A cribriform urothelial neoplasm of the renal pelvis: an adenoid cysticlike variant of inverted urothelial papilloma or florid ureteritis cystica?

A first case report of primary epithelial myoepithelial carcinoma-like renal tumor showing a perivascular pseudorosette-like pattern: Description of morphologic, immunohistochemical, and genetic features

RATIONALE

Over the past decade, although several new entities of renal tumors have emerged, a form of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) that morphologically resembles epithelial-myoepithelial carcinoma has not been reported thus far. Herein, we describe a case of an unusual renal tumor that remained unclassified under a current RCC subtype, and briefly present its morphologic, immunophenotypic, and genetic features.

PATIENT CONCERNS

The patient was an 85-year-old man who presented with hematuria and flank pain. Imaging studies revealed a left renal mass without enlarged lymph nodes. There were no abnormal masses or nodules in other organs.

DIAGNOSES

The patient underwent no other treatment except the left radical nephrectomy under a clinical diagnosis of invasive urothelial carcinoma and was discharged on the thirteenth day. Histologically, the renal tumor showed biphasic proliferation of epithelial (strongly cytokeratin-positive; P63, P40, and vimentin-negative) and myoepithelial (strongly vimentin-positive; focal P63 and P40-positive; and weakly cytokeratin-positive) cells arranged in a perivascular pseudorosette-like pattern. No mutations were detected in multiple gene tests. According to the pathological structure, the patient was diagnosed as primary epithelial myoepithelial carcinoma-like renal tumor.

INTERVENTIONS

To the best of our knowledge, the present tumor has not been previously described, and thus, this variant has not been integrated into a known form of PCC. Therefore, we cannot diagnose this type of tumor with other types of kidney tumors.

OUTCOMES

Three years after primary diagnosis, the patient died of multiple organ failure result from multiple distant metastases.

LESSONS

We present the first case of carcinoma of the kidney with EMC-like features and a perivascular pseudorosette-like growth pattern. Clinicians should be aware of the features of this uncommon variant of RCC to avoid diagnostic delays or misdiagnosis and prevent unnecessary or inappropriate treatment.

The pathology of urinary bladder lesions with an inverted growth pattern

Inverted lesions in the urinary bladder have been the source of some difficulty in urological pathology. The two common ones are von Brunn's nests and cystitis cystic/cystitis glandularis, which are considered normal variants of urothelium. Apart from them, a number of other rare urothelial lesions with inverted growth pattern occur in the urinary bladder. Some of them are only reactive conditions, just as pseudocarcinomatous hyperplasia. Some are benign tumors, namely inverted papilloma. Whereas others are malignant neoplasms, including inverted papillary urothelial neoplasm of low malignant potential (PUNLMP), non-invasive inverted papillary urothelial carcinoma (low-grade and high-grade), and invasive urothelial carcinoma (inverted, nested and big nested variants). Because of the overlapping morphological features of all the inverted lesions mentioned above, even between high-grade invasive carcinoma and pseudocarcinomatous hyperplasia which are only a kind of reactive conditions, it is very important for the surgical pathologist to recognize and be familiar with these inverted lesions in urinary bladder. In this article, we review these spectrums of inverted lesions of the urinary bladder. Emphasis is placed on histogenesis, morphology, differential diagnosis of these lesions, and the pathologic grading of the non-invasive inverted neoplasms, such as inverted papilloma, inverted PUNLMP, non-invasive inverted papillary urothelial carcinoma with low-grade, and non-invasive inverted papillary urothelial carcinoma with high-grade.

Primary carcinoma of renal calyx

Renal calyx carcinoma (RCXC) may mimic collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) or urothelial carcinoma (UC) of the renal pelvis. RCXC is distinguished from CDC and UC of the renal pelvis as having the tumor epicenter in the renal calyx, with limited involvement of the surrounding renal pelvis surface urothelium. In this study, we summarize our experience with this entity. Ten cases of RCXC, including 9 cases with urothelial differentiation (RCXC-UC) and 1 case with salivary gland-type differentiation (RCXC-SC), were identified. Ten consecutive cases of UC were selected for comparison, with extensive renal pelvis involvement and with secondary renal parenchymal invasion. Two cases of collecting duct carcinoma (CDC) were also examined. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on representative tissue blocks for PAX8, PAX2, CK5, CK7, CK20, p63, GATA3, AMACR, RCC, CD10, vimentin, S100, and MSA. The 10 cases of RCXC (M:F=4:6, ages: 62-91 years, mean: 76) presented with renal masses of 3-6cm. Ureteroscopic studies and renal pelvic washings showed atypical/malignant cells in three cases. Seven patients were treated with nephrectomy followed by radiation±chemotherapy, and all cases developed metastases to lymph nodes or liver/lung/bone. In all 7 cases with nephrectomy, there was extensive renal parenchymal involvement with infiltrating borders and diffuse spread along collecting ducts. Six RCXC-UC contained focal squamous differentiation. The RCXC-SC displayed features of adenoid cystic and basaloid features. In situ UC, with or without papillary components, was identified in the calyces in all 7 nephrectomy cases with remaining renal pelvis harboring small tumor burden in 5 cases, and no tumor in another 2 cases. Of the three cases without nephrectomy, no tumor in the renal pelvis could be visualized with endoscopy, however one case was associated with UC of the urinary bladder. Of 10 control UC cases, tumor was limited to the tip of renal papilla in 7 cases, extensive in 3 cases, and with no extension into the collecting ducts. RCXC-UC were all positive for p63, CK5, CK7, and PAX2, with all negative for RCC. PAX8 (70% positive) and GATA3 (50% positive) reactivity was variable. The 10 UC cases shared IHC properties with RCXC-UC but frequent negativity for PAX8 and positivity for GATA3. RCXC is an aggressive neoplasm with high risk of metastases. Similar to CDC, it is located in the renal papilla and rarely with clinically visible renal pelvis tumor or ureteral urine positive for tumor cells. Unlike CDC and non-calyceal UC, RCXC shows predominantly urothelial and squamous differentiation and is associated with an in situ component of adjacent renal calyces. By IHC, RCXC exhibited features intermediate between UC and CDC with decreased or negative immunoreactivity for PAX8 and GATA.