1
|
Taninokuchi Tomassoni M, Braccischi L, Russo M, Adduci F, Calautti D, Girolami M, Vita F, Ruffilli A, Manzetti M, Ponti F, Matcuk GR, Mosconi C, Cirillo L, Miceli M, Spinnato P. Image-Guided Minimally Invasive Treatment Options for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease: A Practical Overview of Current Possibilities. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:1147. [PMID: 38893672 PMCID: PMC11171713 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14111147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2024] [Revised: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Lumbar back pain is one of the main causes of disability around the world. Most patients will complain of back pain at least once in their lifetime. The degenerative spine is considered the main cause and is extremely common in the elderly population. Consequently, treatment-related costs are a major burden to the healthcare system in developed and undeveloped countries. After the failure of conservative treatments or to avoid daily chronic drug intake, invasive treatments should be suggested. In a world where many patients reject surgery and prefer minimally invasive procedures, interventional radiology is pivotal in pain management and could represent a bridge between medical therapy and surgical treatment. We herein report the different image-guided procedures that can be used to manage degenerative spine-related low back pain. Particularly, we will focus on indications, different techniques, and treatment outcomes reported in the literature. This literature review focuses on the different minimally invasive percutaneous treatments currently available, underlining the central role of radiologists having the capability to use high-end imaging technology for diagnosis and subsequent treatment, allowing a global approach, reducing unnecessary surgeries and prolonged pain-reliever drug intake with their consequent related complications, improving patients' quality of life, and reducing the economic burden.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makoto Taninokuchi Tomassoni
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
- Radiology Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Sant’Orsola Malpighi, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Braccischi
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
- Radiology Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Sant’Orsola Malpighi, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Mattia Russo
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesco Adduci
- Neuroradiology, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, 40139 Bologna, Italy
| | - Davide Calautti
- Neuroradiology, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, 40139 Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Girolami
- Spine Surgery Unit, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Fabio Vita
- 1st Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Alberto Ruffilli
- 1st Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Manzetti
- 1st Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Federico Ponti
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - George R. Matcuk
- Department of Imaging, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Cristina Mosconi
- Radiology Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Sant’Orsola Malpighi, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Luigi Cirillo
- Neuroradiology, IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, 40139 Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Miceli
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Spinnato
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, 40136 Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hyung B, Wiseman-Hakes C. A scoping review of current non-pharmacological treatment modalities for phantom limb pain in limb amputees. Disabil Rehabil 2021; 44:5719-5740. [PMID: 34293999 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1948116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Phantom limb pain (PLP) is a chronic neuropathic pain condition of a missing limb following amputation. Pain management is multi-modal, including various non-pharmacological therapies. The purpose of this scoping review was to investigate the evidence surrounding current non-pharmacological treatment modalities for PLP and provide insight into their clinical feasibility. METHOD A systematic search was conducted using four databases (Medline, Embase, PsychInfo, and CINAHL) following the PRISMA-ScR method. Results from papers meeting the inclusion criteria were charted to summarize findings, demographics, and use of neuroimaging. RESULTS A total of 3387 papers were identified, and full texts of 142 eligible papers were assessed. Eleven treatment modalities for PLP were identified with varying levels of evidence. Overall, there were 25 RCTs, 58 case reports, and 59 a combination of pilot, quasi-experimental, observational, and other study designs. CONCLUSIONS Currently, the evidence surrounding most treatment modalities is limited and only a fraction of studies are supported by strong evidence. The findings of this review demonstrated a clear need to conduct more rigorous research with diverse study designs to better understand which modalities provide the most benefit and to incorporate neuroimaging to better determine the neural correlates of PLP and mechanisms of various treatments.Implications for RehabilitationPhantom limb pain (PLP) is a prevalent and debilitating condition following amputation and health care professionals should incorporate an evidence-based pain management protocol into their rehabilitation program.There exist a number of different non-pharmacological therapies to address PLP, however the scientific rigor and levels of evidence vary across modalities.Prescription of interventions for PLP should consider individual patient differences, accessibility to the patient, and quite possibly, a multi-modal approach, particularly for those who also experience residual limb pain.Imagery-based therapies provide the highest level of current evidence based on robust and large randomized control trials, are readily accessible, and are thus most recommended for relief of PLP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Hyung
- Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Catherine Wiseman-Hakes
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.,KITE-University Health Network, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shofwan S, Liem L, Janitra G, Basuki N, Rhatomy S. Discitis Following Radiofrequency Nucleoplasty: A Case Report. Anesth Pain Med 2020; 10:e110322. [PMID: 34150577 PMCID: PMC8207849 DOI: 10.5812/aapm.110322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Radiofrequency nucleoplasty is a minimally invasive procedure to treat chronic low back pain, especially mild degenerative disc diseases. Discitis after radiofrequency nucleoplasty is a rare case. Case Presentation A 62-year-old male patient with a chief complaint of 10 years low back pain, gradually worsening for the last two years, a history of hypertension, chronic kidney disease, and routine dialysis twice a week, referred to the center. He underwent a lumbar medial branch block using radiofrequency and radiofrequency nucleoplasty procedure of lumbar 4-5 (L4-L5). Three weeks after the intervention, he could not move his legs, associated with urinary and fecal incontinence. MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) of the lumbar spine was performed, and the results indicated hyperintensity in L4-L5, suspicious of discitis. Laminectomy at L4 and L5 was performed. Eight months after surgery, the patient could feel and lift legs, and urinary and fecal incontinence was also controlled. Conclusions Early diagnosis of discitis is critical and challenging. Delay in diagnosis may lead to treatment delay and the development of neurological deficits. Comprehensive treatment with bed rest, antimicrobial therapy, and sensible application of timely surgery are essentials to an optimal outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Said Shofwan
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Sultan Agung Islamic Hospital, Medical Faculty, Sultan Agung Islamic University, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia
| | - Liong Liem
- Consultant Pain Management Amsterdam UMC, Universitair Medische Centra (VUmc), Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Grady Janitra
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Sultan Agung Islamic Hospital, Medical Faculty, Sultan Agung Islamic University, Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia
| | - Nur Basuki
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Klaten Islamic Hospital, Klaten, Indonesia
| | - Sholahuddin Rhatomy
- Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Dr. Soeradji Tirtonegoro General Hospital, Klaten, Indonesia / Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
- Corresponding Author: Sholahuddin Rhatomy, Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Dr. Soeradji Tirtonegoro General Hospital, Klaten, Indonesia / Faculty of Medicine, Public Health, and Nursing, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Naderi Nabi B, Sedighinejad A, Haghighi M, Biazar G, Hashemi M, Haddadi S, Fathi A. Comparison of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Pulsed Radiofrequency Sympathectomy for Treating Painful Diabetic Neuropathy. Anesth Pain Med 2015; 5:e29280. [PMID: 26587405 PMCID: PMC4644305 DOI: 10.5812/aapm.29280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2015] [Revised: 06/06/2015] [Accepted: 06/20/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a long-term complication of type 1 and type 2 diabetes that majorly impacts quality of life. Its prevalence increases with age and duration of diabetes. It is more common in patients who have suboptimal glycemic control over several years. Because DPN may be resistant to conventional treatments, it is common for patients to only have partial pain relief. Therefore, new therapeutic options are needed for the condition. Objectives: The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) lumbar sympathectomy in treating painful DPN. Patients and Methods: Sixty-five patients with painful DPN refractory to conventional treatment were randomly and evenly assigned to either the TENS or PRF lumbar sympathectomy groups. Pain evaluations were based on the 10-point numerical rating scale (NRS). Subjects were followed for three months and had a total of four study visits (baseline and 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after treatment). Results: Sixty patients completed all study visits. In both groups, the NRS rating significantly decreased after treatment, with a marked pain reduction observed at the first follow-up evaluation. In the PRF group, the NRS decreased from 6.46 at baseline to 2.76 at the 1 week visit. One and 3 months after treatment, the NRS was 4.30 and 5.13, respectively (P < 0.0001). In the TENS group, the NRS decreased from 6.10 at baseline to 3.96 at the 1 week visit. One and 3 months after treatment, the NRS was 5.23 and 5.90, respectively (P < 0.0001). Unfortunately, the NRS steady increased almost back to baseline levels in the TENS group. The NRS only slightly increased during the follow-up period in the PRF group, but did not reach baseline levels. Conclusions: Both TENS and PRF lumbar sympathectomy are promising pain relief treatments for painful DNP. However, PRF lumbar sympathectomy seems to have a superior efficacy. Further studies with a larger sample size and a longer follow-up period are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bahram Naderi Nabi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Anesthesiology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
| | - Abbas Sedighinejad
- Department of Anesthesiology, Anesthesiology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
| | - Mohammad Haghighi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Anesthesiology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
| | - Gelareh Biazar
- Department of Anesthesiology, Anesthesiology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
- Corresponding author: Gelareh Biazar, Department of Anesthesiology, Anesthesiology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran. Tel: +98-1333329523, Fax: +98-1313222021, E-mail:
| | - Masood Hashemi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Soodabeh Haddadi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Anesthesiology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
| | - Amirhossein Fathi
- Department of Anesthesiology, Anesthesiology Research Center, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schianchi PM, Sluijter ME, Balogh SE. The Treatment of Joint Pain with Intra-articular Pulsed Radiofrequency. Anesth Pain Med 2013; 3:250-5. [PMID: 24282777 PMCID: PMC3833041 DOI: 10.5812/aapm.10259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2013] [Accepted: 02/20/2013] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The intra-articular (IA) application of pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) for pain in small and large joints represents a recent development that has proven to be effective in many cases. We performed a retrospective study of 89 such procedures in 57 consecutive patients with chronic articular pain. Objectives The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the effectiveness of intraarticular PRF in a group of 57 consecutive patients with chronic joint pain. Patients and Methods Patients with intractable joint pain for more than 6 months were treated with IA PRF 40-45V for 10-15 min in small joints and 60V for 15 min in large joints using fluoroscopic confirmation of correct needle position. A total of 28 shoulders, 40 knees, 10 trapezio-metacarpal, and 11 first metatarso-phalangeal joints were treated. Results were evaluated at 1, 2, and 5 months. The procedure was repeated after 1 month in 10 patients with initial suboptimal results. Success was defined as a reduction of pain score by at least 50%. Results All groups showed significant reductions in pain scores at all three follow-up visits. Success rates were higher in small joints (90% and 82%, respectively) than large ones (64% and 60%, respectively). Interestingly, IA PRF was successful in 6 out of 10 patients who had undergone previous surgery, including 3 with prosthetic joint replacement and in 6 of the 10 repeated procedures. There were no significant adverse effects or complications. Conclusions IA PRF induced significant pain relief of long duration in a majority of our patients with joint pain. The exact mechanism is unclear, but may be related to the exposure of immune cells to low-strength RF fields, inducing an anti-inflammatory effect. The success rate appears to be highest in small joints. We recommend additional research including control groups to further investigate and clarify this method; our data suggest that it may represent a useful modality in the treatment of arthrogenic pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro M Schianchi
- S. Anna Clinic, Lugano, Switzerland
- Corresponding author: Pietro M. Schianchi, S. Anna Clinic, Lugano, Switzerland. Tel: +41-919233978, Fax: +41-919238917, E-mail:
| | - Menno E Sluijter
- Centre for Pain Medicine, Swiss Paraplegic Centre, Nottwil, Switzerland
| | - Susan E Balogh
- Centre for Pain Medicine, Swiss Paraplegic Centre, Nottwil, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Teixeira A, Sluijter ME. Intravenous application of pulsed radiofrequency-4 case reports. Anesth Pain Med 2013; 3:219-22. [PMID: 24223366 PMCID: PMC3821152 DOI: 10.5812/aapm.10242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2013] [Revised: 02/11/2013] [Accepted: 02/15/2013] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
It has been suggested that PRF might possibly have an effect on the immune cells. We considered using the intravenous route to apply PRF in conditions that are caused by an unresolved immune action or connected to allostatic load, implicating an abnormally reacting immune system to obtain a systemic effect that could possibly be an additional tool in treating some of these conditions. These manuscript reports four cases that illustrate the wide variety of conditions where this new technique might be helpful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Teixeira
- Clínica de Dor, Porto, Portugal
- Corresponding author: Alexandre Teixeira, Clínica de Dor, Porto, Portugal. Tel: +351-933300033, Fax: +351-226151367, E-mail:
| | - Menno E. Sluijter
- Centers for Pain Medicine, Swiss Paraplegic Center, Nottwil, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|