Renal cell carcinoma, chromophobe type, with collecting duct carcinoma and sarcomatoid components

Detection of two synchronous histologically different renal cell carcinoma subtypes in the same kidney: a case report and review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the dominant primary renal malignant neoplasm, encompassing a significant portion of renal tumors. The presence of synchronous yet histologically distinct ipsilateral RCCs, however, is an exceptionally uncommon phenomenon that is rather under-described in the literature regarding etiology, diagnosis, management, and later outcomes during follow-up.

CASE PRESENTATION

We aim to present the 9th case of a combination chromophobe RCC (ChRCC) and clear cell RCC (ccRCC) in literature, according to our knowledge, for a 69-year-old North African, Caucasian female patient who, after complaining of loin pain and hematuria, was found to have two right renal masses with preoperative computed tomography (CT) and underwent right radical nephrectomy. Pathological examination later revealed the two renal masses to be of different histologic subtypes.

CONCLUSION

The coexistence of dissimilar RCC subtypes can contribute to diverse prognostic implications. Further research should focus on enhancing the complex, yet highly crucial, preoperative detection and pathological examination to differentiate multiple renal lesions. Planning optimal operative techniques (radical or partial nephrectomy), selecting suitable adjuvant regimens, and reporting long-term follow-up outcomes of patients in whom synchronous yet different RCC subtypes were detected are of utmost importance.

Sarcomatoid Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Patient: Female, 63

Final Diagnosis: Sarcomatoid chromophobe renal cell carcinoma

Symptoms: Painless gross hematuria

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: —

Specialty: Renal Surgery

A Composite Renal Tumor with Dual Differentiation, Chromophobe and Collecting Duct Carcinoma

Chromophobe carcinoma constitutes a small subset of all renal carcinomas. Within this category, rare tumors with divergent differentiation have been recognized. Herein, we report a rare case of composite chromophobe and collecting duct carcinoma and describe its pathologic and clinical features.

Primary collision tumors of the kidney composed of oncocytoma and papillary renal cell carcinoma: A review

BACKGROUND

There are well known cases of hybrid tumors of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and oncocytoma in kidney, where both tumors have the same cell of origin - intercalated cell of the collecting duct. However, collision tumors composed of neoplasms originating from different cell lineages such as oncocytoma and papillary RCC are extremely rare. Herein, we made a collective literature review of reported cases of collision tumors composed of oncocytoma and papillary RCC, adding a case that we recently experienced.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A PubMed database was search for collision tumors of the kidney composed of oncocytoma and papillary RCC and a collective literature review was made. To this cohort, we also added a recently encountered case with similar, confirmed by immunohistochemistry, morphological features.

RESULTS

To date 8 cases of a collision tumor composed of papillary RCC and oncocytoma have been described in the literature. All of them had a smaller papillary RCC component present within a larger oncocytoma.

CONCLUSION

Because of a few cases of such a collision tumors reported, it is difficult to make classification and right clinical management of these patients. None of the reported cases had tumor recurrence or progression on a follow-up. The presence of only small portion of papillary RCC in a large oncocytoma raises a possibility of under-sampling of malignant component in large oncocytomas in core biopsy or surgically resected specimens. We recommend better sampling, particularly at the periphery of otherwise classic oncocytomas to unveil this possible association.

Adult Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Review of Established Entities from Morphology to Molecular Genetics

According to the current World Health Organization (WHO), renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) that primarily affect adults are classified into 8 major subtypes. Additional emerging entities in renal neoplasia have also been recently recognized and these are discussed in further detail by Mehra et al (Emerging Entities in Renal Neoplasia, Surgical Pathology Clinics, 2015, Volume 8, Issue 4). In most cases, the diagnosis of a RCC subtype can be based on morphologic criteria, but in some circumstances the use of ancillary studies can aid in the diagnosis. This review discusses the morphologic, genetic, and molecular findings in RCCs previously recognized by the WHO, and provides clues to distinction from each other and some of the newer subtypes of RCC. As prognosis and therapeutic options vary for the different subtypes of RCC, accurate pathologic distinction is critical for patient care.

Collision tumor of the kidney composed of clear cell carcinoma and collecting duct carcinoma: report of a case with unusual morphology and clinical follow-up

We report the case of a 67-year-old female who presented with a large renal mass. Gross examination of the nephrectomy specimen demonstrated a 6-cm renal mass that invaded into the renal sinus and perinephric fat. Histologic examination revealed two distinct tumor types. The first type was a conventional (clear cell) renal cell carcinoma that was of low nuclear grade and comprised the minority of the overall tumor. The second type was a high-grade collecting duct carcinoma with glandular/tubular differentiation and composed the majority of the tumor. Immunohistochemical studies demonstrated distinctive patterns of the two tumor types, thus confirming two distinct lineages. Five months postoperatively, the patient developed metastasis to the lungs and right hilar lymph node region. A fine needle aspiration of a lung nodule demonstrated a metastatic, poorly differentiated carcinoma, similar to the collecting duct carcinoma component in the kidney. Collision tumors of the kidney are rare with fewer than 10 cases reported in the literature. Our report further expands the spectrum of this rare phenomenon.

The clinical and CT imaging features of metanephric adenoma

BACKGROUND

Patients with metanephric adenoma have a good prognosis after undergoing total nephrectomy or local resection with kidney preservation. Accurate diagnosing is important for guiding clinical treatment. Only few previous case reports have been found focusing on the imaging findings of metanephric adenoma.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the multislice computed tomography (MSCT) imaging characteristics of metanephric adenoma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The imaging findings in eight patients with metanephric adenoma were studied retrospectively. MSCT was undertaken to investigate tumor location, size, attenuation, cystic or solid appearance, calcification, capsule sign, and enhancement pattern.

RESULTS

Tumors (mean diameter, 3.3 ± 1.0 cm) were solitary (8/8), solid (7/8) with cystic components (2/8), no calcifications (7/8), had a poorly-defined margin (8/8), were centered in the renal medulla (7/8), compressed the renal pelvis (3/8), and none had retroperitoneal lymph node metastasis. The attenuation of metanephric adenoma tumors was less or equal compared to the renal cortex or medulla on unenhanced CT (30.6 ± 2.6 vs. 36.3 ± 4.6 vs. 33.2 ± 3.9, P > 0.05), while tumor enhancement after administration of an contrast agent was lower than that of normal renal cortex and medulla during all phases (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Metanephric adenoma tends to be a solitary, poorly defined margin, isodense or hypodense mass arising from the renal medulla with enhancement less than the cortex and medulla during all phases.

The MSCT and MRI findings of collecting duct carcinoma

AIM

To characterize the multi-section computed tomography (MSCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of collecting duct carcinoma (CDC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty patients with CDC were studied retrospectively using MSCT (n = 20), and MSCT and MRI (n = 5). MSCT and MRI were undertaken to investigate tumour location, size, radiodensity, cystic or solid appearance, calcification, capsule, signal, enhancement pattern, and metastases.

RESULTS

Tumours (mean diameter 3.6 ± 1.7 cm) were solitary (20/20), solid (18/20), had cystic components (12/20), calcifications (12/20), poorly defined (18/20), were centred in the medulla (20/20), compressed the renal pelvis (12/20), and had lymph node metastases (2/20). On unenhanced computed tomography (CT), the radiodensity of the CDC was greater than that of the normal renal cortex or medulla (43.8 ± 2.4 versus 37.6 ± 5.1 or 32.6 ± 4.1, p = 0.041, n = 20). Five patients with CDC underwent MRI, which revealed cystic components (4/5), poorly defined CDC (5/5), and none of the patients had lymph node metastasis. The CDC was isointense on T1-weighted imaging, and iso- or hypointense on T2-weighted imaging. Enhancement was lower within the CDC than the renal cortex and medulla during all enhanced phases (p = 0.032, 0.001, 0.018, respectively, n = 20).

CONCLUSION

CDC should be considered when a renal tumour is centred in the medulla, with increased radiodensity on unenhanced CT and reduced enhancement compared to the adjacent cortex or medulla.

The multislice CT findings of renal carcinoma associated with XP11.2 translocation/TFE gene fusion and collecting duct carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Renal cell carcinoma associated with Xp11.2 translocation and TFE gene fusion (Xp11.2/TFE RCC), and collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) are uncommon subtypes of renal cell carcinomas.

PURPOSE

To investigate the multislice CT (MSCT) characteristics of these two tumor types.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Nine patients with Xp11.2/TFE RCC and 10 patients with CDC were studied retrospectively. MSCT was undertaken to investigate differences in tumor characteristics and enhancement patterns.

RESULTS

All patients had single tumors centered in the renal medulla. Two patients with each tumor type had lymph node involvement and there was a single case of hepatic metastasis (Xp11.2/TFE RCC). The mean tumor diameter of Xp11.2/TFE RCC tumors was significantly larger than for CDC tumors. Two patients with Xp11.2/TFE RCC had cystic components as did eight patients with CDC (P < 0.05). Calcifications were present in six patients, each with CDC. Clear tumor boundaries were visible in two patients with CDC and in nine with Xp11.2/TFE RCC (P < 0.05). The density of Xp11.2/TFE RCC tumors was greater than that of CDC tumors, normal renal cortex, or medulla on unenhanced CT. Enhancement was higher with Xp11.2/TFE RCC than with CDC tumors during all phases. Xp11.2/TFE RCC enhancement was higher than in the renal medulla during cortical and medullary phase but lower than in normal renal medulla during the delayed phase. CDC tumor enhancement was lower than that for normal renal medulla during all enhanced phases.

CONCLUSION

Both tumor types originated from the renal medulla. Distinguishing features included density on unenhanced CT, enhancement patterns, and capsule signs. Identifying these differences may aid diagnosis.

A novel case of concurrent renal tumors: chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and carcinoid tumor of the kidney with brief review of renal neuroendocrine tumors

Renal cell carcinoma of chromophobe type is a malignant neoplasm with characteristic large cells that exhibit prominent cell membranes. Primary renal carcinoid tumors are rare tumors with the histological appearance similar to well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors at other sites. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation is exceedingly rare. The authors describe a case of a chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and carcinoid tumor of the kidney presenting as distinct masses in the same kidney in a 34-year-old male. The histologic and immunohistochemical features of both the tumors were characteristic with no overlapping features. The carcinoid tumor presented at a higher stage with nodal metastasis. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first case of 2 morphologically distinct tumors, one chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and the other primary carcinoid tumor in the same kidney.

The Evolving Concept of Renal Neoplasia: Impact of Emerging Molecular and Electron Microscopic Studies

The classification of renal tumors has evolved from one that initially encompassed only 2 types of tumors, i.e., clear and granular cell carcinomas, to the markedly expanded recent classification that incorporates new entities, some of which are primarily defined by specific molecular abnormalities. Despite these advances, a single tumor category, clear cell carcinoma, still incorporates the majority (approximately 70%) of renal tumors. It is, however, postulated that this single category is likely to encompass several different tumor types that are, at present, undifferentiated. Electron microscopic studies have been pivotal in defining the spectrum of oncocytoma-chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Cytoplasmic eosinophilia found in some renal cell carcinomas currently classified as clear cell type is under intense study. Tumors that have recently emerged from this group include tumors with translocations involving chromosome Xp11.2, carcinomas associated with neuroblastoma and epithelioid angiomyolipoma. The spectrum of renal tumors seen in younger patients is wider than among older patients, with rare and unusual tumors being more likely seen in younger patients. The author concludes that although the routine application of electron microscopy to kidney tumor diagnosis may not be practical, systematic ultrastructural studies of these tumors may aid in the definition of new entities.

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma was described by Thoenes et al. in 1986, and associations with carcinoma of collecting ducts, conventional renal cell carcinoma and sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma have been described. We report a case of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma which showed neuroendocrine differentiation. This is the first known case to be clearly identified as such. The patient was a 56-year-old man with constant right flank pain and hematuria; CT scan revealed an 8.5 cm nonhomogeneous mass involving the right kidney. Right radical nephrectomy was performed. The tumor showed a mixture of classical and eosinophilic patterns of chromophobe cell carcinoma. Additionally, it showed insular, glandular and rosetoid-like formations embedded in a dense eosinophilic hyaline stroma. The cells were cuboid or cylindrical with well-defined boundaries, finely stippled chromatin and a small nucleolus. The appearance of the cytoplasm varied from faintly eosinophilic to coarsely granular eosinophilic. Immunohistochemically, the neuroendocrine areas were reactive for C-kit, epithelial membrane antigen, cytokeratin, cytokeratin 7, chromogranin A, neuron-specific enolase, CD56 and S-100 protein. Our case represents a typical chromophobe carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation. Additionally, the immunohistochemical profile in both types of lesion suggests a common origin from renal tubular cells.

Squamous differentiation in a sarcomatoid chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: an unusual case report with review of the literature

We describe an extremely rare occurrence of a squamous differentiation in a sarcomatoid chromophobe renal cell carcinoma in a 45-year-old woman with nodal and lung metastasis at presentation. The tumor on histology showed all 3 components intimately admixed with each other, which to the best of our knowledge is the first such case to be reported in the literature. The renal pelvis was smooth walled and uninvolved. Kidney-specific cadherin was positive in the chromophobe renal cell carcinoma areas and negative in the sarcomatoid and squamous areas.

Chromosome 1 analysis in chromophobe renal cell carcinomas with tissue microarray (TMA)-facilitated fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) demonstrates loss of 1p/1 which is also present in renal oncocytomas

Morphologic overlap between chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) and renal oncocytomas (RO) has been widely recognized. Whether these tumors are genetically related and represent a spectrum of benign to malignant tumor progression remains an open question. We previously showed by conventional cytogenetics and fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) that the most common chromosomal abnormality in RO is loss of chromosome 1 or 1p. In this study, we evaluated chromosome 1 in ChRCC using the same set of FISH probes. Twenty-one ChRCCs from 13 men and 8 women were studied. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were used to construct tissue microarrays. A subtelomeric 1p36.3 probe was used in tandem with 1q25 probes for FISH studies. The patients ranged in age from 34 to 82 years (mean 62.8 y, median 61 y). FISH analysis showed an abnormal chromosome 1 in 20/21 (95%) ChRCCs as follows: 18 tumors (85%) had loss of entire chromosome 1, 2 tumors (10%) had loss of 1p36.3 only, and 1 tumor (5%) was apparently diploid for chromosome 1. In this study, 95% of ChRCCs showed abnormality of chromosome 1 by FISH. The progression of chromosome 1 abnormalities, from diploid to loss of 1p to loss of entire chromosome, is also present in oncocytomas. These results provide further evidence to support a genetic similarity between chromophobe carcinoma and oncocytoma. Whether abnormalities of chromosome 1 are associated with RO tumorigenesis or its progression to carcinoma requires further studies.

Simultaneous chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and squamous renal cell carcinoma

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (CHRC) is a neoplasm of the kidney with clinicopathologic peculiarities that seems to be of better prognosis than conventional renal cell carcinoma. Classical and eosinophilic types are the two histological variants recorded. Also, it has been described in association with carcinoma of collecting ducts, conventional renal cell carcinoma and sarcomatoid renal cell carcinoma. Squamous renal carcinoma is a very rare neoplasm with a malignant course. We describe a case of simultaneous chromophobe renal cell carcinoma with squamous cell carcinoma, finding which, to the best of our knowledge, has not previously been reported.

Pigmented microcystic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma

We report a case of a 60-year-old female with a pigmented microcystic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (PMCRCC). The tumor was 4.5 cm in diameter, and was located in the right kidney. Grossly, on cross section, the tumor was light gray with multiple small brown to black pigmented foci up to 0.2 cm in diameter. Histologically, the tumor showed a microcystic arrangement with cribriform areas and formation of adenomatous structures. The microcystic and cribriform areas were composed of larger pale cells and smaller eosinophilic cells, with cytological features of conventional chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (CRCC). The cytological features of the cells within the adenomatous structures were different. These cells were mostly columnar with nuclei at the base, and had a variable amount of pale to eosinophilic cytoplasm. There were foci of ample brown pigmentation located in the cytoplasm of the tumor cells and extracellularly. In addition, microscopic calcifications were present. Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for EMA, E-cadherin, cytokeratin CAM5.2, and cytokeratin AE1/AE3. Cytokeratin 7 was positive only focally. S-100 protein, melan A, HMB 45, vimentin, and CD117 were negative. PMCRCC is a rare tumor. To the best of our knowledge, only one series containing 20 cases of this variant of CRCC has been described to date. The important feature is that PMCRCC seems to have a relatively benign biological behavior, and distant metastases and sarcomatoid transformation are absent.

Aplicación clínica de las actuales clasificaciones del cáncer renal

The purpose of classifying neoplasias is to recognize groups with similar progress and prognosis and, if possible, receiving the same treatment. This is why those classifications are systematically being submitted to review and improvement through the new technologies. Differentiation of various entities in renal cancer has been comparatively fast, as the new genetic and molecular discoveries have confirmed the morphologic criteria of the different cell types, thus making it possible to open new therapeutic pathways. Using the current WHO classification we recognize subtypes with excellent prognosis (Multilocular cystic renal carcinoma, Type I renal papillary carcinoma, Tubular and fusocellular mucinous carcinoma), other very aggressive ones (Bellini's collecting duct carcinoma, Medullary carcinoma), and also that the sarcomatoid transformation, even in small areas, impacts the prognosis negatively. Childhood-characteristic renal carcinomas associated with chromosome translocations have been recognized (genetic fusion TFE3 or TFEB), as well as the family forms of renal carcinoma. Regarding the UICC (International Union Against Cancer) classification, there are a series of aspects under argument (size, venous invasion, microvascular invasion, invasion of the adipous tissue of the renal sinus) that shall be discussed too, since it is possible that some modifications of the TNM might occur in the near future.

Composite distal nephron-derived renal cell carcinoma with chromophobe and collecting duct carcinomatous elements

Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) are derived from the collecting duct epithelia, although their morphology, molecular biologic characteristics and clinical behaviors are quite different. Herein is presented a case of RCC possessing the chromophobe RCC and CDC elements occurring in a 64 year-old Japanese woman. The patient was referred to Yokohama City University Hospital with complaints of persistent back pain and fever. Radiologic examinations revealed a left renal tumor, and radical nephrectomy was performed. The patient died with multiple metastases, 8 months after the operation. The resected tumor showed an invasive growth, and its cut surface was heterogenous with hemorrhage and necrosis. Histologically, the tumor was composed of chromophobe elements with dedifferentiation, and CDC elements. The chromophobe and CDC elements had obvious histological transition. Lectin histochemistry and immunohistochemistry confirmed that this tumor was derived from the distal nephron. c-KIT, p53 and Ki67 antigen showed differential localization between the chromophobe and CDC elements, even in the transitional areas. Along with the previous reports, the present case seemed to be composite RCC derived from the collecting duct, which might present clues to elucidate carcinogenesis in the distal nephron.

Renal Tumor With Overlapping Distal Nephron Morphology and Karyotype

Although most renal epithelial tumors are derived from the proximal nephron, approximately 10% are believed to originate in the distal nephron. This latter group encompasses oncocytoma, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, and several rare types, including collecting duct carcinoma and renal medullary carcinoma. Despite progress in the classification of renal tumors, a small subset of renal carcinomas remains unclassified (ie, renal cell carcinoma, not otherwise specified). We describe a metastatic tumor consisting of cells with overlapping distal nephron morphologies, including foci of oncocytoma, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, and collecting duct carcinoma, as well as sarcomatoid dedifferentiation. Special stains were inconclusive, and ultrastructural study demonstrated abundant mitochondria and no microvesicles. The karyotype was hypodiploid with 41 chromosomes and abnormalities reported in all 3 phenotypes present. Rearrangements of 1p and of 11q13 previously seen in divergent subsets of oncocytomas were concomitantly present in the current tumor. Thus, this malignancy has features consistent with distal nephron derivation and demonstrates the convergence of the varied tumor morphologies arising within this site. Furthermore, this case exemplifies the value of cytogenetic analysis in the characterization of renal cell carcinoma, not otherwise specified. In view of recent advances in treatment approach, especially for collecting duct carcinoma, further categorization of this nondescript and heterogeneous group of renal cell carcinomas, not otherwise specified, at least by its derivation in relationship to the renal nephron (distal vs proximal), may be of value in the choice of treatment modality.