The clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features of breast carcinomas with signet-ring-cell differentiation

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the clinicopathological features, immunophenotypic characteristics and differential diagnosis of primary breast carcinomas with signet ring cell differentiation, as well as differences in the traits of signet ring-like cell mucin.

METHODS

A total of five cases of primary breast cancer diagnosed with signet ring cell differentiation and treated at The First People's Hospital of Jingmen from January 2016 to December 2021 were collected. HE, immunohistochemical staining, and AB-PAS staining were used for the analysis.

RESULTS

Although we strictly selected all the primary breast cancer cases with signet ring cell differentiation, there were differences in the arrangement of the cells and the grading of nuclei. Our immunohistochemical results showed that the ER was consistently strongly positive, and the PR expression was not consistent, while all the cases of HER2 were negative. CK7 was negative in one case, and CK20 and CK5/6 were not expressed in all the cases. The mucin MUC1 was positive and showed two patterns. MUC2 was strongly positive in all the cases. All the cases were negative for CDX2, SATB2, PAX8, TTF-1, and Napsin A, while the positive expression of COX2, Villin, and WT-1 was not constant. One case expressed neuroendocrine markers. The expression level of Ki67 was between 10 and 30%. AB (pH 2.5)-PAS staining revealed that the intracellular mucus contained more cells with neutral mucus, while the extracellular mucus was mainly acidic.

CONCLUSION

We found that histological morphology, cell morphology, and nuclear grading differentiate among different cases. The immunohistochemical characteristics of primary breast cancers diagnosed with signet ring cell differentiation are helpful for identification. The differences in the expression patterns of mucins may be related to unfavorable clinicopathological factors, but their usefulness as a prognostic marker remains to be further understood. The heterogeneity of cell mucus, the differentiation of tumor cells, and the phenotypic changes of tumors also need further study.

Metastatic non-Hematopoietic Neoplasms to the Breast: A Study of 238 Cases

AIMS

The aim of this study was to review the clinicopathologic characteristics of metastatic non-hematopoietic malignancies to the breast, in order to identify salient features for practicing pathologist that are useful in distinguishing metastatic lesions from primary breast neoplasms.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 238 cases were identified during the period from January 2005 to January 2015. Clinicopathologic features of these cases were retrospectively reviewed. Primary tumors included melanoma (99, 42%), serous carcinoma (35, 15%), neuroendocrine neoplasm (32, 13%), sarcoma (23, 10%), and adenocarcinoma from various organs (47, 20%), among others. Most metastases were unilateral (223, 94%) and unifocal (206, 87%), and were detected radiographically (167, 70%). Concurrent ipsilateral axillary metastasis occurred in 33 (14%) patients. Among 238 cases, 41 had metastatic disease to the breast concurrently or preceding the primary cancer diagnosis. Notable, in 39 (16%) cases, breast metastasis was the first clinical presentation of disease, and 16 (41%) of these cases were initially misdiagnosed as breast primaries. In contrast, with known history of non-mammary primary tumors, only 4 of 197 (2%) cases were misdiagnosed (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Metastatic tumors share many overlapping features with breast primary carcinomas. However, cases with a well-circumscribed tumor, lack of in situ component, ER/PR negativity, and unusual morphologic features should raise the consideration of metastatic disease. While clinical history is paramount for correct diagnosis, metastasis to the breast as the first clinical presentation is not uncommon.

Single organ microenvironment and the common features of tumors of leukemia, lymphoma, and myeloma cells growing there: A literature review

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether the growth and treatment resistance of lymphoma and myeloma tumors is similar to that previously observed in leukemic and solid tumors growing in the same organ microenvironment.

METHODS

All published cases of 3 primary hematologic malignancies in breast, without systemic involvement, were identified, with follow-ups solicited from authors. Treatment approaches were analyzed to highlight the most effective.

RESULTS

Similar histologic features and biology among primary tumors of leukemia, lymphoma, plasmacytoma, and solid breast cancer was revealed. Review of treatments: tumor-directed, chemotherapy, or combination showed the benefit of tumor removal, and use of systemic agents in adjunct, not primary, treatment. Optimal assessment is limited by few cases of PET/CT verifying limited tumor extent. The common biology observed and cases of long survival after tumor/stroma eradication point to the complicity of organ microenvironment in the chemoresistance and treatment failure commonly observed in patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The interaction of an organ microenvironment, particularly its adipocytes, with malignant cells, results in similar histologic changes, metastatic potential, and chemoresistance in 3 hematologic malignancies and solid cancers. Improved survival in hematologic malignancies could result from adopting PET/CT to find tumor and its extent, eradicating tumor, and elucidating common therapeutic targets.

A nomogram for determining the disease-specific survival in invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast: A population study

We aimed to establish and validate a nomogram for predicting the disease-specific survival of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) patients.The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program database was used to identify ILC from 2010 to 2015, in which the data was extracted from 18 registries in the US. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to identify independent prognostic factors and a nomogram was constructed to predict the 3-year and 5-year survival rates of ILC patients based on Cox regression. Predictive values were compared between the new model and the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system using the concordance index, calibration plots, integrated discrimination improvement, net reclassification improvement, and decision-curve analyses.In total, 4155 patients were identified. After multivariate Cox regression analysis, nomogram was established based on a new model containing the predictive variables of age, the primary tumor site, histology grade, American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM (tumor node metastasis) stages II, III, and IV, breast cancer subtype, therapy modality (surgery and chemotherapy). The concordance index for the training and validation cohorts were higher for the new model (0.781 and 0.832, respectively) than for the old model (0.733 and 0.779). The new model had good performance in the calibration plots. Net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement were also improved. Finally, decision-curve analyses demonstrated that the nomogram was clinically useful.We have developed a reliable nomogram for determining the prognosis and treatment outcomes of ILC. The new model facilitates the choosing of superior medical examinations and the optimizing of therapeutic regimens with cooperation among oncologists.

Rare Breast Carcinoma with Paradoxical Plasma Cell Immunoprofile: A Case Report

Plasma cell features are encountered in a variety of non-plasma cell neoplasias, especially carcinomas of a discohesive type, such as those occurring in the digestive tract and breast. Lobular carcinomas of the breast present themselves in a variety of architectural patterns and many cell morphologies, including plasmacytoid types. A matching plasma cell phenotype is sometimes an associated feature. We report a case of a moderate grade invasive lobular carcinoma with focal plasmacytoid morphology and aberrant expression of plasma cell markers in a patient previously diagnosed with multiple myeloma. Paradoxical plasma cell immunoprofiles can be encountered in many malignancies, causing serious diagnostic problems, even more so with those occurring in discohesive carcinomas in multiple myeloma patients.

Hematologic Malignancies of the Breast: A Contemporary Series Investigating Incidence, Presentation, Accuracy of Diagnosis on Core Needle Biopsy, and Hormone Receptor Expression

Background

Distinguishing breast hematologic malignancies in core needle biopsies from other entities can be challenging. Misclassification as a breast carcinoma could result in inappropriate treatment. The aim of this study was to characterize the types, incidence, and helpful diagnostic features of hematologic malignancies of the breast.

Design

All hematologic malignancies of the breast diagnosed at our institution from 2004 to 2017 were identified. Clinical notes, imaging, and slides were reviewed. Immunohistochemical analysis of estrogen receptor α (ERα), estrogen receptor β (ERβ), and androgen receptor (AR) was performed when tissue was available.

Results

In all, 43 hematologic malignancies from biopsies of 37 women and 6 men were identified. Core needle biopsies (35 or 81%) were more common than excisions (8 or 19%). For 14 patients (40%), the core biopsy was the first diagnosis of a hematologic malignancy. Diagnoses included 37 lymphomas (7 primary), 4 leukemias, and 2 myelomas. There was 1 misdiagnosis of carcinoma. Low positivity for hormone receptors was observed in a minority of lymphomas. A definitive diagnosis of hematologic malignancy was made in 31 (89%) of the core needle biopsies. Only 3 patients undergoing core biopsy required excision for diagnosis.

Conclusions

Most of the hematologic malignancies of the breast are currently diagnosed on core needle biopsy and 40% of patients do not have a prior history. To avoid errors, pathologists need to be aware of diagnostic features and morphologic mimics. A hematologic malignancy should be considered if tumor cells are discohesive, carcinoma in situ is absent, and hormone expression is low or absent.

Differentiating breast carcinoma with signet ring features from gastrointestinal signet ring carcinoma: assessment of immunohistochemical markers

Signet ring morphology is recognized throughout the gastrointestinal tract. However, this pattern may be observed in other primary sites giving rise to diagnostic challenges in the work-up of metastases. Relatively newer immunohistochemical markers have not been evaluated in this context. We assessed expression patterns of several common immunohistochemical markers in tumors with Signet ring morphology to delineate a pragmatic approach to this differential diagnosis. Primary breast and gastrointestinal carcinomas showing Signet ring features were reviewed. Non-mammary and non-gastrointestinal tumors with this morphology were included for comparison. Estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), E-cadherin, CK7, CK20, GCDFP-15, mammaglobin, CDX2, GATA-3, and HepPar-1 immunohistochemistry was performed. Expression patterns were compared between breast and gastrointestinal tumors as well as lobular breast and gastric tumors. Ninety-three cases were identified: 33 breast carcinomas including 13 lobular, 50 gastrointestinal tumors including 23 gastric, and 10 from other sites. ER (sensitivity=81.8%, specificity=100%, positive predictive value (PPV)=100%, negative predictive value (NPV)=89.3%) and GATA-3 (sensitivity=100%, specificity=98%, PPV=96.8%, NPV=100%) expression were associated with breast origin. CK20 (sensitivity=66.7%, specificity=93.3%, PPV=94.1%, NPV=63.6%) and CDX2 (sensitivity=72%, specificity=100%, PPV=100%, NPV=68.9%) demonstrated the strongest discriminatory value for gastrointestinal origin. These markers exhibited similar discriminatory characteristics when comparing lobular and gastric signet ring carcinomas. In a limited trial on metastatic breast and gastric cases, these markers successfully discriminated between breast and gastric primary sites in 15 of 16 cases. ER and GATA-3 are most supportive of mammary origin and constitute an effective panel for distinguishing primary breast from primary gastrointestinal Signet ring tumors when combined with CK20 and CDX2 immunohistochemistry.

Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in Breast Cancer

Only a few breast cancer histologic subtypes harbor distinct genetic alterations that are associated with a specific morphology (genotype-phenotype correlation). Secretory carcinomas and adenoid cystic carcinomas are each characterized by recurrent translocations, and invasive lobular carcinomas frequently have CDH1 mutations. Solid papillary carcinoma with reverse polarity is a rare breast cancer subtype with a distinctive morphology and recently identified IDH2 mutations. We review the clinical and pathologic features and underlying genetic alterations of those breast cancer subtypes with established genotype-phenotype correlations and discuss the phenotypes associated with germline mutations in genes associated with hereditary breast cancer.