Ultrasensitive qPCR platform for rapid detection of bacterial contamination of raw biological samples at the point of care

Contamination of cell cultures can result in a significant loss of precious biological material, particularly in long-term processes including amplification of chimeric antigen receptors (CAR)-T cells and differentiation of patient-derived stem cells, for therapeutic purposes. Bacterial contamination can also lead to more complex conditions such as sepsis which can cause morbidity and mortality, despite strict controls and good laboratory/manufacturing practices in the manipulation of complex biological samples such as blood used in autologous and allogeneic stem cells transplantation. The current standard method to identify biological risk is the set-up of microbial cultures, which can be time consuming with the likelihood of wasting large amounts of reagents in the event of contamination. Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (qPCR) is a molecular method able to detect biological agents in a highly sensitive and specific way and in a short time. However, qPCR assays require complex DNA/RNA purification steps and expensive benchtop instruments, which may not always be available. This paper reports an extraction-free and low-volume protocol for qPCR in a standard instrument, which has been demonstrated to be effective on both Gram-positive (Gram+) and Gram-negative (Gram-) bacteria. Detection has been obtained from spiked cell culture samples, reaching a limit of detection (LOD) of 1 colony forming unit (CFU)/ml. To demonstrate the high potential of this optimized procedure, the same samples were also tested on a Point-Of-Care platform, which includes a cartridge with micro-chambers and a compact instrument, capable of performing qPCR with the same efficiency. Staphylococcus aureus (Gram+) was selected as the target for a proof of concept, achieving a LOD of 1 CFU/ml also on the portable device. The availability of these results paves the way for a simplified protocol for DNA extraction and amplification.

Prevalence, Antimicrobial Resistance and Toxin-Encoding Genes of Clostridioides difficile from Environmental Sources Contaminated by Feces

Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) is the most common pathogen causing antibiotic-associated intestinal diseases in humans and some animal species, but it can also be present in various environments outside hospitals. Thus, the objective of this study was to investigate the presence and the characteristics of toxin-encoding genes and antimicrobial resistance of C. difficile isolates from different environmental sources. C. difficile was found in 32 out of 81 samples (39.50%) after selective enrichment of spore-forming bacteria and in 45 samples (55.56%) using a TaqMan-based qPCR assay. A total of 169 C. difficile isolates were recovered from those 32 C. difficile-positive environmental samples. The majority of environmental C. difficile isolates were toxigenic, with many (88.75%) positive for tcdA and tcdB. Seventy-four isolates (43.78%) were positive for binary toxins, cdtA and cdtB, and 19 isolates were non-toxigenic. All the environmental C. difficile isolates were susceptible to vancomycin and metronidazole, and most isolates were resistant to ciprofloxacin (66.86%) and clindamycin (46.15%), followed by moxifloxacin (13.02%) and tetracycline (4.73%). Seventy-five isolates (44.38%) showed resistance to at least two of the tested antimicrobials. C. difficile strains are commonly present in various environmental sources contaminated by feces and could be a potential source of community-associated C. difficile infections.

PREVALENCE OF SALMONELLA SPECIES, CLOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS, AND CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE IN THE FECES OF HEALTHY ELEPHANTS (LOXODONTA SPECIES AND ELEPHAS MAXIMUS) IN EUROPE

Pathogenic Salmonella spp., Clostridium perfringens, and Clostridium difficile have been reported to infect and cause severe enteritis and enterotoxemia in African (Loxodonta spp.) and Asian elephants (Elephas maximus). However, little information exists on whether healthy elephants carry and possibly shed these gastrointestinal organisms. This study was conducted to investigate the prevalence of all three bacteria in feces from healthy elephants in European zoos. Bacterial identification was performed by selective culture on fecal samples and a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification protocol, on the basis of primers targeting the hilA gene (Salmonella spp.), the cpa gene (C. perfringens), and the tpi gene (C. difficile) from deoxyribonucleic acid extracted from elephant feces. The PCR protocol was validated prior to initiation of the investigation. Fecal samples collected from 50 African and 86 Asian elephants originating from 30 European zoologic institutions were investigated. The PCR validation revealed detection limits ranging from 10⁴ to 10⁶ colony-forming units per gram of feces of each gene. Only C. perfringens (one type A and two type E) was detected in the initial sampling (2.2%, three Asian elephants), whereas no Salmonella spp. or C. difficile was detected. At a follow-up sampling from C. perfringens-positive animals and relatives, 2 mo after the initial sampling, three animals were culture positive for Salmonella enterica spp. enterica. All positive samples were obtained with bacterial culture, whereas no PCR reactions were positive. Despite carrying these pathogens, all culture-positive animals were clinically healthy and did not develop signs of gastrointestinal disease during the study period. The findings indicate that prevalence of Salmonella spp., C. perfringens, and C. difficile in feces from healthy Asian and African elephants in Europe is very low.

Outcomes and clinical relevance of stool multiplex bacterial polymerase chain reaction in patients with acute diarrhea: single center experience

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Diagnostic stool multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing has attracted considerable interest, because of its high sensitivity, short turnaround time, and ability to detect multiple organisms simultaneously. This study investigates the clinical usefulness of a stool multiplex bacterial PCR in patients with acute diarrhea.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the stool multiplex bacterial PCR results, clinical parameters, and clinical courses of patients hospitalized because of acute diarrhea between August 2014 and November 2016.

RESULTS

A total of 725 patients (male, 372; mean age, 30.9 ± 29.3 years) underwent stool multiplex bacterial PCR. A total of 243 pathogens were detected in 226 patients. The detection rate of multiplex PCR testing was higher than that of stool culture (32.7% vs. 3.3%, p < 0.01). Severe symptoms of acute diarrhea (bloody diarrhea, frequent diarrhea) and prescribed empirical antibiotics were significantly more common in the positive multiplex PCR group (p = 0.02, p < 0.01, p < 0.01, respectively). However, mean durations of hospital stay were similar in the 2 groups according to the multiplex PCR results (p = 0.32). In addition, Campylobacter spp., which was the most commonly detected pathogen (97/243, 39.9%), was significantly associated with frequent diarrhea and prescribed empirical antibiotics (p < 0.01), but not with duration of hospital stay (p = 0.09).

CONCLUSION

We concluded that stool multiplex bacterial PCR might be a useful tool for identifying bacterial etiology in patients with acute diarrhea, especially in those with Campylobacter spp. infection.

The design, validation and clinical verification of an in-house qualitative PCR to detect Yersinia enterocolitica and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis in faeces

Yersiniosis is a zoonotic foodborne infection of public health significance. The aim of this study was to design and validate a simple, accurate and cost-effective polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to detect pathogenic Yersinia spp. in faecal samples. An intercalating dye (EvaGreen)-based real-time multiplex PCR assay was designed to detect yadA, ystB and inv by melt curve analysis, allowing undifferentiated detection of all Yersinia enterocolitica biotypes, including biotype 1A, and Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. The assay was validated using cultured bacteria and clinical samples. A total of 107 positive and 51 negative samples were tested. The sensitivity and specificity was 98% and 100%. The limit of detection was 10⁴-10⁵ CFU/g faeces. A total of 605 samples (9 positive) were tested in the clinical verification with an accuracy and negative predictive value of 99% [95% confidence interval (CI) 97.9-99.6%] and 99.8% (95% CI 97.9-99.6%), respectively. This is an accurate, simple and cost-effective assay for the detection of pathogenic Yersinia spp.

Comparison of qPCR versus culture for the detection and quantification of Clostridium difficile environmental contamination

Contaminated surfaces serve as an important reservoir for Clostridium difficile transmission. Current strategies to detect environmental contamination of C. difficile rely heavily on culture, and often only indicate presence versus absence of spores. The goal of this study was to compare quantitative PCR (qPCR) to culture for the detection and quantification of C. difficile from inert surfaces. First, we compared the limit of detection (LOD) of a 16S rRNA gene and toxin B gene qPCR assay for detection of C. difficile in solution. Second, we compared the LODs of 16S rRNA gene qPCR versus culture for detection of C. difficile from surfaces. Solution experiments were performed by direct seeding of spores into neutralizing broth, whereas surface experiments involved seeding of spores onto plastic test surfaces, and recovery using sponge swabs. Both experiments were conducted using spores expressing short (NAP1) and long (NAP4) hair lengths. Combining data from both strains, the overall LOD for C. difficile cells in solution was 1.4 cells for 16S rRNA gene and 23.6 cells for toxin B gene qPCR (p<0.001). The overall LOD for C. difficile cells from surfaces was 17.1 cells for 16S rRNA gene qPCR and 54.5 cells for culture (p = 0.05), and was not statistically different between strains for each method (p = 0.52). Overall, the proportion of C. difficile cells recovered from surfaces was good when detected by 16S rRNA gene qPCR and culture (qPCR: 76%, culture: 67%, p = 0.36), but, 16S rRNA gene qPCR was capable of detecting lower levels of surface contamination. Future work attempting to measure the presence of C. difficile on environmental surfaces should consider using qPCR.