Comparison of the effectiveness of polymerase chain reaction and enzyme immunoassay in detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in different female genitourinary specimens

Analysis of laboratory testing results collected in an enhanced chlamydia surveillance system in Australia, 2008-2010

BACKGROUND

Chlamydial infection is the most common notifiable disease in Australia, Europe and the US. Australian notifications of chlamydia rose four-fold from 20,274 cases in 2002 to 80,846 cases in 2011; the majority of cases were among young people aged less than 29 years. Along with test positivity rates, an understanding of the number of tests performed and the demographics of individuals being tested are key epidemiological indicators. The ACCESS Laboratory Network was established in 2008 to address this issue.

METHODS

The ACCESS Laboratory Network collected chlamydia testing data from 15 laboratories around Australia over a three-year period using data extraction software. All chlamydia testing data from participating laboratories were extracted from the laboratory information system; patient identifiers converted to a unique, non-reversible code and de-identified data sent to a single database. Analysis of data by anatomical site included all specimens, but in age and sex specific analysis, only one testing episode was counted.

RESULTS

From 2008 to 2010 a total of 628,295 chlamydia tests were referred to the 15 laboratories. Of the 592,626 individual episodes presenting for testing, 70% were from female and 30% from male patients. In female patients, chlamydia positivity rate was 6.4% overall; the highest rate in 14 year olds (14.3%). In male patients, the chlamydia positivity rate was 9.4% overall; the highest in 19 year olds (16.5%). The most common sample type was urine (57%). In 3.2% of testing episodes, multiple anatomical sites were sampled. Urethral swabs gave the highest positivity rate for all anatomical sites in both female (7.7%) and male patients (14%), followed by urine (7.6% and 9.4%, respectively) and eye (6.3% and 7.9%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The ACCESS Laboratory Network data are unique in both number and scope and are representative of chlamydia testing in both general practice and high-risk clinics. The findings from these data highlight much lower levels of testing in young people aged 20 years or less; in particular female patients aged less than 16 years, despite being the group with the highest positivity rate. Strategies are needed to increase the uptake of testing in this high-risk group.

Comparison of Gen-probe transcription-mediated amplification, Abbott PCR, and Roche PCR assays for detection of wild-type and mutant plasmid strains of Chlamydia trachomatis in Sweden

The clinical performance of two nucleic acid amplification assays targeting the cryptic plasmid and two assays targeting rRNA molecules in Chlamydia trachomatis was examined. First-catch urine samples from Malmoe, Sweden, were tested for C. trachomatis with the Abbott real-time PCR assay m2000 and an in-house PCR for the new variant strain of C. trachomatis with a deletion in the cryptic plasmid. Aliquots of the urine samples were sent to Aarhus, Denmark, and further examined with the Roche COBAS Amplicor CT (RCA) PCR, the Gen-Probe Aptima Combo 2 assay (AC2) targeting the C. trachomatis 23S rRNA, and the Aptima C. trachomatis assay (ACT) targeting the 16S rRNA molecule. A positive prevalence of 9% (163/1,808 urine samples examined) was detected according to the combined reference standard. The clinical sensitivity and specificity of the four assays were as follows: for ACT, 100% (163/163) and 99.9% (1,643/1,645), respectively; for AC2, 100% (163/163) and 99.6% (1,640/1,645); for m2000, 68.7% (112/163) and 99.9% (1,644/1,645); for RCA, 63.8% (104/163) and 99.9% (1,643/1,645). The two Gen-Probe assays detected all mutant strains characterized by the in-house PCR as having the deletion in the cryptic plasmid, whereas the Roche and the Abbott PCRs targeting the plasmid were both unable to detect the plasmid mutant. The difference in clinical sensitivity between the plasmid PCR assays m2000 and RCA, on the one hand, and the rRNA assays AC2 and ACT, on the other, could be attributed almost exclusively to the presence of the plasmid mutant in about one-quarter of the Chlamydia-positive samples examined.

Should we consider alternatives to combined cervical and urethral swabs for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in females?

BACKGROUND

The optimum approach for detecting Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) is considered to be combined cervical and urethral testing.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the contribution of female urethral swabs in CT diagnosis and to examine alternatives.

METHOD

Urethral and endocervical samples for CT were performed on 757 sexually active female patients, >16 years, attending the genitourinary medicine clinic at Macclesfield District General Hospital from October 2005 to November 2006. Swabs were collected and transported to the laboratory in separate AC2 sample collection tubes and were tested by AC2 assay.

RESULTS

Of the 757 patients tested simultaneously by both endocervical and urethral swab, a total of 90 had CT identified by either method giving a positivity rate of 11.9%. Results for urethral and endocervical swabs were concordant in 77 patients (85.6%). Eighty two infections (91.1%) would have been diagnosed by swabbing the cervix only but an additional 8 (8.9%) were picked up by urethral swab. Urethral symptoms had been mentioned by 1 of these 8 women.

CONCLUSION

8.9% infected women were positive only on urethral swab. One of these would have been picked up owing to presenting symptoms, hence reducing the extra yield to 7.8% and leaving only 7 positives on 757 urethral swabs with a detection rate of 1% of all urethral swabs. Considering the low yield and the discomfort of urethral swabbing, an additional urethral swab appears unwarranted on grounds of both cost and patient care. As a small number of cases were detected at the urethra but not the cervix, it may be worthwhile investigating the performance of AC2 when placing an endocervical swab in first catch urine. An effective and simpler approach may be a switch to testing vaginal swabs by AC2.

Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis DNA using MagNA Pure DNA extraction and Cobas Amplicor CT/NG amplification

The automated MagNA Pure DNA extraction method for Chlamydia trachomatis was compared with the manual Cobas Amplicor protocol using 100 microL of input sample volume from 964 specimens. Agreement between protocols was 96.1%. The automated extraction method had a sensitivity of 99% and a specificity of 100%. Amplification inhibition observed after manual preparation of samples (3.8%) was not apparent following automated extraction. Using 200 microL of sample in the automated extraction process lowered the detection limit without raising the inhibition rate. Furthermore, the automated extraction method halved the hands-on time required for the procedure.

Interactive video behavioral intervention to reduce adolescent females’ STD risk: a randomized controlled trial

A longitudinal randomized design was used to evaluate the impact of a theoretically based, stand-alone interactive video intervention on 300 urban adolescent girls' (a) knowledge about sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), (b) self-reported sexual risk behavior, and (c) STD acquisition. It was compared to two controls, representing high-quality informational interventions. One used the same content in book form; the other used commercially available brochures. Following randomization, the interventions were administered at baseline, with booster sessions at 1, 3, and 6 months. Self-reports revealed that those assigned to the interactive video were significantly more likely to be abstinent in the first 3 months following initial exposure to the intervention, and experienced fewer condom failures in the following 3 months, compared to controls. Six months after enrollment, participants in the video condition were significantly less likely to report having been diagnosed with an STD. A non-significant trend in data from a clinical PCR assay of Chlamydia trachomatis was consistent with that finding.

Performance characteristics of the Becton Dickinson ProbeTec System for direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in male and female urine specimens in comparison with the Roche Cobas System

OBJECTIVE

The Becton Dickinson BDProbeTec ET System is a new semiautomated system using strand displacement amplification technology that simultaneously amplifies and detects Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae DNA. The strand displacement amplification products are hybridized with a fluorescent detector probe and are captured by a chemiluminescent assay in a microwell format. An amplification control is also included to monitor assay inhibition. This study evaluated the performance of the BDProbTec ET system in detecting C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae in male and female urine specimens, calculated its ability to process large volumes of specimens, and determined the inhibition rate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight hundred twenty-five male and 399 female urine specimens were tested for both C trachomatis and N gonorrhoeae with the BDProbeTec ET system, and results were compared with those of the Roche Amplicor Cobas system. All urine specimens were processed on both assays on the same day they were received, according to the manufacturers' instructions. Discrepant results were resolved by in-house polymerase chain reaction assays. Internal or amplification controls were also used in each specimen assay to monitor inhibition. The throughput of the BDProbTec ET system was further tested with 150 urine specimens on an 8-hour shift for 2 days.

RESULTS

The overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predicative value, and negative predicative value for for detection of chlamydia were 95.3%, 99.3%, 95.9%, and 99.2% for strand displacement amplification and 95.9%, 98.3%, 90.6%, and 99.3% for the Roche Amplicor system. For detection of gonorrhea, these values were 100%, 99.7%, 88.2%, and 100% and 96.7%, 98.9%, 69%, and 99.9%, respectively. The overall inhibition rates for both strand displacement amplification and Roche Amplicor were less than 3.5%. The BDProbTec ET system was able to produce 150 results each for chlamydia and gonorrhea and the internal control within the 8-hour shift.

CONCLUSIONS

The performance characteristics of the BDProbeTec ET assay are similar to those of the Roche Amplicor polymerase chain reaction for detection of chlamydia and gonorrhea in male and female urine specimens. The system was able to produce 300 results in an 8-hour shift.