Pelvic incidence and lumbar spine instability correlations in patients with chronic low back pain

Potential neurophysiological and biomechanical risk factors for sport-related back problems: A scoping review

This scoping review aims (1) to map the literature dealing with neurophysiological and biomechanical aspects of back problems in athletes in order to identify valid risk-factors for their prevention, plus (2) to identify gaps in the existing research and propose suggestions for future studies. A literature search conducted with Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library was completed by Elsevier, SpringerLink and Google Scholar. The main neurophysiological risk factors identified leading to back problems in athletes are neuromuscular imbalance, increased muscle fatigability, muscle dysfunction and impaired motor control, whilst biomechanical risk factors include maladaptive spinal, spinopelvic and lower limb kinematics, side-to-side imbalances in axial strength and hip rotation range of motion, spinal overloading and deficits in movement pattern. However, most studies focused on back pain in the lumbar region, whereas less attention has been paid to thoracic and cervical spine problems. The range of sports where this topic has been studied is relatively small. There is a lack of research in sports in which the core muscles are highly involved in specific movements such as lifting weights or trunk rotations. A limited number of studies include female athletes and master athletes of both genders. In addition to chronic back pain patients, it is equally important to conduct research on healthy athletes with a predisposition to spine problems. Investigators should focus their empirical work on identifying modifiable risk factors, predict which athletes are at risk for back problems, and develop personalized sport-specific assessment tools and targeted prevention strategies for them. This review was registered using the Open Science Framework Registries (https://osf.io/ha5n7).

Spinopelvic Parameters as Risk Factors of Nonspecific Low Back Pain: A Case-Control Study

Background

The effect of spinopelvic alignment on low back pain (LBP) incidence has been studied in many investigations. However, the interrelation between spinopelvic parameters and LBP is poorly understood. In particular, it is unknown whether particular patterns of spinopelvic parameters render nonspecific LBP. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the role of spinopelvic parameters as risk factors of nonspecific LBP.

Methods

In this case-control study, spinopelvic parameters, including lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), and pelvic incidence (PI), were compared between 148 patients with nonspecific LBP and 148 healthy controls. Demographic characteristics of the patients, such as age, gender, occupation, smoking, diabetes mellitus, and body mass index (BMI), were recorded as confounders. Spinopelvic parameters were assessed using radiographic findings in 2 groups. The analysis was done once as univariate (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test) and once as multivariate (multivariate logistic regression) analysis.

Results

Univariate analysis showed that female gender, higher BMI, smoking, and blue-collar jobs were associated with a higher risk of nonspecific LBP. LL, SS, and PI, but not PT, were all greater in LPB patients in the univariate analysis regarding the spinopelvic parameters. Multivariate analysis showed female gender (odds ratio adjusted (ORAdj) = 4.26 [95% CI, 2.11-9.58]; P = 0.001) and LL (ORAdj = 1.58; [95% CI, 1.18-3.22]; P = 0.026) were predictable risk factors for Nonspecific LBP.

Conclusion

Spinopelvic parameters, particularly LL, could be considered as risk factors of nonspecific LBP so that a more significant LL might indicate a greater risk of LBP. However, the role of other parameters in this association could not be neglected.

Relationship between the morphology and composition of the lumbar paraspinal and psoas muscles and lumbar intervertebral motion in people with chronic low back pain

Muscles of the lumbar spine play an important role in controlling segmental intervertebral motion. This study aimed to evaluate the association between lumbar intervertebral motion and changes in lumbar morphology/composition in people with chronic low back pain (CLBP). A sample of 183 patients with CLBP participated in this cross-sectional study. Participants underwent lumbar flexion-extension X-Rays to determine vertebral motion (translational and/or rotational motion) of lumbar levels (L1-L2 to L5-S1) and lumbar spine Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) to quantify total and functional cross-sectional areas (CSAs) and asymmetry of the multifidus, lumbar erector spinae and psoas muscles. The relationship between morphology/composition of the muscles and lumbar intervertebral motion was investigated. Smaller total and functional CSAs of the multifidus and greater CSAs of the lumbar erector spinae muscle were observed in participants with greater intervertebral motion. Muscle asymmetry was observed at different lumbar vertebral levels. The greatest amount of translational intervertebral motion was observed at the L3-L4 level, while the greatest amount of rotational translation occurred at the L4-5 level. Associations were observed between the morphology of the paraspinal muscles at the vertebral levels adjacent to the L3-L4 level and the increased intervertebral motion at this level. Relationships between measures of muscle morphology/composition and increased segmental vertebral motion were observed. The results may provide a plausible biological reason for the effectiveness of rehabilitating deficient paraspinal muscles in a subset of people with CLBP. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Spinopelvic alignment predicts disc calcification, displacement, and Modic changes: Evidence of an evolutionary etiology for clinically-relevant spinal phenotypes

Lumbar disc-displacement, Modic changes (MCs), and UTE Disc Sign (UDS) on MRI are clinically relevant spinal phenotypes that can lead to sciatica/LBP. Not all degenerated discs result in disc-displacement, MCs and UDS, suggesting varied etiologies. Spinopelvic parameters have been implicated in various spinal disorders. Pelvic incidence (PI) is "fixed parameter" since skeletal maturity. No study has addressed disc-displacement, MCs and UDS in context of spinopelvic parameters. Therefore, the aim of study was to determine if spinopelvic parameters are associated and predict clinically-relevant MRI-phenotypes. One hundred and eight population-based subjects (mean age: 52.3 years) were recruited. Spondylolisthesis and scoliosis individuals were excluded. Lumbar lordosis (LL), PI, sacral slope (SS), and pelvic tilt (PT) were assessed on lateral plain radiographs. Disc degeneration was assessed and summated, and presence or not of disc-displacement and MCs were noted on T2W MRI. UDS was detected on UTE. Following exclusion criteria, 95 subjects were assessed. Disc-displacement (82.1%), MCs (52.6%), and UDS (37.9%) were associated with lower PI, SS, LL, and LL/PI index. On multivariate analyses, lower PI was significantly related to development of these MRI phenotypes (adjusted OR range:0.95-0.92; P < .05), with critical PI value of 42° or lower exhibiting fourfold increase risk of combined phenotypes (P = .020). Of UDS discs, 39.3% had adjacent MCs and 83.6% had disc-displacement. 87.5% of MC had directly adjacent UDS. The first study to note that PI may "predict" the development of disc-displacement, MCs and UDS, suggesting potential sub-variants and mechanistic susceptibility that may be grounded in spinopelvic evolution. An "evolutionary etiological pathway" of spinal phenotype development is proposed.

Analysis of the Relationship Between Modic Change and Spinopelvic Parameters in the Sagittal Plane

Background

This study explored relationship between Modic change and spinopelvic parameters in the sagittal plane.

Material/Methods

We divided 80 patients into 4 groups: 60 subjects diagnosed with Modic changes (MC) were enrolled in the MC groups (MC1, MC2, and MC3) with each MC type consisting of 20 subjects, and 60 healthy subjects were enrolled in the control group. Spinopelvic parameters in the sagittal plane were calculated to assess their associations with MC. Multivariate logistic regression was used to explore possible risk factors for MC.

Results

PI and LL in the MC groups were significant smaller than in the control group (p<0.05). PI, SS, and PT were significantly correlated with LL with a correlation coefficient of 0.75_PI, 0.71_SS and 0.69_PT (p<0.05). Multivariate logistic regression of the significant variables showed that PI (less than 43.2°) is an independent significant risk factor for MC. ROC analysis showed that moderate diagnostic value was obtained for the significant variable, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.80 (p>0.05).

Conclusions

We concluded that PI is risk factor for MC, and smaller PI is associated with higher incidence of MC.

Postoperative changes in sacropelvic junction in short-segment angular kyphosis versus Scheuermann kyphosis

PURPOSE

To comparatively evaluate the biomechanical alterations those occur in the sagittal plane of sacropelvic junction in angular kyphosis (AK) and Scheuermann kyphosis (SK) patients after surgery.

METHODS

The spine radiographs of 52 patients operated for short-segment AK (n = 20) or SK (n = 32) were studied. Main outcome measures were sacral slope, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, lumbar lordosis, and thoracic kyphosis angles.

RESULTS

In AK group, local and thoracic kyphosis angles, as well as lumbar lordosis angle, showed statistically significant reduction with surgery. Thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis angles were reduced significantly in SK group. Postoperatively, there were significant differences between groups in lumbar lordosis, pelvic tilt angle, and sacral slope (p = 0.021, p = 0.001, and p = 0.027, respectively). Thoracic kyphosis angle and sacral slope were increased, and there was a remarkable correlation between thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis values in the AK group.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that a significant sacropelvic improvement can be achieved by balanced sagittal vertical axis and T1 spinopelvic leading to a good sagittal alignment of spine in patients with AK and SK. Changes seen in morphological parameters after surgery may be closely related with baseline biomechanics and structure of the spine and pelvis. Therefore, further clinical and scientific trials are necessary both to elucidate the biomechanics, their clinical implications, and to develop new techniques and models for spine and pelvis surgery.