Diagnostic Tools for Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury: GNRB, Lachman Test, and Telos

GNRB® Knee Arthrometer: Inter- and Intra-observer Reliability and Learning Curve

Background Diagnosing anterior cruciate ligament rupture is challenging, particularly due to the subjective nature of clinical laxity assessments. Objective evaluation methods are necessary for consistency and publication in clinical research. This study aims to assess the reproducibility of the GNRB® knee arthrometer (GeNouRoB, Laval, France) across different examiners and to examine the associated learning curve for a junior examiner. Methods Anterior translation measurements were conducted on 20 healthy knees using the GNRB arthrometer. Two examiners, a senior and a junior, performed the measurements independently and were blinded to each other's results. Measurements were taken at two different push forces (134 N and 200 N). The study evaluated inter- and intra-observer reproducibility using Cohen's kappa coefficient and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The junior examiner also performed a third series of measurements to assess the learning curve. Results The senior examiner demonstrated excellent reproducibility with an ICC greater than 0.75 for all measurements. The junior examiner's reproducibility varied from fair to good, with an ICC ranging from 0.45 to 0.75. Inter-observer reproducibility between the senior and junior examiners was excellent (ICC >0.75). Notably, the junior examiner's reproducibility improved to an excellent level (ICC >0.75) during the second series of measurements. Conclusion The GNRB system provides a reproducible method for evaluating anterior knee laxity across different examiners. A learning curve of approximately 20 knees is sufficient for a junior examiner to achieve statistically excellent reproducibility.

Comparison between a Novel Knee Arthrometer and Simultaneous Stress Radiography for the Diagnosis of Complete and Partial Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears

OBJECTIVES

The type of ligamentous tear and the degree of knee laxity have important guiding significance for the diagnosis and management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. Instrumental measurement is necessary for ACL tears since physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) cannot provide an objective and quantitative assessment of knee laxity. This study aimed to compare the application of a novel knee arthrometer and simultaneous stress radiography in differentiating between complete and partial acute ACL tears, and further assess the correlation between the two measurements.

METHODS

A total of 106 patients with complete acute ACL tears and 52 patients with partial acute ACL tears were included in the study. Preoperative arthrometry and simultaneous stress radiography were performed using the Ligs arthrometer at 90, 120, and 150 N to assess side-to-side difference (SSD) in anterior knee laxity. The optimal threshold was determined using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used to assess the diagnostic value of the measurement. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlation between the two measurements.

RESULTS

The optimal differential SSD thresholds in the Ligs arthrometer were 2.7 mm at 90 N, 3.8 mm at 120 N, and 4.6 mm at 150 N. Similarly, the optimal differential SSD thresholds in simultaneous stress radiography were 3.8 mm at 90 N, 5.1 mm at 120 N, and 5.6 mm at 150 N. The AUC analysis revealed that the Ligs arthrometer was fairly informative at 90 N (AUC = 0.851), 120 N (AUC = 0.878), and 150 N (AUC = 0.884), and simultaneous stress radiography was highly informative at 90 N (AUC = 0.910), 120 N (AUC = 0.925), and 150 N (AUC = 0.948). Moreover, the AUC of the combined measurements was 0.914 at 90 N, 0.931 at 120 N, and 0.951 at 150 N. A significantly strong correlation was found between the two measurements at 90 N (r = 0.743, p < 0.001), 120 N (r = 0.802, p < 0.001), and 150 N (r = 0.823, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The Ligs arthrometer and simultaneous stress radiography proved to be valid diagnostic tools to differentiate between complete and partial acute ACL tears, with a strong correlation between the two measurements in SSD values. Compared with single instrumental measurement, the combination of the two measurements can further improve the diagnostic value in this regard.

The optimal measurement method considering reliability and validity in the anterior knee laxity of anterior cruciate ligament tears

INTRODUCTION

To seek an optimal measurement method with high reliability and high validity for evaluation of the anterior knee laxity on stress radiographs and comparing the translation values to those of KT-2000 arthrometer.

METHODS

Anterior knee laxity in 77 patients was measured preoperatively using the TelosTM and the KT-2000 arthrometer. Side-to-side difference measurements were taken using three conventional measuring methods and one proposed method (Modified Lateral). The knee position on the stress radiograph was evaluated and scored based on the stress radiograph qualifying criteria depending on stress film correctiveness. Intraclass correlation coefficients were analyzed to evaluate the reliability of the measurement methods and were compared between high (Group H) and low (Group L) radiograph quality score groups for each method. Validity was assessed by comparing the KT-2000 and the TelosTM using Pearson correlation (r value).

RESULTS

The Modified Lateral method showed the best Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICCs), followed by Center to Center, and Medial to Medial and Lateral to Lateral methods without considering the quality of Telos. In the comparison between groups based on Telos quality for intra-rater reliability, the Medial to Medial (MM) method demonstrated the best reliability in both groups (MM: ICCs, Group H = 0.942, Group L = 0.917, P = 0.693). As for inter-rater reliability, the Modified Lateral (ML) method exhibited the best reliability in both groups (ML: ICCs, Group H = 0.923, Group L = 0.882, P = 0.547). The value measured using the ML method in Telos showed the highest correlation coefficient with the KT-2000 measured value in both groups H and L. There were no statistically significant differences among the correlation coefficient values.

CONCLUSION

The Modified Lateral method is recommended for its high reliability, taking into account the differences in bilateral knee positions and anatomical discriminability on stress radiographs when evaluating anterior knee translation with Telos. It also best reflected the KT-2000 arthrometer.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case Series, Level IV.

Study on the use of 3D printed guides in the individualized reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of the accuracy and effectiveness of 3D printed guides to assist femoral tunnel preparation in individualised reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

METHODS

Sixty patients who attended the Affiliated Hospital of Binzhou Medical College for autologous hamstring single bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament from October 2018 to October 2020 were selected and randomly divided into two groups, including 31 cases in the 3D printing group (14 males and 17 females, mean age 41.94 ± 10.15 years) and 29 cases in the control group (13 males and 16 females, mean age 37.76 ± 10.34 years). Patients in both groups were assessed for intraoperative femoral tunnel accuracy, the number of intraoperative positioning and the time taken to prepare the femoral tunnel, the length of the anteromedial approach incision, the pre-planned bone tunnel length and intraoperative bone tunnel length in the 3D printed group, IKDC score and Lysholm score preoperatively and at 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively, the Lachman、pivot-shift test preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively, gait analysis to assess internal and external rotation in flexion of the knee at 12 months postoperatively and postoperative complications in both groups.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in functional knee scores and anteromedial approach incision length between the 3D printed and control groups (p > 0.05), while there was a statistical difference in the accuracy of tunnel positioning, the time taken to prepare the femoral bone tunnel and the degree of external rotation of the knee in flexion between the two groups (p < 0.05). There was no statistical difference between the preoperative planning of the bone tunnel length and the intraoperative bone tunnel length (p > 0.05).

COMPLICATIONS

One case in the 3D printing group developed intermuscular vein thrombosis in the affected lower limb after surgery, which disappeared after treatment, while three cases in the control group developed intermuscular vein thrombosis in the affected lower limb. No complications such as bone tunnel rupture, deep vein thrombosis in the lower limb and infection occurred in either group.

CONCLUSION

3D printed guides assisted with individualized ACL reconstruction may improve the accuracy of femoral tunnel positioning, which is safe and effective, while reducing the operative time and the number of intraoperative positioning, without increasing the length of incision, and may obtain higher functional scores and rotational stability of the knee joint, which is in line with the concept of individualized ACL reconstruction.

Irreducible knee dislocation: improved clinical outcomes of open and arthroscopic surgical treatment. A systematic review of the literature

PURPOSE

Irreducible knee dislocations (IKDs) are a rare rotatory category of knee dislocations (KDs) characterized by medial soft tissue entrapment that requires early surgical treatment. This systematic review underlines the need for prompt surgical reduction of IKDs, either open or arthroscopically. It describes the various surgical options for ligament management following knee reduction, and it investigates their respective functional outcome scores to assist orthopedic surgeons in adequately managing this rare but harmful KD.

METHODS

A comprehensive search in four databases, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and MEDLINE, was performed, and following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. Studies with LoE 5 were excluded, and the risk of bias was analyzed according to the ROBINS-I tool system. This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed for all data extracted.

RESULTS

Four studies were included in the qualitative analysis for a total of 49 patients enrolled. The dimple sign was present in most cases. The surgical reduction, either open or arthroscopically performed, appeared to be the only way to disengage the entrapped medial structures. After the reduction, torn ligaments were addressed in a single acute or a double-staged procedure with improved functional outcome scores and ROM.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review underlines the importance of promptly reducing IKDs through a surgical procedure, either open or arthroscopically. Moreover, torn ligaments should be handled with either a single acute or a double-staged procedure, leading to improved outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Influence of a posteromedial meniscocapsular injury on the knee anterior laxity. A cadaveric study

PURPOSE

The number of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries has considerably increased in the recent years, especially in young adults and adolescents. Associated meniscal tears increase anterior and rotary laxity. Posterior peripheral meniscocapsular tear of medial meniscus is also called ramp lesion. Prevalence of 9% to 17% in adults and up to 23% in pediatric population has been reported. The aim of this study was to determine anterior laxity of cadaveric ACL-deficient knees with several size of ramp lesions.

METHODS

Fresh cadaveric knees were explored. Major osteoarthritis and/or ACL and meniscal tears on arthroscopy were exclusion criteria. Mean age at death was 86 years old. Dynamic laximetry with GNRB® device was made in several conditions: Knee prior to any procedure, after arthroscopic exploration, after ACL section, and then after increasing sizes of ramp lesions up to 30 mm. Anteroposterior laxity was measured with 2 loading forces successively (134N and 200N).

RESULTS

After ACL section only, tibiofemoral joint anterior laxity was significantly increased. Mean increase was 156% regardless of the loading force. No statistical laxity difference was found between knees with ACL section only and knees with ACL and meniscal section for any size of ramp lesions. Increasing size of ramp lesion was not correlated with increasing of laxity.

CONCLUSION

We could not find a threshold size of ramp lesion which increases knee anterior laxity. We were not able to determine a threshold recommending a ramp lesion repair.

Correlation Between the Location and Distance of Kissing Contusions and Knee Laxity in Acute Noncontact ACL Injury

BACKGROUND

Bone bruise (BB) and kissing contusion are common features of acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The correlation between the location and distance of kissing contusions and knee laxity remains unclear.

PURPOSE

To determine the significance of different patterns of BB in acute noncontact ACL injury and assess the correlation between the location and distance of kissing contusions and the severity of knee laxity.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A total of 205 patients with acute noncontact ACL injury undergoing arthroscopic treatment between January 2021 and May 2022 were included in this retrospective analysis. Patients were grouped according to the different patterns of BB. The type of ACL injury and concomitant injuries were analyzed on MRI and confirmed by arthroscopy. Anterior knee laxity was assessed by the Ligs digital arthrometer and stress radiography, and rotational knee laxity was assessed by the intraoperative pivot-shift test. The MRI parameters of the location and distance of kissing contusions were measured to assess their correlations with the severity of knee laxity.

RESULTS

Of the 205 patients with acute noncontact ACL injury, 38 were in the non-BB group and 167 were in the BB group, the latter including 32 with the isolated BB on the lateral tibial plateau and 135 with kissing contusions. There was no significant difference in the mean time from initial injury to MRI scan between the non-BB group and the BB group (14.34 ± 2.92 vs 15.17 ± 2.86 days; P = .109) or between the isolated BB subgroup and the kissing contusion subgroup (14.94 ± 2.92 vs 15.23 ± 2.85 days; P = .605). The side-to-side difference (SSD) in anterior knee laxity and the incidences of complete ACL injury, concomitant injuries, and high-grade pivot-shift test were significantly higher in the BB group than in the non-BB group, and in the kissing contusion subgroup compared with the isolated BB subgroup. The kissing contusion index of the lateral femoral condyle (LFC) and the sagittal distance of kissing contusions were significantly correlated with the SSD in anterior knee laxity and the grade of pivot-shift test (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The presence of BB, in particular the appearance of kissing contusions, was related to greater knee laxity and higher incidences of complete ACL injury and concomitant injuries in acute noncontact ACL injury. For patients with kissing contusions, as the location of BB on the LFC moved forward and the distance between kissing contusions increased, anterior and rotational knee laxity became more serious.

Nonoperative Treatment for Traumatic Partial Graft Rupture After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A 2-Year Follow-up Study

Background

There are no studies on the nonoperative treatment of traumatic partial anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft rupture.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes and failure rates between nonoperative treatment and revision ACL reconstruction for traumatic partial ACL graft rupture. We hypothesized that the outcomes and failure rates would be comparable and that nonoperative treatment of traumatic partial ACL graft rupture can produce satisfactory outcomes.

Study Design

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 2114 patients treated for isolated ACL rupture between January 2000 and June 2020. Patients with traumatic partial graft rupture after ACL reconstruction with minimum 2-year follow-up data were included. Patients who met all the following conditions were candidates for nonoperative treatment: (1) Lachman or pivot-shift grade 0 or 1 at 6 months after ACL reconstruction, (2) ACL graft with low to intermediate signal intensity on 1-year postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and (3) MRI after reinjury showing definite evidence of trauma, some fibers remaining in continuity of the ACL graft, and no anterior tibial subluxation in the sagittal plane. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to treatment method: nonoperative treatment (group A) and revision ACL reconstruction (group B). Clinical scores, laxity test results, radiological outcomes, and graft failures were compared between the groups.

Results

In total, 47 patients had traumatic partial graft rupture (group A, n = 10; group B, n = 37). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in terms of clinical scores, laxity tests, radiological outcomes, or graft failure.

Conclusion

The clinical and radiological outcomes of nonoperative treatment of traumatic partial graft rupture after ACL reconstruction were comparable with those of revision ACL reconstruction. Nonoperative treatment of traumatic partial ACL graft rupture can produce satisfactory outcomes in selected patients.

The validity of the Ligs digital arthrometer at different loads to evaluate complete ACL ruptures

Objective: The Ligs Digital Arthrometer is a recently launched versatile arthrometer that can be used for the quantitative assessment of knee and ankle joint laxity. This study aimed to evaluate the validity of the Ligs Digital Arthrometer for the diagnosis of complete anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures at different loads.

Materials and Methods: From March 2020 to February 2021, we included 114 normal subjects and 132 subjects diagnosed with complete ACL ruptures by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and eventually confirmed by arthroscopy in the study. Anterior knee laxity was independently measured by the same physical therapist using the Ligs Digital Arthrometer. Recorded anterior knee laxity and calculated the side-to-side difference (SSD) at 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 N loads, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine the optimal laxity threshold, and the diagnostic value was evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC).

Results: The demographic data of the subjects were comparable between the two groups (p &gt; 0.05). The mean values of anterior knee laxity measured by the Ligs Digital Arthrometer between the complete ACL ruptures group and the control group were significantly different at 30, 60, 90, 120, and 150 N loads (p &lt; 0.001 for all). According to the results of ROC curve analysis, the optimal laxity threshold for the diagnosis of complete ACL ruptures was 1.1 mm SSD (Se = 66.7%, Sp = 69.3%) at 30 N, 1.3 mm (Se = 74.2%, Sp = 82.5%) at 60 N, 1.6 mm (Se = 79.5%, Sp = 94.7%) at 90 N, 1.9 mm (Se = 84.1%, Sp = 92.1%) at 120 N and 2.1 mm (Se = 85.6%, Sp = 91.2%) at 150 N. The AUC order at different loads from high to low was 150 N (0.948 [0.923–0.973])&gt;120 N (0.933 [0.903–0.963])&gt;90 N (0.902 [0.862–0.943])&gt;60 N (0.846 [0.799–0.893])&gt;30 N (0.720 [0.657–0.783]).

Conclusion: The Ligs Digital Arthrometer proved to be of high diagnostic value in complete ACL ruptures at 90 N, 120 N, and 150 N loads. The diagnostic value improved with the increase of load in a certain range. Based on the results of this study, as a portable, digital and versatile new arthrometer, the Ligs Digital Arthrometer was a valid and promising tool for diagnosing complete ACL ruptures.

Single versus double hamstring tendon graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the paediatric patient: a single-blind randomised controlled trial study protocol

INTRODUCTION

There is currently no clear indication in the literature regarding a single or double hamstring tendon (single bundle) autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in the paediatric patient. The primary aim of this single blind randomised controlled trial is to determine whether a single or double hamstring tendon graft ACLR leads to superior clinical outcomes postsurgery in paediatric patients with ACL injury.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Single site, prospective, single blind, randomised controlled trial with two parallel treatment arms. 100 patients aged 10-18 years who present with an isolated ACL tear±meniscal injury, verified on MRI, will be randomly allocated to one of the two surgical groups. The primary outcomes will be side-to-side difference in anterior tibial translation and graft failure incidence 12 months postsurgery. Primary and secondary outcomes will also be assessed at 2-year and 5-year postsurgery.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Results will be presented in peer-reviewed journals and at international conferences and disseminated to participants and healthcare professionals via newsletters and hospital presentations. This study is approved by the Children's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service Human Research Ethics committee.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12620001170910p; Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry.

Determining the Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for Patient-Reported Outcome Scores After Primary ACL Reconstruction

Background:

Little is known about the threshold of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at which patients perceive to have attained a substantial clinical benefit (SCB) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

Purpose:

To determine the SCB value of PROs 1 year after ACLR in the general population and to determine factors that predict SCB attainment.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

The Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form (IKDC-SKF), Tegner, and Anterior Cruciate Ligament–Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scores were examined postoperatively in 88 patients who underwent ACLR. At the 12-month follow-up visit, the patients answered 2 independent anchor questions about daily discomfort and functional recovery. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to differentiate PRO scores between patients who responded as having no difficulty versus some difficulty with daily knee discomfort (anchor question 1) and between patients with substantial recovery versus nonsubstantial recovery of knee function (anchor question 2). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated to assess reliability, and the differences between the AUC values were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine predictors affecting SCB attainment.

Results:

There were 76 patients enrolled in this study. The 12-month Lysholm, IKDC-SKF, Tegner, and ACL-RSI scores that corresponded to the SCB were 88.0, 85.1, 6.5, and 64.2 for anchor question 1 and 84.5, 77.7, 5.5, and 57.1 for anchor question 2, respectively. The AUC values obtained from the ROC curve analyses showed acceptable to excellent reliability (anchor question 1: Lysholm, 0.90; IKDC-SKF, 0.86; Tegner, 0.71; ACL-RSI, 0.92; anchor question 2: Lysholm, 0.80; IKDC-SKF, 0.90; Tegner, 0.82; ACL-RSI, 0.82) and were all statistically significant ( P < .001 to P = .028). For all PROs, younger age (Odds Ratio (OR), 0.88-0.94; P < .001 to P = .027) and greater muscle strength (OR, 1.03-1.07; P < .001 to P = .023) were predictive factors of SCB attainment.

Conclusion:

The postoperative Lysholm, IKDC-SKF, Tegner, and ACL-RSI scores showed acceptable to excellent reliability in predicting the SCB after ACLR in the general population. Age at surgery and thigh muscle strength influenced SCB attainment for all PROs.

An Increased Lateral Femoral Condyle Ratio Is an Important Risk Factor for a Medial Meniscus Ramp Lesion Including Red-Red Zone Tear

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine radiological findings associated with ramp lesions in knees with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury.

METHODS

This study included the primary ACL reconstructions from June 2011 to March 2019. The exclusion criteria were combined fractures and multiligament injuries. Patients were categorized based on arthroscopy-confirmed presence of ramp lesions, which was defined as a longitudinal tear around the meniscocapsular junction or red-red zone tear of medial meniscus posterior horn. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to find the risk factors such as age, sex, body mass index, medial tibial slope, mechanical axis angle, presence of Segond fracture, and lateral femoral condyle (LFC) ratio. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the ROC curve (AUC) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Ramp lesions were identified in 89 (27.7%) patients among the total 321 included primary ACL reconstructions. The risk of ramp lesion was associated with increased LFC ratio (odds ratio [OR]: 62.929; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.473-467.351; P < .001), varus alignment >3° (OR: 5.858; 95% CI: 3.272-10.486; P < .001), and steeper medial tibial slope (OR: 1.183; 95% CI: 1.05-1.333; P = .006). The cutoff values of the LFC ratio and medial tibial slope for ramp lesions were >71% (AUC: 0.696; sensitivity: 43.82%; specificity: 91.38%; P < .001) and >12.1° (AUC: 0.643; sensitivity: 85.39%; specificity: 38.79%; P < .001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Deep posterior LFC, varus alignment, and steep medial tibial slope were associated factors for ramp lesions in knees with ACL injury. In patients with ACL injury who show the above-mentioned radiographic findings, careful assessment and suspicion for ramp lesions should be considered.

STUDY DESIGN

Level III, retrospective cross-sectional study.

The Comparison of Clinical Result between Primary Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament with Additional Internal Bracing and Anatomic Single Bundle Reconstruction-A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

The current standard of treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is reconstruction (ACLR). This technique has some disadvantages: poor proprioception, donor site morbidity and the inability to restore joint kinematics. ACL repair could be an alternative treatment. The purpose of the study was to compare the stability and the function after ACL primary repair versus single-bundle ACLR.

METHODS

In a retrospective study, 12 patients underwent primary ACL repair with internal bracing, 15 patients underwent standard ACLR. Follow-up examinations were evaluated at up to 2 years postoperatively. One patient in the ACL repair group was lost to follow-up due to re-rupture. The absolute value of anterior tibial translation (ATT) and the side-to-side difference in the same patient (ΔATT) were evaluated using the GNRB arthrometer. The Lysholm knee scoring was obtained. Re-ruptures and other complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Anterior tibial translation (ATT) was significantly decreased in the ACL repair group compared with the ACLR group (5.31 mm vs. 7.18 mm, respectively; p = 0.0137). Arthrometric measurements demonstrated a mean side-to-side difference (ΔATT) 1.87 (range 0.2 to 4.9) mm significantly decreased compared to ACLR 3.36 (range 1.2-5.6 mm; p = 0.0107). The mean Lysholm score was 85.3 points in the ACL repair group and 89.9 in ACLR group. No significant differences between ACL repair and ACLR were found for the Lysholm score. There was no association between AP laxity and clinical outcomes. There were two complications in the internal bracing group: one patient had re-rupture and was treated by ACLR, another had limited extension and had arthroscopic debridement.

CONCLUSIONS

Anterior tibial translation was significantly decreased after ACL repair. Additionally, the functional results after ACL repair with internal bracing were comparable with those after ACLR. It should be noted that the two complications occurred. The current study supports further development of ACL repair techniques.

Clinically Reliable Knee Flexion Angle Measured on Stress Radiography for Quantifying Posterior Instability in Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

Background

After posterior cruciate ligament injury, stress radiography is a common method of quantifying posterior instability, defined as the side-to-side difference in posterior tibial displacement (PTD) between the injured knee and contralateral noninjured knee. However, no study has evaluated the reliability of PTD according to knee flexion angle (KFA) measurements on stress radiographs.

Purpose

To evaluate the test-retest reliability of stress radiographic measurements of the KFA in the noninjured knee. In addition, we established a reliable range of KFAs to indicate posterior instability by comparing results with the instability measured at 90° KFA, which is considered the gold standard.

Study Design

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 3.

Methods

We evaluated patients who had undergone bilateral stress radiographic examinations at least 5 times for ligament injuries between January 2013 and November 2019. All examinations were performed on a Telos device with a 150-N posterior load. A total of 120 knees and 644 stress radiographs were enrolled. We measured the KFA and PTD on stress radiographs and evaluated the reliability of repeated PTD measurement and the correlation between KFA and PTD.

Results

The distribution of the actual noninjured knee KFA ranged from 56.9° to 106.7°. Among the 644 radiographs, 155 (24.1%) showed KFAs between 85° and 95°, and 287 (44.6%) showed KFAs between 80° and 85°. A significant correlation was found between KFA and PTD (P < .001), and the intrapatient intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.788. A KFA range of 85° to 92° satisfied the criteria of high ICC (0.885) and nonsignificant correlation between KFA and PTD (P = .055) and thus was considered a reliable range of KFAs for quantifying posterior instability. We found no significant risk factors for measurement error, including age (P = .674), sex (P = .328), height (P = .957), weight (P = .248), or body mass index (P = .257).

Conclusion

We found high reproducibility of posterior displacement measurements on Telos stress radiography at a KFA of 85° to 92° in noninjured knees.

Validity of the Genourob arthrometer in the evaluation of total thickness tears of anterior cruciate ligament

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the laxity with the GNRB arthrometer in subjects with anterior cruciate ligament injury.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A diagnostic study was performed by three operators using the Genourob arthrometer, measuring the displacement of the anterior cruciate ligament. The concordance was assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient mixed effects model, Lin correlation coefficient and graphic method from Bland-Altman. Using the anterior cruciate ligament tear as a dependent variable and the Genourob measurement as an independent variable, a logistic regression was determined.

RESULTS

Obtaining the complete information of 157 knees. The measurements with the Genourob arthrometer distributed symmetrically, with mean ± standard deviation of knees with anterior cruciate ligament injury: 5.64 ± 1.72 and knees without anterior cruciate ligament injury: 3.29 ± 1.72. The ICCs as well as the LCCs were equal to or greater than 0.99. The BA showed discrepancy for a pair of observations no greater than 7.64%. The odds ratio of the knee displacement measurement for the presence of anterior cruciate ligament injury was 4.04 (95% CI: 2.59-6.32; p-value < .01) with a ROC area of 0.863 (95% CI: 0.789-0.9456). The cut-off point of the anteroposterior knee displacement located at 6.8 mm determined a sensitivity of 74.4% and specificity of 93.8%, with a Youden Index = 0.67.

CONCLUSION

The Genourob arthrometer is reliable and valid to establish where laxity values correlate with total thickness tears of the anterior cruciate ligament.

Anterior knee translation measurements after ACL reconstruction are influenced by the type of laximeter used

PURPOSE

Laximeters were designed to diagnose an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficient knee, but their use has now focused on providing an objective assessment of the anterior translation (AT) of an intact and ACL-reconstructed knee. In this study we report the introduction and direct comparison of an automated and computerized AT measurement device, GNRB, with the device previously established by the institute and as the current literature standard, the KT1000.

METHODS

A prospective data collection was commenced upon introduction of the GNRB. The measurements of AT in each patient were performed by the same investigator with each device using 134 N applied to both knees, giving a side-to-side difference. The investigators were a sport scientist, a biomechanical engineer and a physiotherapist. Increased AT was defined as a difference > 3 mm.

RESULTS

Three investigators performed the measurements in 122 patients, 9.8 (± 1.8) months after ACL reconstruction. Mean AT of the healthy knee was 5.7 mm with KT1000 and 4.4 mm with GNRB (p = 0.002). Mean AT of the ACL reconstructed knee was 7.0 mm with the KT1000 and 5.3 mm with the GNRB (p = 0.037). The KT1000 had a higher variance of results than the GNRB (p < 0.001). There were 25 patients with increased AT measured by KT1000 compared with 12 patients using the GNRB (p < 0.016), with only 5 on both devices.

CONCLUSIONS

GNRB has better consistency of results when compared to the KT1000. Both devices lack comparability for detecting increased AT, with the KT1000 recording a side-to-side difference of more than 3 mm in twice as many patients as the GNRB.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Influence of Posterior Tibial Slope on Clinical Outcomes and Survivorship After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Autografts: A Minimum of 10-Year Follow-Up

PURPOSE

To investigate the influence of medial and lateral posterior tibial slope (PTS) on long-term clinical outcomes and survivorship after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using hamstring autografts.

METHODS

A total of 232 patients (mean age, 28.2 ± 8.9 years) who underwent primary ACL reconstruction from October 2002 to July 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with multiple ligament reconstruction, total meniscectomy, contralateral knee surgery before ACL reconstruction, open growth plate, and less than 10-year follow-up were excluded in the study. The medial and lateral PTS were measured from preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. Based on Li et al.'s previous study, the patients were divided into 2 groups according to their medial PTS (≤5.6° vs >5.6°) and lateral PTS (≤3.8° vs >3.8°), respectively. Clinical outcomes (clinical scores, stability tests and failure rate) were compared between the groups at the last follow-up. Furthermore, survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

All clinical scores (International Knee Documentation Committee subjective, Lysholm, and Tegner activity scores) and stability tests (physical examinations and side-to-side difference in Telos stress radiographs) were insignificantly different between the 2 groups classified based on medial or lateral PTS. However, the failure rate was significantly higher in patients with medial PTS >5.6° (16.1% vs 5.1%, P = .01) or lateral PTS >3.8° (14.5% vs 4.7%; P = .01). The odds ratios of graft failure due to increased medial and lateral PTS were 3.18 (95% confidence interval, 1.22-8.28; P = .02) and 3.43 (95% confidence interval, 1.29-9.09; P = .01), respectively. In addition, the 10-year survivorship was significantly lower in patients with medial PTS >5.6° (83.9% vs 94.9%, P = .01) or lateral PTS >3.8° (85.5% vs 96.0%; P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Increased medial (>5.6°) and lateral (>3.8°) PTS were associated with higher failure rate and lower survivorship at a minimum of 10-year follow-up after primary ACL reconstruction using hamstring autografts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative trial.

Clinical Outcomes and the Failure Rate of Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Were Comparable Between Patients Younger Than 40 Years and Patients Older Than 40 Years: A Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up Study

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical outcomes and failure rates of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) between young and middle-aged surgery patients.

METHODS

Patients who underwent revision ACLRs between January 2008 and June 2017 with a minimum 2-year follow-up were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to age: ≥40 years (group A) and <40 years (group B). Detailed patient demographic data, preoperative radiographic data, and concurrent meniscal and chondral lesion were reviewed. Clinical scores, laxity tests results, and graft failures were compared between groups at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients (group A, n = 24, 46.6 ± 4.5 years; group B, n = 62, 26.2 ± 6.3 years) were included in this study. Demographic data showed that the time interval from primary to revision ACLR was longer in group A than in group B (96.2 ± 80.9 vs. 52.0 ± 42.1 months, P = .011). Group A had a higher prevalence of chondral defects of the trochlea (P = .016). No significant differences were identified in the prevalence and severity of meniscal lesions. At the final follow-up, all clinical scores were improved postoperatively but did not differ significantly between the groups. No significant differences were identified in side-to-side difference on Telos stress radiographs (group A, 6.3 ± 5.0 mm; group B, 5.6 ± 3.8 mm; P = .403) and graft failure rate (group A, 33.3%; group B, 30.6%; P = .358) at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study showed that the clinical outcomes of revision ACLRs in patients improved significantly in patients younger than 40 years and were comparable to those observed in patients older than 40 years at a minimum 2-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Stress radiography at 30° of knee flexion is a reliable evaluation tool for high-grade rotatory laxity in complete ACL-injured knees

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic value of stress radiography and determine the cutoff values for high-grade anterolateral rotatory laxity in complete anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient knees at different positions.

METHODS

Forty-two patients with complete ACL rupture (group 1) and 37 normal subjects (group 2) were prospectively enrolled. The amount of anterior translation in the medial (MM) and lateral (LL) distance compartments and the difference between them (LL-MM distance) were measured using stress radiography at 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90° positions. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was assessed for the presence of a high-grade (grade > 2) pivot shift.

RESULTS

The MM and LL distances in group 1 were significantly different at 30° and 45° positions (P < 0.05). The AUC of the MM (AUC, 0.903) and LL (AUC, 0.901) distances at the 30° position was significantly higher than that of the other positions (P = 0.000); however, the cutoff values were different to diagnose ACL injury (MM vs. LL, 3.1 mm vs. 5.4 mm). A 2.1-mm cutoff for the LL-MM distance showed 78.4% sensitivity and 90.3% specificity for detecting the presence of a high-grade pivot shift (AUC = 0.905, P = 0.000).

CONCLUSION

The cutoff values of stress radiography differed according to anatomical references and knee flexion positions. Stress radiography of a 2.1 mm difference in LL-MM distance at 30° of knee flexion can be a reliable method for high-grade rotatory laxity in complete ACL-injured knees.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 1, diagnostic study.

Reliability and Validity of an Innovative Device for ACL Testing: The Mobil-Aider™

BACKGROUND

Knee disorders prevalence is estimated at more than 50% in a lifetime. There are over 250,000 anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries per year in the United States. There are over 175,000 ACL reconstructions annually. This study was a double-blinded design to establish the reliability and validity of a new orthopedic device to measure linear translation of the tibia on the femur (ACL testing).

METHODS

A Zeiss Smartzoom microscope was used as the gold standard to assess the ability of the Mobil-Aider™ to measure linear translation. Sixty blinded measures were taken with each of 6 different devices.

RESULTS

Both the intraclass correlation and the Pearson correlation were .986. The Cronbach alpha reliability analysis was 0.992. Independent 1-sample t tests were performed on the differences between the Mobil-Aider™ and Zeiss values, and were not found to be significant (P = .42); that is, they were the same. Bland-Altman plot and a linear regression revealed no propositional bias. Finally, with 360 measures over 6 devices, the power of this study was calculated to be 100%.

DISCUSSION

This data are the first step in establishing reliability and concurrent validity of a new device. As a result of the current data, the Mobil-Aider™ device is deemed a promising orthopedic tool for use in assessing the laxity of the ACL. Additional testing needs to be performed on both healthy and injured knees.

CONCLUSIONS

There is potential for the Mobil-Aider™ to contribute to the assessment of ACL injuries, but additional human testing is needed.

Poorer dynamic postural stability in patients with anterior cruciate ligament rupture combined with lateral meniscus tear than in those with medial meniscus tear

Background

Only limited data are available regarding postural stability between anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-injured patients with medial meniscus (MM) tear and those with lateral meniscus (LM) tear. The purpose of this study was to compare preoperative postural stability for both involved and uninvolved knees in ACL rupture combined with MM and LM tears. It was hypothesized that there would be a significant difference in postural stability between these two groups.

Methods

Ninety-three ACL-injured patients (53 combined with MM tears vs. 40 combined with LM tears) were included. Static and dynamic postural stability were evaluated with the overall stability index (OSI), anterior–posterior stability index (APSI), and medial–lateral stability index (MLSI) using stabilometry. Knee muscle strength was evaluated using an isokinetic testing device.

Results

In the static postural stability test, none of the stability indices showed significant differences between the two groups for both knees (p > 0.05). In the dynamic postural stability test for involved side knees, the OSI and APSI were significantly higher in the LM tear group compared to the MM tear group (OSI: 2.0 ± 0.8 vs. 1.6 ± 0.5, p = 0.001; APSI: 1.5 ± 0.6 vs. 1.3 ± 0.5, p = 0.023), but not the MLSI (p > 0.05). In the static and dynamic postural stability tests in each group, there were no significant differences between the involved and uninvolved side knees (p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the knee muscle strength between the two groups (p > 0.05). All postural stability showed no significant correlation with knee muscle strength (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Dynamic postural stability was poorer in patients with ACL rupture combined with LM tear than in those with MM tear. Therefore, close monitoring for postural stability would be necessary during preoperative and postoperative rehabilitation, especially for patients with ACL rupture combined with LM tear.

Level of evidence: Level III

Clinical and Functional Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at a Minimum of 2 Years Using Adjustable Suspensory Fixation in Both the Femur and Tibia: A Prospective Study

Background:

The success of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction requires reliable and rigid graft fixation. Cortical suspensory fixation (CSF) devices have become an acceptable alternative to interference screws for soft tissue ACL grafts. However, CSF devices have been reported to be associated with tunnel widening and increased postoperative anterior laxity compared with interference screw fixation. Adjustable CSF devices were introduced to avoid these problems but have been associated with graft lengthening and inconsistent outcomes.

Purpose:

To (1) report the side-to-side difference (SSD) in anterior laxity at 150 N, clinical scores, and failure rates 2 years after ACL reconstruction with 4-strand semitendinosus autografts using an adjustable CSF device and (2) determine the preoperative factors associated with clinical outcomes.

Study Design:

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods:

A total of 131 patients who had undergone primary ACL reconstruction, performed with 4-strand semitendinosus grafts that were secured using Pullup adjustable-length CSF devices with femoral and tibial fixation techniques, were prospectively enrolled in this study; 34 patients were excluded because of contralateral instability or ipsilateral knee injuries that required additional surgery. This left a cohort of 97 patients who were evaluated preoperatively and at 6, 12, and 24 months. The evaluation consisted of measuring the SSD in anterior laxity and patient-reported outcome scores (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] and Lysholm scores). Regression analyses were performed to determine associations between these outcomes and 9 preoperative variables.

Results:

Only 2 patients could not be reached, 2 could not be evaluated because of contralateral ACL tears, and 2 had graft failure. At 2-year follow-up, the remaining 91 patients had a mean SSD in anterior laxity of 0.8 ± 1.8 mm (range, –4.2 to 5.3 mm), mean IKDC score of 87.6 ± 10.6 (range, 43.7-100.0), and mean Lysholm score of 90.8 ± 9.3 (range, 56.0-100.0). At final follow-up, compared with knees with partial ruptures, those with complete ruptures had equivalent laxity (P = .266) and Lysholm scores (P = .352) but lower IKDC scores (P = .009). Multivariable regression revealed that the IKDC score decreased with increased preoperative laxity (β = –1.35 [95% CI, –2.48 to –0.23]; P = .019).

Conclusion:

The novel adjustable-length CSF device produced satisfactory anterior laxity and clinical outcomes, with a failure rate of 2.1%, which compare favorably with those reported for nonadjustable CSF devices.