Procedural Curriculum to Verify Intern Competence Prior to Patient Care

Preparing interns for clinical practice through an institution-wide simulation-based mastery learning program for teaching central venous catheter placement

Central venous catheter (CVC) placement is a challenging procedure with known iatrogenic risks. However, there are no residency program requirements to demonstrate baseline CVC procedural competency. Competency-based procedural education has been shown to decrease CVC-associated morbidity, but there has been limited literature about institution-wide efforts to ensure initial trainee competency for CVC placement. This study describes the implementation of a competency-based CVC curriculum for first-year interns across an institution before supervised clinical care. An institution-wide, simulation-based mastery training curriculum was designed to assess initial competency in CVC placement in first-year residents during 2021 and 2022. A checklist was internally developed with a multidisciplinary team. Using the Mastery-Angoff technique, minimum passing standards were derived to define competency levels considered appropriate for intern participation in supervised clinical care. Interns were trained through the competency-based program with faculty assessing intern performance using the CVC checklist to verify procedural competency. Over 2 academic cycles, 229 interns from 20 specialties/subspecialties participated. Overall, 83% of interns met performance standards on their first posttest attempt, 14% on the second attempt, and 3% on the third attempt. Interns from both cycles demonstrated significant improvement from baseline to posttest scores (P < .001). Overall, 10.5% of interns performed dangerous actions during assessment (malpositioning, retained guidewire, or carotid dilation). All interns ultimately achieved the passing standard to demonstrate initial competency in the simulation assessment. All participating interns demonstrated simulation-based competency allowing them to place CVCs under supervised clinical care. Dangerous actions, however, were not uncommon. Simulation-based teaching and learning frameworks were a feasible method to promote patient safety through an institutional-wide verification of preliminary procedural competency.

National survey on management of spontaneous pneumothorax from emergency department to specialised treatment: room for improvement

Introduction

Spontaneous pneumothorax (SP) affects both young, otherwise healthy individuals and older persons with known underlying pulmonary disease. Initial management possibilities are evolving and range from observation to chest tube insertion. SP guidelines suggest an individualized approach based on multiple factors such as symptoms, size of pneumothorax, comorbidity and patient preference.

Aim

With this Danish national survey we aimed to map organization of care including involved specialties, treatment choice, training, and follow-up plans to identify aspects, and optimization of spontaneous pneumothorax management.

Method

A survey developed by the national interest group for pleural medicine was sent to all departments of emergency medicine, thoracic surgery, respiratory medicine, and to relevant departments of abdominal or orthopaedic surgery.

Results

The response rate was 75 % (47 of 65). Overall, 21% of responding departments had no guideline for SP management, which was provided by multiple specialties with marked heterogeneity in choice of treatment including tube size, management during admission, and referral procedure to follow-up. Few departments required procedure training, and nearly all of the responders called for improvements in management of pneumothorax.

Conclusion

This survey suggests that SP management and care is delivered heterogeneously across Danish hospitals with marked difference between respiratory physicians, emergency physicians, general surgeons and thoracic surgeons. It is therefore likely that management is sub-optimal. There is a need for a common Danish SP guideline to ensure optimal treatment across involved specialties.