The Efficacy of Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Combined with Tibial Tuberosity Transfer in the Treatment of Patellofemoral Instability

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and tibial tuberosity transfer can be used to successfully manage patellofemoral instability in the setting of trochlea dysplasia

BACKGROUND

Management of patella instability remains a challenge particularly in the presence of trochlea dysplasia. The aim of this study is to assess the recurrence rates of those with patellar instability who have undergone a combined tibial tuberosity transfer (TTT) and medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) in the setting of trochlea dysplasia.

METHODS

All skeletally mature patients who underwent combined TTT and MPFLR for recurrent patella instability were identified between January 2009 and December 2019. A retrospective review was conducted, with information regarding re-dislocation/subluxation and complications collected.

RESULTS

Seventy patients with a mean age 25.3 years were identified and evaluated. Thirteen patients were found to have low-grade dysplasia (Dejour A), with 57 patients having high-grade dysplasia (Dejour B/C/D). No patients in the low,grade dysplasia group suffered a recurrence of their symptoms, with four in the high-grade group suffering episodes of re-dislocation/subluxation. Three patients subsequently underwent a trochleoplasty, with the other patient managed successfully non-operatively. There were a total of 13 complications in 11 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

A combined procedure of MPFLR and TTT can be used to manage patellofemoral instability even in the setting of trochlea dysplasia with a low rate of recurrence. Trochlea dysplasia, however, remains an anatomical risk factor for recurrence and patients should be counselled accordingly. The anatomical risk factors should be assessed in all patients to allow for the development of the most appropriate management plan, of which this combined procedure represents a potentially successful option.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV (Case Series).

Isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction results in similar postoperative outcomes as medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and tibial-tubercle osteotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) versus concomitant MPFLR and tibial-tubercle osteotomy (TTO) on patient-reported functional outcomes, rate of patellar redislocation, and rate of return to sport in skeletally mature patients with recurrent patellar instability and lateralization as defined by elevated tibial-tubercle trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance.

METHODS

Three databases MEDLINE, PubMed and EMBASE were searched from inception to July 10th, 2022 for literature outlining the management of patients with TT-TG indices greater than 15 mm with either isolated MPFLR or concomitant MPFLR and TTO procedures. The authors adhered to the PRISMA and R-AMSTAR guidelines as well as the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data on functional outcomes via the Kujala anterior knee pain score, redislocation rates, return to sport rates, and complications were recorded. The MINORS score was used for all studies to perform a quality assessment of included studies.

RESULTS

A total of 31 studies comprising 1405 patients (1452 knees) were included in this review. The mean Kujala score in 13 studies comprising 848 total patients in the isolated MPFLR group was 85.0 (range 80.9-97.5) compared to a score of 83.7 (range 77.2-94.0) in 14 studies comprising 459 patients in the concomitant group. The mean pooled redislocation rate in 19 studies examining isolated MPFLR procedures comprising 948 patients was 3.1% (95% CI 2.1-4.4%, I² = 7%) as opposed to 3.2% (95% CI 1.9-5.0%, I² = 0%) in 15 studies comprising 486 patients in the concomitant group. The mean pooled return to sport rate in seven studies with 472 total patients in the isolated MPFLR group was 82% (95% CI 78-86%, I² = 16%) compared to a score of 92% (95% CI 78-99%, I² = 58%) in four studies comprising 54 patients in the concomitant group. There were similar complication rates between both treatment groups, including range of motion deficits, fractures, infections, and graft failures.

CONCLUSION

Isolated MPFLR leads to similar anterior knee pain, similar redislocation rates and lower return to sport rates than concomitant MPFLR and TTO procedures in patients with TT-TG distances greater than 15 mm. Information from this review can aid surgeons in their decision to choose MPFLR versus concomitant procedures for this patient population, and can also guide future studies on this topic.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Lateral Patellar Dislocation: A Critical Review and Update of Evidence-Based Rehabilitation Practice Guidelines and Expected Outcomes

»

Nonoperative treatment of a lateral patellar dislocation produces favorable functional results, but as high as 35% of individuals experience recurrent dislocations.

»

Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction is an effective treatment to prevent recurrent dislocations and yield excellent outcomes with a high rate of return to sport.

»

Both nonoperative and postoperative rehabilitation should center on resolving pain and edema, restoring motion, and incorporating isolated and multijoint progressive strengthening exercises targeting the hip and knee.

»

Prior to return to sports, both functional and isolated knee strength measurements should be used to determine leg symmetry strength and to utilize patient-reported outcome measures to assess the patient's perceived physical abilities and patellofemoral joint stability.

Inconsistencies in Reporting Risk Factors for Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Failure: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is a common surgical treatment for patients with recurrent patellar instability. A variety of risk factors, such as age, trochlear dysplasia, patella alta, and increased tibial tubercle-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, have been identified and may lead to postoperative failure or poor outcomes.

PURPOSE

While a large number of risk factors have been identified, significant heterogeneity exists in evaluating and reporting these risk factors in the literature. The goal of this study was to perform a systematic review to determine risk factors associated with worse outcomes after MPFL reconstruction and their consistency of being controlled for or analyzed among studies.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed using the MEDLINE database to identify relevant clinical outcome studies after MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellar instability. Eligible studies were evaluated for risk factors that were associated with MPFL failure, defined as recurrent instability or lack of improvement on patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores. Each study was then evaluated for inclusion of these risk factors.

RESULTS

Ten studies were included in the final analysis, comprising 1287 knees from 1275 patients who underwent isolated MPFL reconstruction. Of these 10 studies, 8 defined outcomes based on PROs and 3 defined outcomes based on postoperative recurrent instability (1 study included both outcomes). In the PRO failure group, 12 risk factors were found across all studies: trochlear dysplasia, trochlear bump height, elevated TT-TG, patellar tilt, hyperlaxity, age at first dislocation, age at surgery, body mass index, bilateral symptoms, WARPS/STAID score (weak atraumatic, risky anatomy, pain, and subluxation/strong, traumatic, anatomy normal, instability, and dislocation), femoral tunnel malposition, and femoral tunnel widening. In the recurrent instability failure group, 7 risk factors were found across all studies: trochlear dysplasia, bump height, patella alta, higher sulcus angle, higher congruence angle, preoperative J sign, and femoral tunnel malposition. Trochlear dysplasia and femoral tunnel malposition were consistently cited in several studies as risk factors for worse PROs and higher rates of recurrent instability. Patella alta was indicated as a significant risk factor for recurrent instability in 1 of 2 studies analyzing postoperative instability failures and was not associated with worse PROs in any of the studies analyzed. Similarly, elevated TT-TG distance was not a significant risk factor in any of the studies that analyzed recurrent instability as the failure endpoint.

CONCLUSION

While various risk factors are postulated to affect outcomes after MPFL reconstruction, there remains inconsistency within the literature regarding the inclusion of all risk factors in a given analysis. Furthermore, the significance of these risk factors varies among studies in terms of whether they affect postoperative outcomes. We found that more severe trochlear dysplasia (types C and D) and femoral tunnel malposition (>10 mm from Schöttle's point) appear to have the most consistent effect on producing higher rates of recurrent dislocation as well as worse PROs. Despite this, the role of concomitant bony procedures to adjust certain pathoanatomic risk factors in addition to MPFL reconstruction remains unknown. Future high-level studies must be conducted that respect the multifactorial nature of patellar instability and should analyze all risk factors (demographic, anatomic, and radiographic) reported to affect outcomes.

Consensus guidelines for management of patellofemoral instability

BACKGROUND

The aim of this consensus process was to provide robust national guidelines to assist with decision making with regards to surgical management of patellofemoral instability.

METHODS

A national group of surgeons, physiotherapists, basic scientists and a radiologist with expert experience in patellofemoral instability was convened. A formal consensus process was undertaken using validated methodology. They reviewed the existing literature, performed a group consensus meeting to develop recommendations and followed this with a wider consultation meeting with an open invitation for final ratification. The guidelines were reviewed and authorised by the BASK executive committee, followed by the British Orthopaedic Association prior to final publication.

RESULTS

The review of the literature confirmed a significant absence of an evidence base to guide clinicians in the surgical management of patellofemoral instability. The consensus process outlined guidance relating to diagnosis and clinical assessment, appropriate imaging modalities, recommendations for surgical options and appropriate post operative physiotherapy. Following wide invitation to contribute to the final document, 102 people responded. Twenty six of those provided additional comments which were blinded, discussed and included or excluded following further discussion amongst the working group.

CONCLUSION

Patellofemoral instability is a complex pathology with multiple surgical options available to those who decide surgery is indicated. In the absence of a strong evidence base, these guidelines aim to assist with that decision making process and will pave the way for more robust clinical trials in the future.

The feasibility of a randomised control trial to assess physiotherapy against surgery for recurrent patellar instability

Background

Patellar instability is a relatively common condition that leads to disability and restriction of activities. People with recurrent instability may be given the option of physiotherapy or surgery though this is largely driven by clinician preference rather than by a strong evidence base. We sought to determine the feasibility of conducting a definitive trial comparing physiotherapy with surgical treatment for people with recurrent patellar instability.

Methods

This was a pragmatic, open-label, two-arm feasibility randomised control trial (RCT) with an embedded interview component recruiting across three NHS sites comparing surgical treatment to a package of best conservative care; ‘Personalised Knee Therapy’ (PKT). The primary feasibility outcome was the recruitment rate per centre (expected rate 1 to 1.5 participants recruited each month). Secondary outcomes included the rate of follow-up (over 80% expected at 12 months) and a series of participant-reported outcomes taken at 3, 6 and 12 months following randomisation, including the Norwich Patellar Instability Score (NPIS), the Kujala Patellofemoral Disorder Score (KPDS), EuroQol-5D-5L, self-reported global assessment of change, satisfaction at each time point and resources use.

Results

We recruited 19 participants. Of these, 18 participants (95%) were followed-up at 12 months and 1 (5%) withdrew. One centre recruited at just over one case per month, one centre was unable to recruit, and one centre recruited at over one case per month after a change in participant screening approach. Ten participants were allocated into the PKT arm, with nine to the surgical arm. Mean Norwich Patellar Instability Score improved from 40.6 (standard deviation 22.1) to 28.2 (SD 25.4) from baseline to 12 months.

Conclusion

This feasibility trial identified a number of challenges and required a series of changes to ensure adequate recruitment and follow-up. These changes helped achieve a sufficient recruitment and follow-up rate. The revised trial design is feasible to be conducted as a definitive trial to answer this important clinical question for people with chronic patellar instability.

Trial registration

The trial was prospectively registered on the International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry on the 22/12/2016 (reference number: ISRCTN14950321). http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN14950321

Failure Analysis in Patients With Patellar Redislocation After Primary Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

Background:

Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) has become a popular surgical procedure to address patellofemoral instability. As a consequence of the growing number of MPFL reconstructions performed, a higher rate of failures and revision procedures has been seen.

Purpose:

To perform a failure analysis in patients with patellar redislocation after primary isolated MPFL reconstruction.

Study Design:

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods:

Patients undergoing revision surgery for reinstability after primary isolated MPFL reconstruction were included. Clinical notes were reviewed to collect demographic data, information on the primary surgery, and the mechanism of patellar redislocation (traumatic vs nontraumatic). Preoperative imaging was analyzed regarding femoral tunnel position and the prevalence of anatomic risk factors (ARFs) associated with patellofemoral instability: trochlear dysplasia (types B through D), patella alta (Caton-Deschamps index >1.2, patellotrochlear index <0.28), lateralization of the tibial tuberosity (tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance >20 mm, tibial tuberosity–posterior cruciate ligament [TT-PCL] distance >24 mm), valgus malalignment (mechanical valgus axis >5°), and torsional deformity (internal femoral torsion >25°, external tibial torsion >35°). The prevalence of ARF was compared between patients with traumatic and nontraumatic redislocations and between patients with anatomic and nonanatomic femoral tunnel position.

Results:

A total of 26 patients (69% female) with a mean age of 25 ± 7 years were included. The cause of redislocation was traumatic in 31% and nontraumatic in 69%. Position of the femoral tunnel was considered nonanatomic in 50% of patients. Trochlear dysplasia was the most common ARF with a prevalence of 50%, followed by elevated TT-PCL distance (36%) and valgus malalignment (35%). The median number of ARFs per patient was 3 (range, 0-6), and 65% of patients had 2 or more ARFs. Patients with nontraumatic redislocations showed significantly more ARFs per patient, and the presence of 2 or more ARFs was significantly more common in this group. No significant difference was observed between patients with anatomic versus nonanatomic femoral tunnel position.

Conclusion:

Multiple anatomic risk factors and femoral tunnel malposition are commonly observed in patients with reinstability after primary MPFL reconstruction. Before revision surgery, a focused clinical examination and adequate imaging including radiographs, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), standing full-leg radiographs, and torsional measurement with computed tomography or MRI are recommended to assess all relevant anatomic parameters to understand an individual patient’s risk profile. During revision surgery, care must be taken to ensure anatomic placement of the femoral tunnel through use of anatomic and/or radiographic landmarks.

How Does Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction Influence Patellar Height?

BACKGROUND

Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is the gold standard treatment for recurrent patellar dislocation. Patella alta has been reported in about half of patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability.

HYPOTHESIS

MPFL reconstruction (MPFLr) has a beneficial role in the correction of patellar height in patients with mild patella alta (Caton-Deschamps index [CDI] between 1.20 and 1.40).

STUDY DESIGN

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

Skeletally mature patients, with no history of previous or concomitant knee surgical procedures, who underwent isolated MPFLr using hamstring autograft for recurrent patellar instability between 2005 and 2018, were included in this study. The authors calculated CDI, modified Insall-Salvati index (MISI), and Blackburne-Peel index (BPI) ratios. Measurements done by 2 independent observers were calculated and used to compare pre- and postoperative patellar height (patella alta: CDI >1.20).

RESULTS

A total of 89 patients (95 knees) were included in the study, with a mean age of 25.0 years (range, 15.0-45.0 years). There were 70% women and 30% men. We found patella alta in 35.8% of cases preoperatively. Among them, 79.4% had reduced patellar height indices, within normal limits, postoperatively (mean follow-up, 18.4 ± 12.0 months). All the ratios showed a significant reduction in patellar height after surgery (CDI: 0.19 [range, -0.05, 0.60]; MISI: 0.22 [-0.14, 0.76]; BPI: 0.18 [-0.08, 0.59]; P < .00001). The CDI of 79.4% of the study knees was reduced to within normal limits postoperatively. The CDI was maintained within normal limits postoperatively in 93.4% of the knees with normal patellar height and reduced to normal in 50% of the knees with severe patella alta before surgery . No patient reported patella infera before surgery, whereas this condition was found in 8.2% of study patients postoperatively. A moderate correlation was reported between preoperative radiographic indices and their reduction after surgery (CDI: P < .001, ρ = 0.39; MISI: P < .001, ρ = 0.39; BPI: P < .001, ρ = 0.48).

CONCLUSION

The higher the preoperative patellar height, the more important is the lowering effect of MPFLr using the hamstring for patellar instability. Bony procedures should not be indicated in patients with patellar instability and a CDI between 1.20 and 1.40.