1
|
Inchingolo AM, Dipalma G, Inchingolo AD, Palumbo I, Guglielmo M, Morolla R, Mancini A, Inchingolo F. Advancing Postoperative Pain Management in Oral Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2024; 17:542. [PMID: 38675500 PMCID: PMC11054702 DOI: 10.3390/ph17040542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The goal of this review is to shed light on the management of orofacial discomfort after a cancer diagnosis in the head and neck region. A search was conducted on PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify studies on postoperative pain control in oral cancer. The review included open-access research, investigations into pain management, randomized clinical trials, retrospective studies, case-control studies, prospective studies, English-written studies, and full-text publications. Exclusion criteria included animal studies; in vitro studies; off-topic studies; reviews, case reports, letters, or comments; and non-English language. Three reviewers independently accessed databases and assigned a quality rating to the chosen articles. The review explores postoperative pain management in oral cancer patients; highlighting persistent opioid use; the efficacy of adjuvant drugs, such as gabapentin; and a multimodal approach. It emphasizes the need for personalized pain management, recognizing individual pain perception and tailoring interventions. Integrating pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies is crucial for comprehensive pain management. The review also serves as a guide for future research, emphasizing the need for standardized methodologies and diverse participant populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gianna Dipalma
- Correspondence: (G.D.); (F.I.); Tel.: +39-339-698-9939 (G.D.); +39-331-211-1104 (F.I.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Francesco Inchingolo
- Correspondence: (G.D.); (F.I.); Tel.: +39-339-698-9939 (G.D.); +39-331-211-1104 (F.I.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ye Z, Zhu Y, Zhang R, Wang Y, Huang J, Gan X. Effect of Multimodal Preemptive Analgesia of Flurbiprofen Axetil, Nalbuphine, and Retrobulbar Block on Postoperative Pain and Enhanced Recovery in Patients Undergoing Oculoplastic Day Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded Study. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg 2023; 39:260-265. [PMID: 36727809 DOI: 10.1097/iop.0000000000002308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the effect of either flurbiprofen axetil or nalbuphine combined with retrobulbar block (RB) before surgery on postoperative pain control and enhanced recovery in day-care patients undergoing orbital implantation. METHODS A total of 45 patients undergoing orbital implantation with general anesthesia were randomly divided into three groups: flurbiprofen axetil (1 mg/kg) combined with RB (group F), nalbuphine (0.1 mg/kg) combined with RB (group N), and placebo as normal saline with RB (group C). The primary outcome was the average pain score (numeric rating scale: 0-10) within the first 24 hours. Other outcomes including the peak pain score, paracetamol requirement, quality of recovery (QoR)-15, and adverse effects (AEs) were assessed. RESULTS The average and peak pain scores within 24 hours after surgery in group F were significantly lower than in other groups ( p < 0.0167). Compared with group C, the NRS scores were significantly decreased at 2 and 4 hours in group F, and 2 hours in group N after surgery ( p < 0.0167), but without significant differences at other measured time points. The time to first paracetamol oral intake displayed a significant difference among the three groups ( p < 0.0167). CONCLUSION Preemptive use of flurbiprofen axetil 1 mg/kg combined with RB is an optimal choice for multimodal analgesia for day-care patients undergoing orbital implantation in terms of efficient acute pain control, without impeding patient-enhanced recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zexi Ye
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China
- Department of Anesthesiology, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Yanling Zhu
- Department of Anesthesiology, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Rui Zhang
- Department of Anesthesiology, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Yongyi Wang
- Department of Anesthesiology, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Jingxia Huang
- Department of Anesthesiology, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Xiaoliang Gan
- Department of Anesthesiology, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Go BC, Go CC, Chorath K, Moreira A, Rajasekaran K. Nonopioid perioperative analgesia in head and neck cancer surgery: A systematic review. World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2022; 8:107-117. [PMID: 35782401 PMCID: PMC9242426 DOI: 10.1002/wjo2.62] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 01/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Management of postoperative pain after head and neck cancer surgery is a complex issue, requiring a careful balance of analgesic properties and side effects. The objective of this review is to discuss the efficacy and safety of multimodal analgesia (MMA) for these patients. Methods Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase, Scopus, and clinicaltrials.gov were systematically searched for all comparative studies of patients receiving MMA (nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, anticonvulsants, local anesthetics, and corticosteroids) for head and neck cancer surgeries. The primary outcome was additional postoperative opioid usage, and secondary outcomes included subjective pain scores, complications, adverse effects, and 30‐day outcomes. Results A total of five studies representing 592 patients (MMA, n = 275; non‐MMA, n = 317) met inclusion criteria. The most commonly used agents were gabapentin, NSAIDs, and acetaminophen (n = 221), NSAIDs (n = 221), followed by corticosteroids (n = 35), dextromethorphan (n = 40), and local nerve block (n = 19). Four studies described a significant decrease in overall postoperative narcotic usage with two studies reporting a significant decrease in hospital time. Subjective pain scores widely varied with two studies reporting reduced pain at postoperative day 3. There were no differences in surgical outcomes, medical complications, adverse effects, or 30‐day mortality and readmission rates. Conclusion MMA is an increasingly popular strategy that may reduce dependence on opioids for the treatment of postoperative pain. A variety of regimens and protocols are available for providers to utilize in the appropriate head and neck cancer patient. Management of postoperative pain after head and neck cancer surgery is a complex issue, requiring a careful balance of analgesia and undesired side effects. Five studies (n = 592 patients) reported on the use of nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs, acetaminophen, anticonvulsants, local anesthetics, and corticosteroids. Four studies described a significant decrease in overall postoperative narcotic usage though subjective pain scores widely varied. Multimodal analgesia is a popular and effective strategy that may reduce dependence on opioids for the treatment of postoperative pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beatrice C. Go
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
| | - Cammille C. Go
- Perelman School of Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
| | - Kevin Chorath
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
| | - Alvaro Moreira
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology University of Texas Health‐San Antonio San Antonio Texas USA
| | - Karthik Rajasekaran
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gupta AK, Mena S, Jin Z, Gan TJ, Bergese S. Postoperative pain: a review of emerging therapeutic options. Expert Rev Neurother 2021; 21:1085-1100. [PMID: 34461794 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2021.1974840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Postoperative pain is often managed by opioid medications, even though they carry a risk of adverse effects such as vomiting, constipation, sedation, respiratory depression and physical dependence. Furthermore, opioid use in the healthcare setting has likely contributed to the epidemic. However, the mismanagement of postoperative pain can result in delayed recovery time, impaired physical function, increased risk of morbidity and mortality, chronic pain, and higher healthcare costs. AREAS COVERED This review explores emerging therapeutic options and strategies in the management of acute postoperative pain and focuses on opioid-sparing, multimodal analgesia. This includes regional anesthetic techniques, non opioid pharmacotherapy, novel opioids and non-pharmacologic therapy. We have also discussed examples of novel analgesics and formulations which have potential benefits in reducing postoperative pain and opioid use after surgery. EXPERT OPINION The development of novel regional anesthesia techniques allows for opioid minimization in increasing number of surgical procedures. This synergizes with the availability of novel non-opioid analgesic adjucts. In addition, several novel opioid drugs have been developed which may be pathway selective and associated with less adverse effect than conventional opioids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhishek K Gupta
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Health Science Center, Stony Brook, United States
| | - Shayla Mena
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Health Science Center, Stony Brook, United States
| | - Zhaosheng Jin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Health Science Center, Stony Brook, United States
| | - Tong J Gan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Health Science Center, Stony Brook, United States
| | - Sergio Bergese
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Health Science Center, Stony Brook, United States.,Department of Neurological Surgery, Stony Brook University Health Science Center, Stony Brook, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Torabikhah M, Yousefi H, Ansari AHM, Musarezaie A. The Effect of Reducing the Fasting Time on Postoperative Pain in Orthopaedic Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY RESEARCH 2021; 26:310-315. [PMID: 34422610 PMCID: PMC8344633 DOI: 10.4103/ijnmr.ijnmr_291_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
Background Patients undergoing orthopedics surgery experience the most severe postoperative pain. The fasting time is a factor that affects this complication. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of fasting time reduction by using oral carbohydrate on postoperative pain and analgesic consumption in orthopedic patients. Materials and Methods This randomized control trial was conducted between November 2017 and December 2018. Sixty-four patients were randomly assigned into the intervention (which consumed 200 mL of the 12.50% carbohydrate, 2 h before the surgery) and the control group (which was fasted from midnight). Postoperative pain was measured by visual analog scale; the amount of the consumed analgesics was also recorded. The data were analyzed by using Chi-square and t-test. Results The mean (SD) of the pain scores in the control group immediately and 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24 h after consciousness were 7.19 (2.64), 6.69 (2.17), 6.31 (2.05), 6.16 (2.08), 6.06 (2.24), and 5.38 (1.86), respectively. These scores for the intervention group were 7.44 (1.48), 6.31 (1.25), 5.72 (1.17), 5.59 (1.43), 5.25 (1.13), and 4.97 (1.57). The mean of the pain scores between two groups was not different (p > 0.05). The amount of the consumed morphine (t 61= -2.10, p = 0.039), pethidine (t 62= -2.25, p = 0.028), and diclofenac (t 62= -2.51, p = 0.015) were significantly different between the two groups. Conclusions The pain intensity in the patients with shortened fasting time was lower, but it was not statistically significant. Moreover, reducing fasting time by using carbohydrate significantly reduced the use of analgesics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohsen Torabikhah
- Student Research Center, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Hojatollah Yousefi
- Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Adult Nursing Department, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | | | - Amir Musarezaie
- Nursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Adult Nursing Department, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ferrell JK, Shindo ML, Stack BC, Angelos P, Bloom G, Chen AY, Davies L, Irish JC, Kroeker T, McCammon SD, Meltzer C, Orloff LA, Panwar A, Shin JJ, Sinclair CF, Singer MC, Wang TV, Randolph GW. Perioperative pain management and opioid-reduction in head and neck endocrine surgery: An American Head and Neck Society Endocrine Surgery Section consensus statement. Head Neck 2021; 43:2281-2294. [PMID: 34080732 DOI: 10.1002/hed.26774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This American Head and Neck Society (AHNS) consensus statement focuses on evidence-based comprehensive pain management practices for thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Overutilization of opioids for postoperative pain management is a major contributing factor to the opioid addiction epidemic however evidence-based guidelines for pain management after routine head and neck endocrine procedures are lacking. METHODS An expert panel was convened from the membership of the AHNS, its Endocrine Surgical Section, and ThyCa. An extensive literature review was performed, and recommendations addressing several pain management subtopics were constructed based on best available evidence. A modified Delphi survey was then utilized to evaluate group consensus of these statements. CONCLUSIONS This expert consensus provides evidence-based recommendations for effective postoperative pain management following head and neck endocrine procedures with a focus on limiting unnecessary use of opioid analgesics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jay K Ferrell
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Maisie L Shindo
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Brendan C Stack
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, Illinois, USA
| | - Peter Angelos
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Gary Bloom
- Thyroid Cancer Survivors' Association (ThyCa), Olney, Maryland, USA
| | - Amy Y Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Louise Davies
- Department of Surgery, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Jonathan C Irish
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Susan D McCammon
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Charles Meltzer
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Santa Rosa, California, USA
| | - Lisa A Orloff
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Aru Panwar
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Jennifer J Shin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Catherine F Sinclair
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Mount Sinai West Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michael C Singer
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Tiffany V Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gregory W Randolph
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Amiri HR, Ohadian Moghadam S, Momeni SA, Amini M. Preemptive Analgesia with a Second Dose of Pregabalin, Acetaminophen, Naproxen, and Dextromethorphan: A Comparative Clinical Trial in Major Surgeries. Anesth Pain Med 2020; 10:e100718. [PMID: 34150558 PMCID: PMC8207851 DOI: 10.5812/aapm.100718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2020] [Revised: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 08/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Postoperative pain management can improve patients’ quality of life and decrease hospitalization rates. Preemptive analgesia may provide an effective approach for both pain control and opioid consumption decrease. A common approach for pain management after surgery is to relieve the pain that has already occurred. Objectives The aim of this clinical trial was to compare the preemptive analgesic effect of single-dose versus two-dose administration of pregabalin, acetaminophen, naproxen, and dextromethorphan (PAND) combination. Methods This study involved 60 patients who had undergone one surgery (including nephrectomy, cystectomy, prostatectomy, colectomy, Whipple, and RPLND). They were randomly divided into two groups: The first group received a single dose of PAND, while the other group received a second dose within 6 hours after discharge from recovery. Pain intensity was assessed by the Universal Pain Assessment Tool (UPAT) in both groups 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24, and 48 hours postoperatively. The postoperative morphine dose in both groups was also recorded. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25. Results Mean pain scores were significantly different between the two groups at 2, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery (P < 0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of opioid consumption (P < 0.001). The total opioid consumption in the second group (with the second administration of PAND) was lower than the first group. Conclusions Preemptive analgesia with a second dose of PAND is an effective method for reducing pain and morphine consumption after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamid Reza Amiri
- Uro-Oncology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Seyed Ali Momeni
- Uro-Oncology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Majid Amini
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
- Corresponding Author: Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kochhar A, Banday J, Ahmad Z, Panjiar P, Vajifdar H. Cervical epidural analgesia combined with general anesthesia for head and neck cancer surgery: A randomized study. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 2020; 36:182-186. [PMID: 33013032 PMCID: PMC7480315 DOI: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_72_19] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2019] [Revised: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 12/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims: The role of cervical epidural analgesia in head and neck cancer surgery is not fully explored. The aim of this study was to evaluate cervical epidural analgesia in terms of opioid and anesthetic requirements and stress response in patients undergoing head and neck cancer surgery. Material and Methods: After institutional ethical committee approval and written informed consent, 30 patients undergoing elective head and neck cancer surgery were randomized into two groups: Group E (cervical epidural analgesia with general anesthesia), and group G (general anesthesia alone). In group E, an 18 gauge epidural catheter was placed at cervical (C) 6 – thoracic (T) 1 level. After test dose, a bolus of 10 ml of 0.2% ropivacaine was given followed by continuous infusion. Technique of general anesthesia and post-operative management was standardized in both the groups. Opioid and anesthetic drug requirement was observed. Blood glucose and serum cortisol levels were measured at baseline; post-incision and after surgery. Results: There was significant reduction in the requirement of morphine (P < 0.001), isoflurane (P = 0.004) and vecuronium (P = 0.001) in group E. Post-operative, blood glucose and serum cortisol levels were significantly reduced (P = 0.0153 and 0.0074, respectively). Early post-operative pain was reduced with the lesser requirement of post-operative morphine. Conclusions: The use of combined cervical epidural analgesia with general anesthesia reduces opioid, anesthetic drug requirement and stress response as compared to general anesthesia alone in patients undergoing head and neck cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anjali Kochhar
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjang Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Jahanara Banday
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, New Delhi, India
| | - Zainab Ahmad
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, University College of Medical Sciences and Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Pratibha Panjiar
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, New Delhi, India
| | - Homay Vajifdar
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hamdard Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Atkins JR, Titch JF, Norcross WP, Thompson JA, Muckler VC. Preemptive Oral Acetaminophen for Women Undergoing Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy. Nurs Womens Health 2019; 23:105-113. [PMID: 30826322 DOI: 10.1016/j.nwh.2019.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2018] [Revised: 10/30/2018] [Accepted: 01/01/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To decrease hospital expenses by administering oral acetaminophen rather than intravenous (IV) acetaminophen to women who undergo laparoscopic hysterectomy. DESIGN A quality improvement project using a between-groups, pre-/postimplementation design for women undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Retrospective chart review was used to compare data of women who received intraoperative IV acetaminophen before implementation versus women who received oral acetaminophen after implementation. Pain scores and opioid consumption in morphine equivalents were recorded at four time points. SETTING/LOCAL PROBLEM A 369-bed hospital in the southeastern United States, where, in 2016, nearly $260,000 was spent on perioperative IV acetaminophen for all operating room cases. PARTICIPANTS Women between the ages of 18 and 55 years scheduled to have total laparoscopic hysterectomy were included. Excluded were women with a history of chronic pain, opioid use, or liver pathology; women with a contraindication to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; and women whose procedures were converted from laparoscopic to open. INTERVENTION/MEASUREMENTS Women were instructed to take oral acetaminophen the day before surgery in divided doses, with 1 g every 6 hours, for a total dose of 3 g. On the day of surgery, women received the final 1-g dose of oral acetaminophen. RESULTS There were no significant differences between groups for pain scores or total opioids received before implementation (mean = 3.28, standard deviation = 2.05) compared with after implementation (mean = 3.65, standard deviation = 1.63; t [18] = -.043, p = .674). The preimplementation cost per individual was $30.03 for 1 g of IV acetaminophen, and the postimplementation cost was $0.36 for 2 500-mg oral acetaminophen tablets, a 98.8% relative cost decrease per woman. CONCLUSION Replacing IV acetaminophen with preemptive oral acetaminophen has the potential to save money without compromising care.
Collapse
|
10
|
Abdelfattah AAM, Rizk F, Hawash N, Hanafy A, El-kalla F, Abd-Elsalam S. Randomized trial of preoperative administration of oral pregabalin for postoperative analgesia in patients scheduled for radiofrequency ablation of focal lesions in the liver. Int J Hyperthermia 2018; 34:1367-1371. [PMID: 29308685 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2018.1424946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fatma Rizk
- Department of Physiology, Tanta University Faculty of Medicine, Tanta, Egypt
| | - Nehad Hawash
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt
| | - Amr Hanafy
- Department of Internal Medicine, Zagazig University Faculty of Human Medicine, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Ferial El-kalla
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Tanta University Faculty of Medicine, Tanta, Egypt
| | - Sherief Abd-Elsalam
- Department of Tropical Medicine, Tanta University Faculty of Medicine, Tanta, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Rezaeian A. Administering of pregabalin and acetaminophen on management of postoperative pain in patients with nasal polyposis undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Acta Otolaryngol 2017; 137:1249-1252. [PMID: 28784038 DOI: 10.1080/00016489.2017.1358464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Management of postoperative pain is a common problem in endoscopic sinus surgery. The objective of this study is the evaluation of pregabalin and acetaminophen effects on the management of postoperative pain in patients with nasal polyposis undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). MATERIALS AND METHODS In this clinical trial, double-blinded study, 70 patients with nasal polyposis who have indication of FESS were enrolled to this study. After operation, patients were divided randomly into pregabalin and acetaminophen therapy groups. The pregabalin group (n = 35) was treated under pregabalin 50 mg TDS and the acetaminophen group (n = 35) was treated under tablet acetaminophen 500 mg/6 h. Each group was administered for 3 d. The visual analogue scale (VAS) was measured in onset, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h after surgery. All data were entered into SPSS software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) and appropriate statistical tests were assessed to every relation. RESULTS In this study, there was no significant difference between two groups according to VAS in onset (p = .37); however, VAS in 12, 24, 48 and 72 h after operation was significantly lower in the pregabalin group compared with the acetaminophen group (p < .0001, for every four). Also in the pregabalin group, adverse effects were significantly lower than the acetaminophen group (p < .03). CONCLUSIONS Pregabalin has more effect, safely and usefully than acetaminophen on the management of postoperative pain in the patients with nasal polyposis undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Rezaeian
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| |
Collapse
|