1
|
Arjipour M, Gharib M, Eftekharian M. Endoscopic resection of a giant colloid cyst in the velum interpositum: illustrative case. JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY. CASE LESSONS 2023; 5:CASE22381. [PMID: 36593669 PMCID: PMC9811572 DOI: 10.3171/case22381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/29/2022] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colloid cysts are an unusual differential diagnosis for lesions in the lateral ventricles. Microsurgery is usually recommended for the treatment of giant colloid cysts. This case is the largest reported colloid cyst in this unusual location treated with an endoscope. OBSERVATIONS A 39-year-old woman with a history of pulsing headaches presented with nausea, vomiting, vision blurring, and paresthesia of the left leg. On the brain computed tomography, a huge, well-defined homogeneous hyperdense intraventricular lesion with hydrocephalus was observed. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a spherical lesion over the third ventricle inside the lateral ventricles, obstructing the Sylvius aqueduct. There was no enhancement and no diffusion restriction on diffusion-weighted images. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy was undertaken for hydrocephalus treatment. Then the lesion was resected grossly. The cyst wall was resected as much as it was safe. There was no clot or bloody product inside the lesion. LESSONS Colloid cyst is rarely encountered in the velum interpositum and lateral ventricles, but the authors' giant colloid cyst case along with similar cases led to considering it out of the third ventricle. According to their experience, endoscopic removal is a safe and efficient method for colloid cyst surgery, even in giant cases.
Collapse
|
2
|
Jafari SH, Rabiei N, Taghizadieh M, Mirazimi SMA, Kowsari H, Farzin MA, Razaghi Bahabadi Z, Rezaei S, Mohammadi AH, Alirezaei Z, Dashti F, Nejati M. Joint application of biochemical markers and imaging techniques in the accurate and early detection of glioblastoma. Pathol Res Pract 2021; 224:153528. [PMID: 34171601 DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2021.153528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2021] [Revised: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Glioblastoma is a primary brain tumor with the most metastatic effect in adults. Despite the wide range of multidimensional treatments, tumor heterogeneity is one of the main causes of tumor spread and gives great complexity to diagnostic and therapeutic methods. Therefore, featuring noble noninvasive prognostic methods that are focused on glioblastoma heterogeneity is perceived as an urgent need. Imaging neuro-oncological biomarkers including MGMT (O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase) promoter methylation status, tumor grade along with other tumor characteristics and demographic features (e.g., age) are commonly referred to during diagnostic, therapeutic and prognostic processes. Therefore, the use of new noninvasive prognostic methods focused on glioblastoma heterogeneity is considered an urgent need. Some neuronal biomarkers, including the promoter methylation status of the promoter MGMT, the characteristics and grade of the tumor, along with the patient's demographics (such as age and sex) are involved in diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Among the wide array of imaging techniques, magnetic resonance imaging combined with the more physiologically detailed technique of H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy can be useful in diagnosing neurological cancer patients. In addition, intracranial tumor qualitative analysis and sometimes tumor biopsies help in accurate diagnosis. This review summarizes the evidence for biochemical biomarkers being a reliable biomarker in the early detection and disease management in GBM. Moreover, we highlight the correlation between Imaging techniques and biochemical biomarkers and ask whether they can be combined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seyed Hamed Jafari
- Medical Imaging Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Nikta Rabiei
- School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Mohammad Taghizadieh
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Center for Women's Health Research Zahra, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Sayad Mohammad Ali Mirazimi
- School of Medicine, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran; Student Research Committee, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
| | - Hamed Kowsari
- School of Medicine, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran; Student Research Committee, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
| | - Mohammad Amin Farzin
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
| | - Zahra Razaghi Bahabadi
- School of Medicine, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran; Student Research Committee, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
| | - Samaneh Rezaei
- Department of Medical Biotechnology, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Amir Hossein Mohammadi
- Research Center for Biochemistry and Nutrition in Metabolic Diseases, Institute for Basic Sciences, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran
| | - Zahra Alirezaei
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran; Paramedical School, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran.
| | - Fatemeh Dashti
- School of Medicine, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran; Student Research Committee, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.
| | - Majid Nejati
- Anatomical Sciences Research Center, Institute for Basic Sciences, Kashan University of Medical Sciences, Kashan, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|