Outcomes of lobectomy in 'active' octogenarians with clinical stage I non-small-cell lung cancer

Prognostic Impact of Mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection in Octogenarians With Lung Cancer: JACS1303

INTRODUCTION

The prognostic significance of mediastinal lymph node dissection (MLND) in elderly patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. This post hoc analysis of a nationwide multicenter cohort study (JACS1303) evaluated the prognostic significance of MLND in octogenarians with NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 622 octogenarians with NSCLC who underwent lobectomy. The median follow-up duration was 41.1 months. We compared survival and perioperative outcomes between patients who did and did not undergo MLND.

RESULTS

In total, 414 (67%) patients underwent MLND (ND2 group), whereas 208 (33%) did not undergo MLND (ND0-1 group). The disease stage was more advanced in the ND2 group than in the ND0-1 group. Disease-free survival was slightly greater in the ND0-1 group with marginal significance (P= .079). In the matched cohort (N = 228), which mainly consisted of patients with clinical stage I disease (96%), there was no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding overall and disease-free survival (P= .908 and P = .916, respectively). Operative time and blood loss were significantly lower in the ND0-1 group than in the ND2 group in the entire cohort (P< .001 and P = .050, respectively) and in the matched cohort (P = .003 and P= .046, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Based on a nationwide prospective database, we found limited prognostic impact of MLND, suggesting that MLND can be omitted for octogenarians with early-stage NSCLC.

Outcomes after thoracoscopic surgery in octogenarian patients with clinical N0 non-small-cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

The number of surgeries for elderly patients with lung cancer is increasing. In our institute, thoracoscopic lobectomy and hilar lymph node dissection are the standard procedure for octogenarian patients with clinical N0 non-small-cell lung cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of our strategy for octogenarian patients.

METHODS

Seventy octogenarian patients with clinical N0 non-small-cell lung cancer who underwent surgery were enrolled (O group). As a control group, 205 septuagenarian patients were also enrolled (S group). We compared several clinicopathological factors and outcomes.

RESULTS

The median age of the O group was 82. There was no significant difference in the comorbidity ratio between the two groups. The 5-year overall survival ratio for the O group (72.8%) was significantly worse than that for the S group (88.3%). However, multivariate analysis proved age was not an independent predictor of outcome. The rates of recurrences involving ipsilateral mediastinal lymph nodes were equal in the two groups. After propensity score matching, clinical T1 patients were dominant (85%) in two matched group and no statistically significant differences were observed in the 5-year overall survival between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our strategy for octogenarian patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, including omission of mediastinal lymph node dissection, was determined to be feasible, in particularly with cT1N0 disease.

Lobectomy versus sublobar resection in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review

Surgery is the gold standard treatment of lung cancer. The minimally invasive technique does not only concern access to the chest but also the limits of parenchymal resection. The study debates on the safety and oncological adequacy of sublobar resections in bronchogenic carcinoma patients. A systematic analysis of the data in the literature was carried out, comparing the outcomes of patients with resectable non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent lobectomy or sublobar resection. These last interventions include both segmentectomies and wedge resections taking into consideration the following parameters: complications, relapse rate and overall survival. The complication rate is higher in patients underwent lobectomy compared to sublobar resection, especially in presence of high comorbidity index or octogenarian patients (overall values respectively between 0 and 48% and 0 and 46.6%). Contrarily, the relapse rate (6.2% to 32% vs. 3.6% to 53.4%) and overall survival (50.2% to 93.8% vs. 38.6% to 100%) are more favorable in patients undergoing lobectomy. Sublobar resections are particularly indicated in elderly patients and in patients with high comorbidity index or reduced respiratory functional reserve. However, pulmonary lobectomy still remains the safest and oncologically correct method in patients with good performance status or higher risk of recurrence.

Oncologic Outcomes of Surgery Versus SBRT for Non-Small-Cell Lung Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment of stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma is subject to debate. The aim of this study was to compare overall survival and oncologic outcomes of lobar resection (LR), sublobar resection (SR), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of oncologic outcomes of propensity matched comparative and noncomparative cohort studies was performed. Outcomes of interest were overall survival and disease-free survival. The inverse variance method and the random-effects method for meta-analysis were utilized to assess the pooled estimates.

RESULTS

A total of 100 studies with patients treated for clinical stage I non-small-cell lung carcinoma were included. Long-term overall and disease-free survival after LR was superior over SBRT in all comparisons, and for most comparisons, SR was superior to SBRT. Noncomparative studies showed superior long-term overall and disease-free survival for both LR and SR over SBRT. Although the papers were heterogeneous and of low quality, results remained essentially the same throughout a large number of stratifications and sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that LR has superior outcomes compared to SBRT for cI non-small-cell lung carcinoma. New trials are underway evaluating long-term results of SBRT in potentially operable patients.

Treatment strategy and decision-making for elderly surgical candidates with early lung cancer

Among elderly cancer patients of the same chronological age, there is a wide range of heterogeneity in their ability to tolerate surgery. When an elderly patient comes to a thoracic surgeon, the surgeon first considers how healthy the patient is. If the patient looks healthy or in fit condition, the surgeon offers lobectomy plus mediastinal lymph node dissection. On the other hand, if the patient looks frail, the surgeon may offer, instead of a standard treatment, lobectomy without lymph node dissection, sublobar resection, or radiotherapy or may not offer any kind of treatment. This review was conducted to obtain an overview of these options and compare the treatment outcomes reported in the literature for the purpose of making a good decision for elderly surgical candidates with early lung cancer.

Early Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in Octogenarian and Older Patients: A SEER Database Analysis

BACKGROUND

The median age at diagnosis of lung cancer is 70 years. However, the evidence guiding the management of octogenarians and older patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), is based on data derived from younger patients and may not be appropriate.

METHODS

Patients ≥ 80 years diagnosed with clinical stages I and II NSCLC, between 1988 and 2007, were identified from the SEER database. Patients were classified according to treatments received: no treatment, surgery only, radiation only, and surgery + radiation. Factors associated with survival were assessed using the Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

There were 1338 cases of early stage NSCLC in octogenarians. Surgery was the most common treatment modality. The median overall survival was 3.8 years for patients who had surgery, compared with 1.6 years, 1.6 years, and 0.9 years for those who received surgery + radiation, radiation alone, and no treatment, respectively (P < .0001). Factors significantly associated with worse overall survival following surgery included increasing age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.08; P = .0005), male gender (HR, 1.33; P = .01), stage II (HR, 2.21; P < .0001), and squamous histology (HR, 1.36; P = .01).

CONCLUSION

Surgical resection is associated with long-term survival outcomes in a substantial proportion of octogenarian and older patients with early stage lung cancer and should not be withheld on the basis of age alone.