Effect of Diameter of Saphenous Vein on Stump Length after Radiofrequency Ablation for Varicose Vein

Vitis Vinifera Seed Extract Versus Micronized Purified Flavonoid Fraction for Patients with Chronic Venous Disease: A Randomized Noninferiority Trial

BACKGROUND

Venoactive drugs (VADs) based on Vitis vinifera extract are widely used in Korea. However, studies on the clinical effects and head-to-head comparisons with other groups of VADs are limited. This trial aimed to evaluate whether Vitis vinifera seed extract was noninferior to the micronized purified flavonoid fraction (MPFF) in relieving venous symptoms and improving quality of life in patients with chronic venous disease.

METHODS

In this double-blind prospective randomized trial, patients from 13 hospitals, who were diagnosed with venous incompetence by duplex ultrasound and classified as clinical class 1, 2, or 3 in the Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, and Pathophysiological classifications were enrolled. The primary outcome was the change in the Chronic Venous Disease Quality of Life Questionnaire (CIVIQ-20) score at 8 weeks from baseline. Secondary outcomes included changes in the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire, visual analog scale, and Venous Clinical Severity Score at 4 and 8 weeks from baseline. Moreover, the change in leg circumferences was measured at 8 weeks and compared to baseline.

RESULTS

In total, 303 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either Vitis vinifera seed extract (n = 154) or MPFF (n = 149). The CIVIQ-20 scores at 8 weeks were significantly reduced compared to those at baseline in both groups. No significant intergroup difference in the change of CIVIQ-20 at 8 weeks from baseline was observed (-8.31 ± 14.63 vs. -10.35 ± 14.38, P = 0.29, 95% confidence interval -1.65 to 5.72). The lower limit of the 95% confidence interval was within the predefined noninferiority margin of 6.9. Furthermore, the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire, visual analog scale, and Venous Clinical Severity Score scores significantly decreased at 4 and 8 weeks after randomization compared with baseline in both groups. No significant differences were observed in the reduction of each score between groups. The calf circumference measured at 8 weeks was significantly reduced compared to that at baseline in patients receiving Vitis vinifera seed extract.

CONCLUSIONS

Vitis vinifera seed extract was noninferior to MPFF in relieving venous symptoms and improving the quality of life in patients with chronic venous disease.

Clinical outcomes of nonthermal ablation, thermal ablation, and surgical stripping for varicose veins

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cyanoacrylate closure (CAC), mechanochemical ablation (MOCA), and surgical stripping (SS) for incompetent saphenous veins and to determine a suitable treatment modality for a specific clinical situation.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with varicose veins who underwent RFA, CAC, MOCA, or SS from January 2012 to June 2023. The clinical outcomes, including postoperative complications and the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire score, were assessed.

RESULTS

During the study period, 2866 patients with varicose veins were treated. Among them, 1670 patients (57.9%) were women. The mean age was 55.3 ± 12.9 years. RFA, CAC, MOCA, and SS were performed in 1984 (68.7%), 732 (25.4%), 78 (2.7%), and 88 (3.0%) patients, respectively. The complete target vein closure rate after RFA, CAC, and MOCA was 94.5%, 98%, and 98%, respectively. The absence of a target vein after SS was 98%. Deep vein thrombosis developed in four patients: one in the RFA group and three in CAC group. Surgical or endovenous procedure-induced thrombosis occurred in 2.3%, 4.8%, 6.4%, and 2.3% of the patients after RFA, CAC, MOCA, and SS, respectively. Phlebitis along the target vein occurred in 0.2% and 3.8% of patients after RFA and MOCA, respectively. A hypersensitivity reaction occurred in 3.7% of patients after CAC. Readmission was required for two patients who had undergone SS. Transient nerve symptoms developed in five (0.3%), zero, one (1.3%), and two (2.3%) patients after RFA, CAC, MOCA, and SS, respectively. After treatment, the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire score improved significantly in all groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical outcomes with improvement in quality of life were comparable among the different treatment modalities. The proximity of the nerve or skin to the target vein is the most important factor in selecting a suitable treatment modality.

Myths and truths about varicose veins

Background: Varicose veins are a common chronic venous disorder that leads to a significantly reduced quality of life and high healthcare resource burden. There is a large amount of research-based data and opinions regarding varicose veins. There are also some common myths and misconceptions about the treatment options.Current Concepts: Management options include compression therapy, open venous surgery, and endovenous therapy. An appropriate treatment option must be selected on a case-by-case basis based on the symptoms, severity, and duplex ultrasonography findings. Venous intervention should be considered if the condition is symptomatic and often, there is no need for urgent surgery or endovenous therapy because the symptoms usually progress slowly and severe cardiac problems are rare. According to previous studies, there is no difference between the endovenous therapy modalities and the traditional surgical method (i.e., high ligation and stripping) in terms of recurrence rates. Therefore, case-specific factors, such as anatomy and economic factors, should be considered. When compression therapy is considered, graduated compression stocking with suitable pressure should be prescribed. Venoactive drugs can be suggested in addition to compression therapy for symptomatic varicose veins or venous ulcers.Discussion and Conclusion:. Correct information regarding treatment for varicose veins based on the best available evidence must be provided to patients. The treatment options for varicose veins should be selected on a case-by-case basis considering the patient`s symptoms, anatomy and economic factors.

First-generation therapy for varicose veins: medication, compression, sclerotherapy, and stripping

Background: Improving the understanding varicose veins (VV) is increasing due to life extension and concerns regarding quality of life. Recently, endovascular treatment has become more common, even in mild cases. Excessive procedures are often performed before conservative and non-surgical treatments. We aimed to explain the efficacy of medication, compression, sclerotherapy, and stripping of treatments and to consider the appropriate indications for many treatment methods, including endovascular procedures.Current Concepts: Venoactive drugs can be used as first-line agents for symptoms, such as edema, at all stages of varicose vein. These are effective adjuvant agents and can help achieve compression before and after procedures. Compression therapy is effective for skin change and ulcers and is excellent for the improvement of symptoms. Sclerotherapy has been widely used as an adjuvant treatment, but recently, its indications have been expanded for non-invasive causes. Traditional high ligation and stripping is still the recommended treatment option for recurrent or complicated varicose veins.Discussion and Conclusion: The patients’ symptoms should be evaluated more critically than assessing only the venous reflux using ultrasound. Additionally, objective evaluation of various causes of lower extremity discomfort should be considered. Treatment according to appropriate indications, such as medication, compression, sclerotherapy, stripping, and endovascular therapy, can improve the patients’ quality of life and prevent complications.

Diagnosis of varicose veins

Background: Varicose veins refer to tortuous engorged veins on the lower extremities. Although this is a common condition observed in clinical practice, objective diagnosis is important for optimal treatment.Current Concepts: Thorough physical examination is the first key step for diagnosis of varicose veins. Both legs should be examined between the inguinal region and the feet with the patient in an erect position. The presence and location of venous reflux should be confirmed using duplex ultrasonography (DUS), which serves as a simple, non-invasive modality to assess both the anatomy and physiology of leg veins. Reflux is defined as duration of retrograde flow greater than 0.5 seconds in superficial veins, 0.35 seconds in perforating veins, and 1.0 seconds in deep veins. Computed tomography venography can be used in selective cases as a complementary tool to obtain objective images of all varicose veins; however, this imaging modality cannot confirm venous reflux.Discussion and Conclusion: DUS is a key diagnostic tool for varicose veins. However, DUS results are operator dependent; therefore, this procedure should be performed by experienced technologists or clinicians, based on guidelines. The location and duration of reflux should be recorded.

Campaign for the optimal treatment of varicose veins: welcoming the declaration of the Code of Ethics issued by the Korean Society for Phlebology

Background: Varicose veins (VV) is a common chronic venous disorder that is often left untreated due to its minor symptoms. However, recent developments in minimal invasive surgery has resulted in a rapid increase of VV treatment cases. Unfortunately, there have been some ethical issues regarding the high cost of intervention and non-professional treatment administered for VV at some private clinics.Current Concepts: Most endovenous therapies for VV are not reimbursed by the national health insurance but are only covered by personal health insurance plans in Korea. Rapid increase in the coverage costs for VV treatment has led to conflicts between the insurance companies and doctors in several cases. Recently, the Korean Society for Phlebology declared the Code of Ethics to support evidence-based treatment and warn against unethical practices related to interventions for VV.Discussion and Conclusion: The Korean Society for Vascular Surgery and Korean Society for Phlebology have just launched a campaign for the optimal treatment of VV on their YouTube channel, which shares accurate information regarding VV treatment to inform patients and doctors. To strengthen doctor-patient relationship and to avoid falling prey to unethical practitioners, it is critical to educate and update patients and healthcare service providers regarding the options available for VV treatment.

Current status of endothermal heat induced thrombosis

BACKGROUND

There remain many questions regarding the pathophysiology and risk factors for endothermal heat induced thrombosis formation. Moreover, there are a paucity of data on the timing of its occurrence, and there has been no consensus regarding for its treatment. The purpose of this review is to summarize the current knowledge on the pathophysiology, risk factors and treatment strategies for endothermal heat induced thrombosis.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched from 2001 to present for endothermal heat induced thrombosis, EHIT, deep vein thrombosis, chronic venous insufficiency, varicose veins, endovenous laser and radiofrequency ablation (treatment). All relevant articles identified by the authors mentioning endothermal heat induced thrombosis were included in this review.

RESULTS

A multitude of risk factors, several pathophysiological hypotheses and different treatment strategies are described in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Endothermal heat induced thrombosis is marginally understood. There remains a theoretical risk for significant venous thromboembolic complications. With the new uniform classification of EHIT (American Venous Forum), healthcare providers should continue to investigate the nature of this event.

Effect of saphenous vein diameter and reflux time on stump length after cyanoacrylate closure

Cyanoacrylate closure (CAC) has recently been introduced for the treatment of incompetent saphenous veins. The purpose of the present study is to investigate the correlation of the saphenous vein diameter and reflux time (RT) with the stump length after CAC. A retrospective review was performed using prospectively collected data of CAC patients. The pre-operative saphenous vein diameter and RT were measured. The stump length was measured immediately after the procedure and at 1 week. Pearson's correlation analysis was applied to determine the correlation between the saphenous vein diameter or RT and stump length. A total of 32 saphenous veins were closed in 21 patients, 15 of whom were female. The mean age was 56.9±12.6 years (range, 31-73 years). Complete closure was achieved in all patients. The pre-operative mean diameter was 7.0±2.2 mm. The mean stump lengths were 26.1±10.2 and 28.1±13.6 mm on post-operative days 0 and 7, respectively (P=0.002). The Pearson coefficients for the correlation between the saphenous vein diameter and stump length on post-operative days 0 and 7 were 0.528 (P=0.005) and 0.177 (P=0.430), respectively. Furthermore, the Pearson coefficients for the correlation between the RT and stump length on post-operative days 0 and 7 were -0.215 (P=0.282) and 0.019 (P=0.938), respectively. In conclusion, CAC is effective modality for the treatment of saphenous vein insufficiency. The stump length increased with the diameter of the saphenous veins, while the RT had no marked effect on the stump length. Therefore, the glue injection should be initiated from the instructed position to avoid glue extension into deep veins and to prevent elongating the stump length.