Recurrent challenges in the evaluation of fibroepithelial lesions

Accuracy and Comparison of Core Needle Biopsy Diagnoses With Excision Specimen for Diagnosing Fibroepithelial Lesions of the Breast

Background Core needle biopsy (CNB) for fibroepithelial lesions (FELs) of the breast is commonly encountered by histopathologists. The distinction between fibroadenoma (FA) and phyllodes tumor (PT) can be challenging due to overlapping histological features and the limited nature of CNB material.  Objective This study aimed to assess the accuracy of CNB diagnosis of FA and PT by comparing it with a diagnosis on subsequent surgical excision specimen. Materials and methods A total of 166 cases of FELs of the breast who underwent CNB and subsequent surgical excision between January 2001 and December 2020 were included in our study. All microscopy glass slides were reviewed, and diagnosis confirmed. Results While 125 (75%) cases based on CNB received a definitive diagnosis of either fibroadenoma or PT, the remaining 41 (25%) cases were better classified on excision specimens and were descriptively diagnosed as fibroepithelial lesions on CNB. Diagnoses on CNB and on subsequent excision specimens were concordant in 113 (90.4%) cases. Among 12 cases that were discordant, three cases diagnosed as FA on CNB were upgraded to PT on excision specimens. Nine cases diagnosed as PT on CNB were diagnosed as FA on excision specimens. These included conventional, cellular, juvenile, and complex FA types. Three PTs, which were reported as FA on CNB, measured 6, 12.5, and 17.5 cm in the greatest dimension. Among 23 cases of PT which were further categorized on CNB, tumor categories changed on excision specimens in three cases. The diagnostic accuracy of CNB diagnosis was 90.4%. Conclusion CNB diagnosis showed good accuracy. PT diagnosis should be strongly considered in all tumors measuring >5 cm, especially those exceeding 10 cm. Cellular, juvenile, and complex FAs can be misdiagnosed as PT on CNB. Correlation with clinical and radiological findings can be helpful in establishing correct diagnosis.

Clinicopathological Study of Fibroepithelial Lesions of the Breast in a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India

Introduction Fibroepithelial lesions of the breast mainly include fibroadenoma and phyllodes tumors with overlapping morphological features and varied clinical behavior. This study aims to determine the histopathological spectrum of fibroepithelial lesions of the breast in a tertiary care hospital. Methods This is a cross-sectional study that was carried out in the pathology department from 1st January 2015 to 31st December 2023. Relevant data of all fibroepithelial lesions reported during the study period were retrieved from the medical records, tabulated, and analyzed. The Pearson chi-square test was used to determine the significant association between the various clinicopathological parameters of fibroepithelial lesions. A p-value of less than 0.05 was taken as statistically significant. Results Out of a total of 195 fibroepithelial lesions, 185 (95%) were fibroadenoma, 07 (3.5%) were phyllodes tumors, and three (1.5%) were fibroadenoma with tubular adenoma. The most common age group was 21 to 40 years, with the majority of phyllodes tumors being more than 5 cm in size compared to fibroadenomas. The association between the clinicopathological characteristics such as age of patients, tumor size, and histological grade was statistically insignificant in this study. Conclusions The implementation and usage of morphological diagnostic criteria will help in diagnosing and categorizing this broad group of fibroepithelial lesions, thereby facilitating appropriate treatment for patients.

Differentiation between Phyllodes Tumors and Fibroadenomas through Breast Ultrasound: Deep-Learning Model Outperforms Ultrasound Physicians

The preoperative differentiation of breast phyllodes tumors (PTs) from fibroadenomas (FAs) plays a critical role in identifying an appropriate surgical treatment. Although several imaging modalities are available, reliable differentiation between PT and FA remains a great challenge for radiologists in clinical work. Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted diagnosis has shown promise in distinguishing PT from FA. However, a very small sample size was adopted in previous studies. In this work, we retrospectively enrolled 656 breast tumors (372 FAs and 284 PTs) with 1945 ultrasound images in total. Two experienced ultrasound physicians independently evaluated the ultrasound images. Meanwhile, three deep-learning models (i.e., ResNet, VGG, and GoogLeNet) were applied to classify FAs and PTs. The robustness of the models was evaluated by fivefold cross validation. The performance of each model was assessed by using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were also calculated. Among the three models, the ResNet model yielded the highest AUC value, of 0.91, with an accuracy value of 95.3%, a sensitivity value of 96.2%, and a specificity value of 94.7% in the testing data set. In contrast, the two physicians yielded an average AUC value of 0.69, an accuracy value of 70.7%, a sensitivity value of 54.4%, and a specificity value of 53.2%. Our findings indicate that the diagnostic performance of deep learning is better than that of physicians in the distinction of PTs from FAs. This further suggests that AI is a valuable tool for aiding clinical diagnosis, thereby advancing precision therapy.

Diagnostic concordance of phyllodes tumour of the breast

AIMS

Phyllodes tumours (PT) are rare and distinct breast tumours, which span a morphological continuum. Classification into benign, borderline and malignant categories reflects their biology and clinical behaviour and is essential to guide management. This study aims to assess the diagnostic agreement of PT using the UK National Health Service Breast Screening Programme (NHSBSP) breast pathology external quality assurance (EQA) scheme data.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty-six PTs were identified in the EQA scheme, which were diagnosed by an average of 607 participants/circulation. Data on diagnostic categories were collected and representative slides were reviewed. The level of concordance between reporting pathologists was assessed. There were 14 benign, six borderline and six malignant PT. The overall rate of diagnosis agreement was 86% when analysed as benign lesions, borderline PT and malignant lesions, which decreased to 79% when diagnosed as PT (irrespective of grade) and to 63% when the diagnosis was further refined to PT categories (benign, borderline and malignant PTs). The highest agreement rate was observed in malignant PT (86%) and the lowest in borderline PT (42%). Malignant heterologous elements, stromal overgrowth and leaf-like architecture are features associated with higher concordance rates. Lower-priority features were stromal expansion, clefting and multinodularity.

CONCLUSION

The concordance of PT diagnosis, as an entity, is high, but its classification into benign, borderline and malignant has variable agreement levels, with borderline tumours having the lowest concordance rate. More research to refine the diagnostic criteria for categorisation of PT is warranted to improve concordance between pathologists.

Core needle biopsy in fibroepithelial tumors: predicting factors for phyllodes tumors

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical and imaging predictive factors for the diagnosis of phyllodes tumors in patients with inconclusive results from core needle biopsy (fibroepithelial lesions).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data of patients who underwent surgical excision of breast lesions previously diagnosed as fibroepithelial lesions. Numeric variables were analyzed using the Shapiro-Wilk and t-tests, and categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to calculate odds ratios and detect predictive factors for the diagnosis of PT.

RESULTS

A total of 89 biopsy samples were obtained from 77 patients, of which 43 were confirmed as fibroadenomas, 43 as phyllodes tumors, and 3 as other benign, non-fibroepithelial breast lesions. The mean tumor size was 3.61 cm (range, 0.8-10 cm) for phyllodes tumors and 2.4 cm (range, 0.8-7.9 cm) for fibroadenomas. The predictive factor for phyllodes tumor diagnosis was lesion size >3 cm (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that fibroepithelial lesions of the breast larger than 3 cm are more likely to be phyllodes tumors.

Recurrence prediction for breast phyllodes tumours: validation of the Singapore nomogram in Korean women

AIM

The Singapore nomogram was developed to predict recurrence risk of phyllodes tumours (PTs) of the breast based on histological features of stromal atypia, stromal mitoses, stromal overgrowth and surgical margin status. We aimed to validate the utility of the Singapore nomogram in a Korean PT cohort.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty-four patients with Korean PT who underwent surgical resection between 1996 and 2015 were included in this study. Pathology reports and slides were reviewed to obtain histopathologic features and acquire Singapore nomogram scores. The probability of concordance between predicted and observed survivals by means of the Singapore nomogram was evaluated using a concordance index (C-index).

RESULTS

Of the 124 cases, 57 (46%) were diagnosed as benign, 50 (40.3%) as borderline and 17 (13.7%) as malignant. Recurrences occurred in 25 (20.2%) patients. Univariate analysis showed PTs with higher stromal mitotic counts, marked stromal cellularity, stromal overgrowth, positive surgical margin, marked stromal atypia or a malignant grade presented higher risks of recurrence. Multivariate analysis showed stromal mitoses and surgical margin status independently predicted recurrence-free survival. Patients with high nomogram scores were at greater risk of recurrence (HR=1.05, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.07, p<0.001) with a C-index of 0.762.

CONCLUSION

The Singapore nomogram provided a useful means of predicting PT outcomes in a Korean PT cohort.

Fibroadenoma versus phyllodes tumor: a vexing problem revisited!

BACKGROUND

Fibroepithelial lesions of the breast include fibroadenoma (FA) and phyllodes tumor (PT). Fibroadenomas are benign while phyllodes tumor range from benign, indolent neoplasms to malignant tumors capable of distant metastasis. Our study was to determine the select cytologic features that can accurately distinguish FA from PT.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of patients who had histopathology follow up of FA or PT and on whom a pre-operative fine needle aspiration was performed. Cytologic criteria i.e. epithelial component, stromal component and background cellularity were assessed.

RESULTS

46 FA and 24 PT were specimens were reviewed. Median age and tumor size for FA and PT were 23.0 and 39.0 years, and 2.0 and 5.0 cm, respectively. Univariate analysis and regression models based on generalized estimating equations revealed that large opened out, folded epithelial sheets, frayed and irregular stromal fragment contours, spindle stromal cell nuclei, spindle cell nuclei in the background and background cell atypia are significant cytological predictors of PT. The GEE regression model achieved 78.9% diagnostic accuracy (p <  0.001) in identifying PT based on cytological features. Median epithelial: stromal ratio was 3.4 and 2.6 for FA and PT, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Presence of large, opened out, folded epithelial sheets, frayed and irregular stromal contours with spindle nuclei, background spindle cells and atypia can help distinguish PT from FA.

A novel genomic panel as an adjunctive diagnostic tool for the characterization and profiling of breast Fibroepithelial lesions

Background

Known collectively as breast fibroepithelial lesions (FELs), the common fibroadenomas (FAs) and the rarer phyllodes tumors (PTs) are a heterogenous group of biphasic neoplasms. Owing to limited tissue availability, inter-observer variability, overlapping histological features and heterogeneity of these lesions, diagnosing them accurately on core biopsies is challenging. As the choice management option depends on the histological diagnosis; a novel 16-gene panel assay was developed to improve the accuracy of preoperative diagnosis on core biopsy specimens.

Methods

Using this 16-gene panel, targeted amplicon-based sequencing was performed on 275 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) breast FEL specimens, archived at the Singapore General Hospital, from 2008 to 2012.

Results

In total, 167 FAs, 24 benign, 14 borderline and 6 malignant PTs, were profiled. Compared to FAs, PTs had significantly higher mutation rates in the TERT promoter (p <  0.001), RARA (p <  0.001), FLNA, RB1 and TP53 (p = 0.002, 0.020 and 0.018, respectively). In addition to a higher mutational count (p <  0.001), TERT promoter (p <  0.001), frameshift, nonsense and splice site (p = 0.001, < 0.001 and 0.043, respectively) mutations were also frequently observed in PTs.

A multivariate logistic regression model was built using these as variables and a predictive scoring system was developed. It classifies a FEL at low or high risk (score <  1 and ≥ 1, respectively) of being a PT. This scoring system has good discrimination (ROC area = 0.773, 95% CI: 0.70 to 0.85), calibration (p = 0.945) and is significant in predicting PTs (p <  0.001).

Conclusion

This novel study demonstrates the ability to extract DNA of sufficient quality and quantity for targeted sequencing from FFPE breast core biopsy specimens, along with their successful characterization and profiling using our customized 16-gene panel. Prospective work includes validating the utility of this promising 16-gene panel assay as an adjunctive diagnostic tool in clinical practice.

Accuracy and clinical implications of pre-operative breast core needle biopsy diagnoses of fibroepithelial neoplasms and sarcomatoid carcinomas

PURPOSE

Accurate classification of breast phyllodes tumors (PTs) on core biopsy can be challenging. The differential diagnosis of benign PT (BP) is fibroadenoma (FA), whereas the differential diagnosis of malignant PT (MP) is sarcomatoid (metaplastic) carcinoma (SC).

METHODS

Here, we compare the pre-excision core biopsy diagnosis and clinicopathologic features of histologically confirmed MP, borderline PT (BLP), BP, FA, and SC. Consecutive cases of 34 histologically confirmed PT (14 MP, 10 BLP, 10 BP), 13 SC, and 10 FA were identified.

RESULTS

A core biopsy diagnosis of SC was made only in SC (77%, p = 0.003). The diagnosis "malignant neoplasm" or "atypical spindle cell neoplasm" was made in 100% MP and 23% SC, but no other tumor (p = 0.0001). The diagnosis "phyllodes tumor" was made only in PT (44% BLP, 11% BP, p = 0.06). The diagnosis "fibroepithelial lesion" was made in 44% BLP, 67% BP, and 29% FA. The diagnosis "FA" was made most commonly in FA (57%) (versus 22% BP and no other tumor; p = 0.002). Neoadjuvant therapy was given only in SC (23%, p = 0.03); adjuvant therapy was given in 46% SC and 13% MP (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

A pre-operative core biopsy diagnosis of "malignant spindle cell neoplasm" separates MP and SC from BLP, BP, and FA. However, MP and SC can have overlapping features on core biopsy. Thus, one must be careful not to overcall SC on core biopsy, as patients diagnosed with SC may receive neoadjuvant therapy. A core biopsy diagnosis of "phyllodes tumor" is specific for PT and can guide treatment planning of a wide local excision.

A Diagnostic Approach to Fibroepithelial Breast Lesions

Fibroepithelial breast lesions encompass a heterogeneous group of neoplasms that range from benign to malignant, each exhibiting differing degrees of stromal proliferation in relation to the epithelial compartment. Fibroadenomas are common benign neoplasms that may be treated conservatively. Phyllodes tumors are relatively rare lesions, and classified as benign, borderline, or malignant based on histologic evaluation of various parameters. The diagnostic interpretation of "gray-zone" fibroepithelial lesions often imposes formidable demands on a pathologist's skills. This article offers practical recommendations for the diagnostic workup of these lesions, including the appropriate utilization of ancillary investigations and the approach to core needle biopsies.

Phyllodes tumours of the breast: a consensus review

Phyllodes tumours constitute an uncommon but complex group of mammary fibroepithelial lesions. Accurate and reproducible grading of these tumours has long been challenging, owing to the need to assess multiple stratified histological parameters, which may be weighted differently by individual pathologists. Distinction of benign phyllodes tumours from cellular fibroadenomas is fraught with difficulty, due to overlapping microscopic features. Similarly, separation of the malignant phyllodes tumour from spindle cell metaplastic carcinoma and primary breast sarcoma can be problematic. Phyllodes tumours are treated by surgical excision. However, there is no consensus on the definition of an appropriate surgical margin to ensure completeness of excision and reduction of recurrence risk. Interpretive subjectivity, overlapping histological diagnostic criteria, suboptimal correlation between histological classification and clinical behaviour and the lack of robust molecular predictors of outcome make further investigation of the pathogenesis of these fascinating tumours a matter of active research. This review consolidates the current understanding of their pathobiology and clinical behaviour, and includes proposals for a rational approach to the classification and management of phyllodes tumours.

IMP3 Is Strongly Expressed in Malignant Phyllodes Tumors of the Breast

Background. Phyllodes tumors (PTs) of the breast are rare biphasic neoplasms and are classified as benign, borderline, or malignant. Many biological markers have been studied to discriminate between different grades of PTs. IMP3 is a member of the insulin-like growth factor II mRNA binding protein (IMP) family and is expressed in developing tissues during embryogenesis, whereas in adult tissues it is found only at low or undetectable levels. IMP3 is considered a marker of biological aggressiveness in many cancers, including breast and lung. The aim of this study was to evaluate the immunohistochemical expression of IMP3 in a series of PTs and to determine its association with histological grade and clinical outcome. Materials and Methods. We reviewed retrospectively 62 cases of PTs including their recurrences and 20 cases of fibroadenoma. PTs have been classified as benign in 40 cases, borderline in 13 cases, and malignant in 9 cases. Results. There were significant differences in IMP3 expression: in malignant PTs IMP3 expression was higher (56% of cases) than in borderline (15%) and benign cases (5%), ( P = .001). Fibroadenoma showed no expression for IMP3. IMP3 expression was different in cases with recurrence than cases without recurrence. Furthermore, 3 of the recurrences had a higher histological grade with a positive IMP3 expression compared with the primary tumor. Conclusions. This is the first study evaluating the IMP3 immunohistochemical expression in PTs. Its expression correlates with histological grade and could be used in the differential diagnosis of fibroepithelial tumors and in predicting a more aggressive behavior.

Frequent MED12 mutations in phyllodes tumours of the breast

BACKGROUND

Phyllodes tumours are rare fibroepithelial tumours of the breast, that include benign, borderline, and malignant lesions. Although the molecular basis of phyllodes tumours largely remains unknown, a recent exome study identified MED12 mutations as a sole recurrent genetic alteration in fibroadenoma, a common benign fibroepithelial tumour that shares some histological features with the phyllodes tumour.

METHODS

Forty-six phyllodes tumours and 58 fibroadenomas of the breast were analysed for MED12 mutations by using Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

MED12 mutations were identified in 37 out of the 46 phyllodes tumours (80%). The prevalence of MED12 mutations was similar among benign (15/18, 83%), borderline (12/15, 80%), and malignant tumours (10/13, 77%). MED12 mutations were also identified in 36 of the 58 fibroadenomas (62%). The mutations were frequent among intracanalicular-type (24/32, 75%) and complex-type lesions (4/6, 67%), but were significantly less common among the pericanalicular-type lesions (8/20, 40%). A microdissection-based analysis showed that MED12 mutations were confined to the stromal components in both phyllodes tumours and fibroadenomas.

CONCLUSIONS

MED12 mutations were frequent among the phyllodes tumours of the breast, regardless of the tumour grade. Phyllodes tumours and fibroadenomas share, at least in part, a common genetic background.

Phyllodes tumour among participants in screening mammography

BACKGROUND

In screening, the distinction between phyllodes tumour (PT) and fibroadenoma (FA) is imprecise, often needing surgery.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study and literature review, we wished to (i) present our experience with PT diagnosed among screening participants; (ii) identify discriminating features between FA and PT; (iii) assess the efficacy of cancer screening in identifying PT; and (iv) for women diagnosed with PT, determine appropriate breast cancer screening schedules.

RESULTS

During a 23.7 years time frame, PT was diagnosed in 30 women, reflecting an incidence of 2.53 per 100 000 women screened. Only 22 (73.3%) PT were found by screening. The remaining eight (26.7%) presented as interval tumours. Thirteen PT were benign, eight borderline and nine malignant. Six of eight (75%) malignant PT were symptomatic. A circumscribed mass, mean diameter 34.7 mm, was the dominant finding. Enlargement (14 imaging, seven clinical) was documented in 21 (70%) cases. Diagnostic open biopsy was required in 67.9%. Follow-up of at least 12 months is available in 20 cases. Only two developed recurrence. One woman died of metastatic PT and one PT recurred locally.

CONCLUSION

The extreme rarity of PT in screening contrasts with the prevalence of FAs. The peak incidence of PT in women is 40-50, whereas screening is targeted at women 50-74. Two yearly screening mammography is not designed to detect PT reliably. In particular, malignant PT grows rapidly and becomes symptomatic. Women with benign PT can continue with screening. Women with borderline and malignant PT should resume screening after 5 years of specialist surveillance.

Application of immunohistochemistry in breast pathology: a review and update

CONTEXT

Immunohistochemistry is a valuable tool in routine breast pathology, used for both diagnostic and prognostic parameters. The diagnostic immunomarkers are the scope of this review. Most breast lesions can be diagnosed on routine hematoxylin-eosin sections; however, in several scenarios, such as morphologically equivocal cases or metastatic tumors of unknown primary, the appropriate application of immunohistochemistry adds true value in reaching an accurate diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic utility of the most commonly studied immunomarkers in the field of breast pathology by review of the literature, using the database of indexed articles in PubMed (US National Library of Medicine, Bethesda, Maryland) from 1976 to 2013.

DATA SOURCES

Literature review, and author's research data and personal practice experience.

CONCLUSIONS

The appropriate use of immunohistochemistry by applying a panel of immunomarkers and using a standardized technical and interpretational method will complement the morphologic assessment and aid in the accurate classification of difficult breast lesions and the identification of metastasis from a breast primary.

A subset of malignant phyllodes tumors express p63 and p40: a diagnostic pitfall in breast core needle biopsies

Breast phyllodes tumors are rare fibroepithelial neoplasms of variable grade, and one key differential of malignant phyllodes on core biopsy is sarcomatoid carcinoma. p63 is reported to be sensitive and specific for sarcomatoid carcinoma, with rare expression in phyllodes in limited series. The p63 deltaNp63 isoform, p40, is postulated to be more specific for squamous differentiation but has not previously been evaluated in breast phyllodes or sarcomatoid carcinoma. Tissue microarrays containing 34 unambiguous phyllodes tumors (10 benign, 10 borderline, 14 malignant), 13 sarcomatoid carcinomas, and 10 fibroadenomas were labeled by immunohistochemistry for p63, p40, CD34, and cytokeratins AE1/AE3, 34betaE12, and CK8/18. No borderline phyllodes tumor, benign phyllodes tumor, or fibroadenoma labeled with p63, p40, or cytokeratin. However, p63 labeled 57% malignant phyllodes tumors and 62% sarcomatoid carcinomas, and p40 labeled 29% malignant phyllodes (focal) and 46% sarcomatoid carcinomas. Among established markers, cytokeratins labeled 21% malignant phyllodes tumors (focal) and 100% sarcomatoid carcinomas. CD34 labeled 57% malignant phyllodes tumors and no sarcomatoid carcinomas. Focal p63, p40, and cytokeratin labeling can be seen in malignant phyllodes tumors but not in lower-grade fibroepithelial lesions, and immunoreactivity with these markers alone is not diagnostic of sarcomatoid carcinoma on core needle biopsy. In the differential diagnosis of malignant phyllodes, p40 is a more specific but less sensitive marker of sarcomatoid carcinoma than p63. These results are consistent with the sarcoma literature in which p63 labeling has been increasingly reported and suggest caution in classifying malignant spindle cell tumors of the breast on core biopsy.

Interobserver variability by pathologists in the distinction between cellular fibroadenomas and phyllodes tumors

Fibroepithelial lesions with cellular stroma are frequently termed cellular fibroadenomas although criteria for distinguishing them from a phyllodes tumor are vague and subjective. However, the clinical implications and surgical management for these 2 lesions may be different. We randomly selected 21 cases of fibroepithelial lesions sent in consultation to the senior author that were challenging to classify as cellular fibroadenoma or phyllodes tumor. One to 2 representative slides of each case along with patient age were sent to 10 pathologists who specialize in breast pathology. The World Health Organization criteria for phyllodes tumors and a diagnosis form were included with the study set. For the purposes of data reporting, fibroadenoma and cellular fibroadenoma are considered together. In only 2 cases was there uniform agreement as to whether the tumor represented a fibroadenoma or phyllodes tumor. Of the remaining 19 cases, if the diagnoses of fibroadenoma and benign phyllodes tumor were combined and separated from borderline and malignant phyllodes tumors, there was 100% agreement in 53% of cases and 90% agreement in 79% of cases. This study highlights the difficulty that exists in distinguishing some cellular fibroadenomas from phyllodes tumors even for pathologists who specialize in breast pathology. However, there appears to be considerable agreement when cellular fibroadenomas and benign phyllodes tumors are distinguished from borderline and malignant phyllodes tumors. Further studies are needed to determine if there is a clinically significant difference between cellular fibroadenomas and benign phyllodes tumors and how to better distinguish them from borderline and malignant phyllodes tumors.

Fibroepithelial tumors of the breast: pathologic and immunohistochemical features and molecular mechanisms

CONTEXT

The 2 main prototypes of fibroepithelial tumors of the breast include fibroadenoma and phyllodes tumor (PT). Although both tumors share some overlapping histologic features, there are significant differences in their clinical behavior and management. Phyllodes tumors have been further divided into clinically relevant subtypes, and there is more than one classification scheme for PT currently in use, suggesting a lack of consistency within different practices. Accurate differentiation between fibroadenoma and PT, as well as the grading of PT, may sometimes be challenging on preoperative core needle biopsy. Some immunohistochemical markers have been suggested to aid in the pathologic classification of these lesions.

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the salient histopathologic features of fibroepithelial tumors and review the molecular pathways proposed for the initiation, progression, and metastasis of PTs. Also, to provide an update on immunohistochemical markers that may be useful in their differential diagnosis and outline the practice and experience at our institution from a pathologic perspective.

DATA SOURCES

Sources included published articles from peer-reviewed journals in PubMed (US National Library of Medicine).

CONCLUSIONS

Fibroepithelial tumor of the breast is a heterogenous group of lesions ranging from fibroadenoma at the benign end of the spectrum to malignant PT. There are overlapping histologic features among various subtypes, and transformation and progression to a more malignant phenotype may also occur. Given the significant clinical differences within various subtypes, accurate pathologic classification is important for appropriate management. Although some immunohistochemical markers may be useful in this differential diagnosis, histomorphology still remains the gold standard.

A subset of malignant phyllodes tumors harbors alterations in the Rb/p16 pathway

Breast phyllodes tumors are fibroepithelial neoplasms with variable risk of aggressive local recurrence and distant metastasis, and the molecular pathogenesis is unclear. Here, we systematically study p16 and Rb expression in 34 phyllodes tumors in relation to proliferation. Tissue microarrays were constructed from 10 benign, 10 borderline, and 14 malignant phyllodes (5 cores/tumor) and from 10 fibroadenomas (2 cores/tumor). Tissue microarrays were labeled by immunohistochemistry for p16, Rb, and Ki-67 and by in situ hybridization for high-risk human papillomavirus. Cytoplasmic and nuclear p16 were scored by percentage labeling (0%-100%, diffuse >95%) and intensity. Nuclear Rb was scored by percentage labeling (0%-100%, diffuse >75%) and intensity. p16 and Rb labeling were repeated on whole sections of cases with Rb loss on the tissue microarray. Twenty-nine percent (4/14) malignant phyllodes showed diffuse strong p16 labeling with Rb loss in malignant cells (diffuse p16+/Rb-), whereas 21% (3/14) malignant phyllodes showed the reverse pattern of p16 loss with diffuse strong Rb (p16-/diffuse Rb+). Results were consistent between tissue microarrays and whole sections. No borderline phyllodes, benign phyllodes, or fibroadenoma showed diffuse p16+/Rb- or p16-/diffuse Rb+ phenotypes. No cases contained high-risk human papillomavirus. Average Ki-67 proliferation indices were 15% in malignant phyllodes, 1.7% in borderline phyllodes, 0.5% in benign phyllodes, and 0% in fibroadenoma. Ki-67 was highest in malignant phyllodes with diffuse p16+/Rb- labeling. In summary, 50% malignant phyllodes display evidence of Rb/p16 pathway alterations, likely reflecting p16 or Rb inactivation. These and other mechanisms may contribute to the increased proliferation in malignant phyllodes relative to other fibroepithelial neoplasms.

Myoepithelial and epithelial-myoepithelial, mesenchymal and fibroepithelial breast lesions: updates from the WHO Classification of Tumours of the Breast 2012

In the 4th edition of the WHO Classification of Tumours of the Breast, myoepithelial lesions are retitled myoepithelial and epithelial-myoepithelial lesions in order to better reflect the dual participation of luminal and myoepithelial compartments in some key entities. Malignant myoepithelioma, described as a section within the chapter on myoepithelial lesions in the 3rd edition, is recognised in the 4th edition as part of metaplastic carcinoma. Adenomyoepithelioma with malignancy is categorised in terms of the cellular component undergoing malignant transformation. The list of antibodies that can be used for identifying myoepithelial cells is updated. Among mesenchymal lesions, new additions are nodular fasciitis and atypical vascular lesions, while the haemangiopericytoma is removed. The 3rd edition stated that pathological prediction of behaviour of phyllodes tumours is difficult in the individual case. In the 4th edition, some progress has been made in prioritisation and weighting of histological parameters that can potentially estimate probability of recurrence. The WHO Working Group advocates leaning towards a diagnosis of fibroadenoma in cases where there is histological uncertainty in distinction from a benign phyllodes tumour, or adopting the neutral term 'benign fibroepithelial neoplasm', as the clinical behaviour of fibroadenoma overlaps with that of benign phyllodes tumour. The 3rd edition terminology of 'periductal stromal sarcoma' is revised to 'periductal stromal tumour', akin to the widespread consensus to avoid the use of the term 'cystosarcoma' in the context of phyllodes tumours.

Benign breast lesions: Ultrasound

Benign breast diseases constitute a heterogeneous group of lesions arising in the mammary epithelium or in other mammary tissues, and they may also be linked to vascular, inflammatory or traumatic pathologies. Most lesions found in women consulting a physician are benign. Ultrasound (US) diagnostic criteria indicating a benign lesion are described as well as US findings in the most frequent benign breast lesions.