Explainable AI (xAI) for Anatomic Pathology

Pathologists are adopting whole slide images (WSIs) for diagnosis, thanks to recent FDA approval of WSI systems as class II medical devices. In response to new market forces and recent technology advances outside of pathology, a new field of computational pathology has emerged that applies artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning algorithms to WSIs. Computational pathology has great potential for augmenting pathologists' accuracy and efficiency, but there are important concerns regarding trust of AI due to the opaque, black-box nature of most AI algorithms. In addition, there is a lack of consensus on how pathologists should incorporate computational pathology systems into their workflow. To address these concerns, building computational pathology systems with explainable AI (xAI) mechanisms is a powerful and transparent alternative to black-box AI models. xAI can reveal underlying causes for its decisions; this is intended to promote safety and reliability of AI for critical tasks such as pathology diagnosis. This article outlines xAI enabled applications in anatomic pathology workflow that improves efficiency and accuracy of the practice. In addition, we describe HistoMapr-Breast, an initial xAI enabled software application for breast core biopsies. HistoMapr-Breast automatically previews breast core WSIs and recognizes the regions of interest to rapidly present the key diagnostic areas in an interactive and explainable manner. We anticipate xAI will ultimately serve pathologists as an interactive computational guide for computer-assisted primary diagnosis.

Multivariate discriminant analysis for branching classification of colonic tubular adenoma glands

BACKGROUND

Many morphologic findings of histology can be translated into mathematically computerized data, and identifying important parameters is primarily pathologists' task as users. Shape-specific parameters based on computational geometry properties of glands can be used in the field of pathology. We evaluated the diagnostic utility of three shape-specific parameters: the chord intersection ratio, convexity ratio, and maximum concave area ratio for branching classification of glands.

METHODS

Seven cases of tubular adenoma were studied. After image analysis, segmented neoplastic glands were classified into nonbranching, mild branching, and moderate branching. Using image analysis formulae for the three shape-specific parameters, we compared the values of the parameters with the branching classification results for colonic tubular adenoma.

RESULTS

Multivariate discriminant analysis was used to classify the branching groups. Classification accuracies of nonbranching, mild branching, and moderate branching group based on the three shape-specific parameters were 98, 94, and 95%, respectively. More branching growth exhibited a higher chord intersection ratio and maximum concave area ratio but lower convexity ratio. We found a statistically significant difference in chord intersection ratio, maximum concave area ratio, and convexity ratio between mild, moderate, and nonbranching groups. Among the three features, the chord intersection ratio was the most significant parameter.

CONCLUSIONS

Shape-based parameters of chord intersection ratio, convexity ratio, and maximum concave area ratio are valid assessment parameters for irregular branching structures. For the understanding of spatial relationships of histology, the holistic geometric approach using shape-based parameters can be useful.

Introduction to Digital Image Analysis in Whole-slide Imaging: A White Paper from the Digital Pathology Association

The advent of whole-slide imaging in digital pathology has brought about the advancement of computer-aided examination of tissue via digital image analysis. Digitized slides can now be easily annotated and analyzed via a variety of algorithms. This study reviews the fundamentals of tissue image analysis and aims to provide pathologists with basic information regarding the features, applications, and general workflow of these new tools. The review gives an overview of the basic categories of software solutions available, potential analysis strategies, technical considerations, and general algorithm readouts. Advantages and limitations of tissue image analysis are discussed, and emerging concepts, such as artificial intelligence and machine learning, are introduced. Finally, examples of how digital image analysis tools are currently being used in diagnostic laboratories, translational research, and drug development are discussed.

A Practical Guide to Whole Slide Imaging: A White Paper From the Digital Pathology Association

Context.—

Whole slide imaging (WSI) represents a paradigm shift in pathology, serving as a necessary first step for a wide array of digital tools to enter the field. Its basic function is to digitize glass slides, but its impact on pathology workflows, reproducibility, dissemination of educational material, expansion of service to underprivileged areas, and intrainstitutional and interinstitutional collaboration exemplifies a significant innovative movement with far-reaching effects. Although the benefits of WSI to pathology practices, academic centers, and research institutions are many, the complexities of implementation remain an obstacle to widespread adoption. In the wake of the first regulatory clearance of WSI for primary diagnosis in the United States, some barriers to adoption have fallen. Nevertheless, implementation of WSI remains a difficult prospect for many institutions, especially those with stakeholders unfamiliar with the technologies necessary to implement a system or who cannot effectively communicate to executive leadership and sponsors the benefits of a technology that may lack clear and immediate reimbursement opportunity.

Objectives.—

To present an overview of WSI technology—present and future—and to demonstrate several immediate applications of WSI that support pathology practice, medical education, research, and collaboration.

Data Sources.—

Peer-reviewed literature was reviewed by pathologists, scientists, and technologists who have practical knowledge of and experience with WSI.

Conclusions.—

Implementation of WSI is a multifaceted and inherently multidisciplinary endeavor requiring contributions from pathologists, technologists, and executive leadership. Improved understanding of the current challenges to implementation, as well as the benefits and successes of the technology, can help prospective users identify the best path for success.