Comparison between 1-needle technique versus 2-needle technique for bone marrow aspiration and biopsy procedures

Comparison of the bone marrow trephine sample quality between OnControl drill system and the Jamshidi needle

INTRODUCTION

Bone marrow biopsies are a key diagnostic and monitoring intervention in haematology with manual bone marrow techniques the established method of choice. Powered biopsy devices are now available, but are not widely used in haematology. This study compared the quality of bone marrow trephines obtained with the Jamshidi needle and OnControl powered drill system.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was undertaken on trephine samples prior to and after implementation of the OnControl drill system. Trephine size and quality were assessed independently by three pathologists and compared between techniques and operators using nonparametric tests.

RESULTS

There were 164 samples assessed (Jamshidi n = 69, OnControl, same site as aspirate n = 48, OnControl, separate site from aspirate n = 47). The assessable and total length were similar between the Jamshidi and OnControl techniques, with increased crush artefact observed with the OnControl drill (P < 0.001). Using a separate puncture site for trephine collection and aspirate did not reduce the artefact seen with the OnControl system (P = 0.274). Smaller samples (P < 0.001) and an increase in crushed (P = 0.009) and connective tissue (P = 0.002) were seen in trephines obtained by nonlaboratory-based trainees, regardless of the needle used or their stage of training, compared to laboratory trainees.

CONCLUSIONS

Trephines obtained by either method had similar assessable areas. The OnControl system was associated with more artefact, a finding in line with previous studies. There was no improvement by sampling the trephine from a separate site to the aspirate. Laboratory-based trainees who reviewed marrow morphology produced trephines with better assessable length than those not based in the laboratory.

Bone Marrow Biopsy Needle Type Affects Core Biopsy Specimen Length and Quality and Aspirate Hemodilution

Objectives

Bone marrow biopsies are essential for evaluating patients with suspected or confirmed hematopoietic disorders or malignancies, but little is known about how biopsy needle type affects biopsy length and/or quality. We sought to compare bone marrow biopsy quality in specimens obtained with two different needles.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on bone marrow specimens obtained with manual single-bevel (n = 114) or triple-bevel (n = 166) needles. The lengths of evaluable marrow, core quality, and aspirate quality were assessed by blinded hematopathologists.

Results

The triple-bevel needle produced 1.33-mm shorter lengths of evaluable marrow than the single-bevel needle and was five times less likely to produce a specimen rated as "adequate" and 4.2 times more likely to produce crush artifact. The triple-bevel needle was also 2.4 times more likely to produce hemodilute aspirates.

Conclusions

Bone marrow biopsy needle type affects the length of evaluable marrow and quality of core and aspirate specimens.

Trends in Bone Marrow Sampling and Core Biopsy Specimen Adequacy in the United States and Canada: A Multicenter Study

OBJECTIVES

To assess bone marrow (BM) sampling in academic medical centers.

METHODS

Data from 6,374 BM samples obtained in 32 centers in 2001 and 2011, including core length (CL), were analyzed.

RESULTS

BM included a biopsy (BMB; 93%) specimen, aspirate (BMA; 92%) specimen, or both (83%). The median (SD) CL was 12 (8.5) mm, and evaluable marrow was 9 (7.6) mm. Tissue contraction due to processing was 15%. BMB specimens were longer in adults younger than 60 years, men, and bilateral, staging, and baseline samples. Only 4% of BMB and 2% of BMB/BMA samples were deemed inadequate for diagnosis. BM for plasma cell dyscrasias, nonphysician operators, and ancillary studies usage increased, while bilateral sampling decreased over the decade. BM-related quality assurance programs are infrequent.

CONCLUSIONS

CL is shorter than recommended and varies with patient age and sex, clinical circumstances, and center experience. While pathologists render diagnoses on most cases irrespective of CL, BMB yield improvement is desirable.

Adequacy of powered vs manual bone marrow biopsy specimens: a retrospective review of sequential marrow aspirates and biopsies in 68 patients

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the quality and quantity of the bone marrow aspirates and biopsy specimens obtained with a powered system in comparison with the standard manual method.

METHODS

The Pathology Laboratory Information System was reviewed for patients who had previously undergone bone marrow biopsies performed by both the OnControl Bone Marrow System and the manual method. A total of 136 cases (68 patients) were reviewed for adequacy and compared using an unpaired t test.

RESULTS

The core biopsy specimens obtained by the OnControl system were significantly longer compared with those obtained by the manual system (16.9 vs 14.4 mm, P = .0036). However, the core biopsy specimens obtained by the manual method had on average more evaluable marrow elements (66% vs 40%, P < .0001), and the manual method was superior in 46 of the 68 cases when the length of evaluable marrow was calculated (9.7 vs 7 mm, P = .0049).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that longer core biopsy specimens are obtained by the OnControl Bone Marrow system but that the manual method is still superior when the percentage and length of evaluable bone marrow are analyzed.