Immunohistochemical Expression of p16 in Melanocytic Lesions: An Updated Review and Meta-analysis

Loss of p16 Immunoexpression and Deletions of CDKN2A in the Progression of Extramammary Paget Disease: An Immunohistochemical and Genetic Study of 24 Invasive/Metastatic Cases

ABSTRACT

Information regarding the genetic alterations in extramammary Paget disease (EMPD) is scarce. This study investigated the significance of CDKN2A and MTAP alterations in EMPD progression using immunohistochemistry and panel DNA sequencing. In total, 24 invasive/metastatic EMPD cases were included in this study. The immunoexpression of p16 and MTAP in the primary in situ, primary invasive, and metastatic tumor components was evaluated. Panel DNA sequencing was performed for metastatic tumor components in 5 of the 24 cases. Immunoexpression of p16 in the in situ tumor component was at least partially preserved in all 19 tested cases (100%). By contrast, the invasive tumor component was diffusely or partially lost in 18 (81.8%) of 22 tested cases. Regarding the foci of lymph node metastasis, 13 (81.2%) of the 16 patients showed a significant loss of p16 expression. Loss of MTAP immunoexpression was observed less frequently compared with the loss of p16 expression. CDKN2A homozygous deletions were confirmed in all 5 tested cases by sequencing, whereas MTAP deletions were detected in only 2 cases. In conclusion, p16 expression loss and CDKN2A deletions can be frequently seen in invasive/metastatic cases of EMPD.

PRAME and Historical Immunohistochemical Antibodies Ki-67, P16, and HMB-45 in Ambiguous Melanocytic Tumors

ABSTRACT

Ambiguous melanocytic lesions/tumors (AMLs) can be simply described as melanocytic neoplasms that cannot be differentiated as either a melanoma or a nevus. Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) is a novel antibody that can help differentiate between nevi and melanomas. However, its usefulness remains controversial in AMLs. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the importance of PRAME and diagnostic auxiliary antibodies (Ki-67, p16, HMB-45) in the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions, especially in AMLs. This study included 52 ambiguous melanocytic lesions, 40 nevi, and 40 melanomas. All immunohistochemical studies were performed automatically using the Universal Alkaline Phosphatase Red Detection Kit. Different analytic approaches were used for each antibody based on the literature. Statistically, the multinomial forward stepwise elimination logistic regression analysis was used to create a statistical model to predict the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions based on clinical, morphological, and immunohistochemical data. PRAME positivity was very strong and diffuse in the melanoma group and statistically significantly higher than that of the AML and nevus groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the nevus and AML groups. The Ki-67 proliferation index and HMB-45 staining pattern provided valuable indications for distinguishing between these 3 groups. The P16 antibody was limited in supporting the differential diagnosis. Our statistical model showed that a high mitosis count, central pagetoid spread, and PRAME positivity increased the probability of melanoma against an AML diagnosis. This study showed the advantages of evaluating the PRAME antibody together with morphological features and other immunohistochemical markers (Ki-67 and HMB-45) in the differential diagnosis of melanocytic lesions.

Diagnosing Cutaneous Melanocytic Tumors in the Molecular Era: Updates and Review of Literature

Over the past decade, molecular and genomic discoveries have experienced unprecedented growth, fundamentally reshaping our comprehension of melanocytic tumors. This review comprises three main sections. The first part gives an overview of the current genomic landscape of cutaneous melanocytic tumors. The second part provides an update on the associated molecular tests and immunohistochemical stains that are helpful for diagnostic purposes. The third section briefly outlines the diverse molecular pathways now utilized for the classification of cutaneous melanomas. The primary goal of this review is to provide a succinct overview of the molecular pathways involved in melanocytic tumors and demonstrate their practical integration into the realm of diagnostic aids. As the molecular and genomic knowledge base continues to expand, this review hopes to serve as a valuable resource for healthcare professionals, offering insight into the evolving molecular landscape of cutaneous melanocytic tumors and its implications for patient care.

Comparison of Melanocyte-Associated Immunohistochemical Markers in Acral Lentiginous Melanoma and Acral Benign Nevi

ABSTRACT

Acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM) is a relatively rare clinicopathologic subtype of cutaneous malignant melanoma, but it is the most common type of melanoma among Asians. Although the research to identify immunohistochemical (IHC) markers to differentiate nevi from melanoma is being conducted, specific markers for ALM are not well-known. Therefore, we aimed to analyze and compare the differences in the expression of melanocyte-associated IHC markers between ALM and acral benign nevi (ABN). Two independent groups of 53 and 19 paraffin-embedded specimens (from patients with pathologically confirmed ALM and ABN, respectively) were subjected to IHC staining for MART-1, preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME), SOX10, HMB-45, Ki-67, and p16. We performed a quantitative analysis of PRAME, SOX10, KI-67, and p16 expression and gradient pattern analysis of HMB-45 expression for each specimen. The PRAME (60.1% and 28.5%, P < 0.05) and Ki-67 (7.8% and 3.5%, P < 0.05) expression levels were significantly higher in the ALM group than in the ABN group. The p16 expression was significantly lower (14.2% and 19.4%, P < 0.05), and the absence of HMB-45 gradient was more frequent in the ALM group than in the ABN group. However, no statistical significance was noted in SOX10 (54.8% and 44.7%). Receiver operating characteristic curves showed that PRAME had the highest area under the curve value. In summary, among various IHC markers, PRAME was the most valuable marker for the diagnosis of ALM; however, further large-scale studies are needed to validate these findings.

Ancillary testing for melanoma: current trends and practical considerations

The diagnosis of melanocytic lesions is aided by ancillary testing, but clinical inspection with the histomorphological assessment on biopsy remains sufficient in most cases. Immunohistochemistry and molecular studies have proven useful for diminishing the pool of histomorphologically borderline lesions, and sequential testing may further improve overall diagnostic performance, but these assays should be used in a stepwise fashion if at all. Ancillary tests vary based on their technology, performance, and practical considerations, including but not limited to the specific diagnostic question, cost, and turn-around time, which impact test selection. This review examines currently used ancillary tests for the purpose of characterizing melanocytic lesions. Both scientific and practical considerations are discussed.

"Paradoxical" p16 overexpression in cutaneous melanoma: Molecular and immunohistochemical analysis of a rare phenomenon with a focus on cell cycle regulatory molecules

BACKGROUND

One of the most relevant genetic alterations in cutaneous melanoma (CM) is the biallelic inactivation/loss-of-heterozygosis (LOH) of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2 A (CDKN2A), which results in the immunohistochemical loss of p16 frequently found in CM. However, we recently described a rare case of dermal/deep-seated melanoma arising in giant congenital nevus (DDM-GCN) with p16 overexpression combined with p53 loss and tumor protein 53 (TP53) mutation. Herein, we reported a case series of CM with p16 overexpression and analyzed their clinicopathologic features, immunohistochemical expression of the cell cycle regulatory molecules (CCRM: p53, p21, Cyclin D1, Rb), and mutational landscape.

METHODS

We retrospectively tested for p16 all cases of CM diagnosed at our institution between January 1st 2019-April 1st 2022. In CM with p16 overexpression, we reported clinicopathologic features, immunohistochemical results for melanocytic markers and CCRM, and mutational landscape investigated with a next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel. In cases with zonal p16 overexpression, the immunohistochemical assessment for melanocytic markers and CCRM, as well as the NGS analysis have been performed in both components {with and without p16 overexpression [p16(+)c and p16(-)]}.

RESULTS

Overexpression of p16 was found in 10/2879 (0.35%) CM [5/10 (50%) diffuse and 5/10 (50%) zonal]. We combined the immunohistochemical results for CCRM and molecular data to classify the cases as follows: a) Group 1 with altered expression of at least one CCRM but no TP53 mutations [3/10 (30%), all with Rb altered/lost]; b) Group 2 with altered expression of at least one CCRM and TP53 mutations [4/10 (40%), all with p53 altered]; c) Group 3 with normal expression of CCRM and no TP53 mutations [3/10 (30%), all with mutations in MAPK pathway genes (NRAS and BRAF)]. In CM with zonal p16 overexpression, the histologic appearance of p16(+)c was heterogeneous, whereas combining CCRM profiles and molecular data the cases could be categorized as follows: a) cases with the same CCRM and molecular profiles in both p16(+)c and p16(-)c; b) cases with p16(+)c showing additional genetic mutations and/or modifications of CCRM expression.

CONCLUSIONS

p16 overexpression is a rare event, occurring in advanced-stage, clinically- and histologically-heterogeneous CM. These lesions may be classified into three different groups based on CCRM expression and mutational profiles (including TP53 mutation). The analysis of CM with zonal p16 overexpression suggests that, at least in a subset of cases, this phenomenon could represent a sign of "molecular progression" due to the acquisition of additional genetic mutations and/or modifications of the CCRM profile.

Absence of Differential Cyclin D1 Immunohistochemical Protein Expression in Nevi and Melanoma Evaluated by Digital Image Analysis

BACKGROUND

Distinction of superficial spreading melanoma (SSM) from compound nevi (CN) sometimes poses difficult diagnostic challenges. Herein, we studied cyclin D1 protein expression by immunohistochemistry in SSM and CN and evaluated the results by digital image analysis.

DESIGN

A total of 13 CN and 12 SSM cases were retrospectively reviewed and cyclin D1 immunohistochemistry was performed. Immunohistochemical stained slides were evaluated by digital imaging analysis that included quantification and staining intensity of the cyclin D1 expressing dermal cells.

RESULTS

Cyclin D1 expression was observed in all CN and SSM. CN-positive staining was present in 30% to 93% of the dermal nevocytes, more positive in the upper (mean 85%), than lower half (mean 57%). SSM-positive staining was present in 44% to 96% of the dermal lesion, more positive in the upper (mean 88%) than lower half (mean 49%). When analyzed based on 3+ strong staining intensity, similar regional differences in cyclin D1 expression were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Digital image analysis of Cyclin D1 expression showed no differences between CN and SSM. Quantity and regional distribution of cyclin D1 positivity were found to be similar in both lesions. Our findings argue against the routine use of cyclin D1 immunohistochemistry as a diagnostic tool for differentiating CN from SSM.

Appropriate use criteria for ancillary diagnostic testing in dermatopathology: New recommendations for 11 tests and 220 clinical scenarios from the American Society of Dermatopathology Appropriate Use Criteria Committee

BACKGROUND

Appropriate use criteria (AUC) provide patient-centered physician guidance in test selection. An initial set of AUC was reported by the American Society of Dermatopathology (ASDP) in 2018. AUC reflect evidence collected at single timepoints and may be affected by evolving evidence and experience. The objective of this study was to update and expand AUC for selected tests.

METHODS

RAND/UCLA (RAND Corporation [Santa Monica, CA]/University of California Los Angeles) methodology used includes the following: (a) literature review; (b) review of previously rated tests and previously employed clinical scenarios; (c) selection of previously rated tests for new ratings; (d) development of new clinical scenarios; (e) selection of additional tests; (f) three rating rounds with feedback and group discussion after rounds 1 and 2.

RESULTS

For 220 clinical scenarios comprising lymphoproliferative (light chain clonality), melanocytic (comparative genomic hybridization, fluorescence in situ hybridization, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter), vascular disorders (MYC), and inflammatory dermatoses (periodic acid-Schiff, Gömöri methenamine silver), consensus by panel raters was reached in 172 of 220 (78%) scenarios, with 103 of 148 (70%) rated "usually appropriate" or "rarely appropriate" and 45 of 148 (30%), "appropriateness uncertain."

LIMITATIONS

The study design only measures appropriateness. Cost, availability, test comparison, and additional clinical considerations are not measured. The possibility that the findings of this study may be influenced by the inherent biases of the dermatopathologists involved in the study cannot be excluded.

CONCLUSIONS

AUC are reported for selected diagnostic tests in clinical scenarios that occur in dermatopathology practice. Adhering to AUC may reduce inappropriate test utilization and improve healthcare delivery.

PRAME immunohistochemistry as an adjunct for evaluating ambiguous melanocytic proliferation

BACKGROUND

The histopathological assessment of diagnostically ambiguous melanocytic proliferation remains one of the biggest challenges in the dermatopathology field. PRAME (Preferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma) immunostaining has been shown highly specific for distinguishing unequivocal malignant melanocytic proliferation from benign ones. Knowledge on its utility for evaluating ambiguous melanocytic neoplasms remains limited.

METHODS

We retrieved in our institutional database all cases of diagnostically ambiguous melanocytic neoplasms from January 2016 to January 2021. Each case was subclassified into "favor benign" or "favor malignant" neoplasm using all collected data. Immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of PRAME was assessed and correlated with the final subclassification. Using a previously proposed scoring system, diffuse immunopositivity (>75% of tumor cells) was considered positive. Furthermore, for ambiguous melanocytic proliferation occurring on a pre-existing nevus, the staining was considered positive if more than 75% of the morphologically atypical neoplastic cells were labeled, excluding morphologically unambiguous benign nevocytes.

RESULTS

Fifty-five cases of ambiguous melanocytic proliferation were examined. Thirty-one cases were finally subclassified as "favor malignant" neoplasms and 24 as "favor benign" neoplasms. Thirty-one tumors showed immunopositivity for PRAME, representing respectively 8.3% and 93.5% of "favor benign" and "favor malignant" neoplasms. The specificity and sensitivity of PRAME IHC for benign/malignant distinction were respectively 91.7% and 93.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

PRAME IHC shows high sensitivity and specificity for distinguishing malignant challenging melanocytic proliferations from benign ones and could be used as an everyday tool. However, PRAME immunoreactivity should be interpreted cautiously, knowing that rare benign melanocytic neoplasms could show diffuse positivity.

Immunohistochemistry in melanocytic lesions: Updates with a practical review for pathologists

This review provides a summary of the immunohistochemical markers pertinent to the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions. There is considerable morphologic overlap between benign and malignant melanocytic lesions, and given the significant differences in clinical management, the diagnostic workup becomes crucial. Immunohistochemistry aids in the distinction between various melanocytic proliferations and recent contributions to the literature have furthered our optimization of panels in the diagnostic workup. In recent years, SOX10 has been considered as the optimal marker for melanocytic lesions given the similar sensitivity but higher specificity than S100. HMB-45 is less sensitive than S100 but demonstrates utility in confirmation of deceptively banal small cell and nevoid melanoma variants where deep nests of melanocytes are highlighted. Melan-A (MART-1) and MiTF show similar sensitivity to S100 however there is a lack of expression in spindle cell and desmoplastic melanomas.

Comparison of SOX-10, HMB-45, and Melan-A in Benign Melanocytic Lesions

Purpose

Different immunohistochemical stains are used in dermatopathology to stain melanocytes and diagnose benign and malignant melanocytic lesions.

Methods

SOX-10, HMB-45, and Melan-A immunohistochemical stains were used to assess 32 biopsy specimens with a histologic diagnosis of lentigo. The total number of melanocytes stained with each immunohistochemical stain was counted and an average count was obtained from two readings.

Results

Analysis of the data revealed a significant difference in staining melanocytes between these three immunostains (p=0.0010, ANOVA). SOX-10 stained 0.195 more melanocytes than HMB-45 (p=0.0026). Similarly, Melan-A stained 0.195 more melanocytes than HMB-45 (p=0.0011). However, the difference between SOX-10 and Melan-A was not statistically significant (p=0.9810).

Conclusion

SOX-10 and Melan-A immunostaining stain more melanocytes than HMB-45. No significant difference was noted between Melan-A and SOX-10.

The utility of PRAME immunohistochemistry in the evaluation of challenging melanocytic tumors

BACKGROUND

PRAME (PReferentially expressed Antigen in Melanoma) immunohistochemistry has demonstrated high specificity for unequivocal melanomas; however, its utility in ambiguous melanocytic neoplasms has yet to be fully elucidated.

METHODS

Cases of challenging melanocytic neoplasms were subclassified into one of three categories: challenging, favor benign (FB), challenging, cannot be subclassified (CCS), or challenging, favor malignant (FM). Using a previously published system, whereby cases with diffuse staining (>75%) were considered positive, scoring of PRAME was performed. Additionally, tumors with hotspot staining were also considered positive.

RESULTS

Sixteen out of 85 tumors showed positive staining representing 5% of FB tumors, 24% of CCS tumors, and 47% of FM. In FB and CCS tumors, positive staining was mainly encountered in atypical intraepidermal melanocytic proliferations and spitzoid neoplasms. The specificity of positive PRAME staining was 95% and its concordance with the final diagnostic interpretation was 75%.

CONCLUSIONS

PRAME positivity is more common in neoplasms favored to be malignant by histopathologic evaluation. Its clinical utility may include early diagnosis of incipient melanoma in situ. Rarely, benign melanocytic neoplasms could show diffuse expression of PRAME, and additional studies are needed to determine optimal utilization. Lastly, hotspot staining may increase its sensitivity without much compromise in specificity.

Primary Cilia Are Preserved in Cellular Blue and Atypical Blue Nevi and Lost in Blue Nevus-like Melanoma

Distinguishing cellular blue nevi (CBNs) and atypical CBNs from blue nevus-like melanoma (BNLM) can be diagnostically challenging. Immunohistochemistry may inform the diagnosis in a subset of cases but is not always diagnostic. Further, ancillary molecular testing is expensive and often requires significant tissue to complete. Primary cilia are cell-surface organelles with roles in signal transduction pathways and have been shown to be preserved in conventional melanocytic nevi but lost in melanoma. Immunofluorescence staining of primary cilia can be performed using a single standard-thickness formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue section and has a turnaround time similar to immunohistochemistry. The percentage of tumoral melanocytes retaining a primary cilium is quantified and reported as the ciliation index. In the current study, we explored the utility of the ciliation index in a series of 31 blue nevus-like lesions, including CBNs (12), atypical CBNs (15), and BNLM (4). The average ciliation index for the CBNs was 59±18%, with a median of 60 (range: 28 to 87). The average ciliation index for atypical CBNs was 59±23, with a median of 59 (range: 20 to 93). The average ciliation index for BNLM was 4±3, with a median of 3 (range: 1 to 8). There was no significant difference in ciliation index between the CBN and atypical CBN categories. There was a significant difference between CBN and BNLM and between atypical CBNs and BNLM (P<0.001 for each). Here, we show that ciliation index is a quantitative diagnostic tool useful in the setting of blue nevus-like neoplasms, with benefits including cost and time efficiency.

Histopathologic classification and prognostic factors of melanoma: a 2021 update

Despite the rapid recent advances in molecular analysis of tumors, which allow large-scale and high-resolution genomics, the "gold standard" for melanoma diagnosis continues to be histopathology, in conjunction with clinical characteristics and sometimes with important support of immunohistochemistry. Observations, where postulated that cutaneous melanomas may arise through two distinct pathways, discoveries such as that BRAF^V600E mutations were mostly common in melanomas on sun-exposed skin with little solar elastosis and seminal works for melanoma progression and evolution set the groundwork for the new WHO Classification of Melanoma: a classification of melanoma that not only encompasses histologic but also clinical, epidemiologic, and genetic characteristics. The melanomas were divided into those etiologically related to sun exposure and those that are not, based on their mutational signatures, anatomic site, and epidemiology. On the basis of degree of associated solar elastosis melanomas on the sun exposed skin were further divided by the histopathologic degree of cumulative solar damage (CSD) of the surrounding skin, into low and high CSD. On the low-CSD group of melanomas are included superficial spreading melanomas, while the high-CSD melanomas encompasses lentigo maligna and desmoplastic melanomas. The "non-CSD" classification includes acral melanomas, some melanomas in congenital nevi, melanomas in blue nevi, Spitz melanomas, mucosal melanomas, and uveal melanomas. Nodular and nevoid melanoma may occur in any pathway. A group of intermediate tumors termed melanocytoma is proposed for tumors that in addition to mutations that activate the MAPK pathway, harbor multiple driver mutations, and they are either low-grade or high-grade, to indicate that they may carry a higher risk of malignant transformation. In this review a summary of the most recent WHO classification of melanoma is provided. A short analysis of essential histopathologic prognostic parameters is also provided. The new classification of melanoma discriminates distinct types of melanoma based on their clinicopathologic, and genomic characteristics. Undoubtedly, melanoma research will continue to evolve as new clinical, pathological, molecular data accumulates. The challenge of the forthcoming years is to better characterize the intermediate category of melanocytic lesions.

Immunotherapy combined with high- and low-dose radiation to all sites leads to complete clearance of disease in a patient with metastatic vaginal melanoma

A 73-year-old woman with metastatic vaginal mucosal melanoma that had progressed on ipilimumab and nivolumab experienced clinical and radiographic complete response to dual checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy given in combination with high-dose plus low-dose radiation. General characteristics and treatment options in this disease are highlighted.

Mitotically Active Nevus and Nevoid Melanoma: A Clinicopathological and Molecular Study

ABSTRACT

The distinction between nevoid melanoma and a mitotically active nevus can be challenging at the microscopic level. In this study, we performed cytogenetic testing on a cohort of 25 mitotically active melanocytic proliferations resembling common melanocytic nevus from 25 patients. Based on cytogenetic findings, the lesions were classified as "nevoid melanoma" (n = 13) or "mitotically active nevus" (n = 12). Subsequently, we compared the clinicopathological features between these 2 groups. Nevoid melanomas occurred in older patients (P = 0.007); however, there were no significant differences in gender, size, or anatomical distribution between the 2 groups. Histologically, deep/marginal mitoses (P = 0.006), lack of maturation with depth (P = 0.036), and pseudo-maturation (P = 0.006) were significantly more common in nevoid melanomas. Immunohistochemically, complete loss of p16 was an important divisive feature (P = 0.0004), seen in 70% of nevoid melanomas, and highly correlated with loss of CDKN2A gene (chromosome 9p21). Our findings suggest that such reproducible immunomorphological differences can be of value in distinguishing nevoid melanoma from mitotically active nevus. Nevoid melanomas demonstrated a spectrum of chromosomal aberrations similar to those seen in common subtypes of melanoma, which can serve as a powerful adjunct diagnostic tool in morphologically challenging lesions.

Second Diagnostic Opinion by Experienced Dermatopathologists in the Setting of a Referral Regional Melanoma Unit Significantly Improves the Clinical Management of Patients With Cutaneous Melanoma

The diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma and melanocytic neoplasms in general is one of the most challenging fields in pathology, and the reported interobserver diagnostic agreement in the evaluation of melanocytic lesions is poor. Nevertheless, a correct histopathological diagnosis is crucial to ensure a good clinical management of the patients. The institution of multidisciplinary teams has recently modified the approach to the patients with cutaneous melanoma. Patients referred to a multidisciplinary melanoma unit after receiving a diagnosis of melanoma elsewhere are encouraged to have their histopathological diagnosis confirmed by a second opinion from the experienced pathologist of the team before any treatment is initiated. We performed a retrospective analysis on a series of 121 histopathological revisions required for melanocytic neoplasms in the context of a multidisciplinary team, in order to evaluate the effects of second diagnostic opinion (SDO) on the clinical management of the patients. We defined three types of diagnostic discrepancies between the first diagnosis and the second opinion, according to the greatness of their clinical impact. Overall, the incidence of diagnostic discrepancies of any type was quite high in our series (56%). Interestingly, the SDO determined relevant changes in the clinical management of the patients in 33 out of 121 (27.3%) cases. This study confirms that SDO by expert pathologists significantly affects the course of treatment of melanoma patients and helps improving the diagnostic accuracy and clinical outcome.

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Conjunctival Melanocytic Intraepithelial Lesions, Including SOX10, HMB45, Ki67, and P16

PURPOSE

To determine the usefulness of melan-A, SOX10, HMB45, and p16 immunohistochemical stains in the distinction between the low-grade and high-grade conjunctival melanocytic intraepithelial lesions, either independently or as components of an immunohistochemical panel.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational case series.

METHODS

Institutional pathology records between 2014 and 2018 were searched for all patients with conjunctival melanocytic intraepithelial lesions. Biopsies without supporting clinical history or tissue available for review and immunohistochemical analysis were excluded. Clinical, histopathologic, and immunohistochemical (p16, SOX10, HMB45, and Ki-67) findings were recorded.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients underwent 47 biopsies for conjunctival melanocytic lesions between 2014 and 2018. Pathologic diagnoses were low-grade conjunctival melanocytic intraepithelial lesion (n = 18, 38%) and high-grade conjunctival melanocytic intraepithelial lesion/melanoma in situ (n = 29, 62%). The addition of melan-A and SOX10 immunohistochemical stains resulted in an upgrade of conjunctival melanocytic intraepithelial lesion from low-grade to high-grade in 2 (4%) of 47 cases. The addition of melan-A and SOX10 immunohistochemical stains did not downgrade any of the histomorphologically high-grade lesions. In a clinical-pathologic multivariable model, the parameters most predictive of high-grade melanocytic intraepithelial lesion/melanoma in situ were involvement of the caruncle (odds ratio [OR] = 19, confidence interval [CI] 1.6-212; P = .02] and p16 cytoplasmic H-score >30 (OR = 81, CI 2.7 to >999; P = .01) CONCLUSION: Although the stains for melanocytic markers melan-A and SOX10 facilitate assessment of melanocytic intraepithelial lesions, the current immunohistochemical panels have limited value in distinction between the low-grade and high-grade intraepithelial melanocytic proliferations and need to be used judiciously.

Nevus cell aggregates massively occupying parenchyma of an external iliac lymph node: A case report and review of the literature

We report a case of nevus cell aggregates (NCAs) in an external iliac lymph node from a patient with a compound congenital nevus in the corresponding drainage skin. Melanocytes in parenchyma were in band, nest-like or nodular fashion, and partly continuous with those in capsule and trabeculae. The largest nodule in parenchyma measured 6.5 mm. Melanocytes mostly exhibited benign appearance identical to cutaneous nevus. A few regions abundant in cells displayed atypical features, including increased nucleo-cytoplasmic ratio, small nucleoli, and occasional mitotic figures. Immunohistochemistry showed that melanocytes stained positive for p16, but negative for HMB-45 and nestin. Ki-67 labeling was less than 1% and reticulin mainly surrounded individual melanocytes. Besides, Vysis melanoma fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) plus another 2 probes targeting 9p21(CDKN2A) and 8q24(MYC) showed normal results. The patient is alive without malignant tumor after 52-month follow up. Our case provides a new evidence for the existence of intraparenchymal NCAs in deep lymph node and indicates that melanocytes with some atypical features can occur in nodal nevi. Nevus cells in parenchyma connected to those in capsule and trabeculae are a significant clue to distinguish nodal nevi from metastatic melanomas. Additionally, immunohistochemistry and FISH assay are useful in differential diagnosis.

Expression of P16INK4a in Uveal Melanoma: New Perspectives

Uveal melanoma (UM) is the most common intraocular tumor in adults. Despite sharing the name and similar morphological features with cutaneous melanoma (CM), it is an entirely different neoplasia with a particular genetic background and clinical behavior. CDKN2A is a gene located at chromosome 9p21, encoding for P16INK4a and P14(ARF) proteins, whose role as a tumor suppressor has been clearly defined in many malignant tumors. CDKN2A frequently presents germline mutations in familial CM and epigenetic downregulation in a considerable percentage of sporadic CM. It has been hypothesized that CDKN2A alterations are early events in CM development, playing a central role in the malignant transformation of melanocytes. Alterations of the CDKN2A gene reduce the expression of P16INK4a in most CM subtypes. Immunohistochemical evaluation of P16INK4a is currently used, in association with Ki67 and HMB45, in pathology practice to discriminate between dysplastic nevi and melanoma. On the other hand, CKDN2A is rarely mutated in UM, and the immunohistochemical expression of P16INK4a has only been reported in small case series. We tested P16INK4a expression on paraffin-embedded tissue sections from 9 tissue microarrays (TMAs), built with 2 mm cores derived from 133 uveal melanoma FFPE blocks, collected from 1990 to 2018, and from selected paraffin-blocks of 3 UM liver metastases. The immunohistochemical expression of P16INK4a was assessed with a visual evaluation by light microscopy and then with a digital approach. Both approaches, with an acceptable concordance rate, revealed P16INK4a expression in a large proportion of UM cases and all liver metastases, opening new possibilities of using it in the differential diagnosis between cutaneous and uveal melanoma metastases in cases of unknown primary tumor or patients with two different primary melanomas.

The diagnostic utility of PRAME and p16 in distinguishing nodal nevi from nodal metastatic melanoma

The status of the sentinel lymph node is the strongest predictor of recurrence in patients with malignant melanoma, making accurate distinction between nodal metastases and nodal nevi of paramount importance. We explored the utility of p16 and PRAME in differentiating nodal nevi from metastatic melanoma by immunohistochemistry. We searched our institutional database for cases of nodal nevi and nodal metastatic melanoma. p16 and PRAME expression were assessed with immunolabeling quantified by extent of nuclear positivity (0-25 %, >25 %-50 %, >50 %-75 % and >75 %). Sensitivities and specificities were calculated, and discrimination assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Forty-nine cases out of 51 nevi and 56/56 melanoma cases had lesional tissue present for p16, while 44/51 nevi and 54/56 melanoma cases had lesional tissue present for PRAME. 43 nodal nevi (88 %) had >50 % nuclear staining for p16, while none had >50 % staining for PRAME. More than half (55 %) of melanoma cases had complete loss of nuclear staining for p16, while majority (94 %) had >50 % nuclear staining for PRAME. Using a cut-off value of 50 %, higher PRAME expression had a sensitivity and specificity of 94 % and 100 %, respectively, while lower p16 expression had a sensitivity and specificity of 66 % and 88 %, respectively, for detecting metastatic melanoma. PRAME showed significantly better discrimination (AUC = 0.97, 95 % CI 0.94-1.00) than p16 (AUC = 0.77, 95 % CI 0.68-0.86) for differentiating nodal nevi from nodal melanoma (P < 0.001). Our findings suggest that PRAME is more accurate than p16 in discriminating between the two entities, with excellent sensitivity and specificity.

Intestinal stem cells acquire premature senescence and senescence associated secretory phenotype concurrent with persistent DNA damage after heavy ion radiation in mice

Heavy ion radiation, prevalent in outer space and relevant for radiotherapy, is densely ionizing and poses risk to stem cells that are key to intestinal homeostasis. Currently, the molecular spectrum of heavy ion radiation-induced perturbations in intestinal stem cells (ISCs), that could trigger intestinal pathologies, remains largely unexplored. The Lgr5-EGFP-IRES-creERT mice were exposed to 50 cGy of iron radiation. Mice were euthanized 60 d after exposure and ISCs were sorted using fluorescence activated cell sorting. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) and mitochondrial superoxide were measured using fluorescent probes. Since DNA damage is linked to senescence and senescent cells acquire senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), we stained ISCs for both senescence markers p16, p21, and p19 as well as SASP markers IL6, IL8, and VEGF. Due to potential positive effects of SASP on proliferation, we also stained for PCNA. Data show increased ROS and ongoing DNA damage, by staining for γH2AX, and 53BP1, along with accumulation of senescence markers. Results also showed increased SASP markers in senescent cells. Collectively, our data suggest that heavy-ion-induced chronic stress and ongoing DNA damage is promoting SASP in a fraction of the ISCs, which has implications for gastrointestinal function, inflammation, and carcinogenesis in astronauts and patients.

Conjunctival nevi and melanoma: multiparametric immunohistochemical analysis, including p16, SOX10, HMB45, and Ki-67

The role of p16 in the diagnosis and prognosis of conjunctival melanocytic lesions in the context of other clinical and immunohistochemical parameters has not been systematically explored. This study was conducted to determine whether p16 is a useful parameter in the diagnosis and prognosis of conjunctival melanocytic nevi and melanoma, either independently or as a component of immunohistochemical panels. Sixty-one patients underwent 61 biopsies for conjunctival melanocytic lesions between 2014 and 2018. Pathologic diagnoses were melanoma (n = 25, 41%), nevus (n = 21, 34%), and conjunctival melanocytic lesion of uncertain malignant potential (n = 15, 25%). The biopsies were assessed for expression of p16, SOX10, HMB45, and Ki-67. In a multivariable model, the parameters most predictive of melanoma versus nevus were diffuse HMB45 staining (odds ratio [OR] = 45, confidence interval [CI] = 4.4-457, P = .02] and p16 nuclear H-score≤115 (OR = 9.5, CI = 1.2-77; P = .04). There was no association of p16 expression with melanoma thickness. Next-generation sequencing identified no CDKN2A mutations or copy number alterations in 12 conjunctival melanomas, including the tumors with absent p16 expression. This study demonstrates that p16 immunohistochemical stain is useful in distinguishing conjunctival melanocytic nevi from melanoma, particularly in combination with HMB45. P16 expression does not appear to correlate with CDKN2A status and melanoma thickness.

Non-invasive optical biopsy by multiphoton microscopy identifies the live morphology of common melanocytic nevi

Multiphoton microscopy (MPM) is a promising non-invasive imaging tool for discriminating benign nevi from melanoma. In this study, we establish a MPM morphologic catalogue of common nevi, information that will be critical in devising strategies to distinguish them from nevi that are evolving to melanoma that may present with more subtle signs of malignancy. Thirty common melanocytic nevi were imaged in vivo using MPM. Quantitative parameters that can distinguish between different types of nevi were developed and confirmed by examining the histology of eleven of the imaged nevi. MPM features of nevi examined included cytologic morphology of melanocytes in the epidermis and dermis, the size and distribution of nevomelanocytes both within and around nests, the size of rete ridges, and the presence of immune cells in the dermis. Distinguishing features include cytological morphology, the size of nevomelanocytes, the size of nevomelanocyte nests, and the distribution of nevomelanocytes. Notably, these distinguishing characteristics were not easily appreciated in fixed tissues, highlighting essential differences in the morphology of live skin. Taken together, this work provides a morphologic compendium of normal nevi, information that will be critical in future studies directed at identifying melanocytic nevi that are evolving to melanoma.

Germline mutations predisposing to melanoma

Nearly 15% of melanomas occur in patients with a family history and a subset of these patients have a germline mutation in a melanoma predisposing gene. CDKN2A mutations are responsible for the majority of hereditary melanoma, but many other susceptibility genes have been discovered in recent years, including CDK4, TERT, ACD, TERF2IP, POT1, MITF, MC1R, and BAP1. Additionally, melanoma risk is increased in mixed cancer syndromes caused by mutations in PTEN, BRCA2, BRCA1, RB1, and TP53. While early onset, multiple tumors, and family cancer history remain the most valuable clinical clues for hereditary melanoma, characteristic epithelioid cytology of melanocytic tumors may suggest an underlying BAP1 mutation. Herein, we review the clinical and histopathologic characteristics of melanocytic tumors associated with these germline mutations and discuss the role of genetic counseling.

Clinical Implications of Primary Cilia in Skin Cancer

The primary cilium is a cell surface organelle that is an important component of cellular biology. While it was once believed to be a vestigial structure without biologic function, it is now known to have essential roles in critical cellular signaling pathways such as Hedgehog (HH) and Wnt. The HH and Wnt pathways are involved in pathogenesis of basal cell carcinoma and melanoma, respectively, and this knowledge is now beginning to inform therapeutic and diagnostic options for patients. The purpose of this review is to familiarize clinicians with primary cilia biology and how this complex cellular organelle has started to translate into clinical care.

Dysplastic/Clark naevus in the era of molecular pathology

Dysplastic naevus has been a controversial entity since its first description by Clark in 1978. Despite a recent paradigm shift from the initially proposed notion that dysplastic naevus is a precursor to melanoma, its management has been increasingly more aggressive in the last decade. The latter is due to an unresolved uncertainty regarding its biological nature which necessitates further clarification. Recent molecular genetics, epigenetic and transcriptomic discoveries have revealed that a subset of dysplastic naevi exhibits a genomic profile which is intermediate between that of benign naevus and melanoma. This group of lesions often shows somatic mutations in non-V600E BRAF, NRAS and TERT and hemizygous deletion of CDKN2A gene as well as upregulation of genes involved in proliferation, cell adhesion and migration, and epidermal and follicular keratinocyte-related genes. These new genomic insights suggest that a proportion of dysplastic naevi have a greater propensity to evolve to melanoma; however, the clinical and histopathological features of this proposed intermediate category are still to be elucidated by further research.