Prognostic biomarkers and molecular pathways mediating Helicobacter pylori–induced gastric cancer: a network-biology approach

Overexpression of heat shock protein 47 is associated with increased proliferation and metastasis in gastric cancer

Here, we investigated that the heat shock protein 47 (HSP47) plays a crucial role in the progression of gastric cancer (GC). We analyzed HSP47 gene expression in GC cell lines and patient tissues. The HSP47 mRNA and protein expression levels were significantly higher in GC cell lines and tumor tissues compared to normal gastric mucosa. Using siRNA to silence the expression of HSP47 in GC cells resulted in a significant reduction in their proliferation, wound healing, migration, and invasion capacities. Additionally, we also showed that the mRNA expression of matrix metallopeptidase-7 (MMP-7), a metastasis-promoting gene, was significantly reduced in HSP47 siRNA-transfected GC cells. We confirmed that the HSP47 promoter region was methylated in the SNU-216 GC cell line expressing low levels of HSP47 and in most non-cancerous gastric tissues. It means that the expression of HSP47 is regulated by epigenetic regulatory mechanisms. These findings suggest that targeting HSP47, potentially through its promoter methylation, could be a useful new therapeutic strategy for treating GC.

Role of the Microbiome in the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Cancers

PURPOSE

Stomach and esophageal cancers are among the highest mortality from cancers worldwide. Microbiota has an interplaying role within the human gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Dysbiosis occurs when a disruption of the balance between the microbiota and the host happens. With this narrative review, we discuss the main alterations in the microbiome of gastroesophageal cancer, revealing its potential role in the pathogenesis, early detection, and treatment.

RESULTS

Helicobacter pylori plays a major role the development of a cascade of preneoplastic conditions ranging from atrophic gastritis to metaplasia and dysplasia, ultimately culminating in gastric cancer, while other pathogenic agents are Fusobacterium nucleatum, Bacteroides fragilis, Escherichia coli, and Lactobacillus. Campylobacter species (spp.)'s role in the progression of esophageal adenocarcinoma may parallel that of Helicobacter pylori in the context of gastric cancer, with other esophageal carcinogenic agents being Escherichia coli, Bacteroides fragilis, and Fusobacterium nucleatum. Moreover, gut microbiome could significantly alter the outcomes of chemotherapy and immunotherapy. The gut microbiome can be modulated through interventions such as antibiotics, probiotics, or prebiotics intake. Fecal microbiota transplantation has emerged as a therapeutic strategy as well.

CONCLUSIONS

Nowadays, it is widely accepted that changes in the normal gut microbiome causing dysbiosis and immune dysregulation play a role gastroesophageal cancer. Different interventions, including probiotics and prebiotics intake are being developed to improve therapeutic outcomes and mitigate toxicities associated with anticancer treatment. Further studies are required in order to introduce the microbiome among the available tools of precision medicine in the field of anticancer treatment.