1
|
Austin EE, Cheek C, Richardson L, Testa L, Dominello A, Long JC, Carrigan A, Ellis LA, Norman A, Murphy M, Smith K, Gillies D, Clay-Williams R. Improving emergency department care for adults presenting with mental illness: a systematic review of strategies and their impact on outcomes, experience, and performance. Front Psychiatry 2024; 15:1368129. [PMID: 38487586 PMCID: PMC10937575 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1368129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Care delivery for the increasing number of people presenting at hospital emergency departments (EDs) with mental illness is a challenging issue. This review aimed to synthesise the research evidence associated with strategies used to improve ED care delivery outcomes, experience, and performance for adults presenting with mental illness. Method We systematically reviewed the evidence regarding the effects of ED-based interventions for mental illness on patient outcomes, patient experience, and system performance, using a comprehensive search strategy designed to identify published empirical studies. Systematic searches in Scopus, Ovid Embase, CINAHL, and Medline were conducted in September 2023 (from inception; review protocol was prospectively registered in Prospero CRD42023466062). Eligibility criteria were as follows: (1) primary research study, published in English; and (2) (a) reported an implemented model of care or system change within the hospital ED context, (b) focused on adult mental illness presentations, and (c) evaluated system performance, patient outcomes, patient experience, or staff experience. Pairs of reviewers independently assessed study titles, abstracts, and full texts according to pre-established inclusion criteria with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. Independent reviewers extracted data from the included papers using Covidence (2023), and the quality of included studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute suite of critical appraisal tools. Results A narrative synthesis was performed on the included 46 studies, comprising pre-post (n = 23), quasi-experimental (n = 6), descriptive (n = 6), randomised controlled trial (RCT; n = 3), cohort (n = 2), cross-sectional (n = 2), qualitative (n = 2), realist evaluation (n = 1), and time series analysis studies (n = 1). Eleven articles focused on presentations related to substance use disorder presentation, 9 focused on suicide and deliberate self-harm presentations, and 26 reported mental illness presentations in general. Strategies reported include models of care (e.g., ED-initiated Medications for Opioid Use Disorder, ED-initiated social support, and deliberate self-harm), decision support tools, discharge and transfer refinements, case management, adjustments to liaison psychiatry services, telepsychiatry, changes to roles and rostering, environmental changes (e.g., specialised units within the ED), education, creation of multidisciplinary teams, and care standardisations. System performance measures were reported in 33 studies (72%), with fewer studies reporting measures of patient outcomes (n = 19, 41%), patient experience (n = 10, 22%), or staff experience (n = 14, 30%). Few interventions reported outcomes across all four domains. Heterogeneity in study samples, strategies, and evaluated outcomes makes adopting existing strategies challenging. Conclusion Care for mental illness is complex, particularly in the emergency setting. Strategies to provide care must align ED system goals with patient goals and staff experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth E. Austin
- The Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Science, Macquarie University, Macquarie, NSW, Australia
| | - Colleen Cheek
- The Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Science, Macquarie University, Macquarie, NSW, Australia
| | - Lieke Richardson
- The Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Science, Macquarie University, Macquarie, NSW, Australia
| | - Luke Testa
- The Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Science, Macquarie University, Macquarie, NSW, Australia
| | - Amanda Dominello
- The Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Science, Macquarie University, Macquarie, NSW, Australia
| | - Janet C. Long
- The Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Science, Macquarie University, Macquarie, NSW, Australia
| | - Ann Carrigan
- The Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Science, Macquarie University, Macquarie, NSW, Australia
| | - Louise A. Ellis
- The Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Science, Macquarie University, Macquarie, NSW, Australia
| | - Alicia Norman
- Centre for the Health Economy, Macquarie University Business School, Macquarie University, Macquarie, NSW, Australia
| | - Margaret Murphy
- Western Sydney Local Health District, New South Wales Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Kylie Smith
- Emergency Care Institute, New South Wales Agency for Clinical Innovation, New South Wales Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Donna Gillies
- Quality and Safeguards Commission, National Disability Insurance Scheme, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Robyn Clay-Williams
- The Centre for Healthcare Resilience and Implementation Science, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Science, Macquarie University, Macquarie, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Glenn J, Gibson D, Thiesset HF. Providers' Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Electronic Health Records in Identifying Opioid Misuse. J Healthc Manag 2023; 68:390-403. [PMID: 37944171 PMCID: PMC10635334 DOI: 10.1097/jhm-d-22-00253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
GOAL This study aimed to understand prescribing providers' perceptions of electronic health record (EHR) effectiveness in enabling them to identify and prevent opioid misuse and addiction. METHODS We used a cross-sectional survey designed and administered by KLAS Research to examine healthcare providers' perceptions of their experiences with EHR systems. Univariate analysis and mixed-effects logistic regression analysis with organization-level random effects were performed. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS A total of 17,790 prescribing providers responded to the survey question related to this article's primary outcome about opioid misuse prevention. Overall, 34% of respondents believed EHRs helped prevent opioid misuse and addiction. Advanced practice providers were more likely than attending physicians and trainees to believe EHRs were effective in reducing opioid misuse, as were providers with fewer than 5 years of experience. PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS Understanding providers' perceptions of EHR effectiveness is critical as the health outcome of reducing opioid misuse depends upon their willingness to adopt and apply new technology to their standardized routines. Healthcare managers can enhance providers' use of EHRs to facilitate the prevention of opioid misuse with ongoing training related to advanced EHR system features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Danica Gibson
- Department of Public Health, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gardner RL, Baier RR, Cooper EL, Clements EE, Belanger E. Interventions to Reduce Hospital and Emergency Department Utilization Among People With Alcohol and Substance Use Disorders: A Scoping Review. Med Care 2022; 60:164-177. [PMID: 34908009 DOI: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Substance use disorders (SUDs), prevalent worldwide, are associated with significant morbidity and health care utilization. OBJECTIVES To identify interventions addressing hospital and emergency department utilization among people with substance use, to summarize findings for those seeking to implement such interventions, and to articulate gaps that can be addressed by future research. RESEARCH DESIGN A scoping review of the literature. We searched PubMed, PsycInfo, and Google Scholar for any articles published from January 2010 to June 2020. The main search terms included the target population of adults with substance use or SUDs, the outcomes of hospital and emergency department utilization, and interventions aimed at improving these outcomes in the target population. SUBJECTS Adults with substance use or SUDs, including alcohol use. MEASURES Hospital and emergency department utilization. RESULTS Our initial search identified 1807 titles, from which 44 articles were included in the review. Most interventions were implemented in the United States (n=35). Half focused on people using any substance (n=22) and a quarter on opioids (n=12). The tested approaches varied and included postdischarge services, medications, legislation, and counseling, among others. The majority of study designs were retrospective cohort studies (n=31). CONCLUSIONS Overall, we found few studies assessing interventions to reduce health care utilization among people with SUDs. The studies that we did identify differed across multiple domains and included few randomized trials. Study heterogeneity limits our ability to compare interventions or to recommend one specific approach to reducing health care utilization among this high-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebekah L Gardner
- Department of Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University
- Healthcentric Advisors
| | - Rosa R Baier
- Center for Long-Term Care Quality & Innovation
- Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI
| | | | - Erin E Clements
- Public Health Program, Brown University School of Public Health
| | - Emmanuelle Belanger
- Department of Health Services, Policy & Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI
- Center for Gerontology & Healthcare Research, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moving Away From a "One Size Fits All" Model: Ensuring Opioid Stewardship Includes People Who Use Drugs. J Addict Med 2021; 16:386-388. [PMID: 34690337 DOI: 10.1097/adm.0000000000000938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The opioid-driven overdose crisis has had devastating effects across North America, resulting from a complex interplay between individual, social-structural, and environmental factors. Changing approaches to pain management, increased heroin use, and potent synthetic opioids infiltrating the drug supply are compounded by both lack of access to opioid use disorder treatment and surrounding stigma. Inappropriate opioid prescribing practices in healthcare settings have played a central role, and in recent years, there has been increasing interest in implementing hospital-based opioid stewardship programs aimed at improving safety and monitoring opioid prescribing. There is a range of approaches taken by these programs, ranging from audit and feedback to consult services; however, a significant focus of many of these programs is on medication restriction. Such measures stand to negatively impact the care of people with complex healthcare needs, including those currently on long-term opioid therapy, and those with increased opioid tolerance. In this commentary, we emphasize the importance of creating opioid stewardship programs focused on appropriate pain treatment rather than solely on medication restriction to both appropriately prescribe to and manage pain in people who use illicit drugs. This population faces many barriers to care, such as unique dose requirements and high interpatient variability that "one size fits all" stewardship cannot appropriately address. Additionally, opioid stewardship programs that use patient-centered strategies such as multidisciplinary consult services have been shown to lead to positive health outcomes and have significant potential to address the current shortcomings in pain management for people who use illicit drugs.
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We sought to identify potential patient safety practices to reduce high-risk opioid prescribing. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify opioid stewardship (OS) strategies implemented in primary care and other settings. Included studies evaluated an OS strategy or a multicomponent OS initiative to address potential harms of opioids and used experimental or quasi-experimental designs. RESULTS We identified 14 studies and 1 systematic review that met inclusion criteria. Most studies examined multicomponent OS interventions, which often consisted of guideline-recommended clinical interventions or care processes (e.g., use urine drug screening, check Prescription Drug Monitoring Program), as well as implementation strategies (e.g., dashboards, audit and feedback). Most studies examined the effect of OS interventions on reducing the potential risks of opioids with judicious prescribing and guideline-concordant care (e.g., reduce inappropriate high opioid dosages, avoid co-prescribing opioids and benzodiazepines, use urine drug screening, treatment agreements). CONCLUSIONS The strength of the evidence is low to moderate that OS efforts decrease numbers of opioid prescriptions, proportion of patients on long-term opioids, or days' supply. The strength of the evidence for OS initiatives producing significant reductions in opioid dosages was moderate. Future research is needed on the effectiveness of OS interventions, particularly studies with experimental designs and in diverse settings within the health care system.
Collapse
|
6
|
Martin HD, Modi SS, Feldman SS. Barriers and facilitators to PDMP IS Success in the US: A systematic review. Drug Alcohol Depend 2021; 219:108460. [PMID: 33387937 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 11/15/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMP) help prevent prescription drug misuse and promote appropriate pain management. Despite these benefits and PDMP mandates in most states, PDMPs face challenges that hinder their success. This paper uses the Delone and McLean Information Success (IS) Model to review the current literature for barriers and facilitators to PDMP quality, use, intention to use and user satisfaction in the United States (U.S.). MATERIAL AND METHODS Scopus, PubMed and Embase databases were searched due to their relevance to information technology, education and research. RESULTS There were 142 and 183 barriers and facilitators, respectively, found in 44 peer reviewed articles. Barriers to PDMP quality, use and user satisfaction include lack of interstate data sharing, access difficulties, lack of time, inability to delegate access, lack of knowledge or awareness of the PMDP, and lack of EHR integration. Facilitators to PDMP quality, use and user satisfaction include interstate data connections, real-time data updates, EHR integration, and access delegation. DISCUSSION Interstate data sharing, EHR integration and expanding access to delegates were common themes found. Some results were found to be contradictory such as mandating use. CONCLUSION PDMP users can use these findings to assess current barriers to PDMP success in the U.S. and draw possible solutions from the list of facilitators. Practitioners should consider the context of their state and organization when determining which facilitators would most promote PDMP IS success. Combining facilitators may be the best route to PDMP IS success in certain situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather D Martin
- School of Health Professions, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1716 9th Ave S, Birmingham, AL, 35233, United States.
| | - Shikha S Modi
- School of Health Professions, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1716 9th Ave S, Birmingham, AL, 35233, United States
| | - Sue S Feldman
- School of Health Professions, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1716 9th Ave S, Birmingham, AL, 35233, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Deschamps J, Gilbertson J, Straube S, Dong K, MacMaster FP, Korownyk C, Montgomery L, Mahaffey R, Downar J, Clarke H, Muscedere J, Rittenbach K, Featherstone R, Sebastianski M, Vandermeer B, Lynam D, Magnussen R, Bagshaw SM, Rewa OG. Association between supportive interventions and healthcare utilization and outcomes in patients on long-term prescribed opioid therapy presenting to acute healthcare settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Emerg Med 2021; 21:17. [PMID: 33514325 PMCID: PMC7845034 DOI: 10.1186/s12873-020-00398-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Long-term prescription of opioids by healthcare professionals has been linked to poor individual patient outcomes and high resource utilization. Supportive strategies in this population regarding acute healthcare settings may have substantial impact. METHODS We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of primary studies. The studies were included according to the following criteria: 1) age 18 and older; 2) long-term prescribed opioid therapy; 3) acute healthcare setting presentation from a complication of opioid therapy; 4) evaluating a supportive strategy; 5) comparing the effectiveness of different interventions; 6) addressing patient or healthcare related outcomes. We performed a qualitative analysis of supportive strategies identified. We pooled patient and system related outcome data for each supportive strategy. RESULTS A total of 5664 studies were screened and 19 studies were included. A total of 9 broad categories of supportive strategies were identified. Meta-analysis was performed for the "supports for patients in pain" supportive strategy on two system-related outcomes using a ratio of means. The number of emergency department (ED) visits were significantly reduced for cohort studies (n = 6, 0.36, 95% CI [0.20-0.62], I2 = 87%) and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 3, 0.71, 95% CI [0.61-0.82], I2 = 0%). The number of opioid prescriptions at ED discharge was significantly reduced for RCTs (n = 3, 0.34, 95% CI [0.14-0.82], I2 = 78%). CONCLUSION For patients presenting to acute healthcare settings with complications related to long-term opioid therapy, the intervention with the most robust data is "supports for patients in pain".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Deschamps
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, 8440 112 St. NW, Critical Care Medicine 2-124E Clinical Sciences Building, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada.
| | - James Gilbertson
- School of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sebastian Straube
- Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, 5-30 University Terrace, 8303 - 112 St NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2T4, Canada
| | - Kathryn Dong
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, 2J2.00 WC Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, 8440 112 St NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2R7, Canada
| | - Frank P MacMaster
- Departments of Psychiatry and Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Strategic Clinical Network for Addictions and Mental Health 2888 Shaganappi Trail NW Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T3B 6A8, Canada
| | - Christina Korownyk
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Suite 205 College Plaza, 8215 112 St NW, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2C8, Canada
| | - Lori Montgomery
- Department of Family Medicine, Calgary Chronic Pain Center 1820 Richmond Road SW Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, T2T 5C7, Canada
| | - Ryan Mahaffey
- Department of Anesthesia, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - James Downar
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hance Clarke
- Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Transitional Pain Program, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - John Muscedere
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Katherine Rittenbach
- Addiction & Mental Health Strategic Clinical Network, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Robin Featherstone
- Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Alberta SPOR SUPPORT Unit KT Platform, 4-486D Edmonton Clinical Health Academy, 11405 - 87 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada
| | - Meghan Sebastianski
- Knowledge Translation Platform, Alberta SPOR SUPPORT Unit Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, 362-B Heritage Medical Research Centre (HMRC), Edmonton, Canada
| | - Ben Vandermeer
- Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Alberta SPOR SUPPORT Unit KT Platform, 4-486D Edmonton Clinical Health Academy, 11405 - 87 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 1C9, Canada
| | - Deborah Lynam
- Primary Health Care Information Network, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ryan Magnussen
- Critical Care Strategic Clinical Network, Foothills Medical Centre, ICU Administration - Ground Floor, McCaig Tower, 3134 Hospital Drive, Calgary, Alberta, T2N 2T9, Canada
| | - Sean M Bagshaw
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, 8440 112 St. NW, Critical Care Medicine 2-124E Clinical Sciences Building, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada
| | - Oleksa G Rewa
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, 8440 112 St. NW, Critical Care Medicine 2-124E Clinical Sciences Building, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2B7, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kazimi M, Terndrup T, Tait R, Frey JA, Strassels S, Emerson G, Todd KH. Cultivating emergency physician behavioral empathy to improve emergency department care for pain and prescription opioid misuse. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open 2020; 1:1480-1485. [PMID: 33392553 PMCID: PMC7771829 DOI: 10.1002/emp2.12086] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Revised: 04/08/2020] [Accepted: 04/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Clinical empathy is the ability to understand the patient's experience, communicate that understanding, and act on it. There is evidence that patient and physician benefits are associated with more empathic communications. These include higher patient and physician satisfaction, improved quality of life, and decreased professional burnout for physicians, as well as increased patient compliance with care plans. Empathy appears to decline during medical school, residency training, and early professional emergency medicine practice; however, brief training has the potential to improve behavioral measures of empathy. Improvements in emergency department physician empathy seems especially important in managing patients at elevated risk for opioid-related harm. We describe our conceptual approach to identifying and designing a practice improvement curriculum aimed to cultivate and improve behavioral empathy among practicing emergency physicians. Emergent themes from our preliminary study of interviews, focus groups, and workshops were identified and analyzed for feasibility, sensitivity to change, and potential impact. A conceptual intervention will address the following key categories: patient stigmatization, identification of problematic pain-subtypes, empathic communication skills, interactions with family and friends, and techniques to manage inappropriate patient requests. The primary outcomes will be the changes in behavioral empathy associated with training. An assessment battery was chosen to measure physician psychosocial beliefs, attitudes and behavior, communication skills, and burnout magnitude. Additional outcomes will include opioid prescribing practice, naloxone prescribing, and referrals to addiction treatment. A pilot study will allow an estimation of the intervention impact to help finalize a curriculum suitable for web-based national implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maher Kazimi
- Department of Emergency MedicineOhio State UniversityColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Thomas Terndrup
- Department of Emergency MedicineOhio State UniversityColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Raymond Tait
- Department of PsychiatrySt. Louis UniversitySt. LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Jennifer A. Frey
- Department of Emergency MedicineOhio State UniversityColumbusOhioUSA
| | | | - Geremiah Emerson
- Department of Emergency MedicineOhio State UniversityColumbusOhioUSA
| | - Knox H. Todd
- Department of Emergency MedicineOhio State UniversityColumbusOhioUSA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wong CK, O'Rielly CM, Teitge BD, Sutherland RL, Farquharson S, Ghosh M, Robertson HL, Lang E. The Characteristics and Effectiveness of Interventions for Frequent Emergency Department Utilizing Patients With Chronic Noncancer Pain: A Systematic Review. Acad Emerg Med 2020; 27:742-752. [PMID: 32030836 DOI: 10.1111/acem.13934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2019] [Revised: 01/30/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) present unique challenges to emergency department (ED) care providers and administrators. Their conditions lead to frequent ED visits for pain relief and symptom management and are often poorly addressed with costly, low-yield care. A systematic review has not been performed to inform the management of frequent ED utilizing patients with CNCP. Therefore, we synthesized the available evidence on interventional strategies to improve care-associated outcomes for this patient group. METHODS We searched Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science from database inception to June 2018 for eligible interventional studies aimed at reducing frequent ED utilization among adult patients with CNCP. Articles were assessed in duplicate in accordance with methodologic recommendations from the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Outcomes of interest were the frequency of subsequent ED visits, type and amount of opioids administered in the ED and prescribed at discharge, and costs. Methodologic quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions and Risk of Bias tools for nonrandomized and randomized studies, respectively. RESULTS Thirteen studies including 1,679 patients met the inclusion criteria. Identified interventions implemented pain policies (n = 4), individualized care plans (n = 5), ED care coordination (n = 2), chronic pain management pathways (n = 1), and behavioral health interventions (n = 1). All of the studies reported a decrease in ED visit frequency following their respective interventions. These reductions were especially pronounced in studies whose interventions were focused around individualized care plans and primary care involvement. Interventions implementing opioid restriction and pain management policies were largely successful in reducing the amounts of opioid medications administered and prescribed in the ED. CONCLUSIONS Multifaceted interventions, especially those employing individualized care plans, can successfully reduce subsequent ED visits, ED opioid administration and prescription, and care-associated costs for frequent ED utilizing patients with CNCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles K. Wong
- Department of Emergency Medicine Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary AB Canada
| | - Connor M. O'Rielly
- Department of Community Health Sciences Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary AB Canada
| | - Braden D. Teitge
- Department of Emergency Medicine Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary AB Canada
| | - Robert L. Sutherland
- Department of Community Health Sciences Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary AB Canada
| | - Scott Farquharson
- Department of Emergency Medicine Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary AB Canada
| | - Monty Ghosh
- Department of General Internal Medicine University of Alberta Edmonton AB Canada
| | | | - Eddy Lang
- Department of Emergency Medicine Cumming School of Medicine University of Calgary Calgary AB Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kettler E, Brennan J, Coyne CJ. The effects of a morphine shortage on emergency department pain control. Am J Emerg Med 2020; 43:229-234. [PMID: 32192896 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2019] [Revised: 03/05/2020] [Accepted: 03/08/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In 2018, due to a national morphine shortage, our two study emergency departments (EDs) were unable to administer intravenous (IV) morphine for over six months. We evaluated the effects of this shortage on analgesia and patient disposition. METHODS This was a retrospective study in two academic EDs. Our control period (with morphine) was 4/1/17-6/30/17 and our study period (without morphine) was 4/1/18-6/30/18. We included all adult patients with a chief complaint of pain, initial pain score ≥4, and ≥2 recorded pain scores. The primary outcome was delta pain score. Secondary outcomes included final pain score, proportion of ED visits with opioids vs. non-opioids administered, and ED disposition. RESULTS We identified 6296 patients during our control period and 5816 during our study period. There was no significant difference in mean final pain score (study 4.45, control 4.44, p = 0.802), delta pain score (study -3.30, control -3.32, p = 0.556), nor admission rates (study 18.8%, control 17.8%, p = 0.131). We saw a decrease in opioid use (study 47.4%, control 60.0%, p < 0.01) and an increased use of non-opioid analgesics (study 27.3%, control 18.44%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Removing IV morphine in the ED, without a compensatory rise in alternative opioids, does not appear to significantly impact analgesia or disposition. These data favor a more limited opioid use strategy in the ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ellen Kettler
- University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, 200 W. Arbor Dr. #8676 San Diego, CA 92103, USA.
| | - Jesse Brennan
- University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, 200 W. Arbor Dr. #8676 San Diego, CA 92103, USA.
| | - Christopher J Coyne
- University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Emergency Medicine, 200 W. Arbor Dr. #8676 San Diego, CA 92103, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Strayer RJ, Hawk K, Hayes BD, Herring AA, Ketcham E, LaPietra AM, Lynch JJ, Motov S, Repanshek Z, Weiner SG, Nelson LS. Management of Opioid Use Disorder in the Emergency Department: A White Paper Prepared for the American Academy of Emergency Medicine. J Emerg Med 2020; 58:522-546. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2019.12.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Revised: 12/19/2019] [Accepted: 12/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
12
|
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to produce comprehensive guidelines and recommendations that can be utilized by orthopaedic practices as well as other specialties to improve the management of acute pain following musculoskeletal injury. METHODS A panel of 15 members with expertise in orthopaedic trauma, pain management, or both was convened to review the literature and develop recommendations on acute musculoskeletal pain management. The methods described by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Working Group were applied to each recommendation. The guideline was submitted to the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) for review and was approved on October 16, 2018. RESULTS We present evidence-based best practice recommendations and pain medication recommendations with the hope that they can be utilized by orthopaedic practices as well as other specialties to improve the management of acute pain following musculoskeletal injury. Recommendations are presented regarding pain management, cognitive strategies, physical strategies, strategies for patients on long term opioids at presentation, and system implementation strategies. We recommend the use of multimodal analgesia, prescribing the lowest effective immediate-release opioid for the shortest period possible, and considering regional anesthesia. We also recommend connecting patients to psychosocial interventions as indicated and considering anxiety reduction strategies such as aromatherapy. Finally, we also recommend physical strategies including ice, elevation, and transcutaneous electrical stimulation. Prescribing for patients on long term opioids at presentation should be limited to one prescriber. Both pain and sedation should be assessed regularly for inpatients with short, validated tools. Finally, the group supports querying the relevant regional and state prescription drug monitoring program, development of clinical decision support, opioid education efforts for prescribers and patients, and implementing a department or organization pain medication prescribing strategy or policy. CONCLUSIONS Balancing comfort and patient safety following acute musculoskeletal injury is possible when utilizing a true multimodal approach including cognitive, physical, and pharmaceutical strategies. In this guideline, we attempt to provide practical, evidence-based guidance for clinicians in both the operative and non-operative settings to address acute pain from musculoskeletal injury. We also organized and graded the evidence to both support recommendations and identify gap areas for future research.
Collapse
|
13
|
What Role Has Emergency Medicine Played in the Opioid Epidemic? Partner in Crime or Canary in the Coal Mine? Ann Emerg Med 2018; 72:214-221. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|