Is There Agreement and Precision between Heart Rate Variability, Ventilatory, and Lactate Thresholds in Healthy Adults?

This study aims to analyze the agreement and precision between heart rate variability thresholds (HRVT1/2) with ventilatory and lactate thresholds 1 and 2 (VT1/2 and LT1/2) on a treadmill. Thirty-four male students were recruited. Day 1 consisted of conducting a health survey, anthropometrics, and Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPx). On Day 2, after 48 h, a second incremental test was performed, the Cardiopulmonary Stepwise Exercise Test consisting of 3 min stages (CPxS), to determine VT1/2, LT1/2, and HRVT1/2. One-way repeated-measures ANOVA and effect size (η_p²) were used, followed by Sidak's post hoc. The Coefficient of Variation (CV) and Typical Error (TE) were applied to verify the precision. Bland Altman and the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) were applied to confirm the agreement. HRVT1 showed different values compared to LT1 (lactate, RER, and R-R interval) and VT1 (V̇E, RER, V̇CO₂, and HR). No differences were found in threshold 2 (T2) between LT2, VT2, and HRVT2. No difference was found in speed and V̇O₂ for T1 and T2. The precision was low to T1 (CV > 12% and TE > 10%) and good to T2 (CV < 12% and TE < 10%). The agreement was good to fair in threshold 1 (VT1, LT1, HRVT1) and excellent to good in T2 (VT1, LT1, HRVT1). HRVT1 is not a valid method (low precision) when using this protocol to estimate LT1 and VT1. However, HRVT2 is a valid and noninvasive method that can estimate LT2 and VT2, showing good agreement and precision in healthy adults.

Heart rate variability kinetics during different intensity domains of cycling exercise in healthy subjects

The purpose of this study was to verify the heart rate variability (HRV) and heart rate (HR) kinetics during the fundamental phase in different intensity domains of cycling exercise. Fourteen males performed five exercise sessions: (1) maximal incremental cycling test; (2) two rest-to-exercise transitions for each intensity domain, that is, heavy (Δ30) and severe (Δ60) domains. HRV markers (SD1 and SD2) and HR kinetics in the fundamental phase were analyzed by first-order exponential fitting. There were no significant differences in amplitude values between SD1_Δ30 (8.98 ± 3.52 ms) and SD1_Δ60 (9.44 ± 3.24 ms) and SD2_Δ30 (24.93 ± 9.16 ms) and SD2_Δ60 (25.98 ± 7.29 ms). Significant difference was observed between HR_Δ30 (52 ± 7 bpm) and HR_Δ60 (63 ± 8 bpm). The time constant (τ) values were significantly different between SD1_Δ30 (17.61 ± 6.26 s) and SD1_Δ60 (13.86 ± 5.90 s), but not between SD2_Δ30 (20.06 ± 3.73 s) and SD2_Δ60 (19.47 ± 6.03 s) or HR_Δ30 (56.75 ± 18.22 s) and HR_Δ60 (58.49 ± 15.61 s). However, the τ values for HR_Δ30 were higher and significantly different in relation to SD1_Δ30 and SD2_Δ30, as well as for HR_Δ60 in relation to SD1_Δ60 and SD2_Δ60. The kinetics of the autonomic variable (SD1 marker) was accelerated by the increased intensity. Moreover, significant differences were found for the τ values, with faster HRV markers than HR, in both intensities of Δ30 and Δ60, which suggests that these variables indicate distinct and specific cardiac autonomic response times during different intensity domains in cycling.HIGHLIGHTS The application of HRV to optimize exercise prescription at different effort intensities is extremely important to obtain assertive and effective results.Analysis of the kinetic responses of HRV is a useful tool for the evaluation of exercise performance and health status.A faster kinetics was found for HRV markers in comparison to HR, for both intensities analysed, which suggests that these variables indicate distinct and specific cardiac autonomic response times during different intensity domains in cycling.

Amperometric L-Lactate Biosensor Based upon a Gold Nanoparticles/Reduced Graphene Oxide/Polyallylamine Hydrochloride Modified Screen-Printed Graphite Electrode

This work describes a novel L-lactate biosensor based on the immobilization of L-lactate dehydrogenase enzyme on the screen-printed electrode modified with a ternary composite based on gold nanoparticles, electrochemically-reduced graphene oxide, and poly (allylamine hydrochloride). The enzyme was stabilized by crosslinking with glutaraldehyde. Applied working potential, pH and NAD+ concentration were optimized. The biosensor reports a specific sensitivity of 1.08 µA/mM·cm2 in a range up to 3 mM L-lactic acid with a detection limit of 1 µM. The operational and long-term stability as well as good selectivity allowed the L-lactic acid measurement in dairy products and wine samples.

Applicability of Dmax Method on Heart Rate Variability to Estimate the Lactate Thresholds in Male Runners

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the application of the Dmax method on heart rate variability (HRV) to estimate the lactate thresholds (LT), during a maximal incremental running test (MIRT).

Methods

Nineteen male runners performed two MIRTs, with the initial speed at 8 km·h^-1 and increments of 1 km·h^-1 every 3 minutes, until exhaustion. Measures of HRV and blood lactate concentrations were obtained, and lactate (LT₁ and LT₂) and HRV (HRVT_DMAX1 and HRVT_DMAX2) thresholds were identified. ANOVA with Scheffe's post hoc test, effect sizes (d), the bias ± 95% limits of agreement (LoA), standard error of the estimate (SEE), Pearson's (r), and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated to assess validity.

Results

No significant differences were observed between HRVT_DMAX1 and LT₁ when expressed for speed (12.1 ± 1.4 km·h^-1 and 11.2 ± 2.1 km·h^-1; p=0.55; d = 0.45; r = 0.46; bias ± LoA = 0.8 ± 3.7 km·h^-1; SEE = 1.2 km·h^-1 (95% CI, 0.9-1.9)). Significant differences were observed between HRVT_DMAX2 and LT₂ when expressed for speed (12.0 ± 1.2 km·h^-1 and 14.1 ± 2.5 km·h^-1; p=0.00; d = 1.21; r = 0.48; bias ± LoA = -1.0 ± 1.8 km·h^-1; SEE = 1.1 km·h^-1 (95% CI, 0.8-1.6)), respectively. Reproducibility values were found for the LT₁ (ICC = 0.90; bias ± LoA = -0.7 ± 2.0 km·h^-1), LT₂ (ICC = 0.97; bias ± LoA = -0.1 ± 1.1 km·h^-1), HRVT_DMAX1 (ICC = 0.48; bias ± LoA = -0.2 ± 3.4 km·h^-1), and HRVT_DMAX2 (ICC = 0.30; bias ± LoA = 0.3 ± 3.5 km·h^-1).

Conclusions

The Dmax method applied over a HRV dataset allowed the identification of LT₁ that is close to aerobic threshold, during a MIRT.