Robotic-Assisted Esophagectomy: Current Situation and Future Perspectives

Fully robotic side-to-side stapled anastomosis provides less anastomotic leakage than conventional minimally invasive approach in Ivor Lewis esophagectomy

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluates surgical outcomes of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (ILE) for esophageal and esophagogastric cancer, with the comparison of the robotic approach (RA) and the conventional minimally invasive approach (CA).

METHODS

Selected patients who underwent minimally invasive ILE for esophageal cancer were included between January 2017 and December 2023. We retrospectively investigated the patients' background characteristics and the short-term surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

In this period, among a total of 840 esophagectomies, 81 patients (9.6%) underwent minimally invasive ILE, consisting of 24 cases with RA and 57 with CA. The major indications for ILE were adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus or esophagogastric junction and patients with prior head and neck cancer treatment. Among these thoracic approaches, there were no significant differences in the patients' indications and characteristics, including age, histology, tumor location, clinical TNM stage, and preoperative therapy. Compared with the CA group, no anastomotic leakage was observed in the RA group (17.5% vs. 0, p = .035). Rates of total postoperative complications and length of hospital stay also tended to be reduced in the RA group but did not reach significance.

CONCLUSION

In the Ivor Lewis esophagectomy with a side-to-side linear-stapled anastomosis, the fully robotic approach has the potential to powerfully reduce anastomotic leakage compared to the conventional minimally invasive approach.

Robot-assisted transcervical esophagectomy with a bilateral cervical approach for thoracic esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Thoracic esophageal cancer resection through the neck approach has recently been reported as mediastinoscopic surgery. We present the first report of a new minimally invasive technique for thoracic esophageal cancer: robot-assisted transcervical esophagectomy with a bilateral cervical approach.

METHODS

Ten cases of robot-assisted bilateral transcervical esophagectomy performed at the National Cancer Center Hospital East, Japan, from February 2023 to August 2023 were reviewed. The short-term surgical outcomes were presented, and the feasibility and efficacy of this procedure were discussed.

RESULTS

The mean operation time for the cervical procedure was 184.2 ± 23.6 min. The total time for the whole procedure was 472.7 ± 28.4 min, and total intraoperative blood loss was 162.2 ± 40.0 ml. Among the 10 cases, one patient developed recurrent nerve paralysis, one patient developed pulmonary complications, and no patients developed postoperative pneumonia. The median postoperative hospital stay was 22 (range: 12-43) days. No patients developed severe postoperative surgical complications, which were graded as Clavien-Dindo ≥ III. The total number of surgically harvested mediastinal lymph nodes was 37.2 ± 11.2.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted bilateral transcervical esophagectomy, a novel procedure for thoracic esophageal cancer, was safe and feasible. Using this procedure, the incidence of recurrent nerve palsy, which is a problem with transcervical esophagectomy and mediastinoscopic esophagectomy, is expected to decrease.

Challenges in Robotic Lung Lobectomy through the Anterior Approach

PURPOSE

Robot-assisted thoracic surgery (RATS) has become popular because of its minimally invasive nature and reduced burden on surgeons. The anterior approach (AA) is beneficial because it utilizes the same field of view and procedures as thoracotomy and video-assisted thoracic surgery, although the disadvantages are less well-known.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined 35 consecutive patients who underwent RATS lobectomy via the AA, focusing on clinical factors and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

The study included 12 males and 23 females with a median console time of 177 (120-346) min, median blood loss of 0 (0-100) mL, and median stapler usage of 5 (2-10) units. Postoperative complications, classified as Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III, included three cases of grade IIIa (prolonged air leakage) and one case each of grade IIIb and grade IVa (middle lobe torsion and ventricular arrhythmia). The influence of stapling device operation cannot be ruled out in prolonged air leakage and middle lobe torsion. A moderate correlation (correlation coefficient = 0.492, p = 0.003) was observed between console time and the number of staplers used.

CONCLUSION

Although no severe incidence of vascular injury was observed with the AA, complications related to the use of stapling devices were noted.