Evaluation of Aortic Valve Replacement via the Right Parasternal Approach without Rib Removal

Surgical outcomes associated with partial upper sternotomy in obese aortic disease patients

Background

Excellent partial upper sternotomy outcomes have been reported for patients undergoing aortic surgery, but whether this approach is particularly beneficial to obese patients remains to be established. This study was developed to explore the outcomes of aortic surgical procedures conducted via a partial upper sternotomy or a full median sternotomy approach in obese patients.

Methods

We retrospectively examined consecutive acute type A aortic dissection patients who underwent aortic surgery in our hospital between January 2015 to January 2021. Patients were divided into two groups based on body mass index: ‘non-obese’ and ‘obese’. We then further stratified patients in the obese and non-obese groups into partial upper sternotomy and full median sternotomy groups, with outcomes between these two sternotomy groups then being compared within and between these two body mass index groups.

Results

In total, records for 493 patients that had undergone aortic surgery were retrospectively reviewed, leading to the identification of 158 consecutive obese patients and 335 non-obese patients. Overall, 88 and 70 obese patients underwent full median sternotomy and partial upper sternotomy, respectively, while 180 and 155 non-obese patients underwent these respective procedures. There were no differences between the full median sternotomy and partial upper sternotomy groups within either BMI cohort with respect to preoperative baseline indicators and postoperative complications. Among non-obese individuals, the partial upper sternotomy approach was associated with reduced ventilation time (P = 0.003), shorter intensive care unit stay (P = 0.017), shorter duration of hospitalization (P = 0.001), and decreased transfusion requirements (Packed red blood cells: P < 0.001; Fresh frozen plasma: P < 0.001). Comparable findings were also evident among obese patients.

Conclusions

Obese aortic disease patients exhibited beneficial outcomes similar to those achieved for non-obese patients via a partial upper sternotomy approach which was associated with significant reductions in the duration of intensive care unit residency, duration of hospitalization, ventilator use, and transfusion requirements. This surgical approach should thus be offered to aortic disease patients irrespective of their body mass index.

Surgery of ascending aorta with complex procedures for aortic dissection through upper mini-sternotomy versus conventional sternotomy

Background

Use of minimally invasive approaches for isolated aortic valve or ascending aorta surgery is increasing. However, total arch replacement or aortic root repair through a minimally invasive incision is rare. This study was performed to report our initial experience with surgery of the ascending aorta with complex procedures through an upper mini-sternotomy approach.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 80 patients who underwent ascending aorta replacement combined with complex procedures including hemi-arch, total arch, and aortic root surgeries from September 2010 to May 2018. Using standard propensity score-matching analysis, 36 patients were matched and divided into 2 groups: the upper mini-sternotomy group (n = 18) and the median sternotomy group (n = 18). The preoperative assessment revealed no statistically significant differences between the two groups.

Results

Hospital mortality occurred in one patient (2.8%). The mini-sternotomy group showed a longer cross-clamping time (160 ± 38 vs. 135 ± 36 min, p = 0.048) due to higher rate of valve-sparing aortic root replacement and total arch repair. The cardiopulmonary bypass time in mini-sternotomy group was shorter than that of full sternotomy group (209 ± 47 min vs 218 ± 62 min, p = 0.595) but fell short of significance. There was no significant difference in lower body hypothermia circulatory arrest time between the two groups (40 ± 10 min vs 48 ± 20 min, p = 0.139). The upper mini-sternotomy group displayed a shorter ventilation time (22 vs. 45 h, p = 0.014), intensive care unit stay (4.6 ± 2.7 vs. 7.9 ± 3.7 days, p = 0.005), and hospital stay (8.2 ± 3.8 vs. 21.4 ± 11.9 days, p = 0.001). The upper mini-sternotomy group showed a lower postoperative red blood cell transfusion volume (4.6 ± 3.3 vs. 6.7 ± 5.7 units, p = 0.042) and postoperative drainage volume (764 ± 549 vs. 1255 ± 745 ml, p = 0.034). The rates of dialysis for newly occurring renal failure, neurological complications, and re-exploration were similar between the two groups (p = 1.000).

Conclusion

The upper mini-sternotomy approach is safe and beneficial in ascending aorta surgery with complex procedures for aortic dissection, including total arch replacement and aortic root repair.

Closure of subarterial ventricular septal defect with minimally invasive surgical technique: A case report

•

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery for closure of subarterial ventricular septal defect.

•

The approach using left parasternal thoracotomy via third intercostal space.

•

Excellent exposure of subarterial ventricular septal defect without special instruments.

Introduction

Minimally invasive cardiac surgery has been applied for the treatment of ventricular septal defect (VSD) with various approaches. However, closure of subarterial VSD with minimally invasive technique via left parasternal thoracotomy is rarely reported.

Case presentation

A 22-year-old man, weighing 65 kg, with a diagnosis of subarterial VSD underwent successful repair with minimally invasive technique via left parasternal thoracotomy through third intercostal space. The peripheral perfusion was performed with femoral arterial and venous cannulation. Myocardium was protected by warm blood cardioplegia injected directly into aortic root by a long needle and aortic clamp introduced through the thoracotomy incision.

Discussion

The left parasternal thoracotomy through third intercostal space (ICS) allows to expose both the subarterial VSD and ascending aorta. Myocardial protection and repair of this defect can be performed merely without requirements of video assistance or unique instruments. The patient recovered rapidly and was satisfied with the cosmetic result. The primary concern of this technique is mammary tissue which can be injured by a transverse incision in female patients. In this case, we can transform into the longitudinal incision.

Conclusion

This minimally invasive technique is feasible for the surgical treatment of subarterial VSD. Long-term follow-up and additional cases will be needed for validation of the safety and efficacy of this approach.

Surgery of the Ascending Aorta with or without Combined Procedures through an Upper Ministernotomy: Outcomes of a Series of More Than 100 Patients

BACKGROUND

Use of a minimally invasive approach for isolated aortic valve surgery is increasing. However, management of the root and/or ascending aorta through a mini-invasive incision is not so frequent. The aim of this study is to report our initial experience with surgery of the ascending aorta through a ministernotomy approach.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 102 patients treated for ascending aorta disease through a ministernotomy. Several types of surgeries were performed, including isolated or combined surgical procedures. Pre-operative and operative parameters and in-hospital clinical outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Patient mean age was 63.9 ± 13.6 years (range 29-85). There were 33 (32.4%) female and 69 (67.6%) male patients. Preoperative logistic EuroSCORE I was 7.4% ± 2.1%. Mean cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross-clamp time were 123.7 ± 36.9 and 100.8 ± 27.5 min, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience shows that surgery of the ascending aorta with or without combined procedures can be safely performed through an upper ministernotomy, without compromising surgical results. Although our series is not large, we believe that the experience gained on the isolated aortic valve through a ministernotomy can be safely reproduced in ascending aorta surgery as a routine practice.