3F, Honcho, Aobaku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-0014, Japan
| | - Y Nakamura
- Kyono ART Clinic Takanawa, Takanawa Court 5F, 3-13-1 Takanawa, Minatoku, Tokyo, 108-0074, Japan
- Kyono ART Clinic, 1-1-1-3F, Honcho, Aobaku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-0014, Japan
| | - R Obata
- Kyono ART Clinic Takanawa, Takanawa Court 5F, 3-13-1 Takanawa, Minatoku, Tokyo, 108-0074, Japan
- Kyono ART Clinic, 1-1-1-3F, Honcho, Aobaku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-0014, Japan
| | - N Okuyama
- Kyono ART Clinic Takanawa, Takanawa Court 5F, 3-13-1 Takanawa, Minatoku, Tokyo, 108-0074, Japan
- Kyono ART Clinic, 1-1-1-3F, Honcho, Aobaku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-0014, Japan
| | - Y Ogura
- Kyono ART Clinic Takanawa, Takanawa Court 5F, 3-13-1 Takanawa, Minatoku, Tokyo, 108-0074, Japan
- Kyono ART Clinic, 1-1-1-3F, Honcho, Aobaku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-0014, Japan
| | - H Igarashi
- Kyono ART Clinic Takanawa, Takanawa Court 5F, 3-13-1 Takanawa, Minatoku, Tokyo, 108-0074, Japan
- Kyono ART Clinic, 1-1-1-3F, Honcho, Aobaku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-0014, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Timing should no longer be an obstacle to oocyte cryopreservation in patients with cancer. TUMORI JOURNAL 2016; 103:182-186. [PMID: 28009430 DOI: 10.5301/tj.5000586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/04/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Anticancer treatment-related infertility is preventable with oocyte cryopreservation, but this is often not considered a relevant issue, due to lack of knowledge and time. The aim of this study is to prove that adequate organization of an Oncofertility Unit and the use of new protocols for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) can reduce the time required by the procedure, encouraging consultants and patients to preserve fertility before gonadotoxic treatments. METHODS A total of 125 patients diagnosed with malignant tumors were referred to the Oncofertility Unit of San Raffaele Hospital: 52 patients between April 2011 and October 2013 and 73 patients between October 2013 and November 2015. The 2 periods differ in office organization and type of COS protocol used. RESULTS Between the 2 periods, a reduction in the mean number of days required from first counseling to the initiation (6.45 ± 1.058 vs 1.61 ± 0.228) and the end of the COS (17.83 ± 1.227 vs 13.70 ± 0.393) was observed (p<0.0001). No differences exist in the groups between the mean time required to complete COS (11.38 ± 0.360 vs 12.17 ± 0.309; p = 0.11) and mean number of frozen oocytes (8.458 ± 1.060 vs 10.30 ± 0.919; p = 0.22). Furthermore, in the second period, the number of patients who accepted fertility preservation increased (46.15% vs 64.38%; p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Renewed organization of the Oncofertility Unit and the newest random-start COS protocol allowed us to shorten the time for oocyte cryopreservation and start anticancer treatment on time.
Collapse
|
13
|
Female fertility preservation strategies: cryopreservation and ovarian tissue in vitro culture, current state of the art and future perspectives. ZYGOTE 2016; 24:635-53. [PMID: 27141985 DOI: 10.1017/s096719941600006x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
In the present review, the main strategies of female fertility preservation are covered. Procedures of fertility preservation are necessary for women who suffer from diseases whose treatment requires the use of aggressive therapies, such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy. These kinds of therapy negatively influence the health of gametes and their progenitors. The most commonly used method of female fertility preservation is ovarian tissue cryopreservation, followed by the retransplantation of thawed tissue. Another approach to female fertility preservation that has been actively developed lately is the ovarian tissue in vitro culture. The principal methods, advantages and drawbacks of these two strategies are discussed in this article.
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
In this issue of the Chinese Journal of Cancer, European, American, and Chinese experts review the current management and future perspectives of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), the leading cause of gynecological cancer deaths. Although major advances have been made in understanding the cellular and molecular biology of this highly heterogeneous malignancy, the survival rate of women with EOC has changed little since the introduction of platinum-based treatment as a front-line therapy. The papers describe the progress in deciphering the molecular complexity of this disease and the newly available molecular-driven therapies, which have been applied by shifting trial designs toward restricting eligibility to specific subgroups of patients rather than testing agents in unselected populations. These new trial designs provide potential opportunities for improved efficacy in targeted populations. Given the molecular complexity of this disease, patient survival may be increased by searching for new molecular prognostic/predictive signatures as well as by translating the recent insight of microRNA involvement in EOC progression into new, targeted therapies. Particular attention has been given to the issue of fertility sparing for women affected by curable diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Delia Mezzanzanica
- Unit of Molecular Therapies, Department of Experimental Oncology and Molecular Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milano 20133, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|