Descriptive study of prescriptions for opioids from a suburban academic emergency department before New York's I-STOP Act

The Effect of the Strengthen Opioid Misuse Prevention Act on Opiate Prescription Practices Within the Orthopaedic Surgery Department of an Academic Medical Center

In 2017, the Department of Health and Human Service declared a public health emergency known as the opioid crisis. In North Carolina, the “Strengthen Opioid Misuse Prevention Act of 2017” (STOP Act) went into effect on January 1, 2018, seeking to strengthen oversight over opioid prescriptions. Among other mandates, this legislation limited the duration of the initial prescription to 5 or 7 days. The purpose of this study was to compare narcotic prescription practices within the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery at an academic medical center before and after the enactment of the STOP Act. We hypothesized that there would be a statistically significant decrease in the amount of postoperative opioids prescribed after the STOP Act and that this decrease would be consistent across all types of providers in the Orthopaedic Surgery Department.

Opioid Prescribing Practices in Pediatric Acute Care Settings

OBJECTIVES

Deaths due to prescription opioid overdoses are at record-high levels. Limiting the amount of opioid prescribed has been suggested as a prevention strategy. The purpose of this study was to describe the opioid prescribing practices in the emergency departments and urgent care sites of a Midwestern tertiary care children's hospital system.

METHODS

This retrospective medical record review examined the visits from the 2 pediatric emergency departments and 2 pediatric urgent care sites in the system from June 1, 2012, to May 31, 2013, during which an outpatient opioid prescription was written. The primary outcome was number of days of opioid prescribed. Other data collected included patient demographics, diagnosis, and prescriber information; factors associated with prescriptions written for more than 5 days were identified.

RESULTS

A total of 4075 opioid prescriptions were included in the 1-year study period, and 3991 of these had complete data for analysis. The median amount prescribed was 3.3 days with an interquartile range of 2.5 days. Odds of receiving a prescription of more than 5 days' duration were higher for children younger than 1 year (odds ratio [OR], 12.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.3-21.0), 1 to 4 years of age (OR, 7.7; 95% CI, 5.5-10.8), and 5 to 9 years of age (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.7-3.4); for children with noninjury diagnoses (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.7); or if prescribed by a resident physician (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.8) or from the urgent care (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Opioid prescriptions of more than 5 days were more frequently prescribed for younger patients, noninjury diagnoses, or if prescribed by a resident physician or from the urgent care. We need to focus on medical student, resident, and provider education as well as further opioid research in order to decrease unnecessary prescribing.

The feasibility of an inter-professional transitions of care service in an older adult population

BACKGROUND

Older adults discharged from the Emergency Department (ED) are at high risk for medication interactions and side effects; examples of practice models addressing this transition of care are lacking.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study for adults in one of two urban community EDs. Patients ≥50 years of age discharged with at least one new, non-schedule II prescription medication were included. Patients had the option of three transitions of care services: 1) pharmacist-only with home delivery of discharge medications and full medication reconciliation, 2) pharmacist and home health care, including home delivery, medication reconciliation, and a visit from a home health nurse, or 3) either of the above without home delivery.

RESULTS

Over seven months, 440 ED patients were screened. Of those, 43 patients were eligible, and three patients elected to join the study. All three patients selected pharmacy-only. Identified barriers to enrollment include the rate of schedule II prescriptions from the ED (53% of potential patients) and high patient loyalty to their community pharmacist.

CONCLUSIONS

A pharmacy and home health care transitions of care program was not feasible at an urban community ED. While the pharmacist team identified and managed multiple medication issues, most patients did not qualify due to prescriptions ineligible for delivery. Patients did not want pharmacist or home health nurse involvement in their post ED visit care, many due to loyalty to their community pharmacy. Multiple barriers must be addressed to create a successful inter-professional transition of care model.

Opioid Prescribing: Where Should Academic Emergency Departments Focus Their Efforts?

BACKGROUND

Opioid prescriptions from the emergency department (ED) are being heavily scrutinized. This has resulted in prescribing guidelines and laws.

OBJECTIVE

We analyzed the "current state" of opioid prescribing practices by emergency medicine (EM) trainees to gain understanding where operational, educational, or supervisory efforts should be directed to comply with current guidelines and future legislation.

METHODS

Our retrospective, observational, study was performed at an academic ED with an annual census of 61,289 visits. We extracted all 6962 opioid prescriptions attributed to the ED during calendar year 2015 from the electronic health record. Error prescriptions were excluded from the analysis. Overall prescribing by opioid class was performed. Prescriptions written by EM trainees were categorized by postgraduate year and compared with other prescribers. Prescribing patterns for recurrent visits were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 6962 opioid discharge prescriptions, 5515 were written by EM providers. No refills were provided. A mean of 15.4 pills (95% confidence interval 13.9-16.9) were prescribed. Analysis of variance did not detect a significant difference between mean numbers of pills prescribed by EM providers. However, there was a significant difference between EM and non-EM prescribers. Less-experienced EM providers exhibited greater variability with regard to class and preparation. There were 389 prescriptions written for patients who received at least one other opioid prescription in the preceding 30 days. The number of pills dispensed decreased with increasing prior visits.

CONCLUSION

EM providers prescribe short courses of opiates regardless of postgraduate year. Patients returning to the ED received fewer pills on subsequent visits. Non-EM providers prescribe larger numbers of pills per prescription. This information will help focus future operational efforts and educational efforts to comply with guidelines and laws.

The Effects of Kentucky's Comprehensive Opioid Legislation on Patients Presenting with Prescription Opioid or Heroin Abuse to One Urban Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

Prescription opioid abuse has increased to epidemic proportions in the United States. Kentucky, along with other states, passed comprehensive legislation to monitor and curb opioid prescribing.

OBJECTIVES

This paper characterizes patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) after abusing prescription opioids and heroin prior to and after the passage of House Bill 1 (HB1) in April 2012.

METHODS

Based on a retrospective review of ED visits from 2009-2014 in one urban adult facility, patients were included if the chief complaint or diagnosis was directly related to prescription opioid or heroin abuse. The primary outcome is the number and type of substance abused by each ED patient.

RESULTS

From 2009-2014, 2945 patients presented to the ED after prescription opioid or heroin abuse. The number of prescription opioid patients decreased from 215 (of 276 patients) in 2009 to 203 (of 697 patients) in 2014; 77.9% of patients abused opioids in 2009, vs. 29% in 2014 (a 63% decrease). The number of heroin patients increased from 61 in 2009 to 494 in 2014; 22% of patients in 2009 abused heroin, vs. 71% in 2014 (a 221% increase). Both piecewise regression and autoregressive integrated moving average trend models showed an increased trend in patient heroin abuse beginning in 2011-2012.

CONCLUSIONS

Our facility experienced a decrease in the number of patients who abused prescription opioids and an increase in the number of patients who abused heroin over the study period. The transition seemed to occur just prior to, or concurrent with, enforcement of statewide opioid legislation.