Chest X-rays in detecting injuries caused by blunt trauma

The sensitivity of chest X-ray (CXR) for the detection of significant thoracic injury in children exposed to blast

INTRODUCTION

Thoracic trauma is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in children exposed to blast and early recognition of these injuries is vital. While numerous studies have investigated the sensitivity of chest X-ray (CXR) for the detection of chest injury in blunt trauma, none have evaluated its performance in paediatric blast injury.

METHODS

CXR and Computed Tomography (CT) thorax findings were compared for 105 children who were injured by blast and presented to the UK Role 3 Hospital, Camp Bastion, Helmand Province, during the recent conflict in Afghanistan from 2011 to 2013. CXR performance was evaluated compared to the 'gold standard' of CT for the detection of significant thoracic injuries, defined as pneumothorax, haemothorax, aortic or great vessel injury, 2 or more rib fractures, ruptured diaphragm, sternal fracture, penetrating fragments and pulmonary contusion or laceration.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of CXR for the detection of significant injuries was: pneumothorax 43%, haemothorax 40%, contusion 44%, laceration 100%, blast lung 80% and subdermal metallic fragments 75%. CXR missed all cases of diaphragm injury, ≥2 rib fractures, clavicle fracture and pleural effusion, although numbers of each were small. Specificity for CXR injury detection was 94% for contusion and 93% for fragment, and 100% otherwise. The sensitivity and specificity of CXR for identifying an abnormality that would prompt CT imaging was 72% (95% CI 55-85%) and 82% (95% CI 70-90%).

CONCLUSIONS

CXR has a poor sensitivity for the identification of significant thoracic injury in children exposed to blast. We argue that, given the challenge of clinical assessment of injured children and the potential for serious adverse consequences of missed thoracic injuries, there should be a low threshold for the use of CT chest in the evaluation of children exposed to blast.

Imaging in polytrauma - Principles and current concepts

Imaging forms a crucial component in reducing mortality of polytraumatized patients by aiding appropriate diagnosis and guiding the emergency and definitive treatment. With the exponential expansion in the radiological armamentarium and introduction of protocols like Extended focused assessment with sonography for trauma (EFAST) and Whole body Computed tomography (WBCT), the role of imaging has considerably increased. Emergency imaging protocols should be done for rapid diagnosis of life-threatening injuries allowing simultaneous evaluation and resuscitation. Subsequent comprehensive imaging is essential to diagnose the often clinically missed injuries to reduce the overall morbidity. Imaging protocols must adapt to the patient's clinical scenario, which can be dynamically changing. Each trauma team should devise clear guidelines, protocols, and algorithms suitable for their center depending on the local availability of types of equipment and expertise. Radiologists must efficiently communicate and adopt patient-centered approach to ensure early appropriate care to these severely injured patients. Future research should involve multicentre studies to formulate the most appropriate imaging protocol in polytrauma to increase diagnostic accuracy and thereby reduce patient mortality.

Clinical Utility of Routine Chest X-Rays During the Initial Stabilization of Trauma Patients

OBJECTIVES

The Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) course encourages the use of chest x-ray (CXR) to identify injuries that may change clinical management during the initial stage of trauma resuscitations. Several studies have failed to show benefit for the routine use of CXR without a clinical indication, however. We sought to validate these findings by determining the incidence of clinically significant findings discovered on a portable single-view CXR during the initial stabilization of trauma patients at a Level 1 trauma center.

METHODS

Using our electronic medical record system, we searched for all of the patients who were brought in as a trauma activation that had a portable single-view CXR performed in the emergency department. We used a selected sampling of available subjects for inclusion into the study. We reviewed the staff radiologist reports for positive findings and reviewed the physician and nursing flow sheets for procedural interventions occurring after the CXR was performed but before leaving the resuscitation area. Subjects who were transferred from another facility, had a thoracic procedure performed before CXR or underwent computed tomography before CXRs were excluded.

RESULTS

From 2011 through 2012, we found 2101 subjects who had a portable CXR performed in the emergency department. We reviewed the first 400 subjects' records, with 33 (8.3%) subjects having positive findings on CXR. Of those 33, 8 met inclusion criteria and the remainder met exclusion criteria. The most common findings were pneumothorax (n = 4), clavicle fracture (n = 3), and rib fracture (n = 2). No subjects received a procedural intervention before leaving the resuscitation bay to be transported to the operating room or the computed tomography suite.

CONCLUSIONS

We observed a low incidence of abnormal findings on portable CXR during the initial stabilization of trauma patients, none of whom received an immediate procedural intervention. This dataset supports previously published reports that suggest that a more targeted approach to CXR use may reduce resource utilization.