Comparison between Emergency Severity Index and Heart Failure Triage Scale in heart failure patients: A randomized clinical trial

Admission prioritization of heart failure patients with multiple comorbidities

The primary objective of this study was to enhance the operational efficiency of the current healthcare system by proposing a quicker and more effective approach for healthcare providers to deliver services to individuals facing acute heart failure (HF) and concurrent medical conditions. The aim was to support healthcare staff in providing urgent services more efficiently by developing an automated decision-support Patient Prioritization (PP) Tool that utilizes a tailored machine learning (ML) model to prioritize HF patients with chronic heart conditions and concurrent comorbidities during Urgent Care Unit admission. The study applies key ML models to the PhysioNet dataset, encompassing hospital admissions and mortality records of heart failure patients at Zigong Fourth People's Hospital in Sichuan, China, between 2016 and 2019. In addition, the model outcomes for the PhysioNet dataset are compared with the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) Maryland (MD) State Inpatient Data (SID) for 2014, a secondary dataset containing heart failure patients, to assess the generalizability of results across diverse healthcare settings and patient demographics. The ML models in this project demonstrate efficiencies surpassing 97.8% and specificities exceeding 95% in identifying HF patients at a higher risk and ranking them based on their mortality risk level. Utilizing this machine learning for the PP approach underscores risk assessment, supporting healthcare professionals in managing HF patients more effectively and allocating resources to those in immediate need, whether in hospital or telehealth settings.

The Diagnostic Evaluation of the SINEH Cardiopulmonary Triage Scale and the Emergency Severity Index in the Emergency Department: A Comparative Study

Introduction

The diagnostic evaluation of the emergency severity index (ESI) in the triage of patients with cardiopulmonary complaints has a high sensitivity but a low specificity in the emergency department (ED). Therefore, triage scales with more accurate diagnostic evaluation are required. As a result, accuracy of the SINEH triage scale (SinTS) and the ESI was compared to compare mistriage of critically ill patients with cardiopulmonary complaints.

Methods

This descriptive, analytical and cross-sectional study was conducted between December 2022 and April 2023. In this study, two nurses independently examined each patient using two triage scales. The admission unit and length of hospital stay were also recorded. The outcome was classified as high-risk admission (cardiac care unit and intensive care unit) and low-risk admission (internal unit or discharge from the ED). Undertriage and overtiage were defined as high-risk admission with triage level 3 and 4 and low-risk admission with triage level 1 or 2, respectively. A panel of experts evaluated content validity of SinTS and kappa designating agreement on relevance reported. The inter-rater reliability of two scales was also reported.

Results

Finally, the study included 145 patients. The average age of the patients studied was 61.35 years. SinTS has a total mistriage of 29.63%, with 4.13% being undertriage and 25.5% being overtriage. In ESI, the total mistriage is 66.8%, with 1.3% being undertriage and 65.5% being overtriage. The undertriage of the two scales did not differ significantly by admission unit (p=0.26), but the overtriage of the two methods did (p=0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of SinTS were 86.3%, 63.37%, and 72.27%, respectively, while those of ESI were 95.4%, 5.94%, and 32.79%, respectively.

Conclusion

SINEH triage scale has achieved the optimal accuracy in recognizing the acuity of the patients with chest pain and dyspnea by using SpO2, pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide, troponin I, and peak expiratory flow. When triaging patients with chest pain and dyspnea, SinTS may exhibit a higher level of accuracy compared to ESI. More research is needed to improve accuracy of triage scales in patient with cardiopulmonary complaints.

Reliability and validity of Chengdu pediatric emergency triage criteria: case study of a single center in China

BACKGROUND

We aimed to examine the reliability and validity of Chengdu pediatric emergency triage criteria in order to provide a reference for the development of pediatric emergency triage within other hospitals.

METHODS

We developed Chengdu pediatric emergency triage criteria based on the conditions/symptom, vital signs, and the Pediatric Early Warning Score system within our hospital using the Delphi method in 2020. The simulation scenario triage and real-life triage which were conducted in our hospital during January - March 2021, and the retrospective study of triage records extracted from our hospital's health information system in February 2022, were used to measure the agreement in triage decisions between the triage nurses, and between the triage nurses and the expert team.

RESULTS

For the 20 simulation cases, the Kappa value of triage decisions between the triage nurses was 0.6 (95% CI 0.352-0.849), and the Kappa value of triage decisions between the triage nurses and the expert team was 0.73 (95% CI 0.540-0.911). For the 252 cases in the real-life triage, the Kappa value of triage decisions between the triage nurses and the expert team was 0.824 (95% CI 0.680-0.962). For the 20,540 cases selected for the retrospective study of triage records, the Kappa value of triage decisions between the triage nurses was 0.702 (95% CI 0.691-0.713); that between Triage Nurse 1 and the expert team was 0.634 (95% CI 0.623-0.647); and that between Triage Nurse 2 and the expert team was 0.725 (95% CI 0.713-0.736). The overall agreement rate in triage decisions between the triage nurses and the expert team in the simulation scenario triage was 80%; that between the triage nurses and the expert team in the real-life triage was 97.6%; and that between the triage nurses in the retrospective study was 91.9%. In the retrospective study, the agreement rates in triage decisions between Triage Nurse 1 and the expert team, and between Triage Nurse 2 and the expert team, were 88.0% and 92.3%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Chengdu pediatric emergency triage criteria that developed within our hospital is reliable and valid, and can promote rapid and effective triage by triage nurses.

Using the Delphi method to establish pediatric emergency triage criteria in a grade A tertiary women's and children's hospital in China

BACKGROUND

We aimed to establish simplified and quantifiable triage criteria in pediatric emergency care, improving the efficiency of pediatric emergency triage and ensuring patient safety.

METHODS

We preliminarily determined the pediatric emergency triage criteria with references to pediatric emergency department characteristics and internationally recognized triage tools after literature review and discussion. The final determination of the triage criteria was reached after two rounds of Delphi surveys completed by18 experts from 3 hospitals in China.

RESULTS

Both round 1 and round 2 surveys had a 100% response rate. The overall expert authority coefficient in the two rounds of surveys was 0.872. The experts had 100% enthusiasm for participating in the surveys. Kendall's coefficients of concordance for conditions/symptoms in patients triaged to level 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 0.149, 0.193, 0.102, and 0.266, respectively. All p-values were less than 0.05. The coefficients of variation in conditions/symptoms, vital signs, and the Pediatric Early Warning Score (PEWS) ranged between 0.00 and 0.205, meeting the inclusion criteria. The pediatric emergency triage criteria containing conditions/symptoms, vital signs, PEWS scores, and other 4 level 1 indicators, 51 level 2 indicators and 23 level 3 indicators were built. The maximum waiting time to treatment for the patients triaged to level 1, 2, 3, and 4 was immediate, within 10 min, within 30 min, and within 240 min, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The pediatric emergency triage criteria established in this study was scientific and reliable. It can be used to quickly identify the patients requiring urgent and immediate care, thereby ensuring the priorities for the care of critically ill patients.

Patient disposition using the Emergency Severity Index: a retrospective observational study at an interdisciplinary emergency department

OBJECTIVES

Early patient disposition is crucial to prevent crowding in emergency departments (EDs). Our study aimed to characterise the need of in-house resources for patients treated in the ED according to the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) and the presenting complaint at the timepoint of triage.

DESIGN

A retrospective single-centre study was conducted.

SETTING

Data of all patients who presented to the interdisciplinary ED of a tertiary care hospital in Munich, Germany, from 2014 to 2017 were analysed.

PARTICIPANTS

n=113 694 patients were included.

MEASURES

ESI Score, medical speciality according to the chief complaint, mode of arrival, admission rates and discharge destination from the ED were evaluated.

RESULTS

Patient disposition varied according to ESI scores in combination with the chief complaint. Patients with low ESI scores were more likely to be admitted after treatment in the ED than patients with high ESI scores. Highly prioritised patients (ESI 1) mainly required admission to an intensive care unit (ICU, 27%), intermediate care unit (IMC, 37%) or immediate intervention (11%). In this critical patient group, 30% of patients with neurological or medical symptoms required immediate intensive care, whereas only 17% of patients with surgical problems were admitted to an ICU. A significant number of patients (particularly with neurological or medical problems) required hospital (and in some cases even ICU or IMC) admission despite high ESI scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, ESI seems to be a useful tool to anticipate the need for specialised in-hospital resources on arrival. Patients with symptoms pointing at neurological or medical problems need particular attention as ESI may fail to sufficiently predict the care facility level for this patient group.

An unexpected electrocardiogram sign of subacute left ventricular free wall rupture: Its early awareness may be lifesaving

BACKGROUND

Post-infarct left ventricular free wall rupture (LVFWR) is not always an immediately catastrophic complication. The rupture can be subacute, allowing time for diagnosis and intervention. Accordingly, early recognition of the entity may be lifesaving.

METHODS

We present an electrocardiogram (ECG) change pattern in two cases, which was erroneously attributed to ischemia. Two women in their 80s were admitted to our institute after experiencing the sudden onset of chest pain. They were managed as anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction without reperfusion treatment. Unfortunately, they experienced a recurrence of severe chest pain with cardiogenic shock during hospitalisation. The ECG recorded at that time showed a ST-segment re-elevation in infract-related leads.

RESULTS

The two cases were regrettably received a misjudgement of reinfarction at first, and one of the patients even was administrated with tirofiban. Afterwards the diagnosis of subacute LVFWR was made through antemortem echocardiography.

CONCLUSION

New ST-segment elevation (STE) in infarct-associated leads, coupled with recurrence of chest pain and new-onset hypotension, may constitute the premonitory signs of a subacute LVFWR.

Effects of intracoronary injection of nicorandil and tirofiban on myocardial perfusion and short-term prognosis in elderly patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after emergency PCI

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the effects of the intracoronary injection of nicorandil and tirofiban on myocardial perfusion and short-term prognosis in elderly patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) after emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

Seventy-eight STEMI patients with age >65 years who underwent emergency PCI were consecutively enrolled. These patients received conventional PCI and were randomly divided into a control group and a treatment group (n=39 per group). The control group received an intracoronary injection of tirofiban followed by a maintenance infusion for 36 hours after surgery. The treatment group received intracoronary injection of tirofiban and nicorandil, and then intravenous infusion of tirofiban and nicorandil 36 hours after surgery. The following parameters were measured: TIMI grade, corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC), TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG), ST-segment resolution (STR) rate 2 hours post-operatively, resolution of ST-segment elevation (STR) at 2 hours postoperatively, peak level of serum CK-MB, left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at 7-10 days postoperatively, and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) in-hospital and within 30 days post-operatively.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, more patients in the treatment group had TIMI 3 and TMPG 3, and STR after PCI was significantly higher. The treatment group also had significantly lower cTFC, lower infarction relative artery (IRA), lower peak CK-MB, and no reflow ratio after PCI. The treatment group had significantly higher LVEDD and LVEF but lower incidence of MACEs than the control group.

CONCLUSION

The intracoronary injection of nicorandil combined with tirofiban can effectively improve myocardial reperfusion in elderly STEMI patients after emergency PCI and improve short-term prognoses.