Targeted labeling with tissue marking dyes guided by magnifying endoscopy of endoscopic submucosal dissection specimen improves the accuracy of endoscopic and histopathological diagnosis of early gastric cancer: a before–after study

BACKGROUND

Although histopathological evaluation after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is critical to assess the accuracy of endoscopic diagnosis, it is still challenging to perform precise endoscopic to pathological evaluation. We evaluated the importance of tissue marking dye (TMD)-targeted marking for post-ESD specimen guided by magnificent endoscope on histopathological accuracy and endoscopic-to-histopathological reconstruction.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 81 specimens resected by ESD [43 without TMD marking (N-TMD group), and 38 specimens with TMD-targeted cancerous areas marking guided by post-procedural magnifying endoscopy on resected specimens (TMD group)] between January 31, 2019, and January 31, 2022 at the Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University were included in the study. The baseline characteristics of patients, discrepancies between endoscopic and histopathological diagnosis, and the impact of TMD on histopathological diagnosis and reconstruction were analyzed.

RESULTS

Discrepancies between endoscopic (pre-ESD) and histopathological (post-ESD) diagnosis increased significantly in TMD group (68.4% (26/38) for tumor areas, 26.3% (10/38) for tumor margins, and 26.3% (10/38) for tumor differentiations) when compared with N-TMD group (p < 0.0001). Deeper sections were achieved in all TMD-marked resected lesions and 27.9% (12/43) lesions in the N-TMD group (p < 0.001). More pathological evaluations in TMD group were changed from curative resection to non-curative resection [6/38(15.8%) vs 1/43(2.3%)] compared with N-TMD group (p < 0.0001). TMD-targeted marking also improved the efficiency of histopathological reconstruction on pre-procedural endoscopic images and benefit endoscopists training.

CONCLUSION

TMD-targeted labeling on resected specimens could improve precise endoscopic-to-pathological diagnosis, reconstruction by point-to-point marking and benefit endoscopists training.

Type 1 Gastric Neuroendocrine Tumor Found on Endoscopic Polypectomy

Gastric neuroendocrine tumors (GNET) are rare gastric neoplasms accounting for <1% of all gastric neoplasms. The World Health Organization (WHO) categorized these neoplasms as types 1-3 to help predict malignant potential and long-term survival and guide management. Improved outcomes have been shown with endoscopic resections, but further studies are needed to confirm the best approach. We present a case of a 56-year-old woman who demonstrated the classic features of type one GNET with mucosal and submucosal involvement in the setting of primary atrophic gastritis, secondary hypergastrinemia, and underlying pernicious anemia. In general, standardizing treatment has been difficult due to a variable presentation.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy plus simultaneous versus staged cytoreductive surgery for gastric cancer with occult peritoneal metastasis

BACKGROUND

Our aim is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two treatment strategies, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) plus simultaneous versus staged cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in patients with occult peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 26 GC patients who were potential curatively resectable by pre-operative evaluation and found occult peritoneal metastasis by diagnostic laparoscopy. Patients were treated by HIPEC plus either simultaneous CRS (CRS+HIPEC group, n = 11) or staged CRS after systematic chemotherapy (HIPEC+Chemo+CRS group, n = 15).

RESULTS

There is no mortality observed in both groups. The treatment complications in two group is comparable (P = 0.683), with 26.7% (4/15) in HIPEC+Chemo+CRS group, and 36.4% (4/11) in CRS+HIPEC group, respectively. The compliance of patients undergoing subsequent chemotherapy is higher in HIPEC+Chemo+CRS group (93.3%, 14/15) than that of CRS+HIPEC group (45.5%, 5/11) (P = 0.021). The mean interval time between CRS and first post-CRS systematic chemotherapy were 42.0 ± 12.0 days in HIPEC+Chemo+CRS group versus 69.8 ± 36.3 in CRS+HIPEC group (P = 0.163), respectively. The median OS in the HIPEC+Chemo+CRS group was 25.0 months, while 28.2 months in the CRS+HIPEC group (P = 0.738).

CONCLUSION

For resectable GC patients with laparoscopic findings of occult peritoneal metastasis, HIPEC plus staged CRS is with better tolerance and compliance than simultaneous CRS.

Proposal for a standardized pathology report of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: prognostic significance of pathological parameters

Background

There is confusion in the diagnosis and biological behaviors of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs), because of independently proposed nomenclatures and classifications. A standardized form of pathology report is required for the proper management of patients.

Methods

We discussed the proper pathological evaluation of GEP-NET at the consensus conference of the subcommittee meeting for the Gastrointestinal Pathology Study Group of the Korean Society of Pathologists. We then verified the prognostic significance of pathological parameters from our previous nationwide collection of pathological data from 28 hospitals in Korea to determine the essential data set for a pathology report.

Results

Histological classification, grading (mitosis and/or Ki-67 labeling index), T staging (extent, size), lymph node metastasis, and lymphovascular and perineural invasion were significant prognostic factors and essential for the pathology report of GEP-NET, while immunostaining such as synaptophysin and chromogranin may be optional. Furthermore, the staging system, either that of the 2010 American Joint Cancer Committee (AJCC) or the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS), should be specified, especially for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms.

Conclusions

A standardized pathology report is crucial for the proper management and prediction of prognosis of patients with GEP-NET.

Pathology reporting of neuroendocrine tumors: essential elements for accurate diagnosis, classification, and staging

Much recent debate has focused on the optimal classification of epithelial neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Multiple different systems of terminology, grading, and staging have been proposed, and some systems combine elements of grade and stage into a single prognostic classification. Recently, national and international consensus groups have attempted to standardize the classification of NETs, especially for those arising in the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas. Furthermore, the recognition that common classification criteria (such as proliferative rate) span multiple different systems allows the basic data necessary to predict outcome and tailor therapy to be included in pathology reports, even though a single uniform system of terminology may remain elusive. Formal tumor-node-metastasis (TNM)-based staging systems also have been developed recently, and advances in the treatment of some NETs (pancreatic in particular) are pointing towards the need to assess therapeutic biomarkers in routine practice. This review will present the most widely used systems for classifying, grading, and staging NETs and will summarize the recommendations for the data to be included in standard pathology reports of these uncommon tumors.

Pathology - grading and staging of GEP-NETs

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs) constitute a heterogeneous group of neoplasms. In the last few decades, due to a substantial rise in incidence and prevalence, GEP-NETs have been included among the most common tumours of the gastrointestinal tract. Diagnosis could be challenging and a significant number of patients present with metastatic or unresectable disease. The development of appropriate tools for standardised prognostic stratification and the introduction of effective target therapies have opened new horizons for planning tailored surgical or medical management and follow-up programs for these complex neoplasms. An overview on the GEP-NETs' diagnostic and prognostic criteria proposed by the recently published WHO classification and ENETS and UICC TNM staging systems is presented, focussing on their impact on the clinical and therapeutical approaches.

Conundrums and Caveats in Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Pancreas

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (Pan-NETs) are the second most common epithelial neoplasm of the pancreas after ductal adenocarcinoma. They can be clinically defined as functional, nonfunctional, and hereditary. This review addresses typical and atypical pathologic features of Pan-NETs, with a focus on practical issues involved in differential diagnosis, immunohistochemical work-up, intraoperative frozen section interpretation, sources of diagnostic errors, and classification. The diagnosis of a Pan-NET requires analysis of all available clinical and radiographic information and pathologic characteristics of the tumor, and it is crucial to understand the clinical impact of the pathologic interpretation.

A clinical perspective on gastric neuroendocrine neoplasia

The incidence of gastric neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has increased exponentially based on widespread use of endoscopy and a greater pathological awareness of the condition. A key concern is the potential association with hypergastrinemia induced by proton pump inhibitor administration. Previous confusion regarding diagnosis and therapy has been diminished by a series of international consensus statements defining the biology and management strategies for the disease. Overall, gastric NETs are categorized as well-differentiated or poorly differentiated neoplasms. Well-differentiated gastric NETs are enterochromaffin-like (ECL) cell tumors subclassified into three types based on their relationship to gastrin, a key regulator of ECL cell neoplastic transformation. The treatment of type 1 and type 2 tumors depends on the size and invasiveness of the tumor, whereas type 3 tumors and poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas warrant aggressive surgical resection. The disease-specific 5-year survival ranges from about 95% in type 1 gastric carcinoids to about 25% in poorly differentiated gastric NECs. Elucidation of the precise biology of a gastric NET is critical to diagnosis and delineation of a type-specific management strategy.

The pathologic classification of neuroendocrine tumors: a review of nomenclature, grading, and staging systems

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) arise in most organs of the body and share many common pathologic features. However, a variety of different organ-specific systems have been developed for nomenclature, grading, and staging of NETs, causing much confusion. This review examines issues in the pathologic assessment of NETs that are common among primaries of different sites. The various systems of nomenclature are compared along with new proposal for grading and staging NETs. Although differences persist, there are many common themes, such as the distinction of well-differentiated (low and intermediate-grade) from poorly differentiated (high-grade) NETs and the significance of proliferative rate in prognostic assessment. A recently published minimum pathology data set is presented to help standardize the information in pathology reports. Although an ultimate goal of standardizing the pathologic classification of all NETs, irrespective of primary site, remains elusive, an understanding of the common themes among the different current systems will permit easier translation of information relevant to prognosis and treatment.

NANETS treatment guidelines: well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors of the stomach and pancreas

Well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the stomach and pancreas represent 2 major subtypes of gastrointestinal NETs. Historically, there has been little consensus on the classification and management of patients with these tumor subtypes. We provide an overview of well-differentiated NETs of the stomach and pancreas and describe consensus guidelines for the treatment of patients with these malignancies.