The Intelligibility of the Reversed-Stethoscope Technique in Age-Related Hearing Loss

The clinical use of personal hearing amplifiers in facilitating accessible patient-provider communication: A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Older adults with hearing loss struggle to communicate with care providers and experience higher mortality rates when hospitalized (Genther et al., 2015), even after controlling for age and comorbidities. Personal hearing amplifiers (PHAs), (e.g., Pocketalkers™), can improve communication with older patients.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review to identify research gaps and summarize findings on the clinical use of PHAs with patients with hearing loss. After refining search terms relating to hearing loss and PHAs, we searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, CINAHL Complete, Web of Science Core Collection, ERIC (Proquest), PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number Registry. We identified articles published in English between 1980 and 2022 that reported empirical outcomes relating to PHA use in clinical settings. Two reviewers independently extracted data from articles. We then organized data into an evidence map, and a narrative review summarizing outcomes.

RESULTS

From 4234 initially identified titles and abstracts, 12 met our criteria as full texts. These included three surveys on clinicians' awareness and use of PHAs, one evaluation of the acoustic output of a PHA, and eight interventions wherein PHAs were provided to patients with hearing loss. These papers used 10 different terms for PHAs and largely did not cite one another. Results showed high levels of satisfaction with PHAs, and consistently improved speech understanding. Despite this, care providers used devices inconsistently, with challenges around provider awareness, and device maintenance and location tracking.

CONCLUSIONS

PHAs have a consistent positive effect on patients' ability to understand their care providers despite hearing loss. Barriers and facilitators to their use in clinical settings should be further explored.

The reverse stethoscope technique: a rapid intervention for old age hearing loss

OBJECTIVES

Presbycusis is highly prevalent, affecting between a third and two-thirds of elderly populations. Effective communication between patient and physician has been shown to directly correlate with the quality of patient care. The Reverse Stethoscope Technique (RST) involves placing the earpieces into the patient's ears and speaking into the diaphragm. Here, we aim to show the RST is a simple and effective method to communicate with patients suffering from presbycusis in inpatient settings.

METHODS

Medical inpatients aged >60 years old without cognitive impairment were included in the study. A simple repetition exercise of basic English sentences was performed with and without the RST to assess hearing ability. Patients then undertook a short questionnaire.

RESULTS

Our study included 109 patients with varied 'self-reported' hearing. 50.5% of our cohort reported past communication difficulties with health-care professionals due to hearing difficulties. We identified that the RST increased the mean number of sentences a patient could repeat from 2.6 to 3.5 representing a statistically significant increase (p < 0.001). The technique was most beneficial for patients with 'okay' and 'poor' hearing. The majority of patients (77/109) also stated the technique reduced background noise. The RST was equally effective with facemasks.

CONCLUSION

Current techniques to enhance communication with patients with hearing loss are often underutilized or poorly accessible. Our study identified that the RST is a quick and effective solution that can be easily implemented for patients struggling to communicate with health-care professionals in inpatient scenarios.

Considering Individuals' Hearing Ability Before Administering Cognitive Assessments

Sensory impairments such as age-related hearing loss and poor eyesight have been associated with a negative impact on cognitive screening test scores. Many researchers use cognitive tests and consider factors such as vision and cardiac issues but do not account for hearing loss. We reviewed published literature in the field of gerontology to determine if hearing loss was considered in human subjects research that involved the administration of a cognitive battery or screening test. We present evidence for the need to consider hearing loss when administering cognitive screening tests, as well as recommendations for practitioners and researchers.