A Blinded Randomized Trial Comparing Standard Activated Clotting Time Heparin Management to High Target Active Clotting Time and Individualized Hepcon HMS Heparin Management in Cardiopulmonary Bypass Cardiac Surgical Patients

Comparison of Blood Concentration and Weight-Based Heparin and Protamine Dosing Strategies for Cardiopulmonary Bypass: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

 The conventional method of heparin and protamine management during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is based on total body weight which fails to account for the heterogeneous response to heparin in each patient. On the other hand, the literature is inconclusive on whether individualized anticoagulation management based on real-time blood heparin concentration improves post-CBP outcomes.

METHODS

 We searched databases of Medline, Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINHL), and Google Scholar, recruiting randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective studies comparing the outcomes of dosing heparin and/or protamine based on measured heparin concentration versus patient's total body weight for CPB. Random effects meta-analyses and meta-regression were conducted to compare the outcome profiles. Primary endpoints include postoperative blood loss and the correlation with heparin and protamine doses, the reversal protamine and loading heparin dose ratio; secondary endpoints included postoperative platelet counts, antithrombin III, fibrinogen levels, activated prothrombin time (aPTT), incidences of heparin rebound, and re-exploration of chest wound for bleeding.

RESULTS

 Twenty-six studies, including 22 RCTs and four prospective cohort studies involving 3,810 patients, were included. Compared to body weight-based dosing, patients of individualized, heparin concentration-based group had significantly lower postoperative blood loss (mean difference (MD)=49.51 mL, 95% confidence interval (CI): 5.33-93.71), lower protamine-to-heparin dosing ratio (MD=-0.20, 95% CI: -0.32 ~ -0.12), and higher early postoperative platelet counts (MD=8.83, 95% CI: 2.07-15.59). The total heparin doses and protamine reversal were identified as predictors of postoperative blood loss by meta-regression.

CONCLUSIONS

 There was a significant correlation between the doses of heparin and protamine with postoperative blood loss; therefore, précised dosing of both could be critical for reducing bleeding and transfusion requirements. Data from the enrolled studies indicated that compared to conventional weight-based dosing, individualized, blood concentration-based heparin and protamine dosing may have outcome benefits reducing postoperative blood loss. The dosing calculation of heparin based on the assumption of a one-compartment pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model and linear relationship between the calculated dose and blood heparin concentration may be inaccurate. With the recent advancement of the technologies of machine learning, individualized, precision management of anticoagulation for CPB may be possible in the near future.

Individualized heparin monitoring and management reduces protamine requirements in cardiac surgery on minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation; A prospective randomized study

INTRODUCTION

Individualized heparin and protamine management is increasingly used as a strategy to reduce coagulation activation and bleeding complications. While it is associated with increased heparin requirements during Cardiopulmonary Bypass (CPB), the impact on protamine administration remains controversial. We aim to investigate the effect of heparin level-guided monitoring on protamine dosing during cardiac surgery where low-anticoagulation protocols are implemented.

METHODS

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. A total of 132 patients undergoing elective full-spectrum cardiac surgery with Minimal Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation (MiECC) were recruited. All patients were managed by the same anaesthetic, surgical and perfusion team. Patients were randomly allocated in two groups; the individualized heparin-protamine titration (IHPT) group and the conventional heparinization and reversal group by using ACT (cACT) with a 0.75:1, protamine: heparin ratio. Titration was accomplished with the Hepcon HMS Plus (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) system. The primary outcome of the study was the total protamine dose used. Secondary outcomes comprised of the total heparin dose, the percentage of patients achieving target ACT, 24-h transfusion requirements, postoperative bleeding, duration of mechanical ventilation, major morbidity and length of hospital stay. Patients in each group were divided in two subgroups according to the target ACT; those operated for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using a target ACT >300 s and the rest (non-CABG) patients operated with a target ACT >400 s, respectively.

RESULTS

Protamine requirements were significantly reduced when IHPT was implemented; CABG (118 ± 24 mg vs 163 ± 61 mg; p < 0.001) and non-CABG cases (151 ± 46 mg vs 197 ± 45 mg; p < 0.001). Moreover, heparin requirements were significantly higher in the non-CABG subgroup managed with IHPT (34,539 ± 7658 IU vs 29,893 ± 9037 IU; p = 0.02). In overall, no significant differences were detected with respect to postoperative bleeding, transfusion of RBC or other blood products.

CONCLUSIONS

Individualized heparin monitoring and management reduces protamine requirements in cardiac surgery with MiECC implementing reduced anticoagulation strategy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov; NCT04215588.

Efficacy of the Hepcon system in reducing hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications in antiphospholipid syndrome patients undergoing cardiac surgery

INTRODUCTION

Patients with Antiphospholipid Syndrome (APS) undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery are at increased risk for thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications. Anticoagulation during CPB is typically monitored with activated clotting time (ACT) which may be falsely prolonged in patients with APS. The Hepcon Hemostasis Management System quantitatively determines the whole blood heparin concentration through heparin/protamine titration.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of APS patients who underwent cardiac surgery requiring CPB at the Cleveland Clinic between April 2013, and July 2020. The primary endpoint was the composite rate of hemorrhagic or thromboembolic complications per surgical case in patients monitored by Hepcon versus patients monitored by ACT. Secondary endpoints were median volume of chest tube output and packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusion within the first three post-operative days.

RESULTS

43 patients were included. 20 (47%) patients were monitored using Hepcon while 23 (53%) were monitored using ACT. For the primary endpoint of rate of thromboembolic or hemorrhagic complications per surgical case, there was no statistically significant difference between the Hepcon and ACT groups (HMS, 6/20 [30%]; ACT, 7/23 [30%]; p = >0.99). For the secondary endpoints, there was no statistically significant difference in median post-operative chest tube output (780 mL vs. 850 mL; p = 0.88) and median post-operative PRBC transfusion (1 unit vs. 0 unit; p = 0.28) between the Hepcon and ACT groups, respectively.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in the composite outcome of thrombotic or hemorrhagic complications in patients monitored by Hepcon versus those monitored by ACT.