Characterization of occult hepatitis B infection among Iranian liver transplant recipients

Background

The prevalence of occult hepatitis B infection (OBI) among Iranian liver transplant recipient patients has not been explored yet. The present study aimed to determine the OBI prevalence among Iranian liver transplant recipients.

Methods

This study encompassed 97 patients having undergone liver transplantation due to several clinical backgrounds in the Liver Transplantation Center, Tehran, Iran. After serological evaluation, two different types of PCR methods were applied for amplification of HBV DNA, followed by the direct sequencing of whole hepatitis B virus (HBV) surface genes.

Results

At the time of admission, none of the patients were positive for HBsAg. However, 24 (25%), 12 (12.3%), and 5 (5.1%) cases were positive for anti‐HBc, hepatitis C virus (HCV), and hepatitis delta virus (HDV) antibodies, respectively. Moreover, two males were positive for OBI (2.1%). Both were positive for anti‐HBc and negative for anti‐HBs, anti‐HCV, and anti‐HDV. HBV‐related cirrhosis was the underlying reason for their liver transplantation. HBsAg sequences revealed no amino acid substitution.

Conclusions

The prevalence of OBI in the Iranian liver transplantation patients was relatively low. Future longitudinal studies with a larger sample size are suggested to explore the significance of this clinical finding, including the reactivation of cryptic HBV DNA, in liver transplant subjects.

A 14-Year Follow-Up of a Combined Liver-Pancreas-Kidney Transplantation: Case Report and Literature Review

Objective: To investigate the long-term effect of triple organ transplantation (liver, kidney, and pancreas) in a patient with end-stage liver disease, post chronic hepatitis B, cirrhosis, chronic renal failure, and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus caused by chronic pancreatitis and to explore the optimal surgical procedure.

Case: A 43-year-old man with progressive emaciation and hypourocrinia for 2 months. Results indicated exocrine pancreatic insufficiency and insulin-dependent diabetes related to chronic pancreatitis (CP) after developing end-stage hepatic and renal failure. Simultaneous piggyback orthotopic liver and heterotopic pancreas-duodenum and renal transplantation was performed in 2005. Pancreatic exocrine secretions were drained enterically to the jejunum, and the donor kidney was placed in the left iliac fossa. Patient was prescribed with prednisone, tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, Rabbit Anti-human Thymocyte Immunoglobulin, and simulect for immunosuppression.

Results: Satisfactory hepatic and pancreatic functional recovery was achieved within 7 days post-surgery. The kidney was not functional, and continuous renal replacement therapy was used. However, the donor kidney was removed at day 16 post-surgery due to acute rejection reaction. A new renal transplantation at the same position was performed, and satisfactory kidney function from the new graft was achieved 3 days later. In 14 years of follow-up, patient has not had any rejection reactions or other complications such as pancreatitis, thrombosis, and localized infections. The patient is insulin independent with normal liver and renal functions. FK506+Pred was used for immunosuppression, and the tac tough level maintained 3.0–4.5 ng/ml. Lamivudine was prescribed for long-term use to inhibit HBV virus duplication.

Conclusion: Simultaneous piggyback orthotopic liver and heterotopic pancreas-duodenum and renal transplantation is a good therapeutic option for patients with exocrine pancreatic insufficiency and insulin-dependent diabetes combined with hepatic and renal failure.

Nucleoside analog monotherapy for prophylaxis in Hepatitis B liver transplant patients is safe and efficacious

BACKGROUND

Combination therapy with HBIG and NAs has reduced HBV recurrence post LT. Despite its efficacy, costs of HBIG remain prohibitive. With high-potency NAs, HBIG's use has been questioned. We aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HBIG-free regimens in patients transplanted for HBV-related liver disease.

METHODS

A review of LT patients at the National University Hospital, Singapore from 2001 to 2015 was performed. Patients transplanted for HBV were divided by antiviral treatment received: high- or low-potency NAs, or a combination of HBIG with high-potency NAs. Post-transplant outcomes were reviewed till data censure. Primary outcome was recurrence of HBV viremia post-transplant, while secondary outcomes were HBsAg sero-clearance, graft survival and mortality.

RESULTS

Among 58 patients, 51 (88%) had persistent HBV viral suppression. Patients on a high-potency agent had significantly higher viral suppression compared to those on a low-potency agent (97% vs 72%, p = 0.02). This was also seen in patients with VL detectable at transplant (100% vs 50%, p < 0.01). None of the 16 patients with VL detectable at transplant and treated with high-potency agents developed recurrence. 42 patients (72%) achieved persistent HBsAg sero-clearance. Although this was higher in the high-potency NA-only group, it was not statistically significant (p = 0.56). There were no graft failures or mortalities attributed to HBV recurrence.

CONCLUSION

With the use of high-potency agents, HBIG may not be necessary in the treatment of patients transplanted for HBV-related liver disease, even in the presence of detectable VL at time of transplant.

Low-dose anti-hepatitis B immunoglobulin regimen as prophylaxis for hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Combination of anti-hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) and antiviral nucleotide/nucleoside is the most common regimen for prophylaxis against hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence. However, what the optimal regimen is for HBIg administration remains subject to debate.

METHODS

Two hundred and thirty-two HBV patients who had liver transplantation were included in this study. According to the decline rate of HBIg, the patients were divided into quick (group Q, n = 95) and slow decline groups (group S, n = 137). Quick HBIg decline was defined as anti-HBs titer <200 IU/mL at postoperative month (POM) 1, when 24 000 IU of HBIg was given perioperatively. HBV recurrence was defined as reappearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg).

RESULTS

After a mean (range) follow-up of 42.2 (24.1-76.8) months, the HBV recurrence rate was 12.1% for all 232 patients. The median (interquartile) HBIg titer was 96.2 (41.0-158.0) IU in group Q patients, compared to 418.0 (298.8-692.8) IU in group S patients at POM 1 (P < .001). For the patients in group Q, 18 patients (18.9%) had HBV recurrence; this was higher than the 10 (7.3%) patients in group S (P = .013). Multivariate analysis showed that quick HBIg decline and hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence were the risk factors for HBV recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative low-dose HBIg and antiviral nucleotide/nucleoside can effectively prevent HBV recurrence in patients with slow HBIg decline. For patients with quick HBIg decline, the idealized HBIg and antiviral agent regimen should be adjusted to establish an effective regimen as prophylaxis against HBV recurrence.

Efficacy and effectiveness of anti-HBV therapy with early withdrawal of HBIG prophylaxis to prevent HBV recurrence following liver transplantation

INTRODUCTION

The traditional regimen for prophylaxis of hepatitis B recurrence post-liver transplantation is to use hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) along with oral antiviral therapy; however, it is unclear when it is safe to discontinue HBIG after certain time point and to maintain patients with only oral antiviral therapy. Several studies have suggested that maintenance with oral anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) therapy following short-term or no HBIG following the immediate post-transplantation period may also be safe and effective in prevention of HBV recurrence.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed relevant literature to determine the effectiveness of early withdrawal of HBIG after liver transplantation and its effect on prevention of HBV recurrence. We used PubMed to search for any studies that used HBIG-free or short-term HBIG protocols with continued anti-HBV therapy. Short-term is defined as 12 months or less, and it is an evolving concept as new data on shorter and shorter duration becomes available. Additionally, a mini-quantitative analysis of the studies was performed using studies that involved the use of entecavir and tenofovir as anti-HBV therapy with or without HBIG.

EXPERT OPINION

Patients who are considered low risk for HBV recurrence at the time of liver transplant may safely be able to utilize a short-term duration of HBIG with indefinite antiviral maintenance therapy afterwards, whereas high-risk patients will likely need long-term HBIG in combination with antiviral therapy.

Management of Hepatitis B Virus Infection in Liver Transplantation Setting; The Rising Concerns and Growing Hopes, Report From 10th Congress of the Iranian Society for Organ Transplantation, 2011, Shiraz, Iran

Hepatitis B infection is the main cause of liver related mortality in many countries including Iran. Liver transplantation in cirrhosis due to HBV infection before 1990 was an absolute contraindication. Recurrent infection was a significant event in post liver transplant setting and resulted in increased risk of graft failure and death except successful transplanted individuals. Advances in antiviral prophylaxis have now made graft reinfection majority patients as a rare event. Graft and patient survival have been improved significantly during the past two decades, and consequences of transplantation for hepatitis B virus are now superior to those achieved for most other indications. This has encouraged many centers including the major liver transplantation center of Iran, in Shiraz, to provide liver transplantation to more patients with HBV related end stage liver disease. Management of these patients begins before transplantation along with special care after transplantation. There are some myths and doubts in the management of these patients and one should always balance the cost and efficiency. One of the major concerns is the high economic and social cost of recurrence and all possible efforts should be performed to avoid the ominous consequences of reinfection. Having a clear scientific grasp on the management of HBV cirrhosis before and after liver transplantation, options and protocols, and changing the concept which HBV infected are contraindicated ones for liver transplantation, and future hopes in increasing patients survival after liver transplantation using the new nucleosides analogues and availability of hepatitis B immunoglobulin in the transplantation setting. This scientific report paper outlines the insights communicated at the HBV and liver transplantation symposium during 10th Congress of the Iranian Society for Organ Transplantation, May 2011, Shiraz, Iran.