Comparison of Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Defecography With Clinical Examination in Diagnosing Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: An Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Pelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) is frequently reported in both sexes. Dynamic magnetic resonance defecography (DMRD) is the preferred modality, mainly due to its superiority and complementary role in clinical examination. However, studies from the perspective of Indian patients are scarce and mostly restricted to females. Thus, we assessed the diagnostic performance of DMRD in patients with PFD and correlated the findings with those on clinical examination.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective, observational study involved 57 adult patients of either sex, presenting with pelvic floor symptoms (PFS) and diagnosed with PFD. Initially, the patients underwent clinical examination, and diagnosis was recorded. Subsequently, the patients were subjected to DMRD. The findings were correlated with the Pearson "r" correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

A significantly greater proportion of patients had involvement of multiple compartments (36 vs. 12, p<0.001), cystocele (23 vs. 8, p=0.002), and rectal prolapse (25 vs. 14, p=0.030) on DMRD than clinical examination, while there was no significant difference regarding uterine prolapse (p=0.789). Grading of cystocele and rectal prolapse as well as diagnosis of enterocele/peritoneocele, rectocele, and intussusception could be done only with DMRD. DMRD had a strong and significant correlation with clinical examination regarding cystocele (r=0.943, p=0.003), uterine prolapse (r=0.972, p=0.001), and rectal prolapse (r=0.951, p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

DMRD demonstrated significantly better performance in the diagnosis of multiple compartment involvement, cystocele, and rectal prolapse. DMRD and clinical examination were significantly correlated regarding the diagnosis of cystocele, uterine prolapse, and rectal prolapse. Thus, DMRD provides information, in addition to the clinical examination, and should be used in symptomatic patients.

Static and Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Female Pelvic Floor Dysfunction: Correlation With Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification

BACKGROUND

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is clinically assessed and staged commonly by the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) system. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvic floor is an emerging modality for anatomical and functional assessment of the pelvic floor and staging of POP. The purpose of this study was to correlate the dynamic MRI findings with POP-Q examination for the staging of POP in each pelvic compartment by comparing various anatomic points.

METHODS

A prospective observational study of the comparative cross-sectional design was conducted among patients who underwent MRI of the pelvic floor and POP-Q at our institute. A total of 50 patients were included. Anatomical landmarks in the three compartments were analyzed in relation to standard reference lines on dynamic MRI and compared with POP-Q measurements.

RESULTS

Most of our patients had multicompartment disease (70%). When compared to POP-Q, MRI has a strong correlation for quantification of anterior (0.723) and middle (0.525) compartments and a weak correlation (0.232) for posterior compartment prolapse.

CONCLUSION

POP-Q examination is based on the various points within the vaginal canal, and all the points do not represent a true anatomic landmark. MRI, on the other hand, is based on a true anatomical plane and gives detailed information about various structures in all three compartments. Thus, MRI also helps bridge the gap between various referring specialties in treating pelvic floor disorders.

The establishment of a 3D anatomical coordinate system for defining vaginal axis and spatial position

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP), the herniation of the pelvic organs toward the vaginal opening, is a common pelvic floor disorder (PFD) whose etiology is poorly understood. Traditional methods for evaluating POP are often constrained to external vaginal examination, limited to 2D, or have poor reproducibility. We propose a reliable 3D anatomic coordinate system for standardized 3D assessment of pelvic anatomy using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS

The novel 3D anatomic reference system is based on six bony landmarks of the pelvis manually identified in MRI: the ischial spines and the superior and inferior pubic points of the left and right pubic symphysis. The origin of this system is defined as the midpoint of the ischial spines. The reproducibility and applicability of the pelvic coordinate system were evaluated by (1) implementing it in a new method to quantify vaginal position and axis (angulation) in 3D space from MRI segmentations of the vagina and (2) computing the intraclass correlation (ICC) on coordinate system and vaginal measures. The MRI analysis was performed by four non-medically trained observers on five pelvic MRI datasets on approximately five separate occasions.

RESULTS

Overall, all bony landmarks had excellent intra-observer reliability and inter-observer reliability (ICC>0.90); intra-observer reliability was moderate-to-good among the vaginal position parameters (0.5

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed anatomic coordinate system and vaginal analysis approach allow quantitative assessment of pelvic anatomy that is robust to the experience level of the observer. The application of these methods in radiographic studies will give new insight into the underlying anatomic changes involved in the pathogenesis of POP and other PFDs and help better understand their etiology.

Collapse

Key Words

• 3D Coordinate System
• MRI
• Pelvic Organ Prolapse
• Pelvis
• Reliability Analysis
• Vagina

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Female
• Humans
• Magnetic Resonance Imaging
• Pelvic Organ Prolapse
• Pelvis
• Reproducibility of Results
• Vagina/diagnostic imaging

Collapse

Grants

• UG1 HD069006 NICHD NIH HHS

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Deanna C E Sinex Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, 406 Benedum Hall, 3700 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States
Shaniel T Bowen Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, 406 Benedum Hall, 3700 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States
Ahmed Kashkoush Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, United States
Arianna Rosemond 4350 Northern Pike #150, Monroeville, PA, United States
Danielle Carter Silver Spring, MD, United States
Prahlad G Menon Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, 406 Benedum Hall, 3700 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States
Pamela A Moalli Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, 406 Benedum Hall, 3700 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Magee Women's Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, United States
Steven D Abramowitch Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh, 406 Benedum Hall, 3700 O'Hara Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, United States.

Collapse

Pelvic floor imaging with MR defecography: correlation with gynecologic pelvic organ prolapse quantification

PURPOSE

Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is assessed differently by gynecologists and radiologists. It is clinically staged by physical examination using the POP-Q (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification) system and radiologically staged by modalities such as by Magnetic Resonance Defecography (MRD). The purpose of this study was to correlate the two methods of staging pelvic organ prolapse for each pelvic compartment by comparing correlative anatomic points and differences in technique. This understanding will help synthesize information from two different perspectives and bridge the gap between multiple specialists who participate in the care of patients with complex pelvic floor disorders.

METHODS

A retrospective single institution study comparison of patients who underwent both dynamic magnetic resonance pelvic floor imaging and pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) at our medical center was done. Two urogynecologists performed the POP-Q and one fellowship-trained radiologist interpreted the MRD and both staged pelvic organ prolapse independently.

RESULTS

A total of 280 patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pelvic floor from 1/2013 to 12/2017, of whom 68 met our inclusion criteria. When compared to POP-Q, MRI has strong, moderate, and weak correlation for quantification of anterior, middle, and posterior compartment prolapse, respectively. POP-Q measurements Aa, Ba, C, and D are analogous to true pelvic anatomical landmarks which are directly and consistently measurable by MRI, hence accounting for the better correlation in anterior and middle compartments when compared to measurements Ap and Bp which do not correlate with true anatomical landmarks, and hence can explain the weak correlation for posterior compartment prolapse.

CONCLUSION

When comparing POP-Q to MRI, anterior and middle compartment prolapse have better correlation than posterior compartment prolapse. Inherent differences that exist in technique and anatomic landmarks used for staging pelvic organ prolapse by clinical exam and imaging criteria account for this. MRD, however, still provides anatomic details on static images, real time simultaneous overview of multi-compartmental prolapse, characterizes contents of cul-de-sac hernias and rectal evacuation on dynamic imaging. Corroborative information derived from both methods of staging organ will result in optimum patient care.