Risk Factors of Unfavorable Outcomes, Major Bleeding, and All-Cause Mortality in Patients with Venous Thromboembolism

Association between diabetes and venous thromboembolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus (DM) plays a vital role in the development of cardiovascular disease. However, its association with venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains unclear, for the published study results are conflicting. We performed a meta-analysis of published cohort studies and case-control studies to assess the role of DM in the formation and prognosis of VTE.

METHODS

PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for articles from the database's establishment until September 15, 2022. Of the 15,754 publications retrieved, 50 studies were identified that met the selection criteria. The New castle-Ottawa Scale was used to evaluate the quality of the literature. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated using fixed- or random-effect models.

RESULTS

We combined OR using a random-effects or fixed-effects model: patients with DM had an increased risk of VTE (OR 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-1.41), which still showed a partial association in studies adjusted by confounding factors (OR 1.20, 95% CI: 1.07-1.35). DM was not significantly associated with VTE when analyzed in studies adjusted by body mass index (OR 1.04, 95% CI: 0.94-1.15). VTE patients with DM had a higher risk of short-term and long-term mortality than those without DM (OR 1.58 [95% CI: 1.26-1.99] for long-term mortality and OR 1.20 [95% CI: 1.19-1.21] for short-term mortality).

CONCLUSION

There was no significant association between DM and VTE risk, and body mass index may be a significant confounding factor between DM and VTE risk. However, DM can still lead to an increased risk of long-term and short-term mortality in patients with VTE.

Anterior cruciate ligament tear increases the risk of venous thromboembolism: a population-based cohort study

PURPOSE

Previous studies highlighted an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR); however, the risk for those with ACL tear but without undergoing ACLR has not been reported yet. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk of VTE among ACL tear individuals with or without ACLR derived from the general population.

METHODS

A cohort study was conducted using data from the IQVIA Medical Research Database of the United Kingdom. Up to five non-ACL tear individuals (n = 22,235) were matched to each case of ACL tear (n = 4474) by age, sex, body mass index and entry-time. The relation of ACL tear to VTE [pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT)] was examined using a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model. A sub-cohort analysis, in which the ACL tear individuals were stratified into those with ACLR and those without ACLR, was also conducted.

RESULTS

VTE developed in 13 individuals with ACL tear and nine individuals without ACL tear (incidence rates: 3.1 vs. 0.4/1000 person-years), with multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio (HR) being 6.59 (95% CI 2.28-19.08) in 1-year follow-up. For ACL tear individuals with ACLR, the HR was 11.44 (95% CI 2.71-48.28), and for those without ACLR, the HR was 6.02 (95% CI 1.44-24.25), compared with individuals without ACL tear.

CONCLUSION

This large-sample population-based cohort study provides the first evidence on an increased risk of VTE in ACL tear individuals regardless of subsequent ACLR, which supports the necessity for monitoring venous-thromboembolic complications in the target population, including those without ACLR.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.